Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Pollution: Any solutions for cyclists to minimize impact? Any studies?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Pollution: Any solutions for cyclists to minimize impact? Any studies?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-06, 06:46 PM
  #26  
Immoderator
 
KrisPistofferson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: POS Tennessee
Posts: 7,630

Bikes: Gary Fisher Simple City 8, Litespeed Obed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
^I'm sure if you post enough wingnut trolls in this thread, someone's bound to take the bait.
__________________
Originally Posted by Bikeforums
Your rights end where another poster's feelings begin.
KrisPistofferson is offline  
Old 01-13-06, 07:03 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
burbankbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 268

Bikes: Surly CrossCheck Fixed Gear

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by budster
As noted above, pollution levels are actually higher inside cars than out where you're cycling. Much higher. I know that doesn't seem true, but in fact it is.
Well, in our case - as bikers - you have to read the study more carefully. Check out the first couple lines:


...in many traffic conditions pollution levels inside cars can be up to eighteen times higher than those in "ambient" air outside. The term "ambient air" in this study refers to the air tested simultaneously at fixed monitoring stations located 50 and 100 metres from a roadside.
We're not riding 100 meters (330 feet) from the roadside. We're riding in the road. So how much of that 1800% increase they measure in cars is still present for people breathing "ambient" air 1 meter from the car and not 100 meters? That's the study we would all benefit from knowing.
burbankbiker is offline  
Old 01-13-06, 07:49 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
1955's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 3,563

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Pro & Iron Horse Mavrick 5.5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by krispistoferson
^I'm sure if you post enough wingnut trolls in this thread, someone's bound to take the bait.
Sorry, I just kind of got on a roll.

If I knew this would stay apolicical I wouldn't care, but these type of posts always bring out the anti human anything nuts. So you see I think you guys are just as crazy as you think I am.

Have a nice day.

Ralph
__________________
Ralph (not Ralphie) on a Roubaix in
Huntington Beach, CA
& Iron Horse Maverick 5.5
1955 is offline  
Old 01-13-06, 09:15 PM
  #29  
beginner
 
budster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758

Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mchaz
You also have to consider that when you are cycling you are taking in a lot more air than just sitting in a car. So even if the air is less polluted outside than inside a car, the extra amount of that pollution you are taking in from breathing hevily probably evens out the pollution level.
That's a good point. I looked it up and your hunch is right on:

https://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...20/ai_86230645


Originally Posted by burbankbiker
Well, in our case - as bikers - you have to read the study more carefully. Check out the first couple lines:
...in many traffic conditions pollution levels inside cars can be up to eighteen times higher than those in "ambient" air outside. The term "ambient air" in this study refers to the air tested simultaneously at fixed monitoring stations located 50 and 100 metres from a roadside.
We're not riding 100 meters (330 feet) from the roadside. We're riding in the road. So how much of that 1800% increase they measure in cars is still present for people breathing "ambient" air 1 meter from the car and not 100 meters? That's the study we would all benefit from knowing.
An excellent point. I don't know if this article addresses it specifically, but it contains a great deal of useful (and kinda scary) information about the effects of auto exhaust pollution on cyclists:

https://www.messmedia.org/messville/smog.html

Maybe we do all need Darth Vader masks after all.
budster is offline  
Old 01-13-06, 11:15 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
donrhummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by burbankbiker
Well, in our case - as bikers - you have to read the study more carefully. Check out the first couple lines:




We're not riding 100 meters (330 feet) from the roadside. We're riding in the road. So how much of that 1800% increase they measure in cars is still present for people breathing "ambient" air 1 meter from the car and not 100 meters? That's the study we would all benefit from knowing.
Wow, what a catch - great researching!

So we're back where we started (in the thread) - how do we protect ourselves? Will one of those masks that neutropenic people (and the cyclists in China) wear stop most of the exhaust? (they're less obtrusive, less suffocating and less scary looking than gas masks) What size are the bad particles?
donrhummy is offline  
Old 01-13-06, 11:24 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
donrhummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by budster
https://www.messmedia.org/messville/smog.html

Maybe we do all need Darth Vader masks after all.
Yikes! That is scary! And the particles (the PM2.5) are so friggen' small, that I don't know what we could use to stop them aside from a full-on military-grade gas mask. (Of course I don't understand the physics well enough to guarantee that)
donrhummy is offline  
Old 01-13-06, 11:25 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
donrhummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Does anyone know of any studies that show what the pollution levels are (on average) in the morning hours (say 5-8) versus afternoon, etc?
donrhummy is offline  
Old 01-16-06, 11:13 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
donrhummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Are there any solutions?
donrhummy is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 12:44 AM
  #34  
beginner
 
budster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758

Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Does anyone know of any studies that show what the pollution levels are (on average) in the morning hours (say 5-8) versus afternoon, etc?
From the first article I linked:
Ozone, the main hazardous ingredient in smog, forms when sunlight reacts with automobile and industrial emissions. As sunlight intensifies in the morning, the concentration of ozone increases. Ozone begins accumulating at approximately 11 a.m. and peaks around 3 p.m. After sunset, ozone can no longer form, therefore, the concentration decreases.
https://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...20/ai_86230645

So for solutions, I'd say the best would be to avoid
  • Heavily-travelled roads
  • Hot days
  • Smoggy days
  • 11 am - sunset

I realize it's not possible to avoid these things in all cases, but do the best you can. I think it's a good idea to check ozone forecasts to know when it's bad; one place to do this would be Weather Underground. If you do have to cycle in high ozone, take it as easy as possible. It seems likely that the less hard you're breathing, the less damage you'll do to your lungs. If you can, consider moving someplace with fewer "orange" and "yellow" days.

If you're really worried, try searching the forums for a thread on this from a few months ago. Actually, it was started a couple of years ago, if I recall correctly, and revived recently. Pollution masks were discussed. The most intelligent posts were from a safety professional who recommended a specific type of mask. Unfortunately, you have to be fitted for it by someone who knows what they're doing, and it's got a filter which has to be replaced regularly. And it's hot. And it fogs up (he tried it and decided it wasn't worth the hassle).

In the end, I think this is less of an issue than it seems. I feel better when I cycle than when I don't, even in summer. I've had burning lungs a few times, but it has always passed. I think as long as you don't have to be out there all day, even on the worst days (like bike messengers do), you'll be fine. That's just an intuitive belief, but I haven't seen any science that directly contradicts it, or that offers a compelling case against it.

Last edited by budster; 01-17-06 at 12:01 PM.
budster is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 12:00 PM
  #35  
half man - half sheep
 
Doggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Big Mineral arm - Lake Texoma (Pottsboro, Tx)
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1955
Sorry, I just kind of got on a roll.

If I knew this would stay apolicical I wouldn't care, but these type of posts always bring out the anti human anything nuts. So you see I think you guys are just as crazy as you think I am.

Have a nice day.

Ralph

next time don't eat the cheese.
Doggus is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 01:24 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Rancid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oPt via Spokane, WA
Posts: 842

Bikes: Chromoly Allez comp with Ultegra/DA, IRO Rob Roy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
just found this:
https://news.yahoo.com/s/space/200601...lksthanstreets
__________________
I've been here since 2004? I've never felt this old before.
Rancid is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 02:39 PM
  #37  
cmh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,910
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 327 Times in 161 Posts
Biodeisel production on a large enough scale to meet a significant portion of US energy needs just isn't going to happen. This study at Cornell University found that it takes more than a gallon of gas to produce a gallon of bio-deisel. My feeling is that the small scale biodeisel manufacturing from used french fry oil is energy effecient, but I haven't seen any data on this.

https://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/...ostly.ssl.html

cmh
cmh is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 07:44 PM
  #38  
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,880

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by 1955
When was the last time the enviromental's allowed us to build a refinery?

Ralph
Are you really saying you'd prefer unbreathable air? Sincere question.
cooker is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 08:21 PM
  #39  
beginner
 
budster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758

Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rancid
Well, that's timely!


Passengers in taxis, buses, and cars all inhale substantially more pollution than cyclists and pedestrians, a new study shows.

Researchers measured levels of ultrafine, traffic-produced pollution particles on busy London streets using a newly developed particle counter fitted with a video recorder.

The equipment allowed them to match particle levels with each of the five modes of transport. They also could identify what activities and behaviors lead to the highest exposures.

The results

On average, taxi passengers were exposed to more than 100,000 ultrafine particle counts per cubic centimeter. Bus travelers were exposed to just under 100,000 and people in cars about 40,000.

Pedestrians and bicyclists, meanwhile, were exposed to counts of just 5,000 and 8,000, respectively.
So we're only exposed to 1/12 as much as someone in a taxi or bus, or 1/5 as much as someone in a car.

Of course, how much are we breathing? Remember the earlier study which pointed out we're breathing about 20 times as much air as someone sitting still.
budster is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 09:51 PM
  #40  
Good Afternoon!
 
SamHouston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rural Eastern Ontario
Posts: 2,352

Bikes: Various by application

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One thing you can do is utilize a messenger service that utilizes bikes/walkers properly if it is available to you. The City of Toronto estimates that 250 - 300 bikers/walkers take 2500 cars/light trucks out of circulation in their downtown area each day.

Nevermind that the range at many companies is North York to the north, Vic Park in the east and Parkside in the west. The real numbers are probably a little better than the city estimates.

Use them for any small task that you may have done yourself or sent a coworker out for, doesn't matter what. It's only expensive when you forget time is money.
SamHouston is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 09:59 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
donrhummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by budster
Of course, how much are we breathing? Remember the earlier study which pointed out we're breathing about 20 times as much air as someone sitting still.
Good point. And 20 x 5000 would be 100,000 - the same as those taxi passengers!
donrhummy is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 10:24 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
donrhummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by budster
Unfortunately, you have to be fitted for it by someone who knows what they're doing, and it's got a filter which has to be replaced regularly. And it's hot. And it fogs up (he tried it and decided it wasn't worth the hassle).
Wow, that's weird - you're actually remembering it exactly the opposite and incorrectly.

Here's the thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...pollution+mask

And here's what he said:
Today, I rode home wearing my half-face respirator. I used a North respirator with a N-100 HEPA filter on it (two cartridges). It was not difficult at all. There was a bit more breathing resistance, but not that much more. I did notice several things. I stopped to turn on a light in my work parking lot, and one of my workmates stopped his car to see whether I needed help. But it was very difficult to talk with him. It's well known that communications is inhibited by a respirator, and this simply confirmed it. Also, I noticed that even in the cold air, my safety glasses did not fog up. That's because the exhalation valve is below my chin, and so no warm, moist air from my breath got to the glasses. Finally, I did not smell the car exhausts. All in all, I will be using the respirator again.
So actually he WILL continue using it and it WAS worth the hassle!

I believe this is the basic respirator he used: https://www.approvedgasmasks.com/north-mask.htm
donrhummy is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 10:50 PM
  #43  
CAT6 UTP 568B
 
thewalrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bellingham / Vancouver
Posts: 2,548

Bikes: 2005 Allez Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by burbankbiker
I bought a mask with an air filter in it that's designed for outside activity in cities like LA. It looks more like a surgeon's mask mixed with the aesthetics of a BMX helmet. But in the end, I never wear it.

1.) It's creepy for me and everyone around me.
2.) It doesn't seal well and therefore isn't even working.
I've seen these for sale at a local shop. I don't think it would be needed here, but if I ever went cycling in a large Chinese city, I'd take one along. Here's Shanghai on a "bad air" day:

thewalrus is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 11:35 PM
  #44  
beginner
 
budster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758

Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Wow, that's weird - you're actually remembering it exactly the opposite and incorrectly.

Here's the thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...pollution+mask

And here's what he said:


So actually he WILL continue using it and it WAS worth the hassle!

I believe this is the basic respirator he used: https://www.approvedgasmasks.com/north-mask.htm
You're so right! I guess it goes to show: we remember what we want to believe. Scary.

Well, to make up for it, here's that North respirator for $11.50: https://www.safetysaves.com/safety_we...?productid=464

If you use it, please tell us how it works out.

What I may have remembered was this post, the 2nd to last one:
Originally Posted by Inoplanetyanin
I commute 20 miles a day in Los Angeles area. The air here is pretty horrible.

What mostly bothers me is DUST! It rains very rarely here and dust accumulates on all surfaces. There are also these nasty dust blowers that like to blow on the curb right where I bike.

Anyway, today I tried to use this exact type of respirator and unfortunately several problems got revealed:

- the warm air that comes out of it from the top, foggs the sunglasses. :d (it was early in the morning, so I will see if it happens during the day, but it was a big inconvenience that forced me to take the glasses off);

- it DOES restrict breathing. When going fast or uphill, breathing deep through the mouth, I felt restriction.

- it feels bad! This mask is not going to stay fresh or dry for long! Sweat and moist make it pretty nasty to wear! You also smell it all the time since it covers the nose.

So, unfortunately this mask is not a real solution to pollution problem while commuting. At least for me.
But I wonder if he really did use a similar setup as John Ratliff, because he linked to this mask: https://www.safmed.com/store/product58.html

...which is definitely not the North 5500 respirator, nor the N100 HEPA filter:
https://www.safetysaves.com/safety_we...3-pr-1029.html

As for me, for now I'm just going to continue living in the middle of nowhere.
budster is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 11:43 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
donrhummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by budster
What I may have remembered was this post, the 2nd to last one:

But I wonder if he really did use a similar setup as John Ratliff, because he linked to this mask: https://www.safmed.com/store/product58.html

...which is definitely not the North 5500 respirator, nor the N100 HEPA filter:
https://www.safetysaves.com/safety_we...3-pr-1029.html

Yeah, and in addition, I'd be willing to bet he didn't follow all the instructions for how to ensure proper fit.

Originally Posted by budster
As for me, for now I'm just going to continue living in the middle of nowhere.
*sigh* I wish, but my wife refuses to not be near/in a city.
donrhummy is offline  
Old 01-18-06, 12:18 AM
  #46  
Vanned.
 
worker4youth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,244

Bikes: 2006 Motobecane Le Champ SL, 2006 Mercier Kilo TT, 2004 Gary Fisher Tassajara

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How different is cycling compared to driving with your windows down? I can't imagine a whole lot...except the volume of air respirated.

Last edited by worker4youth; 01-18-06 at 12:23 AM.
worker4youth is offline  
Old 01-18-06, 12:25 AM
  #47  
beginner
 
budster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758

Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
*sigh* I wish, but my wife refuses to not be near/in a city.
My girlfriend is also fond of major cities. We're currently working through that.

Where do y'all live?
budster is offline  
Old 01-18-06, 10:36 AM
  #48  
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,880

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by budster
My girlfriend is also fond of major cities. We're currently working through that.

Where do y'all live?
Despite the presumed concentration of pollutants, people in cities tend to be healthier than people in rural areas.
cooker is offline  
Old 01-18-06, 10:46 AM
  #49  
Banned.
 
galen_52657's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Towson, MD
Posts: 4,020

Bikes: 2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EURO
AND ALSO PREVENTS US FROM DYING OF SCURVY

Two great reasons to eat vitamin C!

Euro must be a limey...
galen_52657 is offline  
Old 01-18-06, 11:07 AM
  #50  
beginner
 
budster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758

Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cooker
Despite the presumed concentration of pollutants, people in cities tend to be healthier than people in rural areas.
That's true.

I think it's true mainly because urban people walk and bike more, which more than offsets the negative effects of higher pollution levels. I live in a small city (25k people), which I suppose is technically "urban," but without most of the drawbacks of large cities (including pollution). Admittedly, we are also without most metropolitan amenities -- but it's pretty easy to get around here sans car.
budster is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.