Pollution: Any solutions for cyclists to minimize impact? Any studies?
#26
Immoderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: POS Tennessee
Posts: 7,630
Bikes: Gary Fisher Simple City 8, Litespeed Obed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
^I'm sure if you post enough wingnut trolls in this thread, someone's bound to take the bait.
__________________
Originally Posted by Bikeforums
Your rights end where another poster's feelings begin.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 268
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck Fixed Gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by budster
As noted above, pollution levels are actually higher inside cars than out where you're cycling. Much higher. I know that doesn't seem true, but in fact it is.
...in many traffic conditions pollution levels inside cars can be up to eighteen times higher than those in "ambient" air outside. The term "ambient air" in this study refers to the air tested simultaneously at fixed monitoring stations located 50 and 100 metres from a roadside.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 3,563
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Pro & Iron Horse Mavrick 5.5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by krispistoferson
^I'm sure if you post enough wingnut trolls in this thread, someone's bound to take the bait.
If I knew this would stay apolicical I wouldn't care, but these type of posts always bring out the anti human anything nuts. So you see I think you guys are just as crazy as you think I am.
Have a nice day.
Ralph
__________________
Ralph (not Ralphie) on a Roubaix in
Huntington Beach, CA
& Iron Horse Maverick 5.5
Ralph (not Ralphie) on a Roubaix in
Huntington Beach, CA
& Iron Horse Maverick 5.5
#29
beginner
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758
Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mchaz
You also have to consider that when you are cycling you are taking in a lot more air than just sitting in a car. So even if the air is less polluted outside than inside a car, the extra amount of that pollution you are taking in from breathing hevily probably evens out the pollution level.
https://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...20/ai_86230645
Originally Posted by burbankbiker
Well, in our case - as bikers - you have to read the study more carefully. Check out the first couple lines:
We're not riding 100 meters (330 feet) from the roadside. We're riding in the road. So how much of that 1800% increase they measure in cars is still present for people breathing "ambient" air 1 meter from the car and not 100 meters? That's the study we would all benefit from knowing.
...in many traffic conditions pollution levels inside cars can be up to eighteen times higher than those in "ambient" air outside. The term "ambient air" in this study refers to the air tested simultaneously at fixed monitoring stations located 50 and 100 metres from a roadside.
https://www.messmedia.org/messville/smog.html
Maybe we do all need Darth Vader masks after all.
#30
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by burbankbiker
Well, in our case - as bikers - you have to read the study more carefully. Check out the first couple lines:
We're not riding 100 meters (330 feet) from the roadside. We're riding in the road. So how much of that 1800% increase they measure in cars is still present for people breathing "ambient" air 1 meter from the car and not 100 meters? That's the study we would all benefit from knowing.
We're not riding 100 meters (330 feet) from the roadside. We're riding in the road. So how much of that 1800% increase they measure in cars is still present for people breathing "ambient" air 1 meter from the car and not 100 meters? That's the study we would all benefit from knowing.
So we're back where we started (in the thread) - how do we protect ourselves? Will one of those masks that neutropenic people (and the cyclists in China) wear stop most of the exhaust? (they're less obtrusive, less suffocating and less scary looking than gas masks) What size are the bad particles?
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by budster
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Does anyone know of any studies that show what the pollution levels are (on average) in the morning hours (say 5-8) versus afternoon, etc?
#34
beginner
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758
Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Does anyone know of any studies that show what the pollution levels are (on average) in the morning hours (say 5-8) versus afternoon, etc?
Ozone, the main hazardous ingredient in smog, forms when sunlight reacts with automobile and industrial emissions. As sunlight intensifies in the morning, the concentration of ozone increases. Ozone begins accumulating at approximately 11 a.m. and peaks around 3 p.m. After sunset, ozone can no longer form, therefore, the concentration decreases.
So for solutions, I'd say the best would be to avoid
- Heavily-travelled roads
- Hot days
- Smoggy days
- 11 am - sunset
I realize it's not possible to avoid these things in all cases, but do the best you can. I think it's a good idea to check ozone forecasts to know when it's bad; one place to do this would be Weather Underground. If you do have to cycle in high ozone, take it as easy as possible. It seems likely that the less hard you're breathing, the less damage you'll do to your lungs. If you can, consider moving someplace with fewer "orange" and "yellow" days.
If you're really worried, try searching the forums for a thread on this from a few months ago. Actually, it was started a couple of years ago, if I recall correctly, and revived recently. Pollution masks were discussed. The most intelligent posts were from a safety professional who recommended a specific type of mask. Unfortunately, you have to be fitted for it by someone who knows what they're doing, and it's got a filter which has to be replaced regularly. And it's hot. And it fogs up (he tried it and decided it wasn't worth the hassle).
In the end, I think this is less of an issue than it seems. I feel better when I cycle than when I don't, even in summer. I've had burning lungs a few times, but it has always passed. I think as long as you don't have to be out there all day, even on the worst days (like bike messengers do), you'll be fine. That's just an intuitive belief, but I haven't seen any science that directly contradicts it, or that offers a compelling case against it.
Last edited by budster; 01-17-06 at 12:01 PM.
#35
half man - half sheep
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Big Mineral arm - Lake Texoma (Pottsboro, Tx)
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1955
Sorry, I just kind of got on a roll.
If I knew this would stay apolicical I wouldn't care, but these type of posts always bring out the anti human anything nuts. So you see I think you guys are just as crazy as you think I am.
Have a nice day.
Ralph
If I knew this would stay apolicical I wouldn't care, but these type of posts always bring out the anti human anything nuts. So you see I think you guys are just as crazy as you think I am.
Have a nice day.
Ralph
next time don't eat the cheese.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oPt via Spokane, WA
Posts: 842
Bikes: Chromoly Allez comp with Ultegra/DA, IRO Rob Roy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
just found this:
https://news.yahoo.com/s/space/200601...lksthanstreets
https://news.yahoo.com/s/space/200601...lksthanstreets
__________________
I've been here since 2004? I've never felt this old before.
I've been here since 2004? I've never felt this old before.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,910
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 327 Times
in
161 Posts
Biodeisel production on a large enough scale to meet a significant portion of US energy needs just isn't going to happen. This study at Cornell University found that it takes more than a gallon of gas to produce a gallon of bio-deisel. My feeling is that the small scale biodeisel manufacturing from used french fry oil is energy effecient, but I haven't seen any data on this.
https://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/...ostly.ssl.html
cmh
https://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/...ostly.ssl.html
cmh
#38
Prefers Cicero
Originally Posted by 1955
When was the last time the enviromental's allowed us to build a refinery?
Ralph
Ralph
#39
beginner
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758
Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rancid
just found this:
https://news.yahoo.com/s/space/200601...lksthanstreets
https://news.yahoo.com/s/space/200601...lksthanstreets
Passengers in taxis, buses, and cars all inhale substantially more pollution than cyclists and pedestrians, a new study shows.
Researchers measured levels of ultrafine, traffic-produced pollution particles on busy London streets using a newly developed particle counter fitted with a video recorder.
The equipment allowed them to match particle levels with each of the five modes of transport. They also could identify what activities and behaviors lead to the highest exposures.
The results
On average, taxi passengers were exposed to more than 100,000 ultrafine particle counts per cubic centimeter. Bus travelers were exposed to just under 100,000 and people in cars about 40,000.
Pedestrians and bicyclists, meanwhile, were exposed to counts of just 5,000 and 8,000, respectively.
Researchers measured levels of ultrafine, traffic-produced pollution particles on busy London streets using a newly developed particle counter fitted with a video recorder.
The equipment allowed them to match particle levels with each of the five modes of transport. They also could identify what activities and behaviors lead to the highest exposures.
The results
On average, taxi passengers were exposed to more than 100,000 ultrafine particle counts per cubic centimeter. Bus travelers were exposed to just under 100,000 and people in cars about 40,000.
Pedestrians and bicyclists, meanwhile, were exposed to counts of just 5,000 and 8,000, respectively.
Of course, how much are we breathing? Remember the earlier study which pointed out we're breathing about 20 times as much air as someone sitting still.
#40
Good Afternoon!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rural Eastern Ontario
Posts: 2,352
Bikes: Various by application
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One thing you can do is utilize a messenger service that utilizes bikes/walkers properly if it is available to you. The City of Toronto estimates that 250 - 300 bikers/walkers take 2500 cars/light trucks out of circulation in their downtown area each day.
Nevermind that the range at many companies is North York to the north, Vic Park in the east and Parkside in the west. The real numbers are probably a little better than the city estimates.
Use them for any small task that you may have done yourself or sent a coworker out for, doesn't matter what. It's only expensive when you forget time is money.
Nevermind that the range at many companies is North York to the north, Vic Park in the east and Parkside in the west. The real numbers are probably a little better than the city estimates.
Use them for any small task that you may have done yourself or sent a coworker out for, doesn't matter what. It's only expensive when you forget time is money.
#41
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by budster
Of course, how much are we breathing? Remember the earlier study which pointed out we're breathing about 20 times as much air as someone sitting still.
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by budster
Unfortunately, you have to be fitted for it by someone who knows what they're doing, and it's got a filter which has to be replaced regularly. And it's hot. And it fogs up (he tried it and decided it wasn't worth the hassle).
Here's the thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...pollution+mask
And here's what he said:
Today, I rode home wearing my half-face respirator. I used a North respirator with a N-100 HEPA filter on it (two cartridges). It was not difficult at all. There was a bit more breathing resistance, but not that much more. I did notice several things. I stopped to turn on a light in my work parking lot, and one of my workmates stopped his car to see whether I needed help. But it was very difficult to talk with him. It's well known that communications is inhibited by a respirator, and this simply confirmed it. Also, I noticed that even in the cold air, my safety glasses did not fog up. That's because the exhalation valve is below my chin, and so no warm, moist air from my breath got to the glasses. Finally, I did not smell the car exhausts. All in all, I will be using the respirator again.
I believe this is the basic respirator he used: https://www.approvedgasmasks.com/north-mask.htm
#43
CAT6 UTP 568B
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bellingham / Vancouver
Posts: 2,548
Bikes: 2005 Allez Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by burbankbiker
I bought a mask with an air filter in it that's designed for outside activity in cities like LA. It looks more like a surgeon's mask mixed with the aesthetics of a BMX helmet. But in the end, I never wear it.
1.) It's creepy for me and everyone around me.
2.) It doesn't seal well and therefore isn't even working.
1.) It's creepy for me and everyone around me.
2.) It doesn't seal well and therefore isn't even working.
#44
beginner
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758
Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Wow, that's weird - you're actually remembering it exactly the opposite and incorrectly.
Here's the thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...pollution+mask
And here's what he said:
So actually he WILL continue using it and it WAS worth the hassle!
I believe this is the basic respirator he used: https://www.approvedgasmasks.com/north-mask.htm
Here's the thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...pollution+mask
And here's what he said:
So actually he WILL continue using it and it WAS worth the hassle!
I believe this is the basic respirator he used: https://www.approvedgasmasks.com/north-mask.htm
Well, to make up for it, here's that North respirator for $11.50: https://www.safetysaves.com/safety_we...?productid=464
If you use it, please tell us how it works out.
What I may have remembered was this post, the 2nd to last one:
Originally Posted by Inoplanetyanin
I commute 20 miles a day in Los Angeles area. The air here is pretty horrible.
What mostly bothers me is DUST! It rains very rarely here and dust accumulates on all surfaces. There are also these nasty dust blowers that like to blow on the curb right where I bike.
Anyway, today I tried to use this exact type of respirator and unfortunately several problems got revealed:
- the warm air that comes out of it from the top, foggs the sunglasses. :d (it was early in the morning, so I will see if it happens during the day, but it was a big inconvenience that forced me to take the glasses off);
- it DOES restrict breathing. When going fast or uphill, breathing deep through the mouth, I felt restriction.
- it feels bad! This mask is not going to stay fresh or dry for long! Sweat and moist make it pretty nasty to wear! You also smell it all the time since it covers the nose.
So, unfortunately this mask is not a real solution to pollution problem while commuting. At least for me.
What mostly bothers me is DUST! It rains very rarely here and dust accumulates on all surfaces. There are also these nasty dust blowers that like to blow on the curb right where I bike.
Anyway, today I tried to use this exact type of respirator and unfortunately several problems got revealed:
- the warm air that comes out of it from the top, foggs the sunglasses. :d (it was early in the morning, so I will see if it happens during the day, but it was a big inconvenience that forced me to take the glasses off);
- it DOES restrict breathing. When going fast or uphill, breathing deep through the mouth, I felt restriction.
- it feels bad! This mask is not going to stay fresh or dry for long! Sweat and moist make it pretty nasty to wear! You also smell it all the time since it covers the nose.
So, unfortunately this mask is not a real solution to pollution problem while commuting. At least for me.
...which is definitely not the North 5500 respirator, nor the N100 HEPA filter:
https://www.safetysaves.com/safety_we...3-pr-1029.html
As for me, for now I'm just going to continue living in the middle of nowhere.
#45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by budster
What I may have remembered was this post, the 2nd to last one:
But I wonder if he really did use a similar setup as John Ratliff, because he linked to this mask: https://www.safmed.com/store/product58.html
...which is definitely not the North 5500 respirator, nor the N100 HEPA filter:
https://www.safetysaves.com/safety_we...3-pr-1029.html
But I wonder if he really did use a similar setup as John Ratliff, because he linked to this mask: https://www.safmed.com/store/product58.html
...which is definitely not the North 5500 respirator, nor the N100 HEPA filter:
https://www.safetysaves.com/safety_we...3-pr-1029.html
Yeah, and in addition, I'd be willing to bet he didn't follow all the instructions for how to ensure proper fit.
Originally Posted by budster
As for me, for now I'm just going to continue living in the middle of nowhere.
#46
Vanned.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,244
Bikes: 2006 Motobecane Le Champ SL, 2006 Mercier Kilo TT, 2004 Gary Fisher Tassajara
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How different is cycling compared to driving with your windows down? I can't imagine a whole lot...except the volume of air respirated.
Last edited by worker4youth; 01-18-06 at 12:23 AM.
#47
beginner
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758
Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
*sigh* I wish, but my wife refuses to not be near/in a city.
Where do y'all live?
#48
Prefers Cicero
Originally Posted by budster
My girlfriend is also fond of major cities. We're currently working through that.
Where do y'all live?
Where do y'all live?
#49
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Towson, MD
Posts: 4,020
Bikes: 2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EURO
AND ALSO PREVENTS US FROM DYING OF SCURVY
Two great reasons to eat vitamin C!
Two great reasons to eat vitamin C!
Euro must be a limey...
#50
beginner
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758
Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cooker
Despite the presumed concentration of pollutants, people in cities tend to be healthier than people in rural areas.
I think it's true mainly because urban people walk and bike more, which more than offsets the negative effects of higher pollution levels. I live in a small city (25k people), which I suppose is technically "urban," but without most of the drawbacks of large cities (including pollution). Admittedly, we are also without most metropolitan amenities -- but it's pretty easy to get around here sans car.