Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Help understanding Shimano gearing

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Help understanding Shimano gearing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-09, 02:30 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 82

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix 2009 with ultegra triple, Raleigh Competition from the 70's

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Help understanding Shimano gearing

My new bike with Shimano Ultegra components has 52-39-30 chainrings and a 12-27 10 speed cassette. I see that the older 9 speed Shimano Ultegra triple has 52-42-30 chainrings. It seems to me that the larger middle chainring on the older Shimanos provides a better range when riding with mild hills or winds. Does anyone know why Shimano changed? Has anyone put a 42 tooth chainring from another manufacturer (such as TA) into a 10 speed Shimano Ultegra triple? Is there a reason why doing this would be a bad idea?
Thanks.
DonFrambach is offline  
Old 07-30-09, 02:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
morphius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
12-27 at the back should be enough for you to climb on almost any hill.
morphius is offline  
Old 07-30-09, 02:38 PM
  #3  
Over the hill
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times in 692 Posts
This is just a guess, but I think they changed the middle ring to 39 because people don't like dropping into the "granny" or "sissy" gear. Even though it comes out to about the same ratio, they feel all manly if they can avoid the small ring more often. I agree that a 42 makes more sense, and it's possible to swap the chainrings and adjust the derailleur to shift reasonably well.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
urbanknight is offline  
Old 07-30-09, 02:53 PM
  #4  
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times in 1,792 Posts
There's plenty of gear overlap with a triple, using either a 42 or 39 middle ring.

The 39 middle ring leaves:
2 non-overlapping gears on the granny,
5 non-overlapping gears on the big ring.
The 42 middle ring leaves:
3 non-overlapping gears on the granny,
4 non-overlapping gears on the big ring.
39 is the standard double chainring size. If you're using a triple with a 39, you'll be shifting the front about the same time as your standard double buddies. This could be a positive thing when you're riding in a group.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is offline  
Old 07-30-09, 04:45 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,227

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1097 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
The 39T middle ring makes more sense, since it produces a more uniform progression between the rings.

The middle ring of a triple is in nearly the same location as the big ring on a double. With that in mind, the middle ring and largest cog is a relatively extreme chain line, that I would rarely use. Since you're shorted by one cog with the middle ring, the 39T makes even more sense.

I used Campy triples for several years, riding in the Colorado mountains, but I used FSA cranks, since Campy doesn't offeer a 39T middle ring. I used a 53/39/28 with a 12-25 to get the same low gear as a Shimano 30/27, but without the large 21-24-27 jumps between the cogs. Worked great.

These days I use a 50/34 with an 11-25 11 speed casssette.
DaveSSS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.