compact or standard
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
compact or standard
I currently have a standard crank on my Giant with 12-25 gears. I am looking for another bike and was told to go with compact crank. Looking to get record 11 with compact and 11-25 . I was told this is the way to go . I ride in NY and NJ. Just a little confused. thanks
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,886
Likes: 0
From: Near Sacramento
Do you ever feel like you need lower gears on the standard? Are you a very high cadence rider (like 110+)? If the answer to either of those is 'yes', then maybe a compact would be a good idea. If the answer to those is 'no', then you may prefer the standard.
__________________
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
-------
Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
#3
Señor Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 14
From: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX
If you plan on racing (CP or PP), get a standard. If not, go for the compact. I'm a big fan of compact gearing for general riding.
#4
Live to ride ride to live
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,896
Likes: 1
From: Austin, Texas
Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro
If you are not doing any climbing, then you will not need a compact. However, if you are climbing and also doing flats, the compact is a good option. A compact with an 11 cog on the cassette is higher gear than a 12 cog on a standard. The compact gives you a wider range than a standard.
#5
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,811
Likes: 0
From: Northern Nevada
I'm a compact fan, too. Didn't used to be, but a couple of years ago, on group rides, i started noticing what gears people actually USE. Judging by the number of people I see who never get off the small chainring, the standard 53-39 crankset with 11-25 or thereabouts is far higher than most cyclists need. I'd bet not more than 25 percent or so of cyclists ever use the big ring with the three or four smallest cogs.
#6
Señor Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 14
From: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX
I'm a compact fan, too. Didn't used to be, but a couple of years ago, on group rides, i started noticing what gears people actually USE. Judging by the number of people I see who never get off the small chainring, the standard 53-39 crankset with 11-25 or thereabouts is far higher than most cyclists need. I'd bet not more than 25 percent or so of cyclists ever use the big ring with the three or four smallest cogs.
Some people don't like the 34T on a compact and for that, there are 36T 110bcd rings. I'm not sure what 36T rings are "officially" compatible with Campagnolo 11, but given the fact that a guy I know rides Campagnolo 11 with a DA7800 crank, I would imagine any 36T chainring--FSA Super, for example--would work.
#7
Should Be More Popular




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 46,297
Likes: 11,812
From: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Like 90% of the questions asked on BF, the correct answer is "it depends."
Look at the gearing you want, the type of riding you do, and choose what is best for YOU.
You will probably do ok with either.
Capishe???
BTW I use standard gearing with 39/53 front and 12-23 cassette and it works well for me. But that's me, pick what is best for your riding.
Look at the gearing you want, the type of riding you do, and choose what is best for YOU.
You will probably do ok with either.
Capishe???
BTW I use standard gearing with 39/53 front and 12-23 cassette and it works well for me. But that's me, pick what is best for your riding.
#8
I'd get a 12-27 cassette with that setup if you're doing climby-climby rides.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
From: Perth, W.A.
At the other end of the scale the 11 tooth will mean you can have fun for a little longer on descents compared with the 12 tooth.
If you're not doing any climbing, replacing the 34T front ring with a 36T like has been mentioned gives you two good ranges while minimising front shifting.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
I've spun out 53x11 while going down a modest arch bridge.
then again, it was with a 20x1.75 wheel.
then again, it was with a 20x1.75 wheel.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
From: Northeast TN
compact with an 11-25 is the way to go!! especially where i live in the mountains. i also do alot of high speed simi flat ridding as well so the 11t comes in handy. as said before 50-11 is higher than 52-12 so i doubt you will feel like you are spinning out and you will be glad you have the compact when climbing.
#13
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn
Bikes: Kona Kula Supreme
#14
I don't like the drastic chain drop from 50 to 34. My 52/39 transitions very smooth. With a 12-28 cassette, I have been very satisfied with the spread. Overall it provides smooth chain movement for refining my cadence.
Besides standard just looks bad ass on a road bike.
Besides standard just looks bad ass on a road bike.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JAX_11
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
39
01-12-12 11:30 AM
sffred
Road Cycling
14
04-26-11 09:24 PM






