climbing out of saddle form
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If my quads begin to burn after 30 seconds of standing is that indicative of poor form or poor standing fitness?
My experience is that if I'm in too low a gear my legs start to burn from spinning (90+ rpm) while standing but if I'm in a high enough gear to feel comfortable (ie. 70-80 rpms) my power meter says I'm putting out much more wattage than my functional threshold so it's not something I can maintain for very long. Any pointers?
--Steve
My experience is that if I'm in too low a gear my legs start to burn from spinning (90+ rpm) while standing but if I'm in a high enough gear to feel comfortable (ie. 70-80 rpms) my power meter says I'm putting out much more wattage than my functional threshold so it's not something I can maintain for very long. Any pointers?
--Steve
#27
Banned
Poor fitness, out of the saddle is tough, the legs wont like it till theyve been forced to do LOTS of it, and heavier riders have a tougher time with it than smaller riders. Over 200lbs it gets damn tough from what Ive seen, but those clydes that can do it are often deadly fast.
You can vary the output by using your arms to take some weight off, turn a bigger gear and do it a bit more slowly, its like climbing stairs basically. Find your own standing threshold and keep working at it, it really doesnt get much easier, just faster. Although lots of riding makes leg burn prettymuch a thing of the past. Instead, when you push too hard too long they either cramp up or just kinda give out---and that is a very disheartening weird feeling, ive had that happen before.
As a rookie messenger I was pathetic at it, my brain wanted to, my form was good, my legs protested, my heart wasnt too happy bout it neither, 5 years later Im quite good at it. I spend about 1/3rd to 1/2 my time working out of the saddle usually accelerating as fast as possible or stopping as fast as possible, took a LONG time before I could do that 5 days a week at will and not get beat up tired from it. It is one of the toughest things to do on a bike, and its often very much a sign of a bikers strength, there are exceptions of course--Basso, Ullrich for example, then there's Armstrong, he went out of the saddle like few Ive ever seen.
You can vary the output by using your arms to take some weight off, turn a bigger gear and do it a bit more slowly, its like climbing stairs basically. Find your own standing threshold and keep working at it, it really doesnt get much easier, just faster. Although lots of riding makes leg burn prettymuch a thing of the past. Instead, when you push too hard too long they either cramp up or just kinda give out---and that is a very disheartening weird feeling, ive had that happen before.
As a rookie messenger I was pathetic at it, my brain wanted to, my form was good, my legs protested, my heart wasnt too happy bout it neither, 5 years later Im quite good at it. I spend about 1/3rd to 1/2 my time working out of the saddle usually accelerating as fast as possible or stopping as fast as possible, took a LONG time before I could do that 5 days a week at will and not get beat up tired from it. It is one of the toughest things to do on a bike, and its often very much a sign of a bikers strength, there are exceptions of course--Basso, Ullrich for example, then there's Armstrong, he went out of the saddle like few Ive ever seen.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beantown
Posts: 1,546
Bikes: 2011 Tsunami, 2004 Fuji Team Issue and More!!!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
BMX Racing is purely out the saddle so I've never felt uncomfortable climbing out the saddle. Climbing steepies in the saddle I'll bend the elbows and get my upper body forward and rear back. I think my biggest flaw out the saddle is I toss the bike a bit much from side to side, an old habit from racing.
#29
Guru N00b
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SFO [650]
Posts: 320
Bikes: '06 Trek 1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pretty good Lance climbing video. Pretty intense action too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6DmNMGEuI0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6DmNMGEuI0
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rural Missouri - mostly central and southeastern
Posts: 3,014
Bikes: 2003 LeMond -various other junk bikes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
36 Posts
Pretty exhaustive discussion of climbing techniques - but I doubt it does anything for the original thread starters climbing ability. I didn't see anyone ask "0810" about why he sucks at climbing hills. No questions about his or her bike setup, his leg-length, his weight.
The best part of the thread , is when someone decides we might as well imitate "pro-level" riders. OK.
Maybe 0810 can tell us why he thinks he needs to learn good form for hill climbing? Maybe some info like height and weight, as well as what kind of riding experience and past training routines would help someone fabricate some advice? Targeted BS is so much more effective than the "throw on the forum wall" kind.
The best part of the thread , is when someone decides we might as well imitate "pro-level" riders. OK.
Maybe 0810 can tell us why he thinks he needs to learn good form for hill climbing? Maybe some info like height and weight, as well as what kind of riding experience and past training routines would help someone fabricate some advice? Targeted BS is so much more effective than the "throw on the forum wall" kind.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 99
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ok... im 6 feet, only a measly 140 pounds.. im 16 years old so not much experience except for a fixed gear mtb bike. i think, or was it SS? the kind where you brake by pedaling backwards. i need good form cause i have minor scoliosis and a bad left shoulder. and cause i live in SF where hills are everywhere.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by daytonian
Climbing out of the saddle takes much more effort than sitting. On our group ride I look for all the "standers" on the first set of hills and go left or right to avoid them even if they keep tempo because midway up they hit LT and are dropped like clockwork. But hey all that standing looks cool especially at the coffee shop
#33
riding once again
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 7,359
Bikes: '06 Cervelo R3, '05 Specialized Allez
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 0810
im 6 feet, only a measly 140 pounds
I tried Terry Morse's step by step on my trainer. (Plan to try for real on the road tomorrow morning.) I found that compared to my weight (im)balance before, getting to what Terry and pedex described took a shift to the back of a few centimeters. Not a huge shift, but a huge change in how much weight was on my hands.
By the way, I find that at full (highly unsustainable) effort, the nose of my saddle (with the bike on a trainer and tilted up simulating a 1-2% grade) might occasionally brush against my inner thigh. But at a lower effort, rather than brushing against my thigh, the saddle brushes against the butt cheek of the side that is on the upstroke. Is that supposed to be happening, or does that indicate something wrong with what I'm doing? I can't imagine why a change in effort level would affect how high up my saddle brushes against me. It's not as if my legs grow and shrink based on the level of exertion.
__________________
If you notice this notice then you will notice that this notice is not worth noticing.
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 99
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i read somewhere that your weight should not be more than twice you height in inches... so for me.. im lighter, giving me potential to become a great climber cause im light? ehh
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North Orange County, CA
Posts: 290
Bikes: Gary Fisher MTB and a Klein Quantum II
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
Don't confuse the "standers" on your group ride with cyclists who know what they're doing.
My personal tests indicated that I'm about 10% less efficient standing than seated aerobically, using climbing rate over heart rate as a measure. Since I made those tests a couple of years ago, I've probably improved my standing efficiency more, so I suspect the difference is now less than 10%.
Reports from physiologists suggest that the best climbers are just as efficient in or out of the saddle. Pantani was certainly successful at climbing out of the saddle.
My personal tests indicated that I'm about 10% less efficient standing than seated aerobically, using climbing rate over heart rate as a measure. Since I made those tests a couple of years ago, I've probably improved my standing efficiency more, so I suspect the difference is now less than 10%.
Reports from physiologists suggest that the best climbers are just as efficient in or out of the saddle. Pantani was certainly successful at climbing out of the saddle.
I agree that good climbers are probably as efficient standing or sitting, but how long can they do each? Watching the pros, I notice that they only seem to stand when accelerating or trying to maintain a speed for a certain, short distance. I don't think I have ever seen one climb a long grade standing.
I could be wrong. My wife says I am most of the time.
#36
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,208
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3517 Post(s)
Liked 3,656 Times
in
1,832 Posts
Originally Posted by Polonswim
I agree that good climbers are probably as efficient standing or sitting, but how long can they do each? Watching the pros, I notice that they only seem to stand when accelerating or trying to maintain a speed for a certain, short distance. I don't think I have ever seen one climb a long grade standing.
There is even a commonly used climbing exercise that swtiches the rider between sitting and standing.
The rider that climbs in just one position seems to be a rarity. I switch off, 30 seconds of standing for every few minutes of seated.
#38
Don't Believe the Hype
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: chicagoland area
Posts: 2,668
Bikes: 1999 Steelman SR525, 2002 Lightspeed Ultimate, 1988 Trek 830, 2008 Scott Addict
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Standing presents a great time to take the pressure off of your quads. Standing and pedalling circles vs. standing and stomping is a huge difference.
Try and pedal in complete circles. The better your core is, the easier standing and climbing is.
Stand to relax from the sitting position, not to stomp and burn your quads more.
Try and pedal in complete circles. The better your core is, the easier standing and climbing is.
Stand to relax from the sitting position, not to stomp and burn your quads more.
#39
Dan J
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Iron Mountain, MI
Posts: 1,244
Bikes: 1974 Stella 10 speed, 2006 Trek Pilot 1.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RiPHRaPH
Standing presents a great time to take the pressure off of your quads. Standing and pedalling circles vs. standing and stomping is a huge difference.
Try and pedal in complete circles. The better your core is, the easier standing and climbing is.
Stand to relax from the sitting position, not to stomp and burn your quads more.
Try and pedal in complete circles. The better your core is, the easier standing and climbing is.
Stand to relax from the sitting position, not to stomp and burn your quads more.
I can't stand for a long time without redlining the HR & having my legs burn, so I usually only do it on short crests to keep my speed up. I find it helps smoothness to try to keep your weight over the pedals as opposed to the bars. I don't really pull on the bars as some say you should, but more use them to keep from falling backwards, if that makes sense. I am trying to work on staying out of the saddle for longer periods of time.
Dan
#40
staring at the mountains
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Castle Pines, CO
Posts: 4,560
Bikes: Obed GVR, Fairdale Goodship, Salsa Timberjack 29
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
112 Posts
On long climbs (like Vail Pass, 9.7mi long), I'll need to give my seat a break by standing: Stand and do five strokes, pause and coast for a few feet, then five more and pause. Repeat until ready to sit back down. (the odd number alternates which leg is extended while coasting). The coasting is enough to stretch out a little and get some recovery....
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint Pete
Posts: 253
Bikes: Seven Axiom Steel, Surly LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dekindy
Which one is Simoni? I can't tell which one looks more comfortable. Please point out the obvious since it is not apparent to me. Thanks.
Simoni is the rider in front. Most of his weight is centerd over his pedals. The other rider is putting more pressure on his hands. In short, Simoni is using his weight more efficiently than the other rider to get up the climb.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North Orange County, CA
Posts: 290
Bikes: Gary Fisher MTB and a Klein Quantum II
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
Climbing a long grade in one position will be tiring to your muscles, so it's good to switch between standing and sitting. They each use different muscles, and switching back and forth is a good way to give your body a break.
There is even a commonly used climbing exercise that swtiches the rider between sitting and standing.
The rider that climbs in just one position seems to be a rarity. I switch off, 30 seconds of standing for every few minutes of seated.
There is even a commonly used climbing exercise that swtiches the rider between sitting and standing.
The rider that climbs in just one position seems to be a rarity. I switch off, 30 seconds of standing for every few minutes of seated.
My thought is because while standing changes the muscle group and gives others a chance to rest, it is not as efficent as seated climbing. I believe that is what the OP is trying to get find out. I also agree with the fact that standing has a place on short hills that can be "sprinted" up, but not for the long haul.
#43
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,208
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3517 Post(s)
Liked 3,656 Times
in
1,832 Posts
#44
Senior Member
Originally Posted by chinarider
Standing also gives you a chance to take the pressure off the sitting area & let blood flow easier. Important if you're have any numbness issues on long rides.
The only other issue that worries me with standing is that if you have an equipment failure (broken chain, crankarm, pedal, etc.) you are probably going to go down pretty hard compared to sitting, and with some pretty delicate areas at risk.
#45
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
0810's problem is most likely just not enough time spent on the bike. He feels unstable, likely if he keeps riding out of the saddle that will go away soon. Practice Practice Practice. Keep weight distrobution in mind bit just ride more for now. You're young and as you say inexperienced. Lots of people don't feel comfortable out of the saddle at first.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 2,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by 0810
i read somewhere that your weight should not be more than twice you height in inches... so for me.. im lighter, giving me potential to become a great climber cause im light? ehh
That cant be correct. If so I'd be 5'9 138 lbs. I'd look disgusting.
#47
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,208
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3517 Post(s)
Liked 3,656 Times
in
1,832 Posts
#48
Banned
Originally Posted by terrymorse
Speak for yourself. I'm 5'11" 135 lbs of ripped flesh.
whats your sprint speed, and 1hr TT distance?
#49
Used to be a climber..
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 6,849
Bikes: 2016 Ridley Fenix SL, 2020 Trek Emonda ALR (rim brake)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by pedex
its a tradeoff just like anything else
whats your sprint speed, and 1hr TT distance?
whats your sprint speed, and 1hr TT distance?
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 2,130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by terrymorse
Speak for yourself. I'm 5'11" 135 lbs of ripped flesh.
I was speaking for myself.....if you care to look emaciated that is your perogative.