Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Handlebar width

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Handlebar width

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-10 | 07:27 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Looking for Lance

Bikes: 2001 Lemond Tourmalet

Handlebar width

Now that I'm doing longer rides more often, I've been thinking that my handlebars are too wide for me. I finally measured them and they are 46cm c2c . This is on a 51cm bike and I'm 5'4". I'm not sure who thought this was a good idea but this seems exceptionally wide for this size bike.

I like being able to breath easily so I don't want to get something too narrow. Also, I'm not all that happy with my handlebar shape and was looking at the FSA Omega Compact. Would a 42cm c2c be good on these? I know they're angled out slightly towards the drops so the hoods would be closer to 40cm which I think is about what the generic formulas would put me on.

Any experience with the Omega in terms of size? I just can't believe how wide the ones that came on the bike are.
VoodooChi|d is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-10 | 07:48 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: NorCal

Bikes: Cervelo R3 (Force)

Well I'm a 5'6" male with average width shoulders and I run a 40cm 3T bar (measured by bar ends c-c). 40cm or 38cm should do you good.
Val23708 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-10 | 08:12 PM
  #3  
rangerdavid's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,095
Likes: 5
From: Boone, North Carolina

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

if your measurements are accurate, a 46 is larger than normal as OEM equipment I would think. My CAAD9 in size 54 came with 42mm bars. you could probably go 42 or 40 with no problem, and probably some benefit.
rangerdavid is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-10 | 08:22 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Looking for Lance

Bikes: 2001 Lemond Tourmalet

I was shocked too, but I measured thrice. It's the Lemond/Trek in-house brand bar so I'm 99% sure it's what came on the bike (I did buy it second hand so I can't be totally sure).
VoodooChi|d is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-10 | 08:24 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
I am 5' 7" and used 42cm bars for years, then got a new bike that came with 40cm bars and while I did feel a bit less stable for a while, I am now far more comfortable.
__________________
Originally Posted by RacerOne
Get the Trek, either one. You'll piss off BF and you'll be happy.

Co owner of The Chain Station bike shop.
Cdy291 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-10 | 08:29 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Mountain View, CA

Bikes: 2012 Scott CR1 Comp

My bike came with 44's, which caused a lot of pain in my hands, neck, and elbows. Downsized to a 40cm, and it's just fine. I am 5'8" but female, although my shoulders are wider than the norm. I could probably ride 38's comfortably as well, but start running out of room to put all the various gadgets and bags
deep_sky is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-10 | 08:31 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
The FSA Omega Compact is ~1cm narrower at the shifter mount than the stated size. So a 42cm will be about 41cm on the hoods. The only way to know what size you'll want is to actually put your hands on some different size bars and find out which feels best to you. Finding out what size works for other people isn't really gonna help you.
SkinnyLegs is offline  
Reply
Old 05-27-10 | 08:42 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Looking for Lance

Bikes: 2001 Lemond Tourmalet

Originally Posted by SkinnyLegs
The FSA Omega Compact is ~1cm narrower at the shifter mount than the stated size. So a 42cm will be about 41cm on the hoods. The only way to know what size you'll want is to actually put your hands on some different size bars and find out which feels best to you. Finding out what size works for other people isn't really gonna help you.
This is what I was looking for. Thanks.
VoodooChi|d is offline  
Reply
Old 05-28-10 | 06:16 AM
  #9  
Terex's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 73
From: 5200' Boulder, CO Area

Bikes: Specialized 6Fattie, Parlee Z5, Cannondale SuperX

Width
Check width first. For optimal control and efficiency, drop handlebars should be about the same width as your shoulders (photo). These bars come in sizes ranging from about 38- to 44-cm wide. So, if the distance between the bony protrusions on top of your shoulder blades is 42 cm, that’s what the handlebar width should be.

https://www.jimlangley.net/crank/bikefit.html And lots of others out there. Search.
Terex is offline  
Reply
Old 05-28-10 | 06:37 AM
  #10  
roadiejorge's Avatar
stole your bike
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 27
From: North Bergen, NJ

Bikes: Orbea Orca, Ridley Compact

If they are 46cm then it sounds like they're definitely too wide for someone of your height unless you have really wide shoulders. A quick way of checking is to look at your hand position on the hoods in relation to your shoulders; if your forearms don't align then your bars might be too wide. I'm suspecting you'll probably need a 40cm, 42cm at most. I'm 5'8 and use 42cm on both of my bikes; I've tried 40cm and they did not feel comfortable.
__________________
I like pie
roadiejorge is offline  
Reply
Old 05-28-10 | 09:40 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,811
Likes: 0
From: Northern Nevada
Originally Posted by Cdy291
I am 5' 7" and used 42cm bars for years, then got a new bike that came with 40cm bars and while I did feel a bit less stable for a while, I am now far more comfortable.
FWIW (I'm not sure it's worth anything, but it's a little interesting), I'm 6'4", and one of my 64cm bikes came with 42cm bars. I rode with them for three or four years and felt fine. Then I ordered a supercheap set of 50cm (yes, 50) bars from Nashbar for my singlespeed, and when they came, i liked them so much I ordered another pair for my main bike. I really like the extra width. It's not easy or cheap to try a range of widths before you decide, unless you're cozy with a bike shop owner, but if you can work out a way to test-ride a bike with wider bars, you may be suprised. Anything narrower than about 46 feels cramped to me now.
Velo Dog is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
imobilinpedalus
Bicycle Mechanics
9
06-16-17 02:41 PM
oldsrocket1965
Classic & Vintage
1
11-27-16 10:05 PM
kurtridesbikes
Commuting
36
09-16-14 11:47 AM
echotraveler
Road Cycling
23
04-19-11 06:17 AM
deepakvrao
Road Cycling
10
09-02-10 08:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.