Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Brooks B17 saddle...narrow or regular?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Brooks B17 saddle...narrow or regular?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-10 | 11:13 PM
  #1  
pgjackson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Brooks B17 saddle...narrow or regular?

I've decided to get a B17 for Christmas. Can't stand my stock Fuji seat and I really like the idea of a hand-made leather seat from England (lived there in the 80's) that has been unchanged for 100 years. I'm in to that kind of stuff, and anything hand made of leather is cool in my book. Heavy seats, I know...but I'm looking for comfort (and a little old-school style).

So which should I get, narrow or regular? I'm not a racer (yet), but I like to push myself and go as fast as possible. From what I've read on other sites, the narrow seat is more suited for "spirited" rides. Just looking for some input from folks who know these saddles.

Me, I'm 5'8", 175lbs with a pretty big butt. Not fat, I just have stocky legs and a bubble butt. I have my bike set up with about a 2-3 inch drop.
pgjackson is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-10 | 04:10 AM
  #2  
deepakvrao's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 21
From: Bangalore India
B17s are not designed for so much drop I think. More for a kind of bar and saddle being level.
deepakvrao is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-10 | 07:53 AM
  #3  
BetweenRides's Avatar
Dog Chaser
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland

Bikes: Trek Emonda, Seven Evergreen, Merlin Cyrene, Trek TCT 5000, Trek Checkpoint

B-17's will do fine with a little drop, but not more than a few inches, has to do with the angle of the nose in making the proper 'hammock' for the boys. I ride in the drops quite a bit and never have an issue with comfort. You should do fine with a regular B-17, that's the most popular model for a reason. The Narrow is just a bit smaller and (for me anyway) not as comfortable on the sit bones, but everyone is different. Also consider the B-17 Champion Special. Same basic saddle, but nice oversize copper rivets - very classic look. If you do want more of a saddle for racing, check out the Swift. This was one of the first I tried, but too narrow for me.

I own 3 B-17 Specials - one steel and 2 Ti, combined over 50,000 miles on them. Couldn't be happier and would never ride anything else.
BetweenRides is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-10 | 07:54 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,393
Likes: 10,170
From: Utah

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

I'm riding a regular B17 on this setup. It's very comfy and has worked well for rides up to 75 miles just fine. I do get some pressure on the boys in the drops but I hardly ride there on this bike.



On this setup I put a B17 Imperial which has a cutout in the center, no pressure at all.



My drop is more than 2-3 inches on both bikes.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
jamesdak is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-10 | 09:09 AM
  #5  
Huffin' N Puffin
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Central NY

Bikes: Anderson Custom Steel, Trek Madone 5.5, Lightspeed Classic

Originally Posted by pgjackson
I have my bike set up with about a 2-3 inch drop.
I have a B17 regular, and drop is about 3.5". Very comfortable.
JoeB14 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-10 | 12:57 PM
  #6  
pgjackson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

My main concern is my large butt on a narrow seat or my thigs rubbing on the wider seat. I also like the idea of the Imperial with the middle cut out (that's where all my pain is in the tain area), but something about it to me looks like it would pinch once the seat is broken in.

I love the look of the reddish-brown on that black Schwinn. If Indiana Jones rode a bike, that's what his saddle would look like.
pgjackson is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-10 | 01:12 PM
  #7  
kaliayev's Avatar
Gouge Away
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 984
Likes: 12
From: BFOH
Might want to look at the Team Pro as well. Width wise it is between the B17 and B17 narrow. I ride one on my Specialized Roubaix and it is probably my favorite saddle.


kaliayev is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 03:47 AM
  #8  
cs1's Avatar
cs1
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,176
Likes: 56
From: Clev Oh

Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn

Originally Posted by BetweenRides
B-17's will do fine with a little drop, but not more than a few inches
Couldn't agree more. If set up properly they are one of the most comfortable saddles ever.
cs1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 05:44 AM
  #9  
KoYak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 243
Likes: 1
From: loudoun County, VA

Bikes: Iron Horse Warrior Expert, Dahon MU P8, Bacchetta Giro 26, HP Velotechnik Grasshopper

Originally Posted by jamesdak

On this setup I put a B17 Imperial which has a cutout in the center, no pressure at all.


My drop is more than 2-3 inches on both bikes.
I use the B17 Imperial on my 2 road bikes. Both with 1.5-2 in drop. No issues riding on the hoods or drops.
KoYak is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 08:53 AM
  #10  
Banned.
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: SE Wisconsin

Bikes: 2010 Trek 2.3 / 2010 Specialized Stumpjumper Comp 29er

I was looking at a swallow originally, and then demo'd a swift due to my large clydesdaleness. The Swift felt slippery (which I was told they all do at first) but pretty comfy sitbones-wise. I have had pretty good luck with my San Marco Regal's and they are 148 width. I could probably use a little more width and that's why I've been still contemplating that Swift, and the Team Pro. Either way, I have heard more compliments than complaints about Brooks saddles. Just remember the break in period.
Delete_Yourself is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 09:10 AM
  #11  
frpax's Avatar
Steel is real, baby!
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 8
From: Boise, ID

Bikes: 1984 Pinarello, 1986 Bianchi Portofino, 1988 Bianchi Trofeo, 1989 Specialized Allez, 1989 Specialized Hard Rock, 2001 Litespeed Tuscany

You looking to buy a new Brooks, or used?
frpax is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 11:34 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,940
Likes: 363
I put a B-17, regular width, on my Cannondale R500T to replace the really narrow Coda seat that came stock. I rode Brooks Pro on all my bikes in the late 70's and early 80's so going with a Brooks was an easy decision. I am a Clyde (6'-1" and 230#) so the regular width is well used up but the comfort is beautiful for me. My wife's 1978 Brooks B-17 is still in use on her old Schwinn Mixte by her sister and is holding up great. I keep Proof hide in the shop and don't over do the use but keep it supple and clean.

Bill
qcpmsame is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 01:46 PM
  #13  
pgjackson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Originally Posted by frpax
You looking to buy a new Brooks, or used?
Right now I'm looking new, but I'd consider a gently used one at the right price.
pgjackson is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 03:00 PM
  #14  
frpax's Avatar
Steel is real, baby!
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 8
From: Boise, ID

Bikes: 1984 Pinarello, 1986 Bianchi Portofino, 1988 Bianchi Trofeo, 1989 Specialized Allez, 1989 Specialized Hard Rock, 2001 Litespeed Tuscany

Originally Posted by pgjackson
Right now I'm looking new, but I'd consider a gently used one at the right price.
PM sent
frpax is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 03:03 PM
  #15  
KoYak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 243
Likes: 1
From: loudoun County, VA

Bikes: Iron Horse Warrior Expert, Dahon MU P8, Bacchetta Giro 26, HP Velotechnik Grasshopper

If you haven't done so, check out Wallingford bikes for Brooks saddles. They lowered their prices in October, I think. and They have a 6 month money back guarantee. So it's a great way to make sure a you get the brooks saddle that fits you.
KoYak is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 05:22 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Semper Fi
If in doubt buy the regular B17. I recently purchased one after 30 years of Turbos then Turbomatics. Most comfortable saddle I have ever owned and feel no break in of any sort.
I was at Pendleton in the late 70's and mid-80's. The riding down the coast highway was very different then from now where its jam packed with houses and cars.
VaMoots is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 06:43 PM
  #17  
Apparition
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0

Bikes: Redline 925

Keep in mind Brooks saddles have about 2cm less usable space than their width spec. You don't want your bones to end up on the metal frame.

I've used swallow, team pro, and B17. I also ordered B17N at one point, but returned it for the reason stated above. I am 155lb with 30in waist. Swallow was too flexible. B17 provides ultimate comfort for moderate effort rides. Team pro feels a bit better during high effort, when legs carry more weight. Both are fine with couple inches of saddle to bar drop.

Be prepared for Brooks saddles to eat seams on your shorts twice as fast as other saddles. All of mine do this, but it is worth it.
submicron is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 10:56 PM
  #18  
djb
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,929
Likes: 1,243
From: Montreal Canada
also am very happy with my B17 and a seat/bar drop of about 2-2 1/2 inches, fine all around.
I would go with the regular, not the narrow.
I would suggest doing some forum searches on stuff people have written of their Brooks experiences. I second the point on being careful and observant of seat positional changes and how they change how it will feel. As with any seat adjustments, do small ones and really pay attention to the feeling. One issue is that they do not have marks on the rails, so a piece of tape will help in seeing fore and aft adjustments better.
Also on breaking in period (mine, not much more than 6 or 7 one hour long rides) and also how to take care of it. Planning a whole bunch of short rides is the best in my opinion for breaking it in.

You will see that right off the bat, it will have a feeling unlike any other seat youve been on, and despite horror stories of breakin and broken butts, in my case the break-in period really wasnt too bad, hot humid weather perhaps helped, but as a 140lb er, it worked well enough for me.

Last edited by djb; 12-05-10 at 11:01 PM.
djb is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 11:06 PM
  #19  
pgjackson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Originally Posted by VaMoots
Semper Fi
If in doubt buy the regular B17. I recently purchased one after 30 years of Turbos then Turbomatics. Most comfortable saddle I have ever owned and feel no break in of any sort.
I was at Pendleton in the late 70's and mid-80's. The riding down the coast highway was very different then from now where its jam packed with houses and cars.
The best thing about Pendleton is that I can get on my bike at my office and within 7 miles be riding along the beach. Lots of nice, low-traffic country roads on base as well.
pgjackson is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 06:59 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 1
From: Syracuse, NY

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R 260 Disc; 2008 Trek 4.7 Madone; 2017 Framed Minnesota 3.0 Fat Bike; 1984 Nishiki International

If your heart is set on the B-17 get the Narrow. But strongly consider the Swallow. I have both. B17N is a much more upright saddle. The Swallow is perfect for a roadbike.

https://www.wallbike.com/brooks/unspr...wallow-classic
gettingold is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lbear
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
19
09-10-12 10:23 PM
lungimsam
General Cycling Discussion
15
08-08-12 06:51 AM
jyl
Classic & Vintage
19
08-02-12 11:10 AM
curdog
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
18
04-04-11 12:20 PM
Kurious Oranj
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
6
09-03-10 05:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.