Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

The next evolution in groupsets

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

The next evolution in groupsets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-09 | 12:43 PM
  #1  
timmyquest's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock
The next evolution in groupsets

Wireless...

"Fly" by wire...

Discuss
timmyquest is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:06 PM
  #2  
ericm979's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,169
Likes: 1
From: Santa Cruz Mountains
Impractical with current technology. Needs more than one battery, vulnerable to interference (i.e can't shift when riding next to power lines), and more setup to pair the shifters to the deraileurs so they don't shift when the rider next to you shifts. A good system would also use some form of cryptographic authentication so someone with a rogue shifter connected to an antenna couldn't shift your bike for you when you are trying to sprint.

None of those things are impossible with current tech, its just that fixing them makes the system too heavy and complex compared to the other solutions out there.

When battery tech gets good enough that the extra batteries are lighter than the wiring in a wired system, then it could happen.
ericm979 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:22 PM
  #3  
Ratfish's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: Męlée Island
That's all we need is even more electromagnetic radiation being shot at us.
Ratfish is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:24 PM
  #4  
Rutnick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ericm979
Impractical with current technology. Needs more than one battery, vulnerable to interference (i.e can't shift when riding next to power lines), and more setup to pair the shifters to the deraileurs so they don't shift when the rider next to you shifts. A good system would also use some form of cryptographic authentication so someone with a rogue shifter connected to an antenna couldn't shift your bike for you when you are trying to sprint.

None of those things are impossible with current tech, its just that fixing them makes the system too heavy and complex compared to the other solutions out there.

When battery tech gets good enough that the extra batteries are lighter than the wiring in a wired system, then it could happen.

coded 2.4 gightz transmitters aren't that hard to make sparky. My Cateye V3 is 2.4ghz AND coded. It's just a signal. don't make it that freaking hard.

Maybe UMD or someone else can chime in here but aren't the 2.4ghz powertaps coded as well?

You act like this is rocket science. it's not. All it would take is some basic R&D and $ and I would bet there are people on this board that could make it work or take a stab at it.

The Dura Ace electric groupset would be a good place to start.
Rutnick is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:26 PM
  #5  
Rutnick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by timmyquest
Wireless...

"Fly" by wire...

Discuss

Dia Compe Friction downtube for the win.
Rutnick is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:27 PM
  #6  
Tulex's Avatar
Junk Mile Junkie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,465
Likes: 2
From: Webster, NY
Originally Posted by timmyquest
Wireless...

"Fly" by wire...

Discuss
Pcad?
Tulex is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:27 PM
  #7  
bdcheung's Avatar
Carpe Diem
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,149
Likes: 1
From: MABRA

Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1

none of the points Rutnick made address the "multiple batteries" issue.

More batteries = more weight, right?
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
bdcheung is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:28 PM
  #8  
CastIron's Avatar
Sensible shoes.
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,798
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul,MN

Bikes: A few.

I $5 that sez the big three already have wireless prototypes.
__________________
Mike
Originally Posted by cedricbosch
It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
Originally Posted by cedricbosch
Why am I in your signature.
CastIron is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:28 PM
  #9  
timmyquest's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock
Originally Posted by bdcheung
none of the points Rutnick made address the "multiple batteries" issue.

More batteries = more weight, right?
Have faith in technology
https://spluch.blogspot.com/2007/12/p...n-battery.html
timmyquest is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:31 PM
  #10  
Rutnick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bdcheung
none of the points Rutnick made address the "multiple batteries" issue.

More batteries = more weight, right?
when bikes can be made that are 2lbs under the UCI limit, who cares?
Rutnick is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:31 PM
  #11  
timmyquest's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock
Originally Posted by Tulex
Pcad?
Ew Gross!
timmyquest is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:33 PM
  #12  
Rutnick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ratfish
That's all we need is even more electromagnetic radiation being shot at us.
I'd worry more about the cell phone.
Rutnick is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:36 PM
  #13  
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,648
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bdcheung
none of the points Rutnick made address the "multiple batteries" issue.

More batteries = more weight, right?
Well, the head unit battery could be made very small if it didn't have to run the derailleurs.

So that leaves two big batteries instead of one...
Phantoj is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:37 PM
  #14  
Rutnick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bdcheung
none of the points Rutnick made address the "multiple batteries" issue.

More batteries = more weight, right?
Is it totally wireless or just wireless to the derailers? How much freaking battery would be needed to transmit switch commands from the shifters to the derailers anyway? Look at a wireless bike computer, that wireless sensor is basically telling the head unit...yes...yes...yes....how many times in a minute? So pushing a button on a shifter isn't going to take up that much juice to transmit.

A watch battery in my V3 lasted for 1 year in my V3 and it was 2.4 ghz and coded. One each for the shifters. One for the derailers to pickup the command and another battery to shift.

wireless to the derailers just means the same battery as before with a battery to receive the codes from the shifters.
Rutnick is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:40 PM
  #15  
d2create's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 1
From: Houston we have a problem
I'm currently working on developing shifting via telekinesis, but I've hit a mental roadblock.
d2create is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:40 PM
  #16  
bdcheung's Avatar
Carpe Diem
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,149
Likes: 1
From: MABRA

Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1

The derailers still need a power source that can put out enough voltage(?) to move the chain.
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
bdcheung is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:47 PM
  #17  
Rutnick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bdcheung
The derailers still need a power source that can put out enough voltage(?) to move the chain.
yes and they would. Either two batteries (one to receive and one to shift) or one battery to do both.

You can put one battery on the right chainstay to shift the RD and one on the DT or actually integrated with the FD.

The battery pack for the RD wouldn't be any worse than the sensor for the Polar CS600 with power measurement.

Rutnick is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:47 PM
  #18  
CAT = 5
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: MABRA

Bikes: 2001 Caad 5; PF RS2; Ridley Noah; Trek Fuel

Originally Posted by timmyquest
Have you actually LOOKED at those?

are you AWARE of the battery Di2 is using?

This results in a 176 square cm battery. This does not Inlcude additional power for the radio components.
skipmcne is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:47 PM
  #19  
Rutnick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by d2create
I'm currently working on developing shifting via telekinesis, but I've hit a mental roadblock.

sounds like a fixie rider.
Rutnick is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:49 PM
  #20  
CAT = 5
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: MABRA

Bikes: 2001 Caad 5; PF RS2; Ridley Noah; Trek Fuel

Originally Posted by Rutnick
Is it totally wireless or just wireless to the derailers? How much freaking battery would be needed to transmit switch commands from the shifters to the derailers anyway? Look at a wireless bike computer, that wireless sensor is basically telling the head unit...yes...yes...yes....how many times in a minute? So pushing a button on a shifter isn't going to take up that much juice to transmit.

A watch battery in my V3 lasted for 1 year in my V3 and it was 2.4 ghz and coded. One each for the shifters. One for the derailers to pickup the command and another battery to shift.

wireless to the derailers just means the same battery as before with a battery to receive the codes from the shifters.
there are answers to these questions that do not require speculation
skipmcne is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:49 PM
  #21  
dark13star's Avatar
Mountain Goat
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse 3 Carbon

Needs this...
__________________
"I would be an historian as Herodotus was." Charles Olson
https://herodot.us
dark13star is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:52 PM
  #22  
CAT = 5
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: MABRA

Bikes: 2001 Caad 5; PF RS2; Ridley Noah; Trek Fuel

Originally Posted by bdcheung
The derailers still need a power source that can put out enough voltage(?) to move the chain.
The Dérailleurs work as solenoids; which require current to effect a magnetic field. Being able to source Current is more important (as a battery for the shimano-Di2) for shifting than voltage (which is why they went with lithium).
skipmcne is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:54 PM
  #23  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Threads like this should be hermetically sealed and brought back once wireless electronic shifting is available on 105 for 600 bucks.

Doubting technology is a sure-fire way to eventually be wrong.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:54 PM
  #24  
Rutnick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by skipmcne
there are answers to these questions that do not require speculation
I wasn't speculating. basically, my wireless V3 cadence and speed sensor reads two inputs simultaneously, is coded, is 2.4 ghz and lasted 1 year. both are basically reading whether a switch is on or off. The same thing as a shifter. on...off...on...off... runs on one watch battery.

I guess we could throw a nice display to tell you what gear you are in since Pcad can't do it without an optical display of some type.

Nice paper....lots of words....you are hired.
Rutnick is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-09 | 01:55 PM
  #25  
CAT = 5
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: MABRA

Bikes: 2001 Caad 5; PF RS2; Ridley Noah; Trek Fuel

Originally Posted by Rutnick
I wasn't speculating. basically, my wireless V3 cadence and speed sensor reads two inputs simultaneously, is coded, is 2.4 ghz and lasted 1 year. both are basically reading whether a switch is on or off. The same thing as a shifter. on...off...on...off... runs on one watch battery.

I guess we could throw a nice display to tell you what gear you are in since Pcad can't do it without an optical display of some type.

Nice paper....lots of words....you are hired.
PM me; I'll tell you where to send the check.
skipmcne is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.