Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Can someone please explain "Fork Rake" to me?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Can someone please explain "Fork Rake" to me?

Old 09-19-10, 06:40 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Can someone please explain "Fork Rake" to me?

My CAAD 9 fork has a "45" rake. I'm looking at a 3T model that come in either 43, 49, or 53 rake. Nothing in the same rake as mine has now.

So, what will this do if I get the 43, or the 49? I've heard it makes steering either more sensitive (twitchy), or more stable, depending on which way you go.

I just don't understand. If I get the 43, which is closest to what I have now, what difference will that make?


Sorry for the ignorance, but I can't find a chart, graph, or anything else to explain it to me.



RD
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 06:46 AM
  #2  
.
 
Namenda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: "The Woo", MA
Posts: 4,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Namenda is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 07:00 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks Namenda,



So looking at that picture, if I go from a 45 to a 43, which would move the rake back towards the bike a little, then the steering becomes more twitchy? How much difference would a 49 make in stability if I got that from the current 45??
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 07:10 AM
  #4  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,725

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3483 Post(s)
Liked 3,134 Times in 1,800 Posts
Fork rake, as shown above, is the amount of offset from the steering axis to the dropouts. In combination with head tube angle and wheel size, it determines the amount of geometric trail. A larger trail makes the bike more stable but harder to turn. A smaller trail makes the bike more responsive but "twitchier." Most modern bicycles use a head angle in the 72-74 degree range and a rake of 40-50mm, giving trail of 60-65mm.

https://davesbikeblog.blogspot.com/20...le-bit-of.html
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 07:52 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,136

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1029 Post(s)
Liked 535 Times in 429 Posts
Originally Posted by rangerdavid
thanks Namenda,



So looking at that picture, if I go from a 45 to a 43, which would move the rake back towards the bike a little, then the steering becomes more twitchy? How much difference would a 49 make in stability if I got that from the current 45??
The bike will become less twitchy due to a larger trail. You would not want to buy a fork with more offset, since the trail is already on the small side, to start with.

The formula for trail is R/tanH - (offset/sinH), where R is the tire radius and H is the head tube angle. All fork offset reduces trail, so the more offset the smaller the trail and the quicker the steering.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 09:34 AM
  #6  
Gimme back my gears!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,327

Bikes: Cannondale Caad9-5 2009, Scattante XLR TT 2009, Trek Y-Foil 77 1998

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Get the 43 not the 49. You'll develop wee better skill set and your bike won't feel like an old piece of crap.
CyciumX is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 09:47 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,076
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3258 Post(s)
Liked 5,052 Times in 2,614 Posts
If you can't get the exact same rake, go with smaller rake, not larger.
You don't want to learn the hard way that the larger rake was enough to put you into highspeed shimmy.
This is most likely on tall frames where the *(&$#@# mfgrs use steeper headtube angles to keep the wheelbase short.
I have a tall custom Lightspeed for which I had to order a custom-built fork with 38mm rake, because forks with 43-45mm rake would result in shimmy.
Shimagnolo is online now  
Old 09-19-10, 09:49 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,076
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3258 Post(s)
Liked 5,052 Times in 2,614 Posts
Originally Posted by CyciumX
Get the 43 not the 49. You'll develop wee better skill set and your bike won't feel like an old piece of crap.
I don't think you understand that less rake results in *more* stability, not less.
But your advice to go with less rake is good.
Shimagnolo is online now  
Old 09-19-10, 09:51 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,076
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3258 Post(s)
Liked 5,052 Times in 2,614 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
EXCELLENT link.
When I was diagnosing my shimmy problems, I discovered Moulton's articles, which were best discussions anywhere on steering geometry.
Shimagnolo is online now  
Old 09-19-10, 10:20 AM
  #10  
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,586

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 35 Posts
https://www.dclxvi.org/chunk/tech/trail/
queerpunk is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 02:12 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Typically we don't ever hear complaints from people that their bike is too stable and is too unresponsive in turning. Most of the time it's complaints about the steering being to twitchy and the bike being too unstable. In which case, going with less rake (for more trail) will result in a more stable bike. Go for the fork with 43mm rake.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 09-19-10, 06:49 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Jay Andriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 338
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Twitchy is a term used by people who do not like quick steering, those of us who do like quick steering just call it quick steering.
Jay Andriot is offline  
Old 09-20-10, 07:36 AM
  #13  
grilled cheesus
 
aham23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 8675309
Posts: 6,956

Bikes: 2010 CAAD9 Custom, 06 Giant TCR C2 & 05 Specialized Hardrock Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
^^^^ i call it responsive, which the CAAD9 is with the stock fork (rake). it was the most obvious difference i noticed from my Giant TCR. later.
__________________
aham23 is offline  
Old 11-10-10, 04:08 PM
  #14  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,392

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 286 Times in 157 Posts
My cyclocross frame has a 72 degree headtube angle. I'm currently using a fork with a 44 mm offset. I think the handling of the bike is perfect and am trying to duplicate the geometry on my next bike.

The frame I'm considering buying also has a 72 degree headtube angle. The wheel size will be the same, as is the fork length.

The new bike uses a 47 mm offset standard from the factory. However, consider that the headtube angle and tire size is the same as the old frame, I'm going to use my existing 44 mm fork.

I'm assuming that I'm duplicating the geometry of my existing bike as long as the headtube angle, tire size and fork length is unchanged.

Am I correct?
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 11-10-10, 05:39 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,136

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1029 Post(s)
Liked 535 Times in 429 Posts
Only correct if the frame is built for a fork with the same axle to crown length. Not all forks have the same axle to crown length. A longer fork would reduce the HTA and increase the trail. A shorter one would reduce the trail. It takes about a 9mm length diffence to change the HTA by .5 degree.
DaveSSS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aniki
General Cycling Discussion
9
03-26-19 12:25 PM
mikehitb
Framebuilders
2
11-09-17 05:10 AM
tkm
Framebuilders
19
05-17-16 04:52 AM
neeb
Road Cycling
4
03-04-13 03:08 AM
ftwelder
Framebuilders
20
12-15-12 03:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.