Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

compact or standard

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

compact or standard

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-10 | 10:03 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
compact or standard

I currently have a standard crank on my Giant with 12-25 gears. I am looking for another bike and was told to go with compact crank. Looking to get record 11 with compact and 11-25 . I was told this is the way to go . I ride in NY and NJ. Just a little confused. thanks
sicycle is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 10:07 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,886
Likes: 0
From: Near Sacramento
Do you ever feel like you need lower gears on the standard? Are you a very high cadence rider (like 110+)? If the answer to either of those is 'yes', then maybe a compact would be a good idea. If the answer to those is 'no', then you may prefer the standard.
__________________
-------

Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
JoelS is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
kimconyc's Avatar
Señor Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 14
From: Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX

Originally Posted by sicycle
I currently have a standard crank on my Giant with 12-25 gears. I am looking for another bike and was told to go with compact crank. Looking to get record 11 with compact and 11-25 . I was told this is the way to go . I ride in NY and NJ. Just a little confused. thanks
If you plan on racing (CP or PP), get a standard. If not, go for the compact. I'm a big fan of compact gearing for general riding.
kimconyc is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 10:57 AM
  #4  
Carbon Unit's Avatar
Live to ride ride to live
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,896
Likes: 1
From: Austin, Texas

Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro

If you are not doing any climbing, then you will not need a compact. However, if you are climbing and also doing flats, the compact is a good option. A compact with an 11 cog on the cassette is higher gear than a 12 cog on a standard. The compact gives you a wider range than a standard.
Carbon Unit is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 11:30 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,811
Likes: 0
From: Northern Nevada
Originally Posted by kimconyc
If you plan on racing (CP or PP), get a standard. If not, go for the compact. I'm a big fan of compact gearing for general riding.

I'm a compact fan, too. Didn't used to be, but a couple of years ago, on group rides, i started noticing what gears people actually USE. Judging by the number of people I see who never get off the small chainring, the standard 53-39 crankset with 11-25 or thereabouts is far higher than most cyclists need. I'd bet not more than 25 percent or so of cyclists ever use the big ring with the three or four smallest cogs.
Velo Dog is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 12:46 PM
  #6  
kimconyc's Avatar
Señor Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 14
From: Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX

Originally Posted by Velo Dog
I'm a compact fan, too. Didn't used to be, but a couple of years ago, on group rides, i started noticing what gears people actually USE. Judging by the number of people I see who never get off the small chainring, the standard 53-39 crankset with 11-25 or thereabouts is far higher than most cyclists need. I'd bet not more than 25 percent or so of cyclists ever use the big ring with the three or four smallest cogs.
50-11 is more than enough gear for most group rides out there--anything more, and really, you would probably be better off paying money for a closed course. My $.02.

Some people don't like the 34T on a compact and for that, there are 36T 110bcd rings. I'm not sure what 36T rings are "officially" compatible with Campagnolo 11, but given the fact that a guy I know rides Campagnolo 11 with a DA7800 crank, I would imagine any 36T chainring--FSA Super, for example--would work.
kimconyc is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 12:49 PM
  #7  
datlas's Avatar
Should Be More Popular
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 46,297
Likes: 11,812
From: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Like 90% of the questions asked on BF, the correct answer is "it depends."

Look at the gearing you want, the type of riding you do, and choose what is best for YOU.

You will probably do ok with either.

Capishe???

BTW I use standard gearing with 39/53 front and 12-23 cassette and it works well for me. But that's me, pick what is best for your riding.
datlas is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 01:02 PM
  #8  
DScott's Avatar
It's ALL base...
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,716
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by sicycle
I currently have a standard crank on my Giant with 12-25 gears. I am looking for another bike and was told to go with compact crank. Looking to get record 11 with compact and 11-25 . I was told this is the way to go . I ride in NY and NJ. Just a little confused. thanks
so you never got any of those other bikes you've been looking at? No Serotta? That's a shame.

I'd get a 12-27 cassette with that setup if you're doing climby-climby rides.
DScott is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 06:30 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
From: Perth, W.A.
Originally Posted by sicycle
I currently have a standard crank on my Giant with 12-25 gears. I am looking for another bike and was told to go with compact crank. Looking to get record 11 with compact and 11-25 . I was told this is the way to go . I ride in NY and NJ. Just a little confused. thanks
Compact with 11-25 is a nice spread for moderate hills, yet still very usable on the flats. If you have some really steep and/or long hills you might want an 11-28 or whatever Campy do. Even if you're strong enough not to really need the 28 it gives you the option to spin a bit if you get tired.

At the other end of the scale the 11 tooth will mean you can have fun for a little longer on descents compared with the 12 tooth.

If you're not doing any climbing, replacing the 34T front ring with a 36T like has been mentioned gives you two good ranges while minimising front shifting.
scirocco is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 06:39 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Likes: 5
IMO, you might want to keep this in mind: if you can't spin out 50-11 on anything but steep descents, go with a compact.
achoo is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 07:00 PM
  #11  
AEO's Avatar
AEO
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

I've spun out 53x11 while going down a modest arch bridge.


then again, it was with a 20x1.75 wheel.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 07:10 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
From: Northeast TN
compact with an 11-25 is the way to go!! especially where i live in the mountains. i also do alot of high speed simi flat ridding as well so the 11t comes in handy. as said before 50-11 is higher than 52-12 so i doubt you will feel like you are spinning out and you will be glad you have the compact when climbing.
M_FactorX19 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 07:10 PM
  #13  
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn

Bikes: Kona Kula Supreme

Originally Posted by kimconyc
If you plan on racing (CP or PP), get a standard. If not, go for the compact. I'm a big fan of compact gearing for general riding.
+1, switched from standard to compact with 11-25 cassette. I ride in PP, CP & 9W mostly.
BrooKona is offline  
Reply
Old 11-17-10 | 10:20 PM
  #14  
wunderkind's Avatar
Pro Paper Plane Pilot
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 3
I don't like the drastic chain drop from 50 to 34. My 52/39 transitions very smooth. With a 12-28 cassette, I have been very satisfied with the spread. Overall it provides smooth chain movement for refining my cadence.
Besides standard just looks bad ass on a road bike.
wunderkind is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stockae92
Road Cycling
19
09-28-16 04:36 AM
lennyparis
Road Cycling
26
03-16-14 11:27 AM
JAX_11
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
39
01-12-12 11:30 AM
djlarroc
Road Cycling
115
11-12-10 05:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.