"butchering" a Brooks saddle... (Fixer et al)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 242
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Professional, 1993 Raleigh Technium Olympian, 2006 Cervelo Dual, 2008 Cannondale Caad8, 2010 Kona Unit, 2013 Trek Superfly 100 AL Pro, 2014 Trek Crockett 9, 2017 All City Nature Boy 853
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"butchering" a Brooks saddle... (Fixer et al)
I see in the other posts that there are those of you that have been modifying your leather saddles. Where can I find info on how, exactly this is done? Has anyone that's done it taken pics along the way?
Thanks.
Steve
Thanks.
Steve
#2
draw line at carbon forks
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 471
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD6 w/ 105, Fuji Track Pro, Windsor Cliff 4900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#3
hello
Originally Posted by goodall
A few forums member here have used exacto knives instead. They do the job as well.
#4
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
I don't get this. Presumably the purpose of butchering it is to make it lighter, but if you're riding a brooks seat in the first place, you can't be that concerned about weight. Why take an attractive, comfortable 500 gram saddle, and turn it into a less attractive, potentially less comfrotable 400 gram saddle?
#5
SCUL pilot Fixie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 114
Bikes: giant fix gear, recumbant, bianchi road, fuji mt bike, raliegh 3 speed, ross chopper, unicycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I also used the dremmel and found it worked well. I could not find my sciving tool for the edges afterwards, but I used my finger nail and that worked just fine.
I love it, and am about to do it to another one.
I love it, and am about to do it to another one.
#6
hello
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
I don't get this. Presumably the purpose of butchering it is to make it lighter, but if you're riding a brooks seat in the first place, you can't be that concerned about weight. Why take an attractive, comfortable 500 gram saddle, and turn it into a less attractive, potentially less comfrotable 400 gram saddle?
Last edited by roadfix; 01-19-06 at 08:36 PM.
#7
Bye Bye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
I don't get this. Presumably the purpose of butchering it is to make it lighter, but if you're riding a brooks seat in the first place, you can't be that concerned about weight. Why take an attractive, comfortable 500 gram saddle, and turn it into a less attractive, potentially less comfrotable 400 gram saddle?
I didn't really look too hard at how much it weighed. I considered chopping a Pro, to change the look, and to make it a bit more suitable with the bars below the saddle. I ended up getting the Swallow - because I liked the shape and think it comfortable so far. (just mounted it yesterday...)
#8
Butchya can't eat just 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
I don't get this. Presumably the purpose of butchering it is to make it lighter, but if you're riding a brooks seat in the first place, you can't be that concerned about weight. Why take an attractive, comfortable 500 gram saddle, and turn it into a less attractive, potentially less comfrotable 400 gram saddle?
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 242
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Professional, 1993 Raleigh Technium Olympian, 2006 Cervelo Dual, 2008 Cannondale Caad8, 2010 Kona Unit, 2013 Trek Superfly 100 AL Pro, 2014 Trek Crockett 9, 2017 All City Nature Boy 853
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OK. I'm interested in trying out a Brooks for the comfort factor. (Yes, I've read about the break-in period, etc.) And, I'd love to get the "sportier" look that these butcher jobs provide. (No, I can't/won't pay for a Swallow.) However, being a clydesdale (although a light one at 205lb), I have a few concerns...
1. Is it better to trim these saddles after they're broken-in and the leather is stretched more closely to it's final shape?
2. Does trimming the skirts lessen the effectiveness of the tightening nut on the nose of the saddle?
3. Are you guys adding any support (binding, etc) to the underside of the saddle?
4. Do the trimmed saddles still feel, perform, last like an untrimmed saddle?
Thanks.
Steve
1. Is it better to trim these saddles after they're broken-in and the leather is stretched more closely to it's final shape?
2. Does trimming the skirts lessen the effectiveness of the tightening nut on the nose of the saddle?
3. Are you guys adding any support (binding, etc) to the underside of the saddle?
4. Do the trimmed saddles still feel, perform, last like an untrimmed saddle?
Thanks.
Steve
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 145
Bikes: Trek 5200, Pedal Force Carbon Project
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here's some pics of my butchered B17N if it helps. I cut it with an exacto then rounded the edges over with a rough file. To answer your questions; 1- I'm guessing it doesn't make any difference, 2- There's slightly less leather to stretch, so I guess the nut must work better, 3- I'm 170 and don't need the underside flap you see on the swallow. I don't notice it sagging at all. If I was 200 I'd put the flap in. There's enough leather on the B17 to do that, 4-I only put a couple hours on it while it was untrimmed, but it feels the same.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 242
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Professional, 1993 Raleigh Technium Olympian, 2006 Cervelo Dual, 2008 Cannondale Caad8, 2010 Kona Unit, 2013 Trek Superfly 100 AL Pro, 2014 Trek Crockett 9, 2017 All City Nature Boy 853
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Excellent idea to use a flap as support (as opposed to lacing). That'll provide a much sleeker look, and probably be a bit easier to accomplish and make it look good.
Just out of curiosity... How difficult is it to perform such a job with an Exacto knife? That leather looks pretty darn think. Seems like an Exacto would have a tough time getting through it.
Steve
Just out of curiosity... How difficult is it to perform such a job with an Exacto knife? That leather looks pretty darn think. Seems like an Exacto would have a tough time getting through it.
Steve
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 145
Bikes: Trek 5200, Pedal Force Carbon Project
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I first went at it with a dremel and the small abrasive wheel that'll cut through just about anything, but it scorched the leather. So I took an exacto with a #11 blade and found it cut very easily and I had more control. Make a series of shallow cuts. If you make a flap, I think you'll have to score a line about halfway through on the underside of the leather so it bends sharp enough that its not too visible when the saddle is mounted.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 242
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Professional, 1993 Raleigh Technium Olympian, 2006 Cervelo Dual, 2008 Cannondale Caad8, 2010 Kona Unit, 2013 Trek Superfly 100 AL Pro, 2014 Trek Crockett 9, 2017 All City Nature Boy 853
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks, again. I may have to give this a try. Now, I just need to figure out which Brooks will fit me best.
Steve
Steve
#16
Bye Bye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Michigan
If you make a flap, I think you'll have to score a line about halfway through on the underside of the leather so it bends sharp enough that its not too visible when the saddle is mounted.
#17
Bye Bye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Michigan
Here's some pics of my butchered B17N if it helps. I cut it with an exacto then rounded the edges over with a rough file. To answer your questions; 1- I'm guessing it doesn't make any difference, 2- There's slightly less leather to stretch, so I guess the nut must work better, 3- I'm 170 and don't need the underside flap you see on the swallow. I don't notice it sagging at all. If I was 200 I'd put the flap in. There's enough leather on the B17 to do that, 4-I only put a couple hours on it while it was untrimmed, but it feels the same.
Thats a nice looking saddle.
#18
Banned.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
are the rails "higher" on a B17 than a swallow? swallow is too narrow for me, but I don't like the skirts on the B17--but sometimes when people butcher B17 they look really high up on the rails.
#19
Bye Bye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Ziggurat
are the rails "higher" on a B17 than a swallow? swallow is too narrow for me, but I don't like the skirts on the B17--but sometimes when people butcher B17 they look really high up on the rails.
I was concerned about this coming from the Team Pro, as I had my saddle height just right.
When I mounted the Swallow and checked everything, the two appear to have the same height off the rails. The Swallow's rails are much longer than the Pro, allowing for more adjustment for / aft.
I'm not sure how it compares to the B17.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by The_Mickstar
Thanks, again. I may have to give this a try. Now, I just need to figure out which Brooks will fit me best.
Steve
Steve
Also, Brooks as with other saddles are very sensitive to tilt in terms of perineal pressure so be sure to have a good adjustable seat post. As to modifying...I am an inveterant modifier but have resisted because I believe all models of Brooks have evolved to their current config for a reason but applaud the creativity of guys on the forum who like to mod them. I did remove the bag loops on my Champion Special however with a dremmel which is no small feat without hacking the adjacent leather as I prefer the clean look of no bag loops.
HTH,
George
Last edited by biker7; 01-23-06 at 04:55 AM.
#21
Banned.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bmike
I was concerned about this coming from the Team Pro, as I had my saddle height just right.
When I mounted the Swallow and checked everything, the two appear to have the same height off the rails. The Swallow's rails are much longer than the Pro, allowing for more adjustment for / aft.
I'm not sure how it compares to the B17.
When I mounted the Swallow and checked everything, the two appear to have the same height off the rails. The Swallow's rails are much longer than the Pro, allowing for more adjustment for / aft.
I'm not sure how it compares to the B17.
Anyone have a swallow and a B17, to compare?
#22
Bye Bye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Ziggurat
My concern is a B17--a butchered B17 seems to have a LOT of cage showing, compared to a swallow. I think the rails are higher/deeper/whatever on a B17.
Anyone have a swallow and a B17, to compare?
Anyone have a swallow and a B17, to compare?
Like I said, the height was right on from my Pro to the Swallow... at least as accurate as I could measure it and feel it when I pedal.
I like the look of the rails showing, over the "skirt".
#23
Designer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,368
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
HEre's a pic of my Butchered B17. The rails are higher than other saddles... But still, I think the B17 is still the best candidate for a butcher project...
__________________
#24
Bye Bye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by steppinthefunk
HEre's a pic of my Butchered B17. The rails are higher than other saddles... But still, I think the B17 is still the best candidate for a butcher project...
#25
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sweetest butchering I've seen
Thanks