Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

SRAM RIVAL or Shimano105

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

SRAM RIVAL or Shimano105

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-10, 03:05 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
i vote rival too (and i like the cannondale better than the trek too)

its really a win-win
thirdgenbird is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 04:22 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by foresthill
What is that, exactly?
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I meant old standard reach calipers (47mm - 57mm) like Shimano's R600 which are now considered 'long' reach.
14max is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 04:43 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rival for the following reasons:

-It's lighter
-It works well, and carries over most of the features from the higher end SRAM group
-105 will be redesigned for next year
-Newer Shimano has a messed up and confusing compatibility matrix
-SRAM Pricing is pretty decent (Besides eBay, Performance had decent prices on rival Shifters earlier this week whey they had additional % off)
-Hidden cables vs. Current 105
-Rival was redesigned last year I think (the version with the carbon shifters), so it should be current for a while
-Introduction of Apex, will not make Rival a "mid" SRAM group

Ultegra 6700 is probably Shimano's best group right now. If I was considering a new build i'd go Rival or 6700 or:
-New Force Shifters (which are supposed to be functionally similar to Red) if they are only slightly more than Rival
-Rival everything else
-Shimano Crankset (preferably Ultegra, either 6600 or 6700) should be priced similar or less than Rival for 6600
-KMC Chain
intence is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 05:15 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 1,212

Bikes: MTB: Stumpjumper FSR, Road: De Rosa King 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 14max
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I meant old standard reach calipers (47mm - 57mm) like Shimano's R600 which are now considered 'long' reach.
Ah. I believe you're confusing the word "caliper" (which basically means the arms that hold your brake pads) with "brake lever".

All of SRAMs current brake levers are adjustable in/out for reach (Campy, too, I believe.)
foresthill is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 05:17 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
UGASkiDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 928
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RUOkie
Love the Rival. Once you go doubletap you never go back.
Incorrect.....I have a RED/Force and DA 7800 and like the shifting of DA much better but the Ergonomics, weight and price of SRAM better. FWIW I have the SRAM on my everyday bike.

Originally Posted by Jinker
Rival's lighter, more precise. Hasn't been around as long as 105, but should be long lived enough for anyone.

Shimano tends to shift a little more smoothly. SRAM seems 'notchier'. The other way of putting that is there's more tactile feedback when you shift.

SRAM tends to be noisier, especially with SRAM cassettes and chains.

As for Cannondale Vs. Trek, I don't think there's anyone here who would really argue that the Trek 2 series frame is better than the CAAD 9.

Wheels on the 2.3 are decent, but not exceptional. I'm not sure what the weight on the Shimano RS10s is, but assuming it's with spitting distance of the Bontrager Races, the CAAD should be a lighter bike.

Assuming you like the shop and the fit is good, I'd give the nod to the CAAD.

....

Waitaminute, isn't the 9-5 a 105 bike? It's the 9-4 that's Rival, and it has a significant amount of Force on it, to boot.
Correct and incorrect....shimano is much smoother and SRAM is more tactile going down the cog but going up the cog I find shimano (7800 anyway) more tactile.


SRAM is lighter and cheaper though
UGASkiDawg is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 05:31 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eugene, Or
Posts: 56

Bikes: 2010 Felt Z85

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
doesn't seem like many low end bikes are coming stock with rival yet even though its cheaper why is that?
Randy5040 is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 06:03 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by foresthill
Ah. I believe you're confusing the word "caliper" (which basically means the arms that hold your brake pads) with "brake lever".

All of SRAMs current brake levers are adjustable in/out for reach (Campy, too, I believe.)
Thanks for the attempt at a tutorial but, no, that isn't what I meant since was talking about the brake caliper. SRAM doesn't offer a long reach caliper and that wound up being a deal breaker for me when I considered going with a group. My DEAN frameset needed that reach in order to use a 28c tire with a fender.

Last edited by 14max; 03-19-10 at 01:06 AM.
14max is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 06:04 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
trek2.3bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 255

Bikes: Trek 5.2 and Trek 2.3 WSD upgraded to full Ultegra.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a 2.3 that I just upgraded to an Ultegra group. Smooth and perfect for me.

My old 105 group went on my 2.1. Shimano forever!
trek2.3bike is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 06:10 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
mike868y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,284
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'll let you know how I like rival in a few weeks
mike868y is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 06:12 PM
  #35  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I love Rival because I can't afford Campy. The 105 on my 2.3 feels spongy. Not a bad thing necessarily, but I'm used to Rival on my last bike. Wish campy wasn't so awesome and expensive at the same time. A friend of mine has full chorus on his bike and I love it!
zerocool33 is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 06:20 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Rockrivr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 109

Bikes: Felt Z25 & Specialized Rockhopper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Another vote for Rival. I've riden with both and I hands down like the SRAM shifting on the single lever then using the brake to down shift. Upgraded to a Felt Z25 with Red and upgraded the crank to Rival. Very nice ride.
Rockrivr1 is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 06:26 PM
  #37  
Port
 
Rocket-Sauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,656

Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 1,871 Times in 1,065 Posts
Sram -but get a Shimano chain...
Rocket-Sauce is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 06:28 PM
  #38  
stole your bike
 
roadiejorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Bergen, NJ
Posts: 6,907

Bikes: Orbea Orca, Ridley Compact

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Plenty of reasons already posted as to why I also vote for Rival without a question, especially over 105. I've used 105 and have Ultegra on one of my bikes but I use the bike with Rival the most (other reasons than just the gruppo) and absolutely love Double Tap. Shimano's gruppos are really good but I prefer the SRAM shifter ergonomics over Shimano too.
__________________
I like pie
roadiejorge is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 07:01 PM
  #39  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by foresthill
Ah. I believe you're confusing the word "caliper" (which basically means the arms that hold your brake pads) with "brake lever".

All of SRAMs current brake levers are adjustable in/out for reach (Campy, too, I believe.)
Yeah/no. Long reach calipers are calipers that have longer arms. This used to be standard as there was generally more tire clearance on frames. Now it is compact. If I put Michelin 25's on any of my bikes they rub the frames. Sad.

Yes the SRAM Levers are adjustable. That's not what he was talking about.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 03-18-10, 07:10 PM
  #40  
SLO-1
 
Yaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,691

Bikes: '09 BMC Road Racer SL01

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i hate threads like this. i'm dying to sell my 105 shifters &RD and go with rival.
Yaniel is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 05:25 AM
  #41  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wow, Thanks for so many responses. Its pretty clear in which direction this forum points. My plans to ride both bikes this weekend my have hit a snag. The shop where I was going to ride the cannondale caad94 has no more in my size and cant get them from cannondale untill sometime in May. I want to buy a bike in the next week or so. I guess I will have to call every shop in MD DE VA and PA and see if I can find one.
leftturn is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 06:11 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Steve in MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 300

Bikes: 2010 Specialized Roubaix comp (SRAM Rival), 2009 Trek 7.3FX, Early 80's steel frame Suteki road bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have Rival and love it. I was making the same choice back in the fall when I was ordering my new road bike (could be ordered with Rival or 105). Tried them both at my LBS, researched the two, and chose Rival. Haven't doubted that decision a single time since I've had the bike.
Steve in MA is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 07:19 AM
  #43  
Bromptoneer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,942

Bikes: Brompton S2L

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wife's got 105s, I have Rival, used to have an older Ultegra. I think they are both great, but I really love my Rivals. Once you get used to the single lever doing all the work action, it's just great. I've had 0 problems with it, none, and mine's a 2008 (I heard they are better now?). At the end of the day, I think it probably comes down to personal preference, but forgetting potential pricing differences (no clue how they compare in cost), I'd go Rival.
Tsuru is offline  
Old 03-19-10, 07:42 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Steve90068's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,334

Bikes: Road - Lynskey. Mountain - Trek Fuel EX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I have Rival and Ultegra (6600) and I enjoy both for different reasons. Ultegra is smooth, refined and provides a more enjoyable shifting experience on training or recovery days. Rival is more of a mechanical feel, not "clunky" but not as smooth as Ultegra.

I think ultimately it comes down to your preference of shifting. If double tap is for you, you'll never go back but not everyone loves it (and some downright hate it).
Steve90068 is offline  
Old 03-20-10, 10:00 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Mansram01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,344

Bikes: '17 Trek Emonda, '16 Yeti ASR5, '14 Cdale F29 '08 Orbea Orca.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by intence
Rival for the following reasons:

-It's lighter
-It works well, and carries over most of the features from the higher end SRAM group
-105 will be redesigned for next year
-Newer Shimano has a messed up and confusing compatibility matrix
-SRAM Pricing is pretty decent (Besides eBay, Performance had decent prices on rival Shifters earlier this week whey they had additional % off)
-Hidden cables vs. Current 105
-Rival was redesigned last year I think (the version with the carbon shifters), so it should be current for a while
-Introduction of Apex, will not make Rival a "mid" SRAM group

Ultegra 6700 is probably Shimano's best group right now. If I was considering a new build i'd go Rival or 6700 or:
-New Force Shifters (which are supposed to be functionally similar to Red) if they are only slightly more than Rival
-Rival everything else
-Shimano Crankset (preferably Ultegra, either 6600 or 6700) should be priced similar or less than Rival for 6600
-KMC Chain
I lean towards comparing SRAM Rival and Shimano Ultegra rather than 105. 105 is good but SRAM Rival is hands down better based on the reasons above provided by Intence. I've been using SRAM Rival for almost 3 years now and I love it. I'm slowly converting my components to Force. I do like the feel of the hoods and the double-tap system. More bang for the buck!
Mansram01 is offline  
Old 03-20-10, 12:54 PM
  #46  
well hello there
 
Nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430

Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times in 206 Posts
Originally Posted by zerocool33
I love Rival because I can't afford Campy. The 105 on my 2.3 feels spongy. Not a bad thing necessarily, but I'm used to Rival on my last bike. Wish campy wasn't so awesome and expensive at the same time. A friend of mine has full chorus on his bike and I love it!
That's how it feels when it's not adjusted properly.
__________________
.
.

Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Nachoman is offline  
Old 03-20-10, 04:01 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,331

Bikes: 19 Look 765 Gravel RS, 18 Cervelo C5, 13 Niner Jet9 RDO, 08 Surly Crosscheck, 05 Serotta Fierte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have Ultegra on steel road bike, 105 on cross bike, and SRAM Force on Cervelo. I've become a SRAM fan. The double tap and the ergo just feels good to me.
Unagidon is offline  
Old 03-20-10, 10:22 PM
  #48  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rival. I built a bike last year with Rival mostly for the carbon levers in cold weather riding. I can drop to much lighter gloves on carbon Rival compared to aluminum levers. But since I've started using Rival it will be hard to go back to Shimano 105 or Ultegra. I really like having brake function disconnected from the shifter. The system seems to be more tolerant of slop. I switched wheels the other days (snows to slicks, back to snows again) and didn't get the cassette dogged down tight enough. Even with the cassette wiggling around the Rival system still shifted and got me home.
coyotesareus is offline  
Old 03-20-10, 11:06 PM
  #49  
Burning Matches.
 
ElJamoquio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 9,714
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4077 Post(s)
Liked 1,002 Times in 676 Posts
Rankings of what I own:

Force (only better than rival due to weight)
Rival
7800
6600
__________________
ElJamoquio didn't hate the world, per se; he was just constantly disappointed by humanity.
ElJamoquio is offline  
Old 03-20-10, 11:31 PM
  #50  
Rideordie
 
trekkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 25

Bikes: 2007 Madone 5.2SL

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
RIVAL 100% lighter than Durache (spanish) and similar price point as 105
trekkster is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.