Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Stuck between frame sizes. HALP

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Stuck between frame sizes. HALP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-09 | 09:20 AM
  #1  
Porkponey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX

Stuck between frame sizes. HALP

5'7" 30.75" inseam.

I sat on some treks today while I was in there for my bike's free checkup and found that my terrible shape has me stuck between 52 and 54cm frames. I have a very long torso and very short legs. The stand over on the 54 was more than enough in practically flat sandles so I know i'd be fine in my duck walkin' shoes. However the saddle was all of 4 inches above the top tube and the reach to the pedals was very long. The reach to the bars however was perfect and I was very comfortable. The 52 felt cramped, but the saddle didn't need to be completely slammed. To compound this problem I'm considering purchasing a frame set and building it myself as my budget would be much happier with that than 2k outright, but I have no clue where I should be at.
Porkponey is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:22 AM
  #2  
cslone's Avatar
Quarq shill
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,962
Likes: 1
From: Ohio

Bikes: 08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.

Smaller frame, longer stem; as long as it's not a huge stack of spacers too.
cslone is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:24 AM
  #3  
Porkponey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX

Originally Posted by cslone
Smaller frame, longer stem; as long as it's not a huge stack of spacers too.
No spacers. The stem will be flipped and the tube cut. I prefer an aggressive over the front wheel position. It's how I set up my ruckus and it's how I set up my hybrid. I imagine it's how I'll set up the roadie.
Porkponey is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:25 AM
  #4  
AEO's Avatar
AEO
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

I'm practically your size. you're not stuck in between 52 and 54. you should ride the 52cm.

you're average proportioned.

you need to play around with saddle setback, your center of weight and then move onto the stem length to make it fit properly.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:26 AM
  #5  
camhabib's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: Cervelo S3

I was told this once back in the day, whether or not it's still true I don't know:

If you're between sizes, go smaller. It's lighter and stiffer.
camhabib is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:28 AM
  #6  
Porkponey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX

Sounds good. 52 with a longer stem it is. I assume it's best to check actual geometry numbers when comparing between manufacturers.

Anyone want to suggest a nice frameset for less than 1k?
Porkponey is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:29 AM
  #7  
Porkponey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX

Originally Posted by camhabib
I was told this once back in the day, whether or not it's still true I don't know:

If you're between sizes, go smaller. It's lighter and stiffer.

I didn't think about that but that's a pretty clever idea, and you likely won't hear me complaining about light or stiff.
Porkponey is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:30 AM
  #8  
khatfull's Avatar
FBoD Member at Large
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 8
From: Woodbury, MN
Originally Posted by camhabib
I was told this once back in the day, whether or not it's still true I don't know:

If you're between sizes, go smaller. It's lighter and stiffer.
And, you have more option to "increase" the frame size through stems, different reach bars, seat setback, etc. However, it's hard to "decrease' the frame size with anything other than a hacksaw. Nobody likes being forced into a 70mm stem.
khatfull is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:30 AM
  #9  
Bici Cognoscenti
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Weston, FL

Bikes: Pinarello Prince

I bought 53's. I am 5"7 with 30 inseam.
cgjane is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:33 AM
  #10  
SteelCan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: So. Jersey

Bikes: LeMond Reno

Originally Posted by camhabib
I was told this once back in the day, whether or not it's still true I don't know: If you're between sizes, go smaller. It's lighter and stiffer.
I am respectfully of the other belief - that larger frame (which will typically have a taller headset) will be a little more comfortable. Though with the myriad of handlebar shapes/designs it's not as critical.

BTW it might take you 1000miles to determine based on your current flexibility.
SteelCan is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:40 AM
  #11  
Porkponey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX

The time is something I'm prepared for. It's one of the reasons I'm inclined to spend 800 or 900 on a 1.2 or 1.5 and just ride the crap out of it until I have a better idea. I learned a lot from my hybrid about what position I'm the most comfortable in but my noobish mind doesn't entirely know how that translates into a road frame.
Porkponey is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 09:41 AM
  #12  
AEO's Avatar
AEO
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

I ride 50cm and 52cm bikes and I'm 5'7 with 30.5in inseam

they both have around a 53cm top tube.
catch with my fit is that I seem to have longer than average femurs and bikes in this size have steep seat tube angles, so I tend to require 28~32mm of setback from the seatpost to get a proper fit.

what's important is seat tube angle, top tube length and head tube angle.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 10:02 AM
  #13  
Porkponey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX

I think I probably have a fairly short femur. I don't know though since I don't know what femur length should be for my height.

When I sit back to back with my buddy that's 6'0" our heads are level, I just have 5" shorter legs.
Porkponey is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 11:08 AM
  #14  
Georgebowen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Valencia, CA
When I got fitted the guy said to go with a slightly smaller frame and run a 120-130 stem with a tall seatpost. Getting more of the carbon seatpost out of the frame makes it much more comfortable. And the smaller frame allows for more drop in the bars plus saves a little weight. He atually mentioned fitting the frame off the stem length which seemed weird.

That is considerig if the size smaller can be fitted properly with those constaints, and you dont have a freakishly long torso or something.
Georgebowen is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 11:26 AM
  #15  
Keeper of the Castle
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio

Bikes: 2009 CAAD9-5, 2009 Kona Dew Plus, Trek 930

I am also 5'7" with a 30.5" inseam. My torso is long, with broad shoulders and large (for my height) size 10 (45 Euro) feet. I was also torn between a 52 and 54 frame (CAAD9) but ended up with the 54 size. This just felt more comfortable for me and I have less issues with toe overlap.

I would have each adjusted as close a possible by the LBS and go with whatever feels more comfortable.
Gromulus is offline  
Reply
Old 07-14-09 | 12:10 PM
  #16  
Porkponey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX

I'm also rocking a size 9-10 foot which is certainly a bit big given the circumstances. My shoulders are also fairly broad. It's sounding like 52 is a better way to go.
Porkponey is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.