Stuck between frame sizes. HALP
#1
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX
Stuck between frame sizes. HALP
5'7" 30.75" inseam.
I sat on some treks today while I was in there for my bike's free checkup and found that my terrible shape has me stuck between 52 and 54cm frames. I have a very long torso and very short legs. The stand over on the 54 was more than enough in practically flat sandles so I know i'd be fine in my duck walkin' shoes. However the saddle was all of 4 inches above the top tube and the reach to the pedals was very long. The reach to the bars however was perfect and I was very comfortable. The 52 felt cramped, but the saddle didn't need to be completely slammed. To compound this problem I'm considering purchasing a frame set and building it myself as my budget would be much happier with that than 2k outright, but I have no clue where I should be at.
I sat on some treks today while I was in there for my bike's free checkup and found that my terrible shape has me stuck between 52 and 54cm frames. I have a very long torso and very short legs. The stand over on the 54 was more than enough in practically flat sandles so I know i'd be fine in my duck walkin' shoes. However the saddle was all of 4 inches above the top tube and the reach to the pedals was very long. The reach to the bars however was perfect and I was very comfortable. The 52 felt cramped, but the saddle didn't need to be completely slammed. To compound this problem I'm considering purchasing a frame set and building it myself as my budget would be much happier with that than 2k outright, but I have no clue where I should be at.
#3
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX
No spacers. The stem will be flipped and the tube cut. I prefer an aggressive over the front wheel position. It's how I set up my ruckus and it's how I set up my hybrid. I imagine it's how I'll set up the roadie.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
I'm practically your size. you're not stuck in between 52 and 54. you should ride the 52cm.
you're average proportioned.
you need to play around with saddle setback, your center of weight and then move onto the stem length to make it fit properly.
you're average proportioned.
you need to play around with saddle setback, your center of weight and then move onto the stem length to make it fit properly.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#6
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX
Sounds good. 52 with a longer stem it is. I assume it's best to check actual geometry numbers when comparing between manufacturers.
Anyone want to suggest a nice frameset for less than 1k?
Anyone want to suggest a nice frameset for less than 1k?
#7
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX
#8
And, you have more option to "increase" the frame size through stems, different reach bars, seat setback, etc. However, it's hard to "decrease' the frame size with anything other than a hacksaw. Nobody likes being forced into a 70mm stem.
#10
BTW it might take you 1000miles to determine based on your current flexibility.
#11
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX
The time is something I'm prepared for. It's one of the reasons I'm inclined to spend 800 or 900 on a 1.2 or 1.5 and just ride the crap out of it until I have a better idea. I learned a lot from my hybrid about what position I'm the most comfortable in but my noobish mind doesn't entirely know how that translates into a road frame.
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
I ride 50cm and 52cm bikes and I'm 5'7 with 30.5in inseam
they both have around a 53cm top tube.
catch with my fit is that I seem to have longer than average femurs and bikes in this size have steep seat tube angles, so I tend to require 28~32mm of setback from the seatpost to get a proper fit.
what's important is seat tube angle, top tube length and head tube angle.
they both have around a 53cm top tube.
catch with my fit is that I seem to have longer than average femurs and bikes in this size have steep seat tube angles, so I tend to require 28~32mm of setback from the seatpost to get a proper fit.
what's important is seat tube angle, top tube length and head tube angle.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#13
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX
I think I probably have a fairly short femur. I don't know though since I don't know what femur length should be for my height.
When I sit back to back with my buddy that's 6'0" our heads are level, I just have 5" shorter legs.
When I sit back to back with my buddy that's 6'0" our heads are level, I just have 5" shorter legs.
#14
When I got fitted the guy said to go with a slightly smaller frame and run a 120-130 stem with a tall seatpost. Getting more of the carbon seatpost out of the frame makes it much more comfortable. And the smaller frame allows for more drop in the bars plus saves a little weight. He atually mentioned fitting the frame off the stem length which seemed weird.
That is considerig if the size smaller can be fitted properly with those constaints, and you dont have a freakishly long torso or something.
That is considerig if the size smaller can be fitted properly with those constaints, and you dont have a freakishly long torso or something.
#15
Keeper of the Castle
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Bikes: 2009 CAAD9-5, 2009 Kona Dew Plus, Trek 930
I am also 5'7" with a 30.5" inseam. My torso is long, with broad shoulders and large (for my height) size 10 (45 Euro) feet. I was also torn between a 52 and 54 frame (CAAD9) but ended up with the 54 size. This just felt more comfortable for me and I have less issues with toe overlap.
I would have each adjusted as close a possible by the LBS and go with whatever feels more comfortable.
I would have each adjusted as close a possible by the LBS and go with whatever feels more comfortable.
#16
Thread Starter
Do a barrel roll.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Rockledge, FL
Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX
I'm also rocking a size 9-10 foot which is certainly a bit big given the circumstances. My shoulders are also fairly broad. It's sounding like 52 is a better way to go.





