Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

rim recommendation?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

rim recommendation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-07 | 03:43 PM
  #1  
Road Fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

rim recommendation?

My wheel builder is sourcng some rims for me, and he can't get the Mavic Reflex in silver, taht I would prefer. Any suggestions for a modern non-aero tubular rim? He's suggesting Velocity Escape.

I might change to a clincher. Here my short list is Velocity Aerohead OC, a Mavic Open Pro, or DT 1.1.

How do these clinchers stack up, and any more tubular rims you can recommend?

Road Fan
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 09-06-07 | 05:29 PM
  #2  
DC_Emily's Avatar
Headed to the Library...
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: DC

Bikes: 2003 cherry red Bianchi Giro, Quattro Assi Team 2000 Rocket

Are these your race wheels? If not, you may be better of with clinchers solely based on the lower cost and ease of fixing flats. Furthermore, many of the benefits (higher psi, less rolling resistance, etc.) can be had with open tubular tires. I ride Vittoria Open Corsa EVO KS, which are fantastic.

As for wheels, I have a set of DA hubs to Open Pro rims which I've been riding for 2 1/2 seasons now. The rims are bomb proof. I love 'em.
DC_Emily is offline  
Reply
Old 09-06-07 | 06:10 PM
  #3  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

I'll second Open Pro rims. I've got one set laced to vintage Campy Record high flange hubs, and another set laced to 2007 Campy Record hubs. They're all 36 spoke 3-cross, and the wheels are bullet-proof and reasonably light.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 09-06-07 | 06:20 PM
  #4  
waterrockets's Avatar
Making a kilometer blurry
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 26,170
Likes: 93
From: Austin (near TX)

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

I've had Mavics and Velocitys, and I say to get the Velocitys (tubie or clincher). They may not be any better, but they're no worse, and cost less. Great products, really.

Last edited by waterrockets; 09-06-07 at 08:33 PM.
waterrockets is offline  
Reply
Old 09-06-07 | 07:07 PM
  #5  
iab's Avatar
iab
Senior Member
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,867
Likes: 5,399
From: NW Burbs, Chicago
If you are under 180, there is a set of NOS Fiamme Ergals on ebay. Unfortunately you'll have to beat out our Japanese friends for them.
iab is offline  
Reply
Old 09-07-07 | 05:12 AM
  #6  
Road Fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by iab
If you are under 180, there is a set of NOS Fiamme Ergals on ebay. Unfortunately you'll have to beat out our Japanese friends for them.
The builder recommends Aeroheads, with an O/C in the back. I'm using a Record hubset, which could use extra help in stability. He doesn't downplay Mavic Open Pros or Reflexes, but he thinks the Aeros will be more stable. I have 1000s of miles on old Mavic tubulars, so I'm not too concerned about over stressing tubulars. However I've never owned something as aggressively light as an Ergal. I hover around 180#, floating a bit above that right now and also don't race, so these are training and road wheels. I've always (30+ years) liked the superior feel and liveliness of racy gear. I'm not ready for 38 mm ballon tires quite yet.

I think it's the Veloflex Pave Open, Aeroheads, CX ray spokes and the Record 10 speed hub. Zoom!

Road Fan
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 09-07-07 | 06:49 AM
  #7  
adrien's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA

Bikes: Firefly custom Road, Ira Ryan custom road bike, Ira Ryan custom fixed gear

sounds like the aeroheads are your best bet.

I'm about 230, and can't keep open pros true (a lot of torque on standing climbs inevitably pushes them out of true.

I have aeroheads on my mtb and deep-Vs on the cross bike. Thousands of miles on each, never needed truing. They are on the heavy side, though.
adrien is offline  
Reply
Old 09-07-07 | 06:56 AM
  #8  
5
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: Killadelphia

Bikes: 2007 Fuji Roubaix LTD, 2005 Bianchi Pista

I just had a long conversation with one of the top wheelbuilders in my area (his shop rep is based on wheelbuilding), who really tilted for Velocity rims. In his opinion, the Mavic quality has taken a downturn in recent years. He said he's seen far too many of the Open Pro eyelets crack and break, and the shim used in welding the rim come loose and fall inside. The extent of the problems is such that, though he used to be all-Mavic on his personal wheels, he has since shifted completely to Velocity, which is really putting his money where his mouth is. I was quite convinced by his rationale.

As for me, I already have a set of Velocity (front Aerohead, rear Deep-V), and haven't had any complaints whatsoever.
michaelmc is offline  
Reply
Old 09-07-07 | 07:03 AM
  #9  
5
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: Killadelphia

Bikes: 2007 Fuji Roubaix LTD, 2005 Bianchi Pista

Originally Posted by adrien
sounds like the aeroheads are your best bet.

I'm about 230, and can't keep open pros true (a lot of torque on standing climbs inevitably pushes them out of true.

I have aeroheads on my mtb and deep-Vs on the cross bike. Thousands of miles on each, never needed truing. They are on the heavy side, though.
The Deep Vs are heavy, but the Aeroheads compare quite favorably to the Open Pros:

Aerohead claimed mass: 405g
Aerohead O/C claimed mass: 400g
Open Pro claimed mass: 435g

From weightweenies:
Aerohead measured mass: 435g (from 1999, YMMV)
Aerohead O/C measured mass: 395g
Open Pro measured mass: 430g average
michaelmc is offline  
Reply
Old 09-07-07 | 07:13 AM
  #10  
Back in the Sooner State
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
From: Norman, OK
Velocity aeroheads.
ImprezaDrvr is offline  
Reply
Old 09-07-07 | 07:49 AM
  #11  
waterrockets's Avatar
Making a kilometer blurry
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 26,170
Likes: 93
From: Austin (near TX)

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Originally Posted by adrien
I'm about 230, and can't keep open pros true (a lot of torque on standing climbs inevitably pushes them out of true.
It's not the torque. Your power doesn't vary spoke tension anywhere near as much as sideloads when swinging the bike out of the saddle. Doing this on climbs compounds the problem as more of your weight is on the rear wheel anyway.

It's not your power though.
waterrockets is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.