PowerTap Batteries
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: SE USA, Appalachia
Bikes: 98 Litespeed Natchez
PowerTap Batteries
Does anyone know if using a PT without the HRM chest strap causes the head unit to eat batteries extra fast? I am wondering if the unit is constantly seaching for or trying to "learn" the HRM that is not there and thus draining the battery. The last two batteries in my head unit have lasted less than a month each time, and I am wondering if this is a possible cause. Is there a way to prevent the unit from doing the HRM search? The unit is an SL 2.4 wireless.
- Yes, the batteries are good when I put them in. Lithium Energizers and I check the voltage prior to using them.
- Yes, the batteries are good when I put them in. Lithium Energizers and I check the voltage prior to using them.
#3
AFAIK, the pt headunit only searches for devices for a certain amount of time (for example, when you first turn the head unit, you see the rotating lines on the power and hr displays). If it can't find anything, it just stops searching and displays -- instead of a number.
#4
cab horn

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 28,353
Likes: 31
From: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
AFAIK, the pt headunit only searches for devices for a certain amount of time (for example, when you first turn the head unit, you see the rotating lines on the power and hr displays). If it can't find anything, it just stops searching and displays -- instead of a number.
#5
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: SE USA, Appalachia
Bikes: 98 Litespeed Natchez
AFAIK, the pt headunit only searches for devices for a certain amount of time (for example, when you first turn the head unit, you see the rotating lines on the power and hr displays). If it can't find anything, it just stops searching and displays -- instead of a number.
I think for now I am just going to at least let the unit "learn" the HRM and see if that seems to help, since AFAIK now the units don't actually have to be specifically told to "learn" a new sensor when there is a battery change, they just do it automatically. Am I right on that? Hard to keep up with the new software. So mine is possibly always trying to do the initial learn?
#8
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: SE USA, Appalachia
Bikes: 98 Litespeed Natchez
1 minute, but really since the unit isn't doing anything like searching before it goes idle, an extra minute shouldn't dramatically decrease the battery life.
Last edited by whrl1; 07-26-10 at 09:38 AM.
#10
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: SE USA, Appalachia
Bikes: 98 Litespeed Natchez
AFAIK, the pt headunit only searches for devices for a certain amount of time (for example, when you first turn the head unit, you see the rotating lines on the power and hr displays). If it can't find anything, it just stops searching and displays -- instead of a number.
I checked on my ride today to make sure it wasn't searching for the HRM and it shows --- for HR once it finds the hub. I also checked to see if it was doing a HR search after a hub signal loss during the ride, and it doesn't seem to be searching then either.
Can someone explain to me why having the unit in the download cradle would potentially drain the battery, even if the unit has gone to sleep after the DL. I often see this mentioned to explain dead batteries as well.
#13
thinking about it...

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
My battery life nearly doubled when I stopped the vicious cycle of download, analyze, update training log, get sucked into hours of FB/BF screen time, fall asleep on couch, go eat dinner, go to bed for real, find head unit still attached to PC in the morning.






