Forerunner 405, should I??
#2
Mr. Sparkle
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 534
Likes: 6
From: Sugar Land, TX
Bikes: 08 Specialized Allez Elite
My girlfriend is a runner first, cyclist second. She uses the 405, it works but it's not ideal. The good thing is you can get all the same features of an Edge, like altimeter, you can pair with ANT+ devices like cadence sensor.
The downside - the display is small so you won't get the same amount of data you would with a true cycling computer. The touch bezel system isn't easy to use on the bike. The altimeter isn't as accurate as the Edge models. The biggest problem is the lack of battery life, especially when you get ANT+ devices paired. The device rarely lasts past two hours when using cadence sensor and heart rate monitor. It also isn't compatible with power meters.
If you're looking for a dedicated cycling computer, I'd save up for an Edge and use your mileage points for something else. If you run a lot and cycle a little, the 405 would be a good way to go.
The downside - the display is small so you won't get the same amount of data you would with a true cycling computer. The touch bezel system isn't easy to use on the bike. The altimeter isn't as accurate as the Edge models. The biggest problem is the lack of battery life, especially when you get ANT+ devices paired. The device rarely lasts past two hours when using cadence sensor and heart rate monitor. It also isn't compatible with power meters.
If you're looking for a dedicated cycling computer, I'd save up for an Edge and use your mileage points for something else. If you run a lot and cycle a little, the 405 would be a good way to go.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Bikes: Giant Defy 2
Skip the 405, it's the one poor computer that Garmin has released. The touch bezel is terrible for running, and even worse for cycling. I'd pick up a 310XT for versatility and power support, or an Edge 500 for dedicated bike computer-ness
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco, CA
It's not even close to "poor" and I have no problems with it for running (I use autoscroll and avoid any bezel problems). It's been fantastic for running going on a year now. That being said there's no way I'd want to use it for cycling mainly because the screen is too small to hold much of the data I prefer to see on a bike computer.
#9
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
I have the 405 and would not recommend you get it. It's annoying to use for several reasons. For example, when the watch gets moist from sweat it's nearly impossible to use.
The GPS and data are good, but the user interface sucks.
The GPS and data are good, but the user interface sucks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DGonzalez
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
1
08-30-12 10:43 AM





