Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

how much difference in 185 grams?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

how much difference in 185 grams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-04 | 10:10 AM
  #1  
ClevelandGuy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
how much difference in 185 grams?

Checked the weight difference online for Mavic Ksyrium Elite vrs. the SSC SL.

Comes to 185 grams lighter, 6.6 ounces. Over six ounces seems like a lot to me but never experienced that difference in weight for a comparison. Anyone know what its like? Been ridding on the Elite for years now but often have wondered what that much less rotating weight would do for the ride. Worth it? or would the most noticable difference be a much lighter wallet ?
ClevelandGuy is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-04 | 05:40 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, England

Bikes: Giant CFR 1, Specialized Allez Comp

In my experience, all things being equal, as long as you're not cycling up hills all day then 185 grams extra weight on your wheels isn't going to be all that noticeable. Having said this i'd go for the lightest wheelset you can afford because you'll have a more enjoyable ride if nothing else. To me it's worth paying the extra money for this alone. Cycling is supposed to be fun after all.
Provence is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-04 | 06:20 PM
  #3  
Dutchy's Avatar
We drive on the left.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, South Australia
According to the mavic site

The Mavic site has the Elites at 780/990 = 1770g The SSC SL's at 660/840 = 1500g, that is 270g which is more significant.

CHEERS.

Mark
Dutchy is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-04 | 09:10 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Palatine IL
Rotational weight is more important than static weight. If I remember correctly from my engineering classes, the actual weight that you can take off rotational weight is equal to 4 x's static weight. I think having lighter wheels are very important to a cyclist.
bfong is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-04 | 11:14 PM
  #5  
Banned.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,761
Likes: 3
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana

Bikes: 84 Trek 660 Suntour Superbe; 87 Giant Rincon Shimano XT; 07 Mercian Vincitore Campy Veloce

Originally Posted by bfong
Rotational weight is more important than static weight. If I remember correctly from my engineering classes, the actual weight that you can take off rotational weight is equal to 4 x's static weight. I think having lighter wheels are very important to a cyclist.
Unless you buy ultralight racing wheels then they are not strong enough for on the road riding everyday, then a slightly heavier wheel will be better. If your racing then you usually need 2 wheel sets, one set you train on that is cheaper to buy and thus heavier and the other most expensive lighter rims for racing only.
froze is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-04 | 11:17 AM
  #6  
el Inglés's Avatar
El Inglés
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Benidorm , Alicante , ESPAÑA

Bikes: road ( Mendiz ) & mtb (crap )

Originally Posted by ClevelandGuy
Checked the weight difference online for Mavic Ksyrium Elite vrs. the SSC SL.

Comes to 185 grams lighter, 6.6 ounces. Over six ounces seems like a lot to me but never experienced that difference in weight for a comparison. Anyone know what its like? Been ridding on the Elite for years now but often have wondered what that much less rotating weight would do for the ride. Worth it? or would the most noticable difference be a much lighter wallet ?

Probably .
el Inglés is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-04 | 11:31 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
From: So Cal

Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 6.2

Pedaling a half pound less{thats about 270g isnt it?}for miles at a 95 cadence will show.
shokhead is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-04 | 01:45 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 3
From: Montreal

Bikes: Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid

Rotating mass makes itself felt most when accelerating, so you will notice the difference in stop and go commuting traffic. Not much in a time trial at a pretty steady speed.
AndrewP is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-04 | 05:12 PM
  #9  
sch
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,056
Likes: 166
From: Mountain Brook. AL
The biggest factor will be your overall average speed.
I agree with those who say that wheel wgt differences
that are in the several hundred gram range are primarily
an acceleration limiting factor. The wind resistance of
the wheel is a bigger factor than the weight as your
average speed goes above 18-20mph, especially above 26mph. Time trialists use shrouded rear wheels and oversize rims optimised for low air resistance and gladly
ignore the significant weight penalty these impose because the benefit at 26-30mph of low air resistance
greatly outweighs the weight penalty. Everything else
being equal the lighter the bike the less energy needed
for a given speed but 6-12 oz is the difference between
a waterbottle full and 1/3d empty or a dump before the
ride. Steve
sch is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.