Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

For thos who have ridden 50 and 100 mile rides...

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

For thos who have ridden 50 and 100 mile rides...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-07, 10:14 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
donrhummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For thos who have ridden 50 and 100 mile rides...

Any idea how the speed tends to translate? Is there any way to translate it? If so, which direction does it go? For example, can a 100 mile speed help predict an approx. 50 mile speed but not vice versa?

What have your speeds (while trying hard) been for these two rides?
donrhummy is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 10:28 AM
  #2  
Cat None
 
SDRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,508

Bikes: LOOK KG 461, LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er 0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Huh?

I've ridden 50 miles and 100 miles. Not sure what it is you're asking though.
SDRider is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 10:34 AM
  #3  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by SDRider
Huh?

I've ridden 50 miles and 100 miles. Not sure what it is you're asking though.
+1 - Speed is sooooooooooooo dependent upon eating, course, weather, etc. that you really can't predict your speed for one by using another route.

Example:
I usually ride a 16.5 mph century, but I have twice ridden 160 miles at 17.5mph or greater. Difference? The 160 course was West to East one way. Wind at your back for most of it. It's just too dependent upon the course.
Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 10:36 AM
  #4  
The mods changed this...
 
damocles1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,346
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Depends on the group that shows up as well. On Saturday, 5 of us did 55 miles in 2:45. On Sunday, the century in Charleston got clipped off in 4:08 by the lead group.
damocles1 is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 10:37 AM
  #5  
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Any idea how the speed tends to translate? Is there any way to translate it? If so, which direction does it go? For example, can a 100 mile speed help predict an approx. 50 mile speed but not vice versa?

What have your speeds (while trying hard) been for these two rides?
E=mc²
botto is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 10:37 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Posts: 1,643

Bikes: '71 Raleigh Sports, '84 Schwinn LeTour on the trainer (and available for hill repeats), '06 Scott CR1 SL (Ksyrium SL), and a yet-to-be-determined TT bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
If you hit your so-called sweetspot on cadence, etc., you'll feel like you can go on forever. Your average speed at that sweetspot, will likely be more or less the same over 30-, 50-, or 100-miles, given the same terrain and wind conditions.

If you're talkin' about gettin' outside that sweetspot and tryin' to ride hard, you'll have a higher average speed over a shorter distance, given the energy expenditure and fatigue to your legs. Think about running. You can obviously do a faster pace for one-mile than for 10miles, if you're racing. If you're in your sweetspot for long-distance, though, you'll likely have essentially the same pace over your 20th mile as you did over your first.
VegaVixen is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 10:37 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Distance doesn't matter nearly as much as elevation changes.
rknj is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 10:38 AM
  #8  
Cat None
 
SDRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,508

Bikes: LOOK KG 461, LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er 0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by botto
E=mc²
Correct.
SDRider is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 10:40 AM
  #9  
Cat None
 
SDRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,508

Bikes: LOOK KG 461, LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er 0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VegaVixen
If you hit your so-called sweetspot on cadence, etc., you'll feel like you can go on forever. Your average speed at that sweetspot, will likely be more or less the same over 30-, 50-, or 100-miles, given the same terrain and wind conditions.

If you're talkin' about gettin' outside that sweetspot and tryin' to ride hard, you'll have a higher average speed over a shorter distance, given the energy expenditure and fatigue to your legs. Think about running. You can obviously do a faster pace for one-mile than for 10miles, if you're racing. If you're in your sweetspot for long-distance, though, you'll likely have essentially the same pace over your 20th mile as you did over your first.
Agreed. I tend to average about the same pace on longer rides as I do on shorter ones. Wind and hills are usually the only things that change my output...other than fatigue of course.
SDRider is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 12:11 PM
  #10  
Shut up and pedal!
 
joshalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 279

Bikes: Custom Steel made by Alliance, Cannondale Capo, Kona Unit, Bridgestone RB, Ridley Triton

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If a train leaves Pittsburgh PA at 8:15 am and heads west at 100 mph, and another leaves Needles NV at the same time, but heading east at 80 mph where and when do they meet? Show your work.
joshalope is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 12:14 PM
  #11  
bzzzz
 
fuzzthebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Any idea how the speed tends to translate? Is there any way to translate it? If so, which direction does it go? For example, can a 100 mile speed help predict an approx. 50 mile speed but not vice versa?

What have your speeds (while trying hard) been for these two rides?
A general rule of thumb is that power output drops by ~5% as the duration is doubled. So if you could ride 50 km at an average of 250 w, then you could do ~100 km at ~238 w.

If you plug those numbers into a speed/power calculator, you get just over 37 km/h for the 50 km in 1:20, and 36.5 km/h for the 100 km in 2:43. No big difference. Those figures are, of course, highly variable.
fuzzthebee is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 12:17 PM
  #12  
Faster but still slow
 
slowandsteady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 5,978

Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
80% of your 1 hour average speed, assuming similar terrain.
slowandsteady is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 12:30 PM
  #13  
Upgrading my engine
 
DXchulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alamogordo
Posts: 6,218
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
(while trying hard)
That's tough. This question is all but impossible to answer.

I could ride 50 miles very hard without food and not feel too awful bad at the end. I could never do the same thing for 100 miles.

I think if you're doing 100 miles for the first time you should throw "very hard" out the window. You want to know you can actually go that far before you start pushing for speed. I do at least a century every month and next week will be the first one where I'm actually concentrating on speed. You have to build up your endurance first.

Even if you're trained pretty well you'll always be able to average a higher speed for 50 miles than for 100 miles, even if conditions are perfectly equal, which will never be the case. You can go anaerobic in a 50-miler and it won't catch up with you later as much as it would for the 100-miler.
DXchulo is offline  
Old 04-05-07, 02:57 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
corny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 222

Bikes: Cannondale R1000 Compact Drive '05

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Probably around 10% diff between 50 and 100 miles same conditions, but as said this is never the case - so go test it for real
corny is offline  
Old 04-06-07, 05:48 AM
  #15  
My idea of fun
 
kensuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920

Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by donrhummy
Any idea how the speed tends to translate? Is there any way to translate it? If so, which direction does it go? For example, can a 100 mile speed help predict an approx. 50 mile speed but not vice versa?

What have your speeds (while trying hard) been for these two rides?
Too many variables (hills, wind, road conditions, etc) to get a real estimate. But you should be able to get a rough idea under "like conditions" based on all the riding you do to prepare for a century.

50 miler? My best pace was about 23mph. 100? About 21.
kensuf is offline  
Old 04-06-07, 10:17 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rknj
Distance doesn't matter nearly as much as elevation changes.
Agree, lots of steep climbs, as we have here in W. PA will just kill your average speed. No matter how great a climber you are.
oilman_15106 is offline  
Old 04-06-07, 11:32 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Even in ideal conditions depends how regularly you do the larger distance I guess, if you don't have the endurance base then the 100 miles will probably be at a much slower pace than the 50 miles which you are used to, OTOH if you regularly do 100 mile rides then the pace shouldn't be too much slower.
Endox is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.