Is your bike stable at high speed?
#51
Just shy of 400W
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 766
Bikes: Cannondale System 6, Klein Palomino
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I had my R700 up to 47mph and it was pretty darn twitchy. Honestly, it probably isnt safe at that speed if you ask me. 35mph feels fine though.... just my .02
__________________
2008 Cannondale System Six
2016 Pivot Mach 5.5
2008 Cannondale System Six
2016 Pivot Mach 5.5
#52
You know you want to.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,894
Bikes: Pinarello Prince, 1980's 531 steel fixie commuter, FrankenMTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My Pinarello Prince is unstable at high speeds. Above 35mph, he's been known to kill a man with no provocation.
__________________
Weather today: Hot. Humid. Potholes.
Weather today: Hot. Humid. Potholes.
#53
Acquiring new target....
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,276
Bikes: Trek XO-1, Gary Fisher Rig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The fastest I've ever had my bike ('07 Lemond Tourmalet, 59cm with stock Bontrager Selects) was 42mph, on a descent of course. At that speed the bike exhibited no "unpredictable" behavior; no shakes, no speed-wobles, no twitch, no flex and no float.
I descend in the drops, pedals horizontal (unless I'm still mashing), knees in (can't say I've ever "clamped" the top-tube though), and butt off the rear of the saddle. I have no idea if that's the proper way to descend on a road-bike, I just translated what I learned from mountain bikes and it works.
I descend in the drops, pedals horizontal (unless I'm still mashing), knees in (can't say I've ever "clamped" the top-tube though), and butt off the rear of the saddle. I have no idea if that's the proper way to descend on a road-bike, I just translated what I learned from mountain bikes and it works.
#54
or tarckeemoon, depending
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the pesto of cities
Posts: 7,017
Bikes: Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't think "stable" is really the word for it, but I don't feel like I'm not in control of the bike. Quite the opposite. My bike is happy at speeds that scare the **** out of me.
#55
Peloton Shelter Dog
Weight shouldn't be a factor. My bike weighs about 16.2 lbs, very light. The bike is quite stable.
#56
NorCal Climbing Freak
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Fastest I've taken my bike is 52 mph. It felt stable, though I considered during the descent that now would be a horrible time for a catastrophic part failure.
#57
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 51
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, thank you for input, I especially enjoyed Moultons blog. A lot to think about but not sure where to start. Several posts describe what to do when it happens. I would prefer to pursue making the problem go away by making adjustments if it is possible. I have heard different things like, shift body forward, seat post, have fork checked (I have read the Calfee article and it does make sense) try different wheel set, tubes, tires. I have been contemplating getting a pro bike fit and I wonder if I should start there or is it a component thing and I should start there?
#58
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 39
Bikes: Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Kestrel Talon SL, Specalized Roubaix Comp, Cannondale Early 1990s Mtn.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by johnny99
42mph is not fast. This is fast: https://www.wired.com/culture/lifesty...ikerecord_0330
#59
More Energy than Sense
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 718
Bikes: Co-Motion Divide
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My Custom Co-motion is not....but it's better than it was. Long story short, after three years owning the bike and complaining about wobble at high speed, they finally determined I was given the wrong fork. Prior to realizing this, they replaced the frame which didn't help. It's better now but still not great.
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth, Australia and sometimes Penang Malaysia
Posts: 1,916
Bikes: Litespeed L1r, Litespeed Ghisallo 07, TCR Advanced Team SL 0 ISP, Giant TCR Advanced SL, Giant TCR Advanced Team - T-Mobile, Giant Propel Advanced SL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Could it be something to do with fork stiffness, I notice the Roubaix has the zertz elastomer inserts, maybe there is more fork flex going down hill with the change in weight distribution.
My Giant TCR advanced team has super stiff forks that beat you up while riding
but are solid when descending.
My Giant TCR advanced team has super stiff forks that beat you up while riding
but are solid when descending.
#61
i ride a bicycle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,021
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think what is happening in a "shimmy" can be explained without too much engineer-speak. A shimmy is like a resonant frequency - some sort of perturbation starts a vibration at just the right frequency and it continues to grow unless something is changed.
In the simplest terms, the natural frequency of a system (w) is defined as
w=sqrt(k/m)
where k is the stiffness of the system and m is the mass.
So to eliminate the shimmy you have two options:
1)change speed to alter or eliminate the input signal (vibration) that is causing the system to resonate at its natural frequency
2)change the natural frequency of the system by either altering its stiffness or mass
Examples of changing the stiffness and mass have already been given in this thread:
When you clamp the top tube with your knees, you are effectively stiffening the system. (If you want to play semantics, technically you are not "damping" any vibrations; you are stiffening the system and changing its natural frequency so that it no longer resonates in response to whatever input it is experiencing)
The member who posted about seeing a motorcycle shimmy so hard it bucked its rider off, then continued straight (without shimmy) for quite a distance gave us an example of changing the mass: when the rider was bucked off, the mass of the system changed and thus so did the natural frequency, and the shimmy disappeared.
I didn't staty at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but I did take a few mechanical engineering grad courses in dynamics and vibrations...
Mac
In the simplest terms, the natural frequency of a system (w) is defined as
w=sqrt(k/m)
where k is the stiffness of the system and m is the mass.
So to eliminate the shimmy you have two options:
1)change speed to alter or eliminate the input signal (vibration) that is causing the system to resonate at its natural frequency
2)change the natural frequency of the system by either altering its stiffness or mass
Examples of changing the stiffness and mass have already been given in this thread:
When you clamp the top tube with your knees, you are effectively stiffening the system. (If you want to play semantics, technically you are not "damping" any vibrations; you are stiffening the system and changing its natural frequency so that it no longer resonates in response to whatever input it is experiencing)
The member who posted about seeing a motorcycle shimmy so hard it bucked its rider off, then continued straight (without shimmy) for quite a distance gave us an example of changing the mass: when the rider was bucked off, the mass of the system changed and thus so did the natural frequency, and the shimmy disappeared.
I didn't staty at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but I did take a few mechanical engineering grad courses in dynamics and vibrations...
Mac
#62
Double Secret Probation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Eastern Indiana
Posts: 2,578
Bikes: Madone 6 series SSL, Cannondale CX9, Trek TTX, Trek 970, Trek T2000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Both my Madone and Cannondale CAAD 8 are solid. I've had both up to at least 48 mph (never cracked 50). No shimmy or other problems.
__________________
Time to Ride...
Time to Ride...
#64
FIT-Fred In Training
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 47
Bikes: 94 Specialized Epic 98 Specialized Stumpjumper M2 07 Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
my commuter bike- a Stumpjumper M2- is stable at 52mph.
Sorry, I just wanted to say that. There was one hell of a tailwind that day.
Sorry, I just wanted to say that. There was one hell of a tailwind that day.
#65
Dirt-riding heretic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 17,413
Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
My F4:13 actually feels MORE stable the faster it goes. I've had it in the high 40's/low 50's a couple times with no problems at all. That's with bladed-spoke Fulcrum 1's.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
#66
Gorntastic!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by c64
my commuter bike- a Stumpjumper M2- is stable at 52mph.
Sorry, I just wanted to say that. There was one hell of a tailwind that day.
Sorry, I just wanted to say that. There was one hell of a tailwind that day.
My new Lemond Buenos Aires is stable over 50 mph, much more so than my old R1000.
__________________
#68
Lawman
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 205
Bikes: Spec. Tarmac Expert SL4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My Specialzed E5 is absolutely stable in 45 mph downhill switchbacks. My Lemond Zurich (carbon/steel) is spooky in the same switchbacks at 38.
#69
I like beans
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Meffa, MA
Posts: 3,336
Bikes: Tarmac Pro, Bianchi Zurigo, Raleigh Gran Sport, Fuji Del Rey, Ironman Centurion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by scottmorrison99
My bike is fine, but I am Unsafe at any speed!
"That's right, Iceman, I am dangerous..."
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681
Bikes: Pedal Force QS3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i haven't crashed but i rarely exceed 40mph
__________________
15% Hammer Nutrition Discount Code
15% Hammer Nutrition Discount Code
#71
I like beans
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Meffa, MA
Posts: 3,336
Bikes: Tarmac Pro, Bianchi Zurigo, Raleigh Gran Sport, Fuji Del Rey, Ironman Centurion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I actually hit 35 on rutted dirt on a Battenkill-Roubaix downhill on my aluminum Bianchi. Not sure why the heck I was looking at the computer, but damn was that fun. Passed a bunch of riders b/c they probably thought I was crazy. I later found that someone flipped at the bottom of that hill when they hit a rut dead on.
#72
en fuego
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 2,685
Bikes: Trek Madone 3.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My bike (Windsor Fens) has topped out so far at an apparently extraordinarily pedestrian 39.7MPH so far. The bike was very stable at that speed.
#73
Source Of All Knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 385
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slowandsteady
What size stem do you have? My bike is downright scary with a 70mm stem, but smooth as silk with a 90mm.
I think you are on to something, here.
Stems under 100mm feel unstable on very fast downhill runs. The reason for the twitchy behavior is obvious.
#75
Point&click point&click
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 191
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hmm....this thread gives me some insight into the thread I posted the other day. I have a new Merlin Works (compact) and had some scary shimmy with the wind at my back on a flat road. I had it up into to the low 30's while pedaling (and wind ) and as soon as I adjusted my hands on the drops, the shimmy started. Freaky. I suppose it may have had to do a bit with my hand movement, but it seemed controlled. Very frustrating esp. when my much less expensive and non-professionally fit older bike never had this problem.