Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

"butchering" a Brooks saddle... (Fixer et al)

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

"butchering" a Brooks saddle... (Fixer et al)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-06, 11:13 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 242

Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Professional, 1993 Raleigh Technium Olympian, 2006 Cervelo Dual, 2008 Cannondale Caad8, 2010 Kona Unit, 2013 Trek Superfly 100 AL Pro, 2014 Trek Crockett 9, 2017 All City Nature Boy 853

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
"butchering" a Brooks saddle... (Fixer et al)

I see in the other posts that there are those of you that have been modifying your leather saddles. Where can I find info on how, exactly this is done? Has anyone that's done it taken pics along the way?

Thanks.

Steve
The_Mickstar is offline  
Old 01-19-06, 01:59 PM
  #2  
draw line at carbon forks
 
goodall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 471

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD6 w/ 105, Fuji Track Pro, Windsor Cliff 4900

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This article should do the trick:

https://fixedgeargallery.com/articles/brooks.htm
goodall is offline  
Old 01-19-06, 02:04 PM
  #3  
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 18,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 195 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 53 Posts
Originally Posted by goodall
This article should do the trick:

https://fixedgeargallery.com/articles/brooks.htm
The only diff is I now use a dremel tool with a small cut-off disc....It makes it much easier to cut contoured shapes... I have not used a makita grinder since that B17 chop job.
A few forums member here have used exacto knives instead. They do the job as well.
roadfix is offline  
Old 01-19-06, 02:43 PM
  #4  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
I don't get this. Presumably the purpose of butchering it is to make it lighter, but if you're riding a brooks seat in the first place, you can't be that concerned about weight. Why take an attractive, comfortable 500 gram saddle, and turn it into a less attractive, potentially less comfrotable 400 gram saddle?
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 01-19-06, 02:58 PM
  #5  
SCUL pilot Fixie
 
Hawkegirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 114

Bikes: giant fix gear, recumbant, bianchi road, fuji mt bike, raliegh 3 speed, ross chopper, unicycle

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I also used the dremmel and found it worked well. I could not find my sciving tool for the edges afterwards, but I used my finger nail and that worked just fine.

I love it, and am about to do it to another one.
Hawkegirl is offline  
Old 01-19-06, 03:26 PM
  #6  
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 18,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 195 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 53 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
I don't get this. Presumably the purpose of butchering it is to make it lighter, but if you're riding a brooks seat in the first place, you can't be that concerned about weight. Why take an attractive, comfortable 500 gram saddle, and turn it into a less attractive, potentially less comfrotable 400 gram saddle?
Hmm.....good question...

Last edited by roadfix; 01-19-06 at 08:36 PM.
roadfix is offline  
Old 01-19-06, 03:46 PM
  #7  
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
I don't get this. Presumably the purpose of butchering it is to make it lighter, but if you're riding a brooks seat in the first place, you can't be that concerned about weight. Why take an attractive, comfortable 500 gram saddle, and turn it into a less attractive, potentially less comfrotable 400 gram saddle?
You could just buy the Swallow, at 366 grams.

I didn't really look too hard at how much it weighed. I considered chopping a Pro, to change the look, and to make it a bit more suitable with the bars below the saddle. I ended up getting the Swallow - because I liked the shape and think it comfortable so far. (just mounted it yesterday...)

bmike is offline  
Old 01-19-06, 07:52 PM
  #8  
Butchya can't eat just 1
 
***Butch***'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
I don't get this. Presumably the purpose of butchering it is to make it lighter, but if you're riding a brooks seat in the first place, you can't be that concerned about weight. Why take an attractive, comfortable 500 gram saddle, and turn it into a less attractive, potentially less comfrotable 400 gram saddle?
People chop them primarily for looks, not weight.
***Butch*** is offline  
Old 01-19-06, 08:28 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Whats the deal with brook saddles anyway?
Markio is offline  
Old 01-19-06, 08:32 PM
  #10  
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Comfort. Durability. Aesthetics.
bmike is offline  
Old 01-20-06, 09:19 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 242

Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Professional, 1993 Raleigh Technium Olympian, 2006 Cervelo Dual, 2008 Cannondale Caad8, 2010 Kona Unit, 2013 Trek Superfly 100 AL Pro, 2014 Trek Crockett 9, 2017 All City Nature Boy 853

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
OK. I'm interested in trying out a Brooks for the comfort factor. (Yes, I've read about the break-in period, etc.) And, I'd love to get the "sportier" look that these butcher jobs provide. (No, I can't/won't pay for a Swallow.) However, being a clydesdale (although a light one at 205lb), I have a few concerns...

1. Is it better to trim these saddles after they're broken-in and the leather is stretched more closely to it's final shape?

2. Does trimming the skirts lessen the effectiveness of the tightening nut on the nose of the saddle?

3. Are you guys adding any support (binding, etc) to the underside of the saddle?

4. Do the trimmed saddles still feel, perform, last like an untrimmed saddle?

Thanks.

Steve
The_Mickstar is offline  
Old 01-20-06, 10:21 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Michigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 145

Bikes: Trek 5200, Pedal Force Carbon Project

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here's some pics of my butchered B17N if it helps. I cut it with an exacto then rounded the edges over with a rough file. To answer your questions; 1- I'm guessing it doesn't make any difference, 2- There's slightly less leather to stretch, so I guess the nut must work better, 3- I'm 170 and don't need the underside flap you see on the swallow. I don't notice it sagging at all. If I was 200 I'd put the flap in. There's enough leather on the B17 to do that, 4-I only put a couple hours on it while it was untrimmed, but it feels the same.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
P1200004.jpg (37.0 KB, 285 views)
File Type: jpg
P1200005.jpg (50.7 KB, 265 views)
Michigan is offline  
Old 01-20-06, 10:55 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 242

Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Professional, 1993 Raleigh Technium Olympian, 2006 Cervelo Dual, 2008 Cannondale Caad8, 2010 Kona Unit, 2013 Trek Superfly 100 AL Pro, 2014 Trek Crockett 9, 2017 All City Nature Boy 853

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Excellent idea to use a flap as support (as opposed to lacing). That'll provide a much sleeker look, and probably be a bit easier to accomplish and make it look good.

Just out of curiosity... How difficult is it to perform such a job with an Exacto knife? That leather looks pretty darn think. Seems like an Exacto would have a tough time getting through it.


Steve
The_Mickstar is offline  
Old 01-20-06, 11:21 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Michigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 145

Bikes: Trek 5200, Pedal Force Carbon Project

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I first went at it with a dremel and the small abrasive wheel that'll cut through just about anything, but it scorched the leather. So I took an exacto with a #11 blade and found it cut very easily and I had more control. Make a series of shallow cuts. If you make a flap, I think you'll have to score a line about halfway through on the underside of the leather so it bends sharp enough that its not too visible when the saddle is mounted.
Michigan is offline  
Old 01-20-06, 12:29 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 242

Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Professional, 1993 Raleigh Technium Olympian, 2006 Cervelo Dual, 2008 Cannondale Caad8, 2010 Kona Unit, 2013 Trek Superfly 100 AL Pro, 2014 Trek Crockett 9, 2017 All City Nature Boy 853

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks, again. I may have to give this a try. Now, I just need to figure out which Brooks will fit me best.

Steve
The_Mickstar is offline  
Old 01-20-06, 07:55 PM
  #16  
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Michigan
If you make a flap, I think you'll have to score a line about halfway through on the underside of the leather so it bends sharp enough that its not too visible when the saddle is mounted.
Check the Singlespeed Forum... I seem to remember a post by someone who flapped a saddle - didn't score it though... something about a small block of wood and moistening the area to help the folding process... I could be mistaken.
bmike is offline  
Old 01-20-06, 07:56 PM
  #17  
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Michigan
Here's some pics of my butchered B17N if it helps. I cut it with an exacto then rounded the edges over with a rough file. To answer your questions; 1- I'm guessing it doesn't make any difference, 2- There's slightly less leather to stretch, so I guess the nut must work better, 3- I'm 170 and don't need the underside flap you see on the swallow. I don't notice it sagging at all. If I was 200 I'd put the flap in. There's enough leather on the B17 to do that, 4-I only put a couple hours on it while it was untrimmed, but it feels the same.

Thats a nice looking saddle.
bmike is offline  
Old 01-21-06, 11:13 PM
  #18  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
are the rails "higher" on a B17 than a swallow? swallow is too narrow for me, but I don't like the skirts on the B17--but sometimes when people butcher B17 they look really high up on the rails.
Serpico is offline  
Old 01-22-06, 05:11 PM
  #19  
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ziggurat
are the rails "higher" on a B17 than a swallow? swallow is too narrow for me, but I don't like the skirts on the B17--but sometimes when people butcher B17 they look really high up on the rails.

I was concerned about this coming from the Team Pro, as I had my saddle height just right.
When I mounted the Swallow and checked everything, the two appear to have the same height off the rails. The Swallow's rails are much longer than the Pro, allowing for more adjustment for / aft.

I'm not sure how it compares to the B17.
bmike is offline  
Old 01-22-06, 06:19 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
biker7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The_Mickstar
Thanks, again. I may have to give this a try. Now, I just need to figure out which Brooks will fit me best.

Steve
I have tried a few different Brooks as well as many plastic saddles. I will likely ride a Brooks the rest of my life. If you are a big guy, I say try the B-17. The good thing about Brooks is they come in different configs...and widths in particular. No narrow saddle works for me. I currently have a B.17 and B.17 Champion Special which are both great saddles...kind of like a slightly wider Team Pro which is too narrrow for me...can ride one but just not as comfortable as the B.17. The Swallow is even narrower or better for more narrow hipped riders who run a fair measure of forward pelvis tilt.
Also, Brooks as with other saddles are very sensitive to tilt in terms of perineal pressure so be sure to have a good adjustable seat post. As to modifying...I am an inveterant modifier but have resisted because I believe all models of Brooks have evolved to their current config for a reason but applaud the creativity of guys on the forum who like to mod them. I did remove the bag loops on my Champion Special however with a dremmel which is no small feat without hacking the adjacent leather as I prefer the clean look of no bag loops.
HTH,
George

Last edited by biker7; 01-23-06 at 04:55 AM.
biker7 is offline  
Old 01-22-06, 07:12 PM
  #21  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bmike
I was concerned about this coming from the Team Pro, as I had my saddle height just right.
When I mounted the Swallow and checked everything, the two appear to have the same height off the rails. The Swallow's rails are much longer than the Pro, allowing for more adjustment for / aft.

I'm not sure how it compares to the B17.
My concern is a B17--a butchered B17 seems to have a LOT of cage showing, compared to a swallow. I think the rails are higher/deeper/whatever on a B17.

Anyone have a swallow and a B17, to compare?
Serpico is offline  
Old 01-22-06, 07:19 PM
  #22  
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ziggurat
My concern is a B17--a butchered B17 seems to have a LOT of cage showing, compared to a swallow. I think the rails are higher/deeper/whatever on a B17.

Anyone have a swallow and a B17, to compare?
The B17 has long "skirts" on the side... and the Swallow is cut differently than the B17... so they may have similar rail heights. I've noticed on butchered B17's and Pro's that significantly more rail shows.

Like I said, the height was right on from my Pro to the Swallow... at least as accurate as I could measure it and feel it when I pedal.

I like the look of the rails showing, over the "skirt".
bmike is offline  
Old 01-22-06, 07:50 PM
  #23  
Designer
 
steppinthefunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,368
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
HEre's a pic of my Butchered B17. The rails are higher than other saddles... But still, I think the B17 is still the best candidate for a butcher project...

__________________
steppinthefunk is offline  
Old 01-22-06, 07:58 PM
  #24  
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by steppinthefunk
HEre's a pic of my Butchered B17. The rails are higher than other saddles... But still, I think the B17 is still the best candidate for a butcher project...

Nice!
bmike is offline  
Old 05-17-10, 01:53 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sweetest butchering I've seen

Originally Posted by steppinthefunk
HEre's a pic of my Butchered B17. The rails are higher than other saddles... But still, I think the B17 is still the best candidate for a butcher project...

Stepinthefunk, that is the coolest B17 mod I've seen so far. I'm getting some chafing from the skirts on my B17 so I'm looking to butcher it soon. Do you have more pictures of this mod?

Thanks
deeridiot is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.