Lightweight tubes?
#4
Should Be More Popular




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 46,174
Likes: 11,742
From: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
At my LBS, you have your choice of standard, lightweight, ultralight, and latex....I generally get the lightweight ones. I agree ultralight or latex should be avoided unless these are in race-only tires. And if that's the case you may want to be riding sewups anyway.
#6
Should Be More Popular




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 46,174
Likes: 11,742
From: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
#7
Administrator

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,651
Likes: 2,695
From: Delaware shore
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Doesn't make much difference with flats. You're talking about the minimal difference after something cuts through the tire. If lighter tubes improves rolling resistence and reduces weight, why not?
#8
Administrator

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,651
Likes: 2,695
From: Delaware shore
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix SL3, Lynskey Cooper CX
They leak air faster and puncture easier. But I like latex tubes for my flat kit because they fold up smaller so I can fit two in my small saddle bag, where I can only fit one of my regular butyl tubes. I only use 'em to finish a ride, then I patch up the regular tube and put the latex back in the bag.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
From: Perth, W.A.
The latex ones leak air faster, sure, but I don't think they pucture any easier unless you're clumsy when you fit them. If some glass or a thorn can get through a kevlar beaded tyre it's not going to care what the tube is made of, lightweight or not is not going to make any difference to the puncture happening.
#14
Administrator

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,651
Likes: 2,695
From: Delaware shore
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
#16
#17
They leak air faster and puncture easier. But I like latex tubes for my flat kit because they fold up smaller so I can fit two in my small saddle bag, where I can only fit one of my regular butyl tubes. I only use 'em to finish a ride, then I patch up the regular tube and put the latex back in the bag.
On long rides with my touring bike, I carry a rolled up Pasela TG as a spare because it packs much smaller than the Marathon Supremes on the bike.
I'd never thought about extending that idea to the tubes.
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix SL3, Lynskey Cooper CX
It took me way too long to come up with that solution. For a while it seemed that I was either stuck with only a single spare tube in my small bag, or using my overly large bag to carry 2 tubes and having everything rattling around in there because of the abundance of space. Until one day I happened to notice one of the guys at the LBS unrolling a latex tube and I noticed how thin and squishy it was. It had occurred to me that I could just buy an in between-sized bag, but that is kind of a silly problem to have to throw extra money at.
#19
Administrator

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,651
Likes: 2,695
From: Delaware shore
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
#20
Over the hill

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 24,597
Likes: 1,363
From: Los Angeles, CA
Bikes: Pinarello Nytro, Momentum Transend
I personally haven't found much difference in flats between varying weights, but the lightweight ones fold up smaller to fit in my seat bag.
https://ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/0/...lar-specs.html
https://ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/0/...her-specs.html
https://ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/0/...her-specs.html
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#21
I usually opt for the lightweight ones on my daily-driver road bike, and the ultralight butyl (Continental SuperSonic) on my raceday bike. I'd use the SuperSonics for daily use but (1) they're really expensive, and (2) the thinner rubber IS more difficult to patch, and unfortunately my routes have more than their fair share of broken glass.
Performance-wise, I do think the ultralight butyl tubes are worth it for raceday. My club insisted that I race in the Masters state RR championship, instead of just marshalling, so after dangling a 3-man break in front of the peleton for 25 miles, I ended up outsprinting the last survivor by less than half a wheel. He was coming by, but not fast enough.
Tubulars? Oh sure, if I owned a set of Zipp 202s, that would've been a great wheel for the race. Want! Cannot afford. Superlight tubes, yeah I can afford those.
#23
I don't get the obsession with tubulars.
Latex tubes can save 5w @ each wheel, so that's 10 watt total savings if you use latex tubes compared to butyl (this was "scientifically" tested, it can vary).
Also, there's some very nice clincher tyres that have extremely low rolling resistance.
Latex tubes can save 5w @ each wheel, so that's 10 watt total savings if you use latex tubes compared to butyl (this was "scientifically" tested, it can vary).
Also, there's some very nice clincher tyres that have extremely low rolling resistance.
#25
Over the hill

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 24,597
Likes: 1,363
From: Los Angeles, CA
Bikes: Pinarello Nytro, Momentum Transend
I don't get the obsession with tubulars.
Latex tubes can save 5w @ each wheel, so that's 10 watt total savings if you use latex tubes compared to butyl (this was "scientifically" tested, it can vary).
Also, there's some very nice clincher tyres that have extremely low rolling resistance.
Latex tubes can save 5w @ each wheel, so that's 10 watt total savings if you use latex tubes compared to butyl (this was "scientifically" tested, it can vary).
Also, there's some very nice clincher tyres that have extremely low rolling resistance.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle





