Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

54.5 cm = 54cm or 55cm?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

54.5 cm = 54cm or 55cm?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-04, 10:53 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
parakeethouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 54

Bikes: Merckx Majestic, Fuji Pro, Bianchi BuSS, Bianchi Fixed gear

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
54.5 cm = 54cm or 55cm?

My frame size should be 54.5cm CC

Theres a bike I really want but they only have 54cm

Is that gonna be a problem or should I most definately go with a 55cm?
I mean its only 1cm...
What can I do to overcome this 1cm?

What are your experiences?

thanks for any help!
parakeethouse is offline  
Old 04-30-04, 11:01 AM
  #2  
more ape than man
 
timmhaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by parakeethouse
My frame size should be 54.5cm CC

Theres a bike I really want but they only have 54cm

Is that gonna be a problem or should I most definately go with a 55cm?
I mean its only 1cm...
What can I do to overcome this 1cm?

What are your experiences?

thanks for any help!
if your looking at a specific brand bike, the frame sizes probably increminent in 2's (like 54, 56, 58 etc.), so you may not be able to choose 55 anyway.
timmhaan is offline  
Old 04-30-04, 11:18 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
What top tube length do you want. this is more important than +- 1cm of exposed seatpost.
MichaelW is offline  
Old 04-30-04, 11:21 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Avalanche325's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,162

Bikes: Litespeed Firenze / GT Avalanche

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Keep in mind that the typical "frame size" measurement is the seatpost length. Sometimes from the BB to the top of the seat tube, and sometimes from the BB to the center of the top tube (I see now that you said CC). The big thing is that this is NOT the most important measurement. The most important single measurement for a good fit is the top tube length.

As far as the seat tube goes, adjusting the saddle height takes care of that, within a reasonable range of course. What you need to get as close as possible is the reach. Different length stems are the big adjustment there. Like timmhaan said, most brands are made in 2cm increments. Some are on the odd numbers and some on even. CC and CT can be 1cm differance right there.

I did test ride a brand that came in 56 and 59 and I just didn't didn't fit on either one.

If you haven't already done so. Go to one of the on line fit calculators and find out what top tube and stem length you need. https://www.competitivecyclist.com/za...LCULATOR_INTRO The manufacturers have all of these measurements in their frame geometry specs. Then ride some bikes that are in the ballpark. A good LBS will swap stems with no charge, and should even do so for a serious test ride. I found that the more you know about sizing before you go into LBSs, the better off you will be. Most still do the "Standover.......looks good to me" method.
Avalanche325 is offline  
Old 04-30-04, 11:26 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
parakeethouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 54

Bikes: Merckx Majestic, Fuji Pro, Bianchi BuSS, Bianchi Fixed gear

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks much, I did do the Competitive Cyclists measurement and have the figures at home. Will check'em when I get home.
This really, really helps out alot.

WOW, THIS FORUM ROCKS!
parakeethouse is offline  
Old 04-30-04, 11:51 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
miamijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times in 78 Posts
Remember the figure you get for a frame size are irrelevant because every company builds thier frames and measures them differently.

You want a frame with 'X' standover height and a top tube length to match your body....Dont buy a bike a because its a 55 or 54 or 68. Buy it because it fits.

Its like this...you can buy 2 different bikes that fit perfectly. One could be a 54 the other could be a 57. The numerical value doesnt matter.
miamijim is offline  
Old 04-30-04, 11:57 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Auto calculators cannot tell you what stem and TT combination you should ride, they can only make suggestions based on averagely proportioned riders using the bike in a standard style.
You can move the bar position up and back, to give a touring style (or for triathalon position with aerobars), or forward and down for an aerodynamic time-trial position.
You can use different size frames to achieve a suitable TT length, ie get a bigger size if you want a longer frame. Brands vary in the proportions of height/length,a nd there are different styles such as compact frames, where standover clearance is irrelevant.

You can achieve your desired reach with a variety of TT/stem combinations. Its best to balance theres 2 factor, extra long or short stems can affect the steering response. For your size frame, a 10cm stem would be normal, but you can change +- 2cm with acceptable results.
check out the peter white cycle fit guide.
MichaelW is offline  
Old 04-30-04, 12:40 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Don Cook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 816

Bikes: Raleigh, Benotto, Schwinn, Trek

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If you would be theoretically perfectly matched to a 54.5cm frame then either the 54 or the 55 would be just fine. There is far more rider comfort and fit derived from the saddle, saddle position fore/aft, saddle position vertically, stem height, stem length, adjustment of the drop bars, than you would ever be able to find in a 1cm difference in the frame seat tube length.
Don Cook is offline  
Old 04-30-04, 05:00 PM
  #9  
condor63
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Ride the sizes within your stature and decide,as changing stems and crank's can be a hassle- not including one could reach the perfect fit by upping to the next frame size, the LBS will fit for free on a new purchase most of the time. I'm 5'8" with a 31.6" inseam,LBS suggested 54cm Trek 5200 after a professional fitting,but I went with the 56cm and felt less constrained and breathing was easier, on the 54cm it seemed I alway's needed to conform to the bike to get comfort,56cm comfort came naturally.

Last edited by condor63; 04-30-04 at 05:06 PM.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.