Cannondale Synapse
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Cannondale Synapse
Hi all,
I'm a cycling noob (in terms of being familiar with the parts, not in terms of skill). So I'm going to buy a new road bike and have been researching my options for a few weeks now. From everything I've seen, I like the carbon fiber Cannondale Synapse the most.
However, from their website (https://www.cannondale.com/usa/usaeng...-Road/Synapse/), I see many different models. And googling specific models revealed a wide range of prices (anywhere from $1000 to $5000).
1. I don't understand why there is such a huge price range within a specific series. For example, why does the Hi-MOD 1 Dura Ace model cost $5000 and the Carbon 5 105 cost $1500? What is the difference?
2. What is the approximate weight of this bicycle (Carbon 5 105)?
3. For every "upgrade" to the next better model, what am I really getting for the price?
I'm a cycling noob (in terms of being familiar with the parts, not in terms of skill). So I'm going to buy a new road bike and have been researching my options for a few weeks now. From everything I've seen, I like the carbon fiber Cannondale Synapse the most.
However, from their website (https://www.cannondale.com/usa/usaeng...-Road/Synapse/), I see many different models. And googling specific models revealed a wide range of prices (anywhere from $1000 to $5000).
1. I don't understand why there is such a huge price range within a specific series. For example, why does the Hi-MOD 1 Dura Ace model cost $5000 and the Carbon 5 105 cost $1500? What is the difference?
2. What is the approximate weight of this bicycle (Carbon 5 105)?
3. For every "upgrade" to the next better model, what am I really getting for the price?
#2
I drank the Kool-Aid!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 562
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, PA
Bikes: Rivendell Roadini, Rivendell Charlie Gallop Protovelo, Rivendell Clem L
I think the Hi-MOD uses different carbon. Past that the difference in price as you go up is due to the difference group sets. Full Ultegra cost more than 105 thus the increase in price.
#3
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
So, let's consider the Shimano Ultegra vs the Shimano 105. What am I really getting for the price difference? How are these two groupsets different? Am I getting a performance increase somehow? Different style maybe?
#4
Senior Member


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,237
Likes: 92
From: Awesome, Austin, TX
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Interloc Impala, ParkPre Image C6
If I had to pay more then $100 to go from Full 105 to Full Ultegra, I wouldn't do it. Ultegra will save you a few grams and MAY perform slightly better, but probably not enough that you'd notice.
__________________
2014 Specialized Roubaix2003 Interloc Impala2007 ParkPre Image C6 (RIP)
2014 Specialized Roubaix2003 Interloc Impala2007 ParkPre Image C6 (RIP)
#5
I drank the Kool-Aid!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 562
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, PA
Bikes: Rivendell Roadini, Rivendell Charlie Gallop Protovelo, Rivendell Clem L
Looking closer at the specs it looks like it is more complex than I made it sound. While the groupset is upgraded there are also a ton of little things like handlebars, tires, rims etc that are upgraded as well. If it were me I would probably get the 105 but that isnt to say that the upgrades aren't worth it. I am just tight with my money.
Edited to add: I didnt mention that the lower priced ones have alloy frames and carbon forks. I was going on the full carbon only.
Edited to add: I didnt mention that the lower priced ones have alloy frames and carbon forks. I was going on the full carbon only.
#6
CAT4
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, Nebraska
Bikes: 2009 Cervélo S1, 2009 Felt F75, 2010 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5, 2011 Cannondale CAADx, 2011 Specialized Transition Elite
I have the 2010 Synapse Carbon 5 56cm. It weighs 19.1 with 2 water bottle cages (aluminum) and computer on it fully stock. I would go and test ride the 5 and the higher priced models and see if you can tell a big difference. You may tell a difference, but those differences will be small for large incremental price increases. The Synapse Carbon 5 is more bike than most people will ever need.
#7
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Looking closer at the specs it looks like it is more complex than I made it sound. While the groupset is upgraded there are also a ton of little things like handlebars, tires, rims etc that are upgraded as well. If it were me I would probably get the 105 but that isnt to say that the upgrades aren't worth it. I am just tight with my money.
Edited to add: I didnt mention that the lower priced ones have alloy frames and carbon forks. I was going on the full carbon only.
Edited to add: I didnt mention that the lower priced ones have alloy frames and carbon forks. I was going on the full carbon only.
I have the 2010 Synapse Carbon 5 56cm. It weighs 19.1 with 2 water bottle cages (aluminum) and computer on it fully stock. I would go and test ride the 5 and the higher priced models and see if you can tell a big difference. You may tell a difference, but those differences will be small for large incremental price increases. The Synapse Carbon 5 is more bike than most people will ever need.
#9
BTW, I'm trying a Carbon 6 with Apex this weekend to see how it comares with the new Roubaix Elite.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports
#10
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
MSRP for the 2011 Carbon 5 105 is $2149 on the Cannondale website. The Alloy Synapse 5 with 105 group is closer to the price you're quoting. Anything with Dura Ace is going to be expensive, no matter who is selling it, or what material it is made from.
BTW, I'm trying a Carbon 6 with Apex this weekend to see how it comares with the new Roubaix Elite.
BTW, I'm trying a Carbon 6 with Apex this weekend to see how it comares with the new Roubaix Elite.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
The reason they're priced like that is simply marketing. They're building what they can sell. If you're flip flopping between models then their job was well done. It's when people go for the bottom or the top that they know they're leaving money on the table.
Because they can.
Because they can.
#12
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
The reason they're priced like that is simply marketing. They're building what they can sell. If you're flip flopping between models then their job was well done. It's when people go for the bottom or the top that they know they're leaving money on the table.
Because they can.
Because they can.
#15
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: PA, USA
Bikes: Emonda SLR, Salsa Warbird carbon
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Bikes: BMC TeamMachine, CAAD9, CAD R1000
It is possible to buy a 2010 bike with 5700 105 on it. I have one.
So to the OP: check to see if the 2010 bike has the new 105 (if you know the differences), because 2010 bikes should be discounted now, which is always nice.
So to the OP: check to see if the 2010 bike has the new 105 (if you know the differences), because 2010 bikes should be discounted now, which is always nice.
#18
Retro-guy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Danville, CA
Bikes: 1980 Raleigh Super Record
The pluses of the new 105 (5700 series), versus the prior 105 (5600) are:
- cables to the derailleurs are now "hidden" under the bar tape, along with the brake cables (just as they are with the current Ultegra and Dura-Ace, not to mention the SRAM groups) (whereas the 5600 had the derailleur cables coming out the side). This is almost entirely a "looks" issue.
- the pivot points for braking in both the new brifter levers and in the new 105 brakes themselves have been moved a bit - supposedly to provide a bit more braking leverage, especially when braking from the brake-hood tops. I don't know how noticeable this is. It's also not clear to me if the change is mostly in the brifters, or mostly in the brakes (I don't know if your proposed bike has the "full" 105 group, including the brakes, crank, etc., or if some parts are from other companies.)
- a small weight reduction - but as this is only 30 gm (about 1 ounce) over the whole group, it is essentially nothing.
- the new "short cage" rear derailleur (for use with a double or compact double) has a bit more "reach" than before, so that you can fully cross-chain, even with a compact double up front (16-tooth spread), and with an 11-28 cassette (17-tooth spread). In other words, the total "tooth differential" that works with the new RD is 33 teeth. (The old 105's figure was 29 teeth, which meant a 12-25 cassette.) Note that you can still use cassettes with a larger spread with the old 105 RD - you just have to avoid one or two of the worst-case cross-chaining combinations (which most people would avoid anyway). (Actually, the largest rear cog that the old 105 RD would support was a 27 - now it works with a 28.)
Sorry if the above is a bit complicated. The improvements in the new 105 are not THAT significant, but makes it a bit closer in functionality to the current Ultegra. Probably not enough of a difference to reject getting a 2010 model that didn't have it, but all else being equal, you might as well get the latest....
- cables to the derailleurs are now "hidden" under the bar tape, along with the brake cables (just as they are with the current Ultegra and Dura-Ace, not to mention the SRAM groups) (whereas the 5600 had the derailleur cables coming out the side). This is almost entirely a "looks" issue.
- the pivot points for braking in both the new brifter levers and in the new 105 brakes themselves have been moved a bit - supposedly to provide a bit more braking leverage, especially when braking from the brake-hood tops. I don't know how noticeable this is. It's also not clear to me if the change is mostly in the brifters, or mostly in the brakes (I don't know if your proposed bike has the "full" 105 group, including the brakes, crank, etc., or if some parts are from other companies.)
- a small weight reduction - but as this is only 30 gm (about 1 ounce) over the whole group, it is essentially nothing.
- the new "short cage" rear derailleur (for use with a double or compact double) has a bit more "reach" than before, so that you can fully cross-chain, even with a compact double up front (16-tooth spread), and with an 11-28 cassette (17-tooth spread). In other words, the total "tooth differential" that works with the new RD is 33 teeth. (The old 105's figure was 29 teeth, which meant a 12-25 cassette.) Note that you can still use cassettes with a larger spread with the old 105 RD - you just have to avoid one or two of the worst-case cross-chaining combinations (which most people would avoid anyway). (Actually, the largest rear cog that the old 105 RD would support was a 27 - now it works with a 28.)
Sorry if the above is a bit complicated. The improvements in the new 105 are not THAT significant, but makes it a bit closer in functionality to the current Ultegra. Probably not enough of a difference to reject getting a 2010 model that didn't have it, but all else being equal, you might as well get the latest....
#19
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
The pluses of the new 105 (5700 series), versus the prior 105 (5600) are:
- cables to the derailleurs are now "hidden" under the bar tape, along with the brake cables (just as they are with the current Ultegra and Dura-Ace, not to mention the SRAM groups) (whereas the 5600 had the derailleur cables coming out the side). This is almost entirely a "looks" issue.
- the pivot points for braking in both the new brifter levers and in the new 105 brakes themselves have been moved a bit - supposedly to provide a bit more braking leverage, especially when braking from the brake-hood tops. I don't know how noticeable this is. It's also not clear to me if the change is mostly in the brifters, or mostly in the brakes (I don't know if your proposed bike has the "full" 105 group, including the brakes, crank, etc., or if some parts are from other companies.)
- a small weight reduction - but as this is only 30 gm (about 1 ounce) over the whole group, it is essentially nothing.
- the new "short cage" rear derailleur (for use with a double or compact double) has a bit more "reach" than before, so that you can fully cross-chain, even with a compact double up front (16-tooth spread), and with an 11-28 cassette (17-tooth spread). In other words, the total "tooth differential" that works with the new RD is 33 teeth. (The old 105's figure was 29 teeth, which meant a 12-25 cassette.) Note that you can still use cassettes with a larger spread with the old 105 RD - you just have to avoid one or two of the worst-case cross-chaining combinations (which most people would avoid anyway). (Actually, the largest rear cog that the old 105 RD would support was a 27 - now it works with a 28.)
Sorry if the above is a bit complicated. The improvements in the new 105 are not THAT significant, but makes it a bit closer in functionality to the current Ultegra. Probably not enough of a difference to reject getting a 2010 model that didn't have it, but all else being equal, you might as well get the latest....
- cables to the derailleurs are now "hidden" under the bar tape, along with the brake cables (just as they are with the current Ultegra and Dura-Ace, not to mention the SRAM groups) (whereas the 5600 had the derailleur cables coming out the side). This is almost entirely a "looks" issue.
- the pivot points for braking in both the new brifter levers and in the new 105 brakes themselves have been moved a bit - supposedly to provide a bit more braking leverage, especially when braking from the brake-hood tops. I don't know how noticeable this is. It's also not clear to me if the change is mostly in the brifters, or mostly in the brakes (I don't know if your proposed bike has the "full" 105 group, including the brakes, crank, etc., or if some parts are from other companies.)
- a small weight reduction - but as this is only 30 gm (about 1 ounce) over the whole group, it is essentially nothing.
- the new "short cage" rear derailleur (for use with a double or compact double) has a bit more "reach" than before, so that you can fully cross-chain, even with a compact double up front (16-tooth spread), and with an 11-28 cassette (17-tooth spread). In other words, the total "tooth differential" that works with the new RD is 33 teeth. (The old 105's figure was 29 teeth, which meant a 12-25 cassette.) Note that you can still use cassettes with a larger spread with the old 105 RD - you just have to avoid one or two of the worst-case cross-chaining combinations (which most people would avoid anyway). (Actually, the largest rear cog that the old 105 RD would support was a 27 - now it works with a 28.)
Sorry if the above is a bit complicated. The improvements in the new 105 are not THAT significant, but makes it a bit closer in functionality to the current Ultegra. Probably not enough of a difference to reject getting a 2010 model that didn't have it, but all else being equal, you might as well get the latest....
#21
The price is just below the bike.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports
#22
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Try this link. https://www.cannondale.com/usa/usaeng...e-Carbon-5-105
The price is just below the bike.
The price is just below the bike.
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Bikes: BMC TeamMachine, CAAD9, CAD R1000
Try searching for MRAP.
The link works fine. It lists as 2149 USD
#24
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
The MSRP for 5700 is actually lower than 5600. Personally, I would have bought my bike (CAAD9 5) whether or not it was 5700. It was just a bonus that I got 5700. But for your purposes, I would say 10%, so around $100
Try searching for MRAP.
The link works fine. It lists as 2149 USD
Try searching for MRAP.
The link works fine. It lists as 2149 USD
EDIT: Now I see it. I opened the link in a proxy. It seems that it doesn't show prices for Canadian IP addresses (Canadian customers). I used a US proxy and it showed the price then.
Last edited by solarwind; 10-11-10 at 08:05 PM.




and the price is the same.