![]() |
Lightweight tubes?
Do you think they're better/faster?
Do you think they pucture more often? Your thoughts? |
Do you mean latex, lightweight butyl, or both??
|
Avoid them unless you are racing
|
At my LBS, you have your choice of standard, lightweight, ultralight, and latex....I generally get the lightweight ones. I agree ultralight or latex should be avoided unless these are in race-only tires. And if that's the case you may want to be riding sewups anyway.
|
how much weight are you really going to save on tubes? some of you guys and your weight issues... worse than a bunch of high school girls...
|
Originally Posted by CNY James
(Post 12028945)
how much weight are you really going to save on tubes? some of you guys and your weight issues... worse than a bunch of high school girls...
|
Doesn't make much difference with flats. You're talking about the minimal difference after something cuts through the tire. If lighter tubes improves rolling resistence and reduces weight, why not?
|
Originally Posted by CNY James
(Post 12028945)
how much weight are you really going to save on tubes? some of you guys and your weight issues... worse than a bunch of high school girls...
|
If you're really worried about inertia/rolling resistance, ride sew-ups (tubulars).
|
Why avoid them unless racing?
|
Originally Posted by StanSeven
(Post 12028964)
Do you talk this way with people you work with?
|
Originally Posted by Silvercivic27
(Post 12028976)
Why avoid them unless racing?
|
The latex ones leak air faster, sure, but I don't think they pucture any easier unless you're clumsy when you fit them. If some glass or a thorn can get through a kevlar beaded tyre it's not going to care what the tube is made of, lightweight or not is not going to make any difference to the puncture happening.
|
Originally Posted by CNY James
(Post 12029004)
in my line of work, people don't fret over such trivial matters... so, no.
|
But this isn't work, it's the interwebz. So who cares?
|
Originally Posted by ciocc_cat
(Post 12028968)
If you're really worried about inertia/rolling resistance, ride sew-ups (tubulars).
|
Originally Posted by MegaTom
(Post 12029033)
They leak air faster and puncture easier. But I like latex tubes for my flat kit because they fold up smaller so I can fit two in my small saddle bag, where I can only fit one of my regular butyl tubes. I only use 'em to finish a ride, then I patch up the regular tube and put the latex back in the bag.
On long rides with my touring bike, I carry a rolled up Pasela TG as a spare because it packs much smaller than the Marathon Supremes on the bike. I'd never thought about extending that idea to the tubes. |
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
(Post 12029155)
Now that is an interesting idea.
On long rides with my touring bike, I carry a rolled up Pasela TG as a spare because it packs much smaller than the Marathon Supremes on the bike. I'd never thought about extending that idea to the tubes. |
Originally Posted by wens
(Post 12029145)
Some clincher/latex combos have lower rolling resistance than nearly all sew-ups.
|
I personally haven't found much difference in flats between varying weights, but the lightweight ones fold up smaller to fit in my seat bag.
Originally Posted by ciocc_cat
(Post 12028968)
If you're really worried about inertia/rolling resistance, ride sew-ups (tubulars).
http://ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/0/...her-specs.html |
Originally Posted by StanSeven
(Post 12028953)
Doesn't make much difference with flats. You're talking about the minimal difference after something cuts through the tire.
I usually opt for the lightweight ones on my daily-driver road bike, and the ultralight butyl (Continental SuperSonic) on my raceday bike. I'd use the SuperSonics for daily use but (1) they're really expensive, and (2) the thinner rubber IS more difficult to patch, and unfortunately my routes have more than their fair share of broken glass. Performance-wise, I do think the ultralight butyl tubes are worth it for raceday. My club insisted that I race in the Masters state RR championship, instead of just marshalling, so after dangling a 3-man break in front of the peleton for 25 miles, I ended up outsprinting the last survivor by less than half a wheel. He was coming by, but not fast enough. Tubulars? Oh sure, if I owned a set of Zipp 202s, that would've been a great wheel for the race. Want! Cannot afford. Superlight tubes, yeah I can afford those. |
just ordered some 50g performance brand tubes to try ill let you know how they work out. i should have them in the next day or 2
|
I don't get the obsession with tubulars.
Latex tubes can save 5w @ each wheel, so that's 10 watt total savings if you use latex tubes compared to butyl (this was "scientifically" tested, it can vary). Also, there's some very nice clincher tyres that have extremely low rolling resistance. |
I ride with very thin tubes in the front, med in the back. I had problems in the back using the 45g tubes.
|
Originally Posted by kabex
(Post 12029656)
I don't get the obsession with tubulars.
Latex tubes can save 5w @ each wheel, so that's 10 watt total savings if you use latex tubes compared to butyl (this was "scientifically" tested, it can vary). Also, there's some very nice clincher tyres that have extremely low rolling resistance. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.