Crank length
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Crank length
I am in the market for some upgrades and my cahnset is probably first. I am happy with my current crank length ( it is standard as fitted to my Cannondale R500) but I dont know what length it is. When I measure it to try and replicate the length is the measurement taken from centre to centre (crank bolt - pedal bolt) I saaume so as this is the only feasible measurement to take.
What would be the difference in going longer or shorter with the crank arms ?
Thanks
What would be the difference in going longer or shorter with the crank arms ?
Thanks
#2
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Most cranks have their measurements stamped on the inside of the arms. They are measured center of the BB spindle to center of the pedal spindle.
A shorter length will promote a faster spin than with a longer crank in the same gear and at the same speed but you will be unable to apply as much torque as with a longer crank in the same gear. You might want to play around with different values in the gear calculator on Sheldon Brown's website to get an idea. He also offers a pretty decent explanation on the subject and a comparison using what he calls "gain ratios".
A shorter length will promote a faster spin than with a longer crank in the same gear and at the same speed but you will be unable to apply as much torque as with a longer crank in the same gear. You might want to play around with different values in the gear calculator on Sheldon Brown's website to get an idea. He also offers a pretty decent explanation on the subject and a comparison using what he calls "gain ratios".
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
Last edited by khuon; 03-08-04 at 05:35 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 603
Bikes: Torelli Titanio with full Chorus and Eurus wheels
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by khuon
A shorter length will promote a faster spin than with a longer crank in the same gear and at the same speed
Nope. In either case, your gear ratio is the same, so your cadence doesn't change with a change in crank length.
#4
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally Posted by Xtrmyorick
Nope. In either case, your gear ratio is the same, so your cadence doesn't change with a change in crank length.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#5
Crank Crushing Redneck
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: A van down by the river.
Posts: 2,600
Bikes: Bikes are environmentally damaging
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Xtrmyorick
Nope. In either case, your gear ratio is the same, so your cadence doesn't change with a change in crank length.
Applied torque is increased however with longer cranks which does improve your ability to grind a bigger gear at lower cadence and on climbs.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 603
Bikes: Torelli Titanio with full Chorus and Eurus wheels
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDaBikinMan
Correct but your ability to spin a properly sized crank is improved over one that is too long for your legs.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
The constant factor is the force you apply at the pedals. With shorter cranks, you generate less torque, so have to turn a lower gear.
Since smaller cranks have a smaller turning radius, 1 rev takes less work. You can spin faster for the same workrate.
The end result at the tyre is the same, but the pedaling style is different.
Since smaller cranks have a smaller turning radius, 1 rev takes less work. You can spin faster for the same workrate.
The end result at the tyre is the same, but the pedaling style is different.
#8
Bananaed
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly-ish
Posts: 6,426
Bikes: 2001 Lemond Nevada City (only the frame remains)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There's a lot of misinformation going on here, or at least misstated information (or at the very least misinterpreted by yours truly )
Longer cranks give you effectively shorter gearing (i.e. similar to being in a "smaller" gear"). It takes less force against the pedal to turn the same gear at the same speed (although there is the same force being applied at the cranks assuming all other constants, this is from the effect of leverage).
Otoh, many spinners prefer smaller cranks. This has nothing to do with force but just that they prefer the smaller circle the smaller cranks produce for spinning at high RPMs.
Longer cranks give you effectively shorter gearing (i.e. similar to being in a "smaller" gear"). It takes less force against the pedal to turn the same gear at the same speed (although there is the same force being applied at the cranks assuming all other constants, this is from the effect of leverage).
Otoh, many spinners prefer smaller cranks. This has nothing to do with force but just that they prefer the smaller circle the smaller cranks produce for spinning at high RPMs.
#9
Bananaed
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly-ish
Posts: 6,426
Bikes: 2001 Lemond Nevada City (only the frame remains)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Brillig
(although there is the same force being applied at the cranks
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 816
Bikes: Raleigh, Benotto, Schwinn, Trek
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by SamDaBikinMan
Correct but your ability to spin a properly sized crank is improved over one that is too long for your legs.
Applied torque is increased however with longer cranks which does improve your ability to grind a bigger gear at lower cadence and on climbs.
Applied torque is increased however with longer cranks which does improve your ability to grind a bigger gear at lower cadence and on climbs.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 180
Bikes: Greenspeed GTC (Sheila) 2001 model, raleigh S.U.B. touring (Francis the talking M.U.L.E.) 2003 model, Marin Belvadere (Ursa) 2006 model,
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDaBikinMan
Correct but your ability to spin a properly sized crank is improved over one that is too long for your legs.
Applied torque is increased however with longer cranks which does improve your ability to grind a bigger gear at lower cadence and on climbs.
Applied torque is increased however with longer cranks which does improve your ability to grind a bigger gear at lower cadence and on climbs.
that and if the crank is too long for your legs (i have very short legs thank you very much), you have a better chanse of blowing out your knees.
i personally use 160mm on my recumbent and 152mm (child's cranks) on my tourer which is very short, but then so am i. (i'm about to change the cranks out on my tourer to 160mm as well. may try 165mm but that might be too long for me.) i do have a harder time keeping up w/ other riders because of the smaller cranks. it's noticable, but my knees don't hurt so i figure if they want to ride w/ me they can just WAIT for my slow a**. otherwise i'll see em when i do.
cheers
kat
#12
MaNiC!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
Posts: 1,600
Bikes: 2004 Cervelo Soloist 105, 2005 Apollo Apex, 2006 SCOTT Speedster S30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride with 175mm cranks on my new 58cm Cervelo.... my old Apollo had 172.5mm cranks. I have gotten used to these cranks now, and I am now spinning on the flats at up to 110 rpm and sitting anywhere between 90 and 97rpm on climbs. I do feel more comfortable sitting at 85rpm at times, whereas the old cranks provided a "pushing" feeling of being in a too big gear at 90rpm. It's really a matter of finding what is a good length for your style of riding, and a good length for your leg length.... I have really long legs, I have a 79cm saddle height (measured from BB). But my torso wants me to ride a 56cm bike...go figure.
Brendon
Brendon
#13
Oh God, He's back!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,021
Bikes: Paramount
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It appears that the crank length is more of a relationship between the thigh length to crank length than anything else. If TL/CL= ideal, then you lose efficency if you go below that ratio, and you will feel overwhelmed (for lack of a better word) if the ratio goes above Ideal.
My wife is 5'-5" but uses a 175 crank, I on the other hand at 6' pefer a 172.5.
If I change the cranks to a different size on her bike, she will immediately notice the difference without me telling her.
My wife is 5'-5" but uses a 175 crank, I on the other hand at 6' pefer a 172.5.
If I change the cranks to a different size on her bike, she will immediately notice the difference without me telling her.
__________________
I can't ride and Frown!
I can't ride and Frown!
#14
Bananaed
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly-ish
Posts: 6,426
Bikes: 2001 Lemond Nevada City (only the frame remains)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by 1oldRoadie
It appears that the crank length is more of a relationship between the thigh length to crank length than anything else.
Seems reasonable I guess. Are there any guides (TL to CL charts) developped for this?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 180
Bikes: Greenspeed GTC (Sheila) 2001 model, raleigh S.U.B. touring (Francis the talking M.U.L.E.) 2003 model, Marin Belvadere (Ursa) 2006 model,
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brillig
So two people with identical thigh lengths (even if they are different heights) would use the same crank length?
Seems reasonable I guess. Are there any guides (TL to CL charts) developped for this?
Seems reasonable I guess. Are there any guides (TL to CL charts) developped for this?
think sheldon brown goes into crank length farely well. you could try there first.
cheers
kat
#16
Direct Hit Not Required
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 6,193
Bikes: Leopard DC1, Ridley X-Fire, GT Zaskar 9r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
More info on Crank Length than you could shake a stick at.
https://www.cranklength.info/
I'm 5'5" with a 30.5" inseam and I ride 170 on my road bike and 165 on my fixed gear. The 165 defininate feels more natural.
https://www.cranklength.info/
I'm 5'5" with a 30.5" inseam and I ride 170 on my road bike and 165 on my fixed gear. The 165 defininate feels more natural.