Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

50 outer chain ring on triple?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

50 outer chain ring on triple?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-08 | 02:59 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
50 outer chain ring on triple?

I have an Ultegra triple with 52/39/30 and would like to go to 50/39/30. Is this a big deal (need to adjust front shifters, rear etc.) or simply a matter of changing out the rings?

Thanks!
dave-j is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-08 | 03:00 PM
  #2  
80vette's Avatar
Gear Head
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl., Dallas, Tx.

Bikes: 07' Colnago CLX, 04' Allez,03' KHS, 79' super leTour304

Simply a matter of changing the rings.
80vette is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-08 | 03:05 PM
  #3  
AEO's Avatar
AEO
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

you should also lower the front dérailleur since having it set too high results in poor shifting performance.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-08 | 03:22 PM
  #4  
kudude's Avatar
slow up hills
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,931
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA

Bikes: Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic

^^ then you'll have to adjust the front der. still not a big deal, though
kudude is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-08 | 04:03 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,879
Likes: 6
From: Northern California
Try it. It might work fine with no other changes. Lowering your FD might cause pickup problems with the middle ring. The difference between 50 and 52 is pretty small.
johnny99 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-08 | 04:05 PM
  #6  
icyclist's Avatar
Spin Meister
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 74
From: California, USA

Bikes: Trek Émonda, 1961 Follis (French) road bike (I'm the original owner), a fixie, a mountain bike, etc.

I also have to wonder why you would bother to do this, especially if you aren't using a smaller inner chainring, like a 26 or even a 24. What do you gain?
__________________
This post is a natural product. Slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and are in no way to be considered flaws or defects.
icyclist is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-08 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
Tandem Mountain Climber
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 3
From: San Mateo, CA

Bikes: Calfee Tandem, Litespeed Gravel, SuperSix Evo HM, Larry vs. Harry Bullitt (e-cargo)

Why not swap the 39 for a 42, and use the middle ring more?

Middle ring has the best chainline too (or should).
uspspro is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-08 | 04:23 PM
  #8  
icyclist's Avatar
Spin Meister
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 74
From: California, USA

Bikes: Trek Émonda, 1961 Follis (French) road bike (I'm the original owner), a fixie, a mountain bike, etc.

>Why not swap the 39 for a 42, and use the middle ring more?<

Why would swapping out the 39 for a 42 give more use of the middle ring? Wouldn't the fitness - or lack of fitness - have more to do with the number of appropriate teeth on a ring?
__________________
This post is a natural product. Slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and are in no way to be considered flaws or defects.
icyclist is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-08 | 04:39 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, Ca

Bikes: 09 Specialized Tricross Sport

Originally Posted by icyclist
>Why not swap the 39 for a 42, and use the middle ring more?<

Why would swapping out the 39 for a 42 give more use of the middle ring?
Because the bigger middle ring will give you higher gearing per whatever cog you're in and you won't as often have to upshift, e.g. if you just want a quick sprint or are going down a short downhill section, you might not want to change rings. That 39/12 is just not high enough whereas the 42/12 might be.

I actually do have a triple with 42/52 rings and I like the 42 a lot for a quick sprint when I just don't want to change rings. I seldom if ever use my big ring. A 42 tooth ring is what you'll often see on 1x9 set-ups for just that reason.
thirdin77 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-16-08 | 04:44 PM
  #10  
icyclist's Avatar
Spin Meister
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 74
From: California, USA

Bikes: Trek Émonda, 1961 Follis (French) road bike (I'm the original owner), a fixie, a mountain bike, etc.

>That 39/12 is just not high enough whereas the 42/12 might be.<

I understand. However, some riders, depending on strength/age, etc., might be better able to make use of the 39, which I'm guessing is a lot of people. Otherwise many bikes wouldn't come equipped that way. In my case, I like riding hills, and I find I use the bottom end of my 39 a lot, even on steep grades - the 42 wouldn't help me much.
__________________
This post is a natural product. Slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and are in no way to be considered flaws or defects.
icyclist is offline  
Reply
Old 06-17-08 | 11:26 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Thanks for the responses.

My reasoning is that I rarely get onto the 52. But I spin out of the 39 too easily. When I do go to the 52, the double shift to a larger rear cog is pretty large.

Truth be told, I would rather go to a compact, but that requires all sorts of changes and expense. The idea of switching to a 42 middle ring is interesting. I would then need to go to my small ring more on the hills and wouldn't that also increase the cross-chaining?

My rides are hilly, but not mountainous. So, the choice is, would I rather spend more time in my middle ring, with slightly more time on the small ring or more time on the big ring and almost no time on the smallest ring?

What do you guys think?
dave-j is offline  
Reply
Old 06-17-08 | 11:35 AM
  #12  
Solo Rider, always DFL
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
From: Beacon, NY

Bikes: Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur

The difference between a 50 and a 52 is not actually that big if you run the gear calculations. What kind of cassette are you working with, and would another cassette give you a better range of options, potentially?
superslomo is offline  
Reply
Old 06-17-08 | 12:26 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Cassette is 10 speed 12-27.
dave-j is offline  
Reply
Old 06-17-08 | 02:40 PM
  #14  
icyclist's Avatar
Spin Meister
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 74
From: California, USA

Bikes: Trek Émonda, 1961 Follis (French) road bike (I'm the original owner), a fixie, a mountain bike, etc.

If you look at a gear chart, with a 50t and a 39t, you go up from about an 88 gear inch on the 39t, to 90.0 on the 50t. You get an additional three gears, approx. 96, 104 and 113.

With your current 52, you make exactly the same jump, from the 12t to the 15t, this time from about 88 to about 94. You again get an additional three gears, approx. 100, 108 and 117.

So you'd have to make the same amount of jump when going from 39t to 50t as you do now w/ 52t. What you really get out of the smaller chainring is a closer jump, from 88 to 90, instead of your current 88 to 94.

Going with a 42 might make more sense because you would pick up an extra high gear in your middle ring, which is what your looking for, and you wouldn't lose anything off the low end (it would be there w/ the 30t).
__________________
This post is a natural product. Slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and are in no way to be considered flaws or defects.
icyclist is offline  
Reply
Old 06-17-08 | 06:31 PM
  #15  
btographer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 181
Likes: 1
From: Chicago

Bikes: Madone 5.2 Trek Pilot 2.1 Trek 7300 FX

Originally Posted by dave-j
I have an Ultegra triple with 52/39/30 and would like to go to 50/39/30. Is this a big deal (need to adjust front shifters, rear etc.) or simply a matter of changing out the rings?

Thanks!
My bike came with a 52/42/30 and I changed the rings to a 50/39/30. Just lower the front derailer slightly and it works fine.
btographer is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-08 | 08:14 AM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Thanks toall! Have to chew on this a while...
dave-j is offline  
Reply
Old 06-18-08 | 04:13 PM
  #17  
icyclist's Avatar
Spin Meister
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 74
From: California, USA

Bikes: Trek Émonda, 1961 Follis (French) road bike (I'm the original owner), a fixie, a mountain bike, etc.

My final thought - leave your gearing alone. All the gears you want are there. You have to make a jump to the larger chainring at some point, anyway, once you get up to speed. You're not going to gain or lose anything by changing either the outer or middle chainring. OK, you could lose a few grams by dropping two teeth with a 50T chainring - that's all.
__________________
This post is a natural product. Slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and are in no way to be considered flaws or defects.
icyclist is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.