![]() |
I think the pad compound will have a greater effect on the brakes than anything else. The new Force brakes are very nice (very similar to Red). I haven't tried the combo yet, but i'd suspect that Force brakes w/the new Shimano pads would make a nice combo.
If you care about weight go with SRAM, if you don't go with Ultegra. Take the ergo stuff into account too. They're both very good, they both work well. The rest is purely subjective. To me, Ultegra appears to be of higher quality, but that's perhaps because it's heavier (and I still ride SRAM for whatever that's worth). Also, Shimano's new mess of new brakes not working with old shifters, and b-compatibility this with a-compatibility that is a pain. It's one of the reason's I moved to SRAM, it all works, and most of it will work with Shimano cranks, FD, wheelset. |
Quote:
|
For those talking about the front shifting of Shimano -- how much of that do you think might be due to the crankset?
In my case, I switched from a Truvativ crank to Shimano, with the same 105 FD and everything, and it shifted more smoothly and reliably. I don't think it was due to setup -- a front derailleur is probably the simplest drivetrain part to adjust -- but the crank and BB just worked better. But, if you're using another crank with your Shimano setup and it shifts great, then never mind me. :D |
Quote:
I'm just stating that some of these problems which I've had with my Shimano groupset, are common throughout all Shimano, and are not present in the SRAM grouppos. Hence the reason I personally will be changing. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I just posted in this thread because some other dude said he hated his 105, and I agreed. And somehow you brought the thread back around to me. |
Quote:
[quoteIf you're going to make a bike with a frankengroup, why not go with Shimano 105 or ultegra brakes?]In my experience on numerous test rides, nothing stops as well as Shimano brakes.[/quote] Where did I say there were the best? In my experience with stock Shimano, SRAM, Tektro, and very limited with Campy, brakes, Shimano were the best. All I did was ask a question and participate in the discussion. You, on the other hand, contributed nothing but a "Lol", which is almost the same as contributing nothing. Furthermore, since when was this a thread about the best? The title of the thread is "Ultegra vs Force". If it was the best, then it would've been Dura Ace, Red or Super Record. Furthermore, my post was in response to this comment from ptle: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Edit: I wouldn't go as far as to say I'll never touch anything Shimano again as I have 5610 pedals (that I love), a 105 front derailleur (which has been acting up recently), RS10 wheels and R086 shoes... |
How many of people know how to properly setup a drive train? Maybe 2%? Judging from this thread, I'd say so.
I'm all for discussion about ergonomics, aesthetic, and even stiffness, but you are kidding yourself if you think that a bad front shift has much at all to do with the brand of equipment you are running. It's a poor workman who blames his tools. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i'll chime in with my two cents
I currently run Ultegra 6700 on one bike, Rival/Ultegra mix on one bike, and my wife runs 105/tiagra on her bike. I am still getting used to the double tap shifting but I like it. I would say I like it better than the shimano style but its different. I dont mind either style of shifting. Both shift reliably and both get the job done. If setup right there shouldnt be any shifting problems. Heck I dont have any problems on my wife's 105/tiagra bike. I setup it up when she first got it and shes put 1000 miles on it w/ no need for any adjustments. The bike shop is not always the end all be all of adjustments. Theres always small differences once you put load on the system. It may shift fine while on the stand but very minor tweaks might need to be made during road testing. I agree the shop may get very close but in my experience it always needs some additonal adjustments. I dont have too much experience with many shops b/c I do all my wrenching myself. Only experience is with new bikes or friends of mine who had their bikes "tuned" up. I have rival brakes and ultegra 6700 brakes. I like the modulation and feel of the ultegra better. I cannot compare the front shifting. I like the front shifting on my Ultegra 6700 so much thats what I have on my sram bike. I also have a Ultegra chain and cassette. This combo I believe works out really well b/c it's quiet and has the front shifting that I really like. Ergonomics are pretty close among the two. The Shimano has a thicker bottom end while the sram seems thinner all along the hoods. Both work great for my small hands. In overall shifting there is a little more play on the shimano while the sram has more feel. This I think is by design due to the double tap system. In conclusion this is just babble but I like them both. I have Ultegra on my race bike but mainly because I didnt want to swap parts. I wouldnt mind having sram parts on it either. I would go with whichever shifting style your more comfy with. They both work and work well. Also consider pricing. When on sale ive seen Ultegra 6700 go in the 700ish range on some websites. While I was shopping my Sram build best deal I could find of force was high 800s. on a side note. 105 and Tiagra work perfectly fine if setup properly. ;) I didnt want to get into it but I had to comment on them because I've setup my wifes bike as well as a couple friends' bikes. Once they were setup they didnt really need any adjustment |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.