Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Questions about SRAM

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Questions about SRAM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-11, 11:24 PM
  #1  
neits
Thread Starter
 
stien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 1,590
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Questions about SRAM

Any reason against matching Force shifters with a Rival group and calling it a day? Do people really prefer Rival to Ultegra even? I'm thinking about building up a second bike with said group. Should I really upgrade any other part beyond Rival?
stien is offline  
Old 01-14-11, 11:38 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have ridden Sram Rival, Sram Force, Shimano 105, and Shimano Ultegra. I personally prefer Sram to Shimano, and I preper Rival to Ultegra yes. I couldn't tell a HUGE difference between Force and Rival other than weight. I do use a Force BB30 crankset because I think it's stiffer and the crankarms are carbon vs AL on the Rival. Just my .02. my current set up is all Rival with Force crankset. I love it.
twince is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 12:12 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,099
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by stien
Any reason against matching Force shifters with a Rival group and calling it a day? Do people really prefer Rival to Ultegra even? I'm thinking about building up a second bike with said group. Should I really upgrade any other part beyond Rival?
All SRAM 10 speed road drivetrain components should be compatible. You can even mix in (most? all?) XX mountain components. UMD would sometimes use an XX RD and cassette for mountain rides.

The main difference is weight. Rival and Force are otherwise identical. Red is a little different, but I'm not sure of the details. Still cross compatible though.
Nerull is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 12:51 AM
  #4  
Go as fast as you can
 
travkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Marcos
Posts: 733

Bikes: Ritte Bosberg with SRAM Red and Mavic Cosmic Carbone SL's

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Other than weight not much reason to add Force unless you are going to use the cranks and bb. Otherwise Rival and SRAM for that matter are the bomb.
travkat is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 01:14 AM
  #5  
neits
Thread Starter
 
stien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 1,590
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Well the only reason I'm going with force shifters is availability. How much are rival ones anyway? I found the force set for 170.
stien is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 08:57 AM
  #6  
Hills hurt.. Couches kill
 
RacerOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brazil, IN
Posts: 3,370

Bikes: 1991 Specialized Sirrus Triple, 2010 Trek Madone 6.5 Project One, 2012 Cannondale Caad10, 2013 Trek Crockett

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mix and match as you like. You'll be pleased with it however you decide.
RacerOne is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 09:14 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
veganeric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 335

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Force brakes have a stiffer spring. Personally I'd upgrade to those over the rival brakes. As for the shifters, weight is the only noticeable difference. Force supposedly has zero loss on the fd, but from my completely unscientific playing around at my LBS I was unable to notice any difference between it and my Rival.

Does anyone know if there is any difference other than color between Force and Rival FDs? The listed weights for both are identical in both styles.
veganeric is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 10:03 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Shuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by veganeric
Force brakes have a stiffer spring. Personally I'd upgrade to those over the rival brakes. As for the shifters, weight is the only noticeable difference. Force supposedly has zero loss on the fd, but from my completely unscientific playing around at my LBS I was unable to notice any difference between it and my Rival.

Does anyone know if there is any difference other than color between Force and Rival FDs? The listed weights for both are identical in both styles.
That's because rival has zero loss on the front too, but like Force is lacking zero loss on the rear. Red is zero loss on both the front and rear.

For the Force front derailleur it has the ability to trim, Rival may not. I'm not sure.
Shuke is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 11:26 AM
  #9  
Getting a clue
 
engstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 408

Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 4.7, Diamondback Wildwood

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shuke
For the Force front derailleur it has the ability to trim, Rival may not. I'm not sure.
Rival FD has the ability to trim only the large ring. On my Rival equipped bike I don't need trim on the large ring but I do on the small ring. Oh well, it's a compact crankset so I don't spend too much time in the small chainring and certainly don't get crossed up enough in it to really need an index position.
engstrom is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 03:18 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Nerull
All SRAM 10 speed road drivetrain components should be compatible. You can even mix in (most? all?) XX mountain components. UMD would sometimes use an XX RD and cassette for mountain rides.

The main difference is weight. Rival and Force are otherwise identical. Red is a little different, but I'm not sure of the details. Still cross compatible though.
Not quite anymore. The new Apex stuff adds limitations with cassettes and derailleurs because it adds a long cage derailleur and a cassette to match.
crhilton is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 03:19 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Shuke
That's because rival has zero loss on the front too, but like Force is lacking zero loss on the rear. Red is zero loss on both the front and rear.

For the Force front derailleur it has the ability to trim, Rival may not. I'm not sure.
The rival shifter trims on the big ring.
crhilton is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 03:28 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 1,701

Bikes: 2008 Cervelo RS, 2011 Scott CR1 Elite, 2014 Volagi Liscio

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
What is "zero loss" and what does it do for you?

Thanks,
RoboCheme is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 03:52 PM
  #13  
Junior cyclist
 
faire_du_velo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 277

Bikes: Scattante r-330

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have rival on my bike but with a force bb30 crank instead.
faire_du_velo is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 04:04 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by RoboCheme
What is "zero loss" and what does it do for you?

Thanks,
It just means as soon at you start moving the shift lever the cable (and derailleur) start moving instead of having a small amount of play in the lever where nothing happens. I have 1st generation sram without it but have ridden a new red bike. On the rear I don't think it makes as much difference, but on the front it is a big improvement. The front shifting is my biggest gripe on my sram c0mpared to my shimano.
canam73 is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 04:12 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have force shifters and rival group. It works great.
martialman.45 is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 04:34 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 1,701

Bikes: 2008 Cervelo RS, 2011 Scott CR1 Elite, 2014 Volagi Liscio

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by canam73
It just means as soon at you start moving the shift lever the cable (and derailleur) start moving instead of having a small amount of play in the lever where nothing happens. I have 1st generation sram without it but have ridden a new red bike. On the rear I don't think it makes as much difference, but on the front it is a big improvement. The front shifting is my biggest gripe on my sram c0mpared to my shimano.
Thanks
RoboCheme is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 04:48 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,780

Bikes: Felt AR1, Cervelo S2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I've owned 105, Rival, and Red. my 2 cents:

105 was less "mechanical" but i hate the hood shape and i hate having to move the brake lever to shift. i prefer the SRAM doubletap.

Rival vs. Red: besides the weight, Red's shifts are much shorter, this is the "zero loss" stuff. worth the money
Inertianinja is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 06:29 PM
  #18  
neits
Thread Starter
 
stien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 1,590
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
So Red shifters with a Rival setup? Room for upgrades. Could be fun.
stien is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 08:19 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190

Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by engstrom
Rival FD has the ability to trim only the large ring. On my Rival equipped bike I don't need trim on the large ring but I do on the small ring. Oh well, it's a compact crankset so I don't spend too much time in the small chainring and certainly don't get crossed up enough in it to really need an index position.
I thought Rival and Force only trim while in the small ring to avoid chain rub against the large ring. I also thought there was no trim while in the large ring because you can cross-chain without any rubbing on the new SRAM groups.

Furthermore, I was under the impression that zero loss was for both left and right shifters, and is included for Rival, Force, and Red.

Can someone with knowledge on the 2011 groups chime in to clarify??
ilovecycling is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 10:04 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 1,212

Bikes: MTB: Stumpjumper FSR, Road: De Rosa King 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ilovecycling
I thought Rival and Force only trim while in the small ring to avoid chain rub against the large ring. I also thought there was no trim while in the large ring because you can cross-chain without any rubbing on the new SRAM groups.

Furthermore, I was under the impression that zero loss was for both left and right shifters, and is included for Rival, Force, and Red.

Can someone with knowledge on the 2011 groups chime in to clarify??
Trim was in the small ring on 2008 rival and force. with 2009 and later (and all red), trim for all groups is in the big ring. For me, it's a totally moot point, and I get no rub whether I use the trim or not.

Zero loss for the front shifter is on all groups for 2009 and later. it is only the rear shifter for red. 2008 rival and force did not have any zero loss at all, and front shifts to the big ring required a pretty big throw as a result. This was my only real complaint with the 2008 force I had.
foresthill is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 10:10 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
crazyarm07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ilovecycling
I thought Rival and Force only trim while in the small ring to avoid chain rub against the large ring. I also thought there was no trim while in the large ring because you can cross-chain without any rubbing on the new SRAM groups.

Furthermore, I was under the impression that zero loss was for both left and right shifters, and is included for Rival, Force, and Red.

Can someone with knowledge on the 2011 groups chime in to clarify??
I have Force - the FD trims in the big ring to prevent chain rub on the FD cage when you're cross-chained from the big ring to the big cassette cog. In the small ring, trim on the FD wouldn't do you any good --> if you cross-chained small chainring to the smaller cogs, you'd get chain rub on the large chainring itself before it started rubbing the FD cage. So basically, until SRAM (or someone else) figures out how to trim the big chainring itself, you can't cross chain small-to-small without chain rub.
crazyarm07 is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 10:21 PM
  #22  
neits
Thread Starter
 
stien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 1,590
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Can you run small up front and 2nd to smallest in the rear without rub?
stien is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 10:40 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm running SRAM Red shifters with Force front and rear derailleurs, FSA SL-K Light 50/34 crankset, and KMC X10SL chain. Just installed all these things this afternoon and everything works great. Drivetrain is very quiet and shifts are effortless. It took me less than 5 minutes to get used to DoubleTap (and this is coming from someone who's used Shimano brifters all his life until today).

Propofol is offline  
Old 01-15-11, 11:11 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190

Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks for the clarification foresthill & crazyarm07! I'm in the process of deciding which SRAM components to run on the new bike I'll be getting in a few weeks (SuperSix or R3), so that information was really helpful. I'm definitely going with Red shifters. I'll decide whether to go Rival, Force, or Red for the rest depending on how much the total build ends up running me.

I thought Shimano Di2 was able to cross chain in either ring without any rub. Is this true, or would the chain still rub the large ring if cross chained in the little ring up front and smallest cog in the rear?
ilovecycling is offline  
Old 01-16-11, 06:39 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,780

Bikes: Felt AR1, Cervelo S2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
My Rival and Red bikes do not rub regardless of cross chaining.
Watch SRAM's youtube FD/RD setup guide- its not hard to do.

Oddly enough, i didnt learn this until i did it myself...LBS always told me the chain has to rub.
Inertianinja is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.