Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

SRAM Rival Observations

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

SRAM Rival Observations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-10, 05:22 PM
  #26  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by adriano
the front shifting effort isnt at all a pain, but it is weird with the rear shifting being so light. if im shifting the front a lot, sometimes ill crank the rear shifter much harder than i ought to.
That's the other aspect that I've got reservations about. Not so much any difference in effort, but determining a shift by how far you push a lever instead of which lever you push. It's like the difference between trimming the FD and shifting it -- I have to be a bit more conscious when all I want to do is trim.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 09-18-10, 05:26 PM
  #27  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
I've ridden 2010 Force for a little over a year now. I was using Shimano (9 speed Dura Ace) before that. I don't even think about what I'm doing, it's just natural now. I wouldn't worry about having to "think" about shifting.

I've also never really had a problem with shifting the front on the bike. When it's in the stand I have to get my hand in the right place to shift it, because it is kinda strong, but I've never had a problem on the bike.
Flatballer is offline  
Old 09-18-10, 05:40 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,306

Bikes: CAAD9-1, Windsor Cliff 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flatballer
If you meant Dura Ace shifters, Tiagra front derailleur, and Ultegra rear, then yes, you can do that. I'm putting less and less faith in what you say the more you say.
Fair enough. I don't pretend to know it all. I was under the impression that not all of Shimano's offerings were compatible but happy to learn the real state of affairs.
cooleric1234 is offline  
Old 09-18-10, 06:47 PM
  #29  
not a role model
 
JeffS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by ThinLine
Good comments. I have 2010 sram Force and like it except for:

1) Seems like I'm going to break the paddle shifter on front D shifting. Takes some considerable force. RD not as much but still strenuous.

Misrouted cables.

Route on the backside of the bars and minimize bends. Consider using better cables as well. A poorly routed bike feels exactly as you describe. I know... I have one sitting in my garage right now. I also have several more sram bikes that shift with very little effort. The difference is night and day.
JeffS is offline  
Old 09-18-10, 08:09 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,306

Bikes: CAAD9-1, Windsor Cliff 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pacificaslim
Of course you could do all of that. To run a shimano setup that is similar to sram's apex, all you need is a road derailleur that can handle the cassette (one caveat: can't be the latest 10-speed mtb derailleurs, so pick a 9-speed mtb derailleur or a road triple rear derailleur), a road front derailleur of your choice, and any 10-speed shimano shifters (105, ultegra, or dura ace).
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems a road triple derailluer wouldn't necessarily work. It would have the total capacity that is needed but I believe they also specify a maximum sprocket size, which for Shimano road offerings is now usually around 28T.

I had heard that you could run a mountain derailleur but I just kind of discounted that as being kind of kludgy. I just wasn't interested in that. In retrospect I don't know why, if it works it works.
cooleric1234 is offline  
Old 09-18-10, 08:18 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,306

Bikes: CAAD9-1, Windsor Cliff 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
That's the other aspect that I've got reservations about. Not so much any difference in effort, but determining a shift by how far you push a lever instead of which lever you push. It's like the difference between trimming the FD and shifting it -- I have to be a bit more conscious when all I want to do is trim.
For the rear shifting I got used to it by the end of the ride. I was shifting less in the front so it still took a little thought. I have no doubt it would become second nature. Plus you hear and feel the click, so it's not like it's a guessing game.
cooleric1234 is offline  
Old 09-18-10, 08:23 PM
  #32  
Seńor Member
 
roshea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jsmonet
6700 derailleurs only work with 6700 shifters for the time being.
That is not correct.
roshea is offline  
Old 09-18-10, 10:40 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,306

Bikes: CAAD9-1, Windsor Cliff 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by roshea
That is not correct.
Can someone set the record straight on this one then?
cooleric1234 is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 06:08 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,946

Bikes: Pedal Force RS2, Canyon, Basso, Tommaso, Rock Racing, Schwinn, SWOBO, Trek

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by JeffS
Misrouted cables.

Route on the backside of the bars and minimize bends. Consider using better cables as well. A poorly routed bike feels exactly as you describe. I know... I have one sitting in my garage right now. I also have several more sram bikes that shift with very little effort. The difference is night and day.
I have minimal bends in cables which are OEM SRAM. The bike was built up by my excellent LBS, who is a great mechanic and understands (and loves) SRAM. Perhaps I just find better torque leverage with SHimano than SRAM shifting. Whole hand versus fingers movement.
DON'T get me wrong, I think 2010 Force is fabulous minus the braking which can't even almost compare to Dura-Ace.
Thanks
ThinLine is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 07:31 AM
  #35  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by cooleric1234
Can someone set the record straight on this one then?
https://bike.shimano.com/publish/cont...ty%20Chart.pdf
https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-mechanics/231157-shimano-compatibility-charts.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/428537-dura-ace-7900-backward-compatibility.html
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/194859-shimano-compatibility-questions.html

Certainly more complex than Sram interchangeability.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 08:40 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 1,306

Bikes: CAAD9-1, Windsor Cliff 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks, that's interesting. If I'm reading that first link correctly the original example I gave was correct? I can't use my 7900 Dura-Ace shifters with Tiagra front derailleur and Ultegra 6700 rear derailleur? Again, not that I'd do that, but just an extreme example.
cooleric1234 is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 08:48 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
alexvpaq's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Qc,Canada
Posts: 995

Bikes: A trek

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If your front shifter is that hard to shift you should consider changing the cable I had this problem on my tiagra shifters and it went from hard like destroying a brick wall with my tongue to Smoother than plowing through ice cream with a red hot iron bar~

LoL
alexvpaq is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 08:53 AM
  #38  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by cooleric1234
Thanks, that's interesting. If I'm reading that first link correctly the original example I gave was correct? I can't use my 7900 Dura-Ace shifters with Tiagra front derailleur and Ultegra 6700 rear derailleur? Again, not that I'd do that, but just an extreme example.
I think that's right. Somewhere in the past month I saw a compatibility chart that included 7800, too.

This the thing about Shimano that bugs me the most. There's no practical reason to have such a complex compatibility matrix. I can think of two possible reasons: 1) the engineers in the different road, MTB, and street groups are fiddling with their own projects and not communicating well with each other, or 2) they want to push customers into changing entire groupsets instead of going piece-by-piece. I had a good idea that my 7800 shifters would work with my 6600 FD and RD, but I wanted to see it in print to be sure.

On the other hand, I can expect any Sram 10sp part to work with any other. I can use first-generation Red shifters with an XX long-cage RD and Apex FD if I want to.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 11:51 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
milliron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco Peninsula
Posts: 768

Bikes: 1997 Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have noticed none of the issues that the OP listed on my SRAM Red setup. I specifically love the ergonomics and how mechanical and precise the shifting feels.

I have over 1200 miles on my Red group after several years with Ultegra 6600. Also, it was setup by an excellent mechanic.
milliron is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 05:01 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
I think that's right. Somewhere in the past month I saw a compatibility chart that included 7800, too.

This the thing about Shimano that bugs me the most. There's no practical reason to have such a complex compatibility matrix. I can think of two possible reasons: 1) the engineers in the different road, MTB, and street groups are fiddling with their own projects and not communicating well with each other, or 2) they want to push customers into changing entire groupsets instead of going piece-by-piece. I had a good idea that my 7800 shifters would work with my 6600 FD and RD, but I wanted to see it in print to be sure.

On the other hand, I can expect any Sram 10sp part to work with any other. I can use first-generation Red shifters with an XX long-cage RD and Apex FD if I want to.

Shimano is smart and I'd guess #2. They want to avoid people buying the dura ace shifters and low end derailleurs. Which is something I'd probably do if I were still buying Shimano groups.

Or it could be that they're trying to prevent, as much as possible, bike manufacturers from mixing groups and pretending it's the high end group when really they picked 3 parts of the high end group (I hate it when manufacturers do that, especially when it's the crank that they swapped out).

I really like SRAM's compatibility.

Their levers aren't the greatest thing ever, but I like the interface and they fit my hands.
crhilton is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maartendc
Bicycle Mechanics
4
10-02-18 10:24 AM
german88
General Cycling Discussion
4
05-22-16 08:37 AM
Banzai
General Cycling Discussion
1
04-27-16 01:04 PM
humboldt'sroads
Road Cycling
11
04-06-12 09:15 PM
truckstop
Road Cycling
50
08-18-10 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.