![]() |
He showered with permission of the test administrator. I think most of the blame should be with him.
|
Originally Posted by Tulex
(Post 8698360)
So, a person should be able to go up to Lance, make him pee infront of them, then get verified. Half the guys on this forum would be in that line just to check out his junk.
Originally Posted by Dubbayoo
(Post 8698456)
Define "in time", because 20 minutes seems to fall under a reasonable definition of in time.
Maybe I'm in the minority, but if a person claims to be an UCI official and ask me to provide samples for dope test, seems to me pretty clear that I should review their credentials, provide the samples until the official is satified. If there is concern about the officials credentials, I could have them checked after providing the samples. Asking for permission to shower prior to providing the samples does not seem like a proper, nor permittable request; seems to me both parties have made mistake. |
He knows the rules to the letter. He broke them. His bad.
|
Why did it take 3 weeks for this story to be released. If it happened on March 17, why not release it to the media on March 18?
That is a trend I've noticed with many scandalous sports stories. |
|
Originally Posted by cat0020
(Post 8698620)
I don't know about you, but I don't want anyone's urine, that's just gross.
"In time" to make a few phone call to varify the official's identity and credentials.. is that satisfactory? |
Originally Posted by patentcad
(Post 8696708)
It's really hard not to think that French officials don't have it in for Lance. They should kiss his ass and pay him a million friggin Euro we-hope-you-actually-make-an-appearance fee for even announcing he's doing their stupid race considering that fact that such news will boost the interest in the event 100% globally.
Doping Schmoping. Somebody should send these Frog Morons to Economics 101. |
The French are simply insanely jealous of Armstrong and his ability to ride them into the ground on their home turf.... it's time for these hysterical cry babies to grow up.
|
Originally Posted by cat0020
(Post 8698317)
How much trouble to pee in a cup when asked? they could have verified the credentials of the official in time, just don't let the guy run off with the samples without varification.
I think not. |
|
Is this anti-Americanism?
If it is, is it casual or insidious? |
i'm no lance groupie but even to me it seems like they have a vendetta against lance.
|
Originally Posted by dsellinger
(Post 8698722)
And draw blood, and cut off a few large chunks of hair?
I think not. |
Lance: I just want to verify who you are.
Inspector: ok Lance: Is it ok if I take a shower while we make the calls? Inspector: no prob Wtf is LA suppose to do? |
Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
(Post 8696802)
they never should have let the press guys start running the show.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...range-1892.jpg Henri Desgrange |
Originally Posted by seb1041
(Post 8698835)
Lance: I just want to verify who you are.
Inspector: ok Lance: Is it ok if I take a shower while we make the calls? Inspector: no prob Wtf is LA suppose to do? |
Originally Posted by seb1041
(Post 8698835)
Lance: I just want to verify who you are.
Inspector: ok Lance: Is it ok if I take a shower while we make the calls? Inspector: no prob Wtf is LA suppose to do? Lance: You said I could shower Inspector: Did Not Lance: Did too Inspector: Did Not Lance: Did Too etc. etc. |
Originally Posted by cat0020
(Post 8698620)
I don't know about you, but I don't want anyone's urine, that's just gross.
"In time" to make a few phone call to varify the official's identity and credentials.. is that satisfactory? Maybe I'm in the minority, but if a person claims to be an UCI official and ask me to provide samples for dope test, seems to me pretty clear that I should review their credentials, provide the samples until the official is satified. If there is concern about the officials credentials, I could have them checked after providing the samples. Asking for permission to shower prior to providing the samples does not seem like a proper, nor permittable request; seems to me both parties have made mistake.
Originally Posted by lotek
(Post 8698864)
FIFY
Lance: You said I could shower Inspector: Did Not Lance: Did too Inspector: Did Not Lance: Did Too etc. etc. For those wanting articles: http://translate.google.com/translat...ml&sl=fr&tl=en http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090409/...g_doping_rules http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/cyclin...ory?id=4054825 http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009...dom-drugs-test |
update
http://velonews.com/article/90386/th...-uci-has-given The French anti-doping agency says the UCI has given permission to open discipline hearings on Armstrong. |
so it's finally settled. good.
|
Originally Posted by cat0020
(Post 8698620)
Maybe I'm in the minority, but if a person claims to be an UCI official and ask me to provide samples for dope test, seems to me pretty clear that I should review their credentials, provide the samples until the official is satified. If there is concern about the officials credentials, I could have them checked after providing the samples.
|
This thread is gay for Lance
|
Witch hunt
|
If you can't get a positive, this is the next best thing....
I don't really like Lance on any level, but this is pretty absurd. |
The tester did not technically stay with him though. Armstrong clearly had time to go in his special shower with water from a spring in Wharfarino in Northern Italy that is believed to have special blood thinning capabilities.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.