Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Look 595 vs. Look 586

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Look 595 vs. Look 586

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-09, 07:20 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,064
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hocam
Oh FFS, a stiffer frame is not going to make your sprint x mph faster, or make you climb any faster either. You guys have bought the marketing bull**** hook line and sinker. Now you're in a tussy because some marketing BS doesn't mix well with other marketing BS. Go ride the bikes and choose the one you like, stop worrying about what frame is stiffer or more laterally compliant or climbs better or whatever.

Weight and aerodynamics aside, the only thing that makes you sprint or climb faster is you.
Party pooper!
Sinn is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 07:24 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
triplebutted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,880

Bikes: Lemond, Gios, Fuji, Trek, too many to write

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Are you planning on getting this frame @ TwoWheelsOnePlanet?
triplebutted is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 07:31 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Look

I think you should first figure out if the geometry fits you. The 595 and 586 have slightly different geos, so that's where most people feel the difference. According to Look, the 586 is more climbing specific, but I don't think you'd notice much difference between the 2 on hilly terrain. I do believe that the lugged structure of the 595 will be a more solid, snappier bike. You are fine on the origin, the ultra would be better for a very tall powerfull sprinter on a very large frame where flex maybe an issue. You won't be able to flex any of the frames. I had 2 identical 595s built up, one for hilly races and one for crits:

look_black_r2.jpg2nd_baby.jpg
karesz3 is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:04 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,064
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by karesz3
I think you should first figure out if the geometry fits you. The 595 and 586 have slightly different geos, so that's where most people feel the difference. According to Look, the 586 is more climbing specific, but I don't think you'd notice much difference between the 2 on hilly terrain. I do believe that the lugged structure of the 595 will be a more solid, snappier bike. You are fine on the origin, the ultra would be better for a very tall powerfull sprinter on a very large frame where flex maybe an issue. You won't be able to flex any of the frames. I had 2 identical 595s built up, one for hilly races and one for crits:

Attachment 97421Attachment 97423
Your bikes are hot. Which is for crits and which for hills? I can't tell.

Your answers sounds a lot like the answers I am getting from LBSs and from those who have had experience with the frames. I highly value a solid and responsive bike. If I go with Look, it will definitely be the 595 origin.

Some have said that they thought the larger sized 595s have a flexy head-tube area, whereas the larger sized 586s have a stiffer front end with a less stiff bottom bracket. But they almost all agree that the 595 is, hands down, the better choice for me because I will be getting the smallest frame, the XS/49. They say that the shorter tubing makes the front end stiffer on the smaller sized 595s than on the larger 595s.

Sounds logical. I will, of course, have to see which fits me best and get a decent test ride on the frame before pulling the trigger.
Sinn is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:36 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Look

The black and white was the lighter one built with Campy Record and carbon stem/bar.
I don't have that bike anymore, I couldn't justify having 2 high end bikes. I ride size 56 (Look calls it a large), and this is by far the most solid front end bike I have every ridden.
There are a lot of good options out there thouhg, so don't limit yourself to one brand.
karesz3 is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:42 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,064
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by karesz3
The black and white was the lighter one built with Campy Record and carbon stem/bar.
I don't have that bike anymore, I couldn't justify having 2 high end bikes. I ride size 56 (Look calls it a large), and this is by far the most solid front end bike I have every ridden.
There are a lot of good options out there thouhg, so don't limit yourself to one brand.
No problem. This is just one option that has survived from an original list of 12. It is now down to 3. I still need to ride this one, though.
Sinn is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:49 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 752
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trogon
He was extremely helpful in steering me to the standard 595 vs. the Origin as well as helping with sizing. They're going to be able to answer your questions with the right information.
What is this "standard" 595 versus "origin" 595 you keep referring to? The choice I see on the Look website for the 595s for the 08 and 09 model years is 595 Origin versus 595 Ultra. Sounds like the OP is considering the Origin, the less stiff one.

I recently demoed a 595 and 586 on back to back days with the same wheels and tires. The 595 just said 595 (no Ultra writing on it) so I assume it was an Origin, although it was a 2007 model. My impressions, which could be all wrong, were that the 586 provided for a very fast, smooth, little more comfortable ride, but that the 595 provided for snappier, more responsive acceleration. I think I would prefer to race the 595, because I like that snappy acceleration feel. Nonetheless, I know of a couple of very good racers here who race the 586s.

Last edited by Skewer; 03-11-09 at 09:55 PM.
Skewer is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 09:23 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Trogon
I like the 586 and I love my 595.

Really - give a call to Look USA or post your question in the Look forum on RBR. The Look USA guys post there and answer questions. I dealt a bunch with a guy named Chas and he was extremely helpful in steering me to the standard 595 vs. the Origin as well as helping with sizing. They're going to be able to answer your questions with the right information.
You do realize the 595 Standard and the 595 Origin are one and the same frame, right? They just didn't really call it the Origin until after the Ultra came out. Essentially you're riding a bike designed for someone heavier just like he's talking about doing.
Dubbayoo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.