The next evolution in groupsets
#2
Impractical with current technology. Needs more than one battery, vulnerable to interference (i.e can't shift when riding next to power lines), and more setup to pair the shifters to the deraileurs so they don't shift when the rider next to you shifts. A good system would also use some form of cryptographic authentication so someone with a rogue shifter connected to an antenna couldn't shift your bike for you when you are trying to sprint.
None of those things are impossible with current tech, its just that fixing them makes the system too heavy and complex compared to the other solutions out there.
When battery tech gets good enough that the extra batteries are lighter than the wiring in a wired system, then it could happen.
None of those things are impossible with current tech, its just that fixing them makes the system too heavy and complex compared to the other solutions out there.
When battery tech gets good enough that the extra batteries are lighter than the wiring in a wired system, then it could happen.
#4
Impractical with current technology. Needs more than one battery, vulnerable to interference (i.e can't shift when riding next to power lines), and more setup to pair the shifters to the deraileurs so they don't shift when the rider next to you shifts. A good system would also use some form of cryptographic authentication so someone with a rogue shifter connected to an antenna couldn't shift your bike for you when you are trying to sprint.
None of those things are impossible with current tech, its just that fixing them makes the system too heavy and complex compared to the other solutions out there.
When battery tech gets good enough that the extra batteries are lighter than the wiring in a wired system, then it could happen.
None of those things are impossible with current tech, its just that fixing them makes the system too heavy and complex compared to the other solutions out there.
When battery tech gets good enough that the extra batteries are lighter than the wiring in a wired system, then it could happen.
coded 2.4 gightz transmitters aren't that hard to make sparky. My Cateye V3 is 2.4ghz AND coded. It's just a signal. don't make it that freaking hard.
Maybe UMD or someone else can chime in here but aren't the 2.4ghz powertaps coded as well?
You act like this is rocket science. it's not. All it would take is some basic R&D and $ and I would bet there are people on this board that could make it work or take a stab at it.
The Dura Ace electric groupset would be a good place to start.
#7
Carpe Diem
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,149
Likes: 1
From: MABRA
Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1
none of the points Rutnick made address the "multiple batteries" issue.
More batteries = more weight, right?
More batteries = more weight, right?
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
#9
#13
Certifiable Bike "Expert"

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,648
Likes: 1
#14
A watch battery in my V3 lasted for 1 year in my V3 and it was 2.4 ghz and coded. One each for the shifters. One for the derailers to pickup the command and another battery to shift.
wireless to the derailers just means the same battery as before with a battery to receive the codes from the shifters.
#16
Carpe Diem
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,149
Likes: 1
From: MABRA
Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1
The derailers still need a power source that can put out enough voltage(?) to move the chain.
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
#17
You can put one battery on the right chainstay to shift the RD and one on the DT or actually integrated with the FD.
The battery pack for the RD wouldn't be any worse than the sensor for the Polar CS600 with power measurement.
#18
CAT = 5
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: MABRA
Bikes: 2001 Caad 5; PF RS2; Ridley Noah; Trek Fuel
Have faith in technology
https://spluch.blogspot.com/2007/12/p...n-battery.html
https://spluch.blogspot.com/2007/12/p...n-battery.html
are you AWARE of the battery Di2 is using?
This results in a 176 square cm battery. This does not Inlcude additional power for the radio components.
#20
CAT = 5
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: MABRA
Bikes: 2001 Caad 5; PF RS2; Ridley Noah; Trek Fuel
Is it totally wireless or just wireless to the derailers? How much freaking battery would be needed to transmit switch commands from the shifters to the derailers anyway? Look at a wireless bike computer, that wireless sensor is basically telling the head unit...yes...yes...yes....how many times in a minute? So pushing a button on a shifter isn't going to take up that much juice to transmit.
A watch battery in my V3 lasted for 1 year in my V3 and it was 2.4 ghz and coded. One each for the shifters. One for the derailers to pickup the command and another battery to shift.
wireless to the derailers just means the same battery as before with a battery to receive the codes from the shifters.
A watch battery in my V3 lasted for 1 year in my V3 and it was 2.4 ghz and coded. One each for the shifters. One for the derailers to pickup the command and another battery to shift.
wireless to the derailers just means the same battery as before with a battery to receive the codes from the shifters.
#21
Mountain Goat
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse 3 Carbon
Needs this...
#22
CAT = 5
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: MABRA
Bikes: 2001 Caad 5; PF RS2; Ridley Noah; Trek Fuel
#23
Dirt-riding heretic
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9
Threads like this should be hermetically sealed and brought back once wireless electronic shifting is available on 105 for 600 bucks.
Doubting technology is a sure-fire way to eventually be wrong.
Doubting technology is a sure-fire way to eventually be wrong.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
#24
there are answers to these questions that do not require speculation
I guess we could throw a nice display to tell you what gear you are in since Pcad can't do it without an optical display of some type.
Nice paper....lots of words....you are hired.
#25
CAT = 5
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: MABRA
Bikes: 2001 Caad 5; PF RS2; Ridley Noah; Trek Fuel
I wasn't speculating. basically, my wireless V3 cadence and speed sensor reads two inputs simultaneously, is coded, is 2.4 ghz and lasted 1 year. both are basically reading whether a switch is on or off. The same thing as a shifter. on...off...on...off... runs on one watch battery.
I guess we could throw a nice display to tell you what gear you are in since Pcad can't do it without an optical display of some type.
Nice paper....lots of words....you are hired.
I guess we could throw a nice display to tell you what gear you are in since Pcad can't do it without an optical display of some type.
Nice paper....lots of words....you are hired.




