Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Deep Rim Depth

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Deep Rim Depth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-09 | 08:38 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Deep Rim Depth

i would like some opinions on what is a good aero rim depth for all around road racing/crits. i have a pair of ksyriums but would like a deeper profile for racing. i have been looking at several 66mm depth but don't want a wheel that is overly cumbersome. Also considering 46mm depth. Any insight appreciated. Thx!
alexrksu is offline  
Reply
Old 06-28-09 | 08:40 PM
  #2  
pdedes's Avatar
ka maté ka maté ka ora
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 4
From: wessex

Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra

have you considered the american classic 420's (34mm rim depth)
pdedes is offline  
Reply
Old 06-28-09 | 08:56 PM
  #3  
Zen Cyclery's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Rim depth should be determined by 3 things
1 Your weight
the larger you are the deeper rim you can handle

2 The wind patterns where you live
the windier it is in your area the harder a deep rim will be to handle

3 how much climbing you do
The more you climb the more a lighter, and by nature shallow wheel will make sense

Example
I weigh 190
The winds are frequent and high in Boulder Co
I climb a lot

I ride Edge 68 clinchers for training.

If you respond to 1-3 then we will be able to provide you with sound advice.
Zen Cyclery is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 12:18 PM
  #4  
admcptch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Central PA

Bikes: CAAD9 w/ SRAM Rival

Well not to thread jack, but I have the same question. I have an Excel doc I have been throwing wheelsets into to get an idea of the different ones when it comes to price/weight/aero/etc.

1. Weight - 135lbs (Height - 5'9")

2. Winds - Generally have constant wind. I do a lot of riding in farm lands so there can be some pretty good crosswinds at times. Nothing too crazy though.

3. I do climb pretty often, but they are not huge climbs by any means. Not many 'mountains' in Central PA.

I'll be doing a mixture of crits and RRs.
admcptch is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 12:32 PM
  #5  
Zen Cyclery's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
^^^^I would suggest some Edge 45s. A nice mid-depth rim would be perfect for all around riding/racing. The 45 would build up into a very stiff wheel in a 20/24 count.
Tubys would weigh about 1045 grams
Clinchers would weigh about 1325 grams

You would could beat the hell out of them no problem
Zen Cyclery is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 01:05 PM
  #6  
admcptch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Central PA

Bikes: CAAD9 w/ SRAM Rival

Originally Posted by Zen Cyclery
^^^^I would suggest some Edge 45s. A nice mid-depth rim would be perfect for all around riding/racing. The 45 would build up into a very stiff wheel in a 20/24 count.
Tubys would weigh about 1045 grams
Clinchers would weigh about 1325 grams

You would could beat the hell out of them no problem
Thanks for the quick reply and advice! However I think those might be out of my price range at the moment. Any other lower-cost suggestions? Soul 4.0s are 40mm, I was looking at them. I'd say my budget for now (college student) would be around $500 or so.
admcptch is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 01:06 PM
  #7  
merckx_rider's Avatar
OUTLAW BIKER
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: So Cal

Bikes: Eddy Merckx team 7-11 Corsa Extra Full Dura Ace, 2015 Equalizer Electric Fat Tire Bike

I loved the old campy aero's light and strong.
merckx_rider is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 01:27 PM
  #8  
Batüwü Creakcreak
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,802
Likes: 294
From: The illadelph
I like my 4.0's.

Not terribly expensive. Have served me well in races, and have been fine for training.

College student here as well, which is why I went for them.
ridethecliche is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 02:26 PM
  #9  
admcptch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Central PA

Bikes: CAAD9 w/ SRAM Rival

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
I like my 4.0's.

Not terribly expensive. Have served me well in races, and have been fine for training.

College student here as well, which is why I went for them.
Yeah I have read many good things about the Soul wheels. I was debating between them and the 3.0s. I wasn't sure if the extra 10mm of rim depth and my weight would cause me to be blown over.
admcptch is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 02:51 PM
  #10  
ericm979's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,169
Likes: 1
From: Santa Cruz Mountains
Originally Posted by admcptch
I wasn't sure if the extra 10mm of rim depth and my weight would cause me to be blown over.
My experience is that they feel wierd and unstable at first, then you get used to it and don't notice it any more. Just remember not to ride no hands in a gusty side wind.
ericm979 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 03:02 PM
  #11  
Crash716's Avatar
i got nothing.
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,723
Likes: 0
From: Cali Forn NI A (SoCal)

Bikes: 13 BH G6 with SRAM Red

so now there is a rider weight to rim depth ratio chart...i can't keep up anymore
Crash716 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 06:04 PM
  #12  
admcptch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Central PA

Bikes: CAAD9 w/ SRAM Rival

Originally Posted by ericm979
My experience is that they feel wierd and unstable at first, then you get used to it and don't notice it any more. Just remember not to ride no hands in a gusty side wind.
Yeah that's what I was thinking, eventually get used to it.

So go for the 4.0s even though they weigh a little more? Difference between the 3.0 and 3.0SL is that they have the lighter spokes and also the lighter hubs that Soul offers. I know there have recently been countless threads on aero vs. weight. Seems the consensus is aero > weight. Either way they are lighter than my R500s.

SOUL S3.0 - Price: $350 - Weight (g): 1540
SOUL S3.0SL - Price: $435 - Weight (g): 1390
SOUL S4.0 - Price: $420 - Weight (g): 1680
admcptch is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 06:17 PM
  #13  
Flatballer's Avatar
No matches
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 11,647
Likes: 444
From: Eastern PA

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Originally Posted by Crash716
so now there is a rider weight to rim depth ratio chart...i can't keep up anymore
Actually, it's a complicated 5 factor formula. It can't be graphed by conventional means.

You have to take into account rider weight, climbing feet per 50 mile ride, average windspeed of the terrain, a multiplier that accounts for riding style, and your FTP.

It's a secret formula though, I can't tell you.
Flatballer is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 08:01 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by admcptch
Yeah that's what I was thinking, eventually get used to it.

So go for the 4.0s even though they weigh a little more? Difference between the 3.0 and 3.0SL is that they have the spokes and also the lighter hubs that Soul offers. I know there have recently been countless threads on aero vs. . Seems the consensus is aero > . Either way they are lighter than my R500s.

SOUL S3.0 - Price: $350 - Weight (g): 1540
SOUL S3.0SL - Price: $435 - Weight (g): 1390
SOUL S4.0 - Price: $420 - Weight (g): 1680
this has been a question of mine as well...interested to hear comments on this.
pkpsu is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 08:06 PM
  #15  
wanders's Avatar
going roundy round
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 4
From: High Point, NC
Originally Posted by Zen Cyclery
Rim depth should be determined by 3 things
1 Your weight
the larger you are the deeper rim you can handle

...
Originally Posted by Crash716
so now there is a rider weight to rim depth ratio chart...i can't keep up anymore
Originally Posted by Flatballer
Actually, it's a complicated 5 factor formula. It can't be graphed by conventional means.

You have to take into account rider weight, climbing feet per 50 mile ride, average windspeed of the terrain, a multiplier that accounts for riding style, and your FTP.

It's a secret formula though, I can't tell you.
I found the formula. I need a disk front and rear.
wanders is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 08:13 PM
  #16  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

404s, or if you're on a budget, some Williams 58 tubulars from the same molds...
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-09 | 08:20 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pkpsu
this has been a question of mine as well...interested to hear comments on this.
me too. i actually did a search earlier today for this exact topic. i'm running aksiums right now so any wheel will probably be a weight improvement and/or aero improvement. to me, the 3.0sl's seem to be the best bet; roughly 2/3 of a pound lighter than the 4.0s and only 1cm difference in depth (assuming i'm understanding the depths correctly). am i off base in my logic? i have a pair of xero xr-1 wheels but am not a fan and will be selling them but i do like the deep rim though.
dvmarshall11 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.