Questions about SRAM
#1
neits
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 1,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Questions about SRAM
Any reason against matching Force shifters with a Rival group and calling it a day? Do people really prefer Rival to Ultegra even? I'm thinking about building up a second bike with said group. Should I really upgrade any other part beyond Rival?
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have ridden Sram Rival, Sram Force, Shimano 105, and Shimano Ultegra. I personally prefer Sram to Shimano, and I preper Rival to Ultegra yes. I couldn't tell a HUGE difference between Force and Rival other than weight. I do use a Force BB30 crankset because I think it's stiffer and the crankarms are carbon vs AL on the Rival. Just my .02. my current set up is all Rival with Force crankset. I love it.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,099
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The main difference is weight. Rival and Force are otherwise identical. Red is a little different, but I'm not sure of the details. Still cross compatible though.
#4
Go as fast as you can
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Marcos
Posts: 733
Bikes: Ritte Bosberg with SRAM Red and Mavic Cosmic Carbone SL's
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Other than weight not much reason to add Force unless you are going to use the cranks and bb. Otherwise Rival and SRAM for that matter are the bomb.
#5
neits
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 1,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Well the only reason I'm going with force shifters is availability. How much are rival ones anyway? I found the force set for 170.
#6
Hills hurt.. Couches kill
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brazil, IN
Posts: 3,370
Bikes: 1991 Specialized Sirrus Triple, 2010 Trek Madone 6.5 Project One, 2012 Cannondale Caad10, 2013 Trek Crockett
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mix and match as you like. You'll be pleased with it however you decide.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 335
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Force brakes have a stiffer spring. Personally I'd upgrade to those over the rival brakes. As for the shifters, weight is the only noticeable difference. Force supposedly has zero loss on the fd, but from my completely unscientific playing around at my LBS I was unable to notice any difference between it and my Rival.
Does anyone know if there is any difference other than color between Force and Rival FDs? The listed weights for both are identical in both styles.
Does anyone know if there is any difference other than color between Force and Rival FDs? The listed weights for both are identical in both styles.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Force brakes have a stiffer spring. Personally I'd upgrade to those over the rival brakes. As for the shifters, weight is the only noticeable difference. Force supposedly has zero loss on the fd, but from my completely unscientific playing around at my LBS I was unable to notice any difference between it and my Rival.
Does anyone know if there is any difference other than color between Force and Rival FDs? The listed weights for both are identical in both styles.
Does anyone know if there is any difference other than color between Force and Rival FDs? The listed weights for both are identical in both styles.
For the Force front derailleur it has the ability to trim, Rival may not. I'm not sure.
#9
Getting a clue
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 408
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 4.7, Diamondback Wildwood
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rival FD has the ability to trim only the large ring. On my Rival equipped bike I don't need trim on the large ring but I do on the small ring. Oh well, it's a compact crankset so I don't spend too much time in the small chainring and certainly don't get crossed up enough in it to really need an index position.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
All SRAM 10 speed road drivetrain components should be compatible. You can even mix in (most? all?) XX mountain components. UMD would sometimes use an XX RD and cassette for mountain rides.
The main difference is weight. Rival and Force are otherwise identical. Red is a little different, but I'm not sure of the details. Still cross compatible though.
The main difference is weight. Rival and Force are otherwise identical. Red is a little different, but I'm not sure of the details. Still cross compatible though.
#14
Senior Member
It just means as soon at you start moving the shift lever the cable (and derailleur) start moving instead of having a small amount of play in the lever where nothing happens. I have 1st generation sram without it but have ridden a new red bike. On the rear I don't think it makes as much difference, but on the front it is a big improvement. The front shifting is my biggest gripe on my sram c0mpared to my shimano.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2008 Cervelo RS, 2011 Scott CR1 Elite, 2014 Volagi Liscio
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It just means as soon at you start moving the shift lever the cable (and derailleur) start moving instead of having a small amount of play in the lever where nothing happens. I have 1st generation sram without it but have ridden a new red bike. On the rear I don't think it makes as much difference, but on the front it is a big improvement. The front shifting is my biggest gripe on my sram c0mpared to my shimano.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,781
Bikes: Felt AR1, Cervelo S2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I've owned 105, Rival, and Red. my 2 cents:
105 was less "mechanical" but i hate the hood shape and i hate having to move the brake lever to shift. i prefer the SRAM doubletap.
Rival vs. Red: besides the weight, Red's shifts are much shorter, this is the "zero loss" stuff. worth the money
105 was less "mechanical" but i hate the hood shape and i hate having to move the brake lever to shift. i prefer the SRAM doubletap.
Rival vs. Red: besides the weight, Red's shifts are much shorter, this is the "zero loss" stuff. worth the money

#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Rival FD has the ability to trim only the large ring. On my Rival equipped bike I don't need trim on the large ring but I do on the small ring. Oh well, it's a compact crankset so I don't spend too much time in the small chainring and certainly don't get crossed up enough in it to really need an index position.
Furthermore, I was under the impression that zero loss was for both left and right shifters, and is included for Rival, Force, and Red.
Can someone with knowledge on the 2011 groups chime in to clarify??
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 1,212
Bikes: MTB: Stumpjumper FSR, Road: De Rosa King 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thought Rival and Force only trim while in the small ring to avoid chain rub against the large ring. I also thought there was no trim while in the large ring because you can cross-chain without any rubbing on the new SRAM groups.
Furthermore, I was under the impression that zero loss was for both left and right shifters, and is included for Rival, Force, and Red.
Can someone with knowledge on the 2011 groups chime in to clarify??
Furthermore, I was under the impression that zero loss was for both left and right shifters, and is included for Rival, Force, and Red.
Can someone with knowledge on the 2011 groups chime in to clarify??
Zero loss for the front shifter is on all groups for 2009 and later. it is only the rear shifter for red. 2008 rival and force did not have any zero loss at all, and front shifts to the big ring required a pretty big throw as a result. This was my only real complaint with the 2008 force I had.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thought Rival and Force only trim while in the small ring to avoid chain rub against the large ring. I also thought there was no trim while in the large ring because you can cross-chain without any rubbing on the new SRAM groups.
Furthermore, I was under the impression that zero loss was for both left and right shifters, and is included for Rival, Force, and Red.
Can someone with knowledge on the 2011 groups chime in to clarify??
Furthermore, I was under the impression that zero loss was for both left and right shifters, and is included for Rival, Force, and Red.
Can someone with knowledge on the 2011 groups chime in to clarify??
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm running SRAM Red shifters with Force front and rear derailleurs, FSA SL-K Light 50/34 crankset, and KMC X10SL chain. Just installed all these things this afternoon and everything works great. Drivetrain is very quiet and shifts are effortless. It took me less than 5 minutes to get used to DoubleTap (and this is coming from someone who's used Shimano brifters all his life until today).

#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Thanks for the clarification foresthill & crazyarm07! I'm in the process of deciding which SRAM components to run on the new bike I'll be getting in a few weeks (SuperSix or R3), so that information was really helpful. I'm definitely going with Red shifters. I'll decide whether to go Rival, Force, or Red for the rest depending on how much the total build ends up running me.
I thought Shimano Di2 was able to cross chain in either ring without any rub. Is this true, or would the chain still rub the large ring if cross chained in the little ring up front and smallest cog in the rear?
I thought Shimano Di2 was able to cross chain in either ring without any rub. Is this true, or would the chain still rub the large ring if cross chained in the little ring up front and smallest cog in the rear?
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,781
Bikes: Felt AR1, Cervelo S2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
My Rival and Red bikes do not rub regardless of cross chaining.
Watch SRAM's youtube FD/RD setup guide- its not hard to do.
Oddly enough, i didnt learn this until i did it myself...LBS always told me the chain has to rub.
Watch SRAM's youtube FD/RD setup guide- its not hard to do.
Oddly enough, i didnt learn this until i did it myself...LBS always told me the chain has to rub.