Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Cannondale 2010 CAAD9 vs Six Carbon

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Cannondale 2010 CAAD9 vs Six Carbon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-09, 12:33 PM
  #26  
Cannondale!
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17

Bikes: Scott Speedster S4 2005

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Today in bike shop I went for the Six Carbon 105 Compact, RED GLOSS! Damn that color is hot in real, much better than on the pic of the Cannondale website. I don't have pics yet

Here are better pics of the real red (gloss) color: https://www.bicicletasgonzalo.es/inde...=397&Itemid=46
TimonB is offline  
Old 10-09-09, 01:26 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Still no CAAD9 sticky yet? I pick CAAD9. Though I keep on hearing that the '10 Six is so much better but I would Ultegra over 105.
n0tverycreative is offline  
Old 10-09-09, 01:47 PM
  #28  
Cannondale!
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17

Bikes: Scott Speedster S4 2005

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by n0tverycreative
Still no CAAD9 sticky yet? I pick CAAD9. Though I keep on hearing that the '10 Six is so much better but I would Ultegra over 105.
The Six 2010 is a damn fine bike, the fork has improved a lot and lost weight. I test rode the 09 Six carbon today and even that felt great, although I am not really an expert at carbons as this is my first. The ultegra was +600 euro, that's like 900 USD, out of budget, 105 is compatible with ultegra for future anyway.

I wanted to go for the caad9 ultegra, but got a great deal on the Six Carbon, made the decision easy. Carbon really does ride nice, wow! But I believe from so many things that I read and read that the caad9 is a top end super bike also that must feel and perform great too.

Last edited by TimonB; 10-09-09 at 01:54 PM.
TimonB is offline  
Old 10-09-09, 05:31 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SF Bay Area East
Posts: 429

Bikes: Open Cycles WI.DE.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Can't you find any 09 Six's? I don't think they have changed much if at all and are VERY much marked down right now.
wirelessness is offline  
Old 10-09-09, 06:04 PM
  #30  
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
I was told the Six is very heavy, but that post above regarding the frame losing 400 grams through a lighter frame/fork is interesting. That would make quite a difference, that's nearly a pound.
patentcad is offline  
Old 10-10-09, 05:04 AM
  #31  
Cannondale!
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17

Bikes: Scott Speedster S4 2005

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yep Patentcad, correct, the frame and fork have changed.

https://www.roadcyclinguk.com/gear-ne...ghts/4257.html

The Six was launched last year as an entry-level carbon fibre all-rounder and for 2010 Cannondale has sliced away 100g of weight, achieved due to a revised lay-up of the carbon. Weight for a 56cm frame is quoted at 1.2kg. There’s now BB30 across the range, weight sizes should ensure a good fit for all and there’s even size-specific carbon dropouts.
https://tour-de-france.velonews.com/article/94154

Six Carbon

In its second year since its inception, the Six Carbon is utilizing more of the Super Six technologies, yet reaching out to those on a budget. Some of the differences in 2010 for the upper end of the line include a revised carbon lay up, a full carbon fork, and improved components.


2010 Cannondale: The Six Carbon had a lively, responsive feel while climbing out of the saddle.

Through a better carbon lay up and minimal paint, the 2010 Six frame is 110 grams lighter. Additionally, the Six fork is now carbon all the way through, saving 300 grams off of last year's weight. These two weight savings combined subtract almost a pound.

The front of the frame uses the same tube shapes as it did last year. The top tube grows in diameter from the seattube, reaching its maximum at the oversized headtube so that they sit flush. And a massive bottom bracket area uses Cannondale’s BB30 technology.

The rear triangle is also visibly the same but with a refined carbon lay up. The seatstays are hourglass-shaped and remain separate above the brake bridge for better vibration damping. The chainstays are asymmetric to optimize stiffness. The left chainstay is wider than the right to provide better lateral stability; the right chainstay is taller for better axial stability as it is more inline with the chain forces. And finally, the carbon dropouts are specifically molded for each frame size for a maximum strength to weight ratio.

I had a chance to try out the Six Carbon 5 for an approximately 40-mile loop that consisted of dirt, long climbs, fast descents, smooth asphalt and not-so-smooth asphalt. The first thing I noticed was a lively response to the pedal stroke. In the saddle or standing, the stiffness of the bottom bracket area was notable. However, the front triangle, stiff that it was, was not quite as stiff as my personal bike, the CAAD9. While it’s hard to know where exactly to give credit, the vertical compliance of the rear triangle was noticeable. Whether it was the saddle, seatpost, wheels, or rear triangle, the system seemed to work.

The Six Carbon line ranges from the 16.8-pound Carbon Six 3 for $3,000, to the 19.6-pound Carbon Six 6 for $1,700. The Six Carbon 5 that I rode weighs 18.2-pounds goes for $2,150.
TimonB is offline  
Old 10-10-09, 12:21 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
I was told the Six is very heavy, but that post above regarding the frame losing 400 grams through a lighter frame/fork is interesting. That would make quite a difference, that's nearly a pound.
Is this now on your Schwag list?
n0tverycreative is offline  
Old 10-10-09, 12:50 PM
  #33  
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by n0tverycreative
Is this now on your Schwag list?
Hardly.
patentcad is offline  
Old 10-10-09, 01:01 PM
  #34  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Hardly.
That's because the logo isn't big enough to be readable fifty feet away.
BarracksSi is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.