Mixed tire size?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mixed tire size?
Older steel road bike, has 700 x 22 front, 700 x 20 on the rear. My question is: Is there any advantage in mixing size re: stability, altering cornering, etc? Also, would the 20 be just a method of fine tuning the gearing? Your thoughts.......thanks
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nope ! Picked this up as used equipment, a pair of NET 97 wheels that had these mounted on em. I thought they were 700 x 23 until I got around to remove em. I am just ignorant as to what the application would be for these, particularly in two different sizes.....
#5
Generic Title
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,927
Bikes: 2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 224
Bikes: Time
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It was likely not done for any riding improvement, might just be a mixed set of tires.
Actually, conti claims improved performance on the Continental Attack & Force tires with a front at 22 and a rear at 23. Some lighter rides even go down to 20 or 19 on the front. I believe it's really going to come down to rider preference and riding style. Personally, I ride 22 or 23 on both front and rear.
If they tires aren't old, I'd just flip them 22 rear and 20 front and ride it until they need replacing. I'm gathering since it's an older steel bike you wont doing any racing on it. If you are, consider the tires you race on carefully.
Actually, conti claims improved performance on the Continental Attack & Force tires with a front at 22 and a rear at 23. Some lighter rides even go down to 20 or 19 on the front. I believe it's really going to come down to rider preference and riding style. Personally, I ride 22 or 23 on both front and rear.
If they tires aren't old, I'd just flip them 22 rear and 20 front and ride it until they need replacing. I'm gathering since it's an older steel bike you wont doing any racing on it. If you are, consider the tires you race on carefully.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152
Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
do a rollout test on different sized tires and see if your statement is true. It is not, and bigger tires generally have a bigger diameter and thus affects how your gearing feels. Sheldon Brown talks about this at length in his gain ratio section.
#9
Time for a change.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Going back 15 years or so and Kona MTB's used to have a wider tyre on the front than the rear.
To be honest- I have never ridden on a 2.0 but as I have lost the front on a 2.3 on a dry road- I do not fancy a narrower tyre unless I am going in straight lines.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
#10
Making a kilometer blurry
Yes, fatter on the front will aid cornering traction, while a skinnier rear lowers rolling resistance where it's needed most.
Still, when I'm in the drops cornering, my slides seem to be front and rear with equal frequency, so I don't see any reason to go with different sizes.
Still, when I'm in the drops cornering, my slides seem to be front and rear with equal frequency, so I don't see any reason to go with different sizes.