![]() |
Originally Posted by heyguys
(Post 7294136)
in 2008 thats not really something to be proud of
OTOH, I'm not impressed with people with thousands of songs merely copied from their buddies. The point was that I enjoy listening to music since I've been using iPods for longer and more than nearly everyone here (>5000 hours over nearly 7 years), just not on my bike. -murray |
Originally Posted by scotch
(Post 7283833)
|
i don't know about you guys but my MP3 player has adjustable volume.
no one would be stupid enough to blast their music and block out all noise. keep it low. don't use noise cancelling earbuds, stay on the side of the road always. and listen to rage against the machine, ACDC, evanescence; ride hard and before you know it 60km has gone by. |
Originally Posted by wideAMG
(Post 7298304)
no one would be stupid enough to blast their music and block out all noise.
keep it low. don't use noise cancelling earbuds, stay on the side of the road always. |
Deaf people ride bikes, too.
I'm sure that they wish they could hear music from an mp3 player, whether while riding or not. :deadhorse: |
Originally Posted by umd
(Post 7298335)
Don't bet on that
then its natural selection. some still ride without helmets. go figure. |
Originally Posted by wideAMG
(Post 7298794)
true.
then its natural selection. some still ride without helmets. go figure.
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
(Post 7298520)
Deaf people ride bikes, too.
I'm sure that they wish they could hear music from an mp3 player, whether while riding or not. :deadhorse: |
One ear bud? Volume down? Huh? Maybe if you're listening to some podcast or something.
For me, I want the best sound possible. For that, isolation is necessary. Now, consider this. I ride a two lane rural highway on my commute. I SEE everything that approaches front and back EVERY F'N TIME. Why the hell do I need to hear them too? Explain that to me you natural selection and safety nanny goons! Come up with the scenario for me that says I need to hear em. |
Originally Posted by daredevil
(Post 7298987)
One ear bud? Volume down? Huh? Maybe if you're listening to some podcast or something.
For me, I want the best sound possible. For that, isolation is necessary. Now, consider this. I ride a two lane rural highway on my commute. I SEE everything that approaches front and back EVERY F'N TIME. Why the hell do I need to hear them too? Explain that to me you natural selection and safety nanny goons! Come up with the scenario for me that says I need to hear em. |
Originally Posted by umd
(Post 7299093)
You do what you want. For me the music is backround noise. It adds to the ambiance, but it isn't the primary objective. It is possible to listen to the music and still use all of your senses. I don't see the point in completely cutting one off intentionally, but I know that's what you will say about me not using a mirror, so I'll just leave it at that. To each his/her own. Whatever makes you feel safe. But if I come up on you and you are in my way and you don't hear me asking you to move over because you are compltely isolating yourself, then I'll smack you. Just you. Of course that scenario shouldn't happen because you are always looking in your mirror, but I encounter people like that all the time.
And enough of the threats internet tough guy. :rolleyes: I'd be embarrassed. |
Originally Posted by daredevil
(Post 7299117)
Do you ride in traffic without a mirror? Well, natural selection I guess.
And enough of the threats internet tough guy. :rolleyes: I'd be embarrassed. But regardless, I do try to follow traffic laws, and whether you like it or not, riding with earphones on both ears is always illegal and riding without a mirror never is. |
Originally Posted by umd
(Post 7299151)
But regardless, I do try to follow traffic laws, and whether you like it or not, riding with earphones on both ears is always illegal and riding without a mirror never is.
|
Originally Posted by daredevil
(Post 7298987)
For me, I want the best sound possible. For that, isolation is necessary.
When I can't even hear the drivetrain because of the wind noise (17-20 mph into a 15-mph headwind is fairly loud), then it's too loud, especially for two hours of riding. I've ridden before with either isolating earbuds or good earplugs, and I'd usually feel pretty relaxed when I got home. After my ride earlier this evening without earbuds or plugs, I was sitting there on the john, noticing that my ears were still ringing -- which wasn't a problem after rides with hearing protection. |
Originally Posted by uke
(Post 7299179)
Do you have documented proof of this? That riding with earphones on both ears is always illegal, everywhere, every time?
Edit: I have admitted I was wrong below VVV |
Originally Posted by umd
(Post 7299219)
No. I was referring to just the US. I suppose its possible that somewhere in the US allows it but I would doubt it. I leave it as an exercise to the readers to disprove me.
http://www.yourcelebritystuff.com/wp...-of-my-ass.jpg |
Originally Posted by uke
(Post 7299234)
Got it. You don't actually have any proof that riding with earphones is always illegal everywhere, every time in the US, but you're going to lie that it's always illegal, everywhere, and every time in the US until proven otherwise for the sake of an online argument.
http://www.yourcelebritystuff.com/wp...-of-my-ass.jpg Note: for the purposes of this discussion regarding earphones, hearing aid devices are excepted. Edit: I have admitted I was wrong below VVV |
Originally Posted by umd
(Post 7299259)
I haven't looked at the vehicle code for every state to prove that lights are required at night but I think it is a safe bet.
I'm not sure how many consecutive times you need to be proven full of ***** but we're already at two, so I'll be off to do something else now. |
Originally Posted by uke
(Post 7299234)
Got it. You don't actually have any proof that riding with earphones is always illegal everywhere, every time in the US, but you're going to lie that it's always illegal, everywhere, and every time in the US until proven otherwise for the sake of an online argument.
|
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
(Post 7299274)
I have three PDFs of DC bike laws, and none of them contain the words "headphones", "earphones", or even "music". So, yeah, even here, where a cyclist mayor is trying to push cycling further into the mainstream (as if it even needs his help anyway), using a music player while riding isn't (yet) an issue.
|
Originally Posted by daredevil
(Post 7299117)
Do you ride in traffic without a mirror?
Whew. It must be the iPod that keeps me safe. |
Originally Posted by uke
(Post 7299268)
I'm not sure how many consecutive times you need to be proven full of ***** but we're already at two, so I'll be off to do something else now.
Originally Posted by logical fallacies
straw man argument is one that misrepresents a position in order to make it appear weaker than it actually is, refutes this misrepresentation of the position, and then concludes that the real position has been refuted. This, of course, is a fallacy, because the position that has been claimed to be refuted is different to that which has actually been refuted; the real target of the argument is untouched by it.
In any event, it most certainly IS illegal in California and I live in California so I will not do it. Of course, you can call my hypocritical too if you want, because I will admit that I do not stop at stop signs if I know there are no cars and I will sometimes roll through a light after stopping if is clear. Edit: I have admitted I was wrong below VVV |
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
(Post 7299274)
I have three PDFs of DC bike laws, and none of them contain the words "headphones", "earphones", or even "music". So, yeah, even here, where a cyclist mayor is trying to push cycling further into the mainstream (as if it even needs his help anyway), using a music player while riding isn't (yet) an issue.
Originally Posted by uke
(Post 7299284)
I've got my local laws in Illinois as well, and they don't saw a word about any of the above. He was just lying to try to have the last word. Sad, but you see that a lot when people try to control other people's behavior.
|
Originally Posted by patentcad
(Post 7299296)
I've only been doing it without incident in the NY Metro area for 20 years. So far so good.
Whew. It must be the iPod that keeps me safe. I don't question you riding without a mirror at all. In your situation I may not either. One thing I know for sure though is that I wouldn't listen to music if I couldn't see these trucks coming. |
Sorry guys, I get a little pissy on days I don't get a good ride in. Tomorrow is another day and another ride. Have a good night :beer:
|
Not to come to umd defense but it is illegal to ride in Illionis with a headset in (other then a cellphone headset or hearing aid).
Illinois law states that you may not wear a headset while driving. Headsets are defined as any device, other than a hearing aid, that allows the wearer to hear or receive electronic communications. (The use of a single-sided headset or earpiece with a cellular or other mobile telephone is permitted.) Motorcycle, motor-driven cycle and moped operators may use intercom helmets that permit drivers and/or passengers to speak to one another. And since you are required to follow the rules of the road this would apply to cyclist too. (Also interesting umd is putting for a legal argument while starting a thread about no handed riding which is illegal in most states.) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.