Can I use a short cage derailleur?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NOLA
Posts: 103
Bikes: 06 KHS flite 300 00 Cannondale F1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Can I use a short cage derailleur?
Hello all and thanks in advance, the help I have received thus far has been invaluable on my journey into road biking.
I have been chasing a certain ride on my bike and have yet to find it. I am thinking my tiagra rear derailleur may be the cause of some rough shifts that completely destroy my pace.
And now finally my question...
I have a 25 as my large cog in the rear and a 52 large cog mounted to a triple in the front. Can I use an ultegra short cage 6500 9 spd for my cassette, which is nine spd.
Any help would be appreciated and I will try to provide any info that could help.
Thanks again.
I have been chasing a certain ride on my bike and have yet to find it. I am thinking my tiagra rear derailleur may be the cause of some rough shifts that completely destroy my pace.
And now finally my question...
I have a 25 as my large cog in the rear and a 52 large cog mounted to a triple in the front. Can I use an ultegra short cage 6500 9 spd for my cassette, which is nine spd.
Any help would be appreciated and I will try to provide any info that could help.
Thanks again.
#2
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,252
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 951 Post(s)
Liked 1,119 Times
in
647 Posts
You want a long cage with almost any triple set up. Short cage derailleurs don't have enough chain wrap capacity.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#5
Your Recovery Ride Buddy
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 24 879.6396 miles behind you
Posts: 436
Bikes: 2000 Serotta Classique, 1999 Serotta C3S Atlanta, 2004 Kona Jake the Snake, 2009 Kona Paddywagon, 2006 Kona Kula, 1980's Fuji Pursuit TT Fix/SS conversion, 1980's Torpado Super Strada, Bridgestone RB1 Synergy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There is a formula to determine how much chain take-up your derailleur must be capable of.
(A/2-B/2)+(C/2-D/2)=Z
where
A=Largest Rear Cog (teeth)
B=Smallest Rear Cog (teeth)
C=Largest Front Ring (teeth)
D=Smallest Front Ring (teeth)
Z=Derailleur Take-up (teeth)
Divide Z by 2 and you have the number of inches of take-up. Using this you should be able to measure your current set-up and assess whether you need long or short cage.
By the way, after plugging lots of numbers into this I've come to realize that the only gearing combos that really need long-cage are triples. Even compact gearing with larger granny-type sprockets in the rear still work with short-cage.
(A/2-B/2)+(C/2-D/2)=Z
where
A=Largest Rear Cog (teeth)
B=Smallest Rear Cog (teeth)
C=Largest Front Ring (teeth)
D=Smallest Front Ring (teeth)
Z=Derailleur Take-up (teeth)
Divide Z by 2 and you have the number of inches of take-up. Using this you should be able to measure your current set-up and assess whether you need long or short cage.
By the way, after plugging lots of numbers into this I've come to realize that the only gearing combos that really need long-cage are triples. Even compact gearing with larger granny-type sprockets in the rear still work with short-cage.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You'll learn to adjust your power and timing of your shifts so they come out nicer eventually.
If you're mashing you'll want to up your cadence before you mess with anything. Mashing and shifting under full power can definitely make for some poor shifts.
If you're mashing you'll want to up your cadence before you mess with anything. Mashing and shifting under full power can definitely make for some poor shifts.
#7
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,252
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 951 Post(s)
Liked 1,119 Times
in
647 Posts
They do have a little wiggle room in their numbers, but go too far outside that (you can now get an 11-34 cassette to go with your 52/34 double if you wanted) and you will be sorry.
And a more accurate formula would be (A+C) - (B+D) = chain wrap.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
Last edited by urbanknight; 01-28-11 at 03:45 PM.
#8
Your Recovery Ride Buddy
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 24 879.6396 miles behind you
Posts: 436
Bikes: 2000 Serotta Classique, 1999 Serotta C3S Atlanta, 2004 Kona Jake the Snake, 2009 Kona Paddywagon, 2006 Kona Kula, 1980's Fuji Pursuit TT Fix/SS conversion, 1980's Torpado Super Strada, Bridgestone RB1 Synergy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
They do have a little wiggle room in their numbers, but go too far outside that (you can now get an 11-34 cassette to go with your 52/34 double if you wanted) and you will be sorry.
And a more accurate formula would be (A+C) - (B+D) = chain wrap.
And a more accurate formula would be (A+C) - (B+D) = chain wrap.
#9
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,252
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 951 Post(s)
Liked 1,119 Times
in
647 Posts
Using this formula doesn't equate to accurately sizing your chain. You can still have adequate chain wrap/takeup in your derailleur but if you have sized the chain too small, you can ruin your rear derailleur if you go into large/large gearing.
That's incorrect, and it will give you a figure twice as large as the correct one. Remember that the chain is engaged by only half of each ring/sprocket, hence the /2.
That's incorrect, and it will give you a figure twice as large as the correct one. Remember that the chain is engaged by only half of each ring/sprocket, hence the /2.
For example, my Shimano 105 derailleur has a capacity of 29. My chain wrap for my 50/34 11-28 is 33 (78-45), so I'm pushing it a little. I can tell that I'm near the actual limit because the chain almost slack in the 34/11 while the cage is almost fully extended in the 50/28 (not that you should use those combos anyway).
Another example: In the case where my derailleur exploded, the chain was completely slack and would skip if you shifted into the small/small combo, so it couldn't have been any shorter, but it was obviously too short for the big/big (actually next-to-big in my case).
The OP asked which derailleur he could use, not which chain length. What you're missing is that if you go too far beyond the chain wrap capacity of a derailleur, it will be impossible for a chain to be the correct length. It will either be too long for the small/small combo, or too short for the large/large combo.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
Last edited by urbanknight; 01-28-11 at 05:02 PM.
#10
Your Recovery Ride Buddy
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 24 879.6396 miles behind you
Posts: 436
Bikes: 2000 Serotta Classique, 1999 Serotta C3S Atlanta, 2004 Kona Jake the Snake, 2009 Kona Paddywagon, 2006 Kona Kula, 1980's Fuji Pursuit TT Fix/SS conversion, 1980's Torpado Super Strada, Bridgestone RB1 Synergy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm sorry, but it sounds to me that you have no idea what "chain wrap capacity" means. Manufacturers rate their derailleurs that way. You can use any equation you want, but you have no manufacturer spec to compare it with unless you use chain wrap capacity, which is a number that automatically accounts for your /2.
For example, my Shimano 105 derailleur has a capacity of 29. My chain wrap for my 50/34 11-28 is 33 (78-45), so I'm pushing it a little. I can tell that I'm near the actual limit because the chain almost slack in the 34/11 while the cage is almost fully extended in the 50/28 (not that you should use those combos anyway).
Another example: In the case where my derailleur exploded, the chain was completely slack and would skip if you shifted into the small/small combo, so it couldn't have been any shorter, but it was obviously too short for the big/big (actually next-to-big in my case).
The OP asked which derailleur he could use, not which chain length. What you're missing is that if you go too far beyond the chain wrap capacity of a derailleur, it will be impossible for a chain to be the correct length. It will either be too long for the small/small combo, or too short for the large/large combo.
For example, my Shimano 105 derailleur has a capacity of 29. My chain wrap for my 50/34 11-28 is 33 (78-45), so I'm pushing it a little. I can tell that I'm near the actual limit because the chain almost slack in the 34/11 while the cage is almost fully extended in the 50/28 (not that you should use those combos anyway).
Another example: In the case where my derailleur exploded, the chain was completely slack and would skip if you shifted into the small/small combo, so it couldn't have been any shorter, but it was obviously too short for the big/big (actually next-to-big in my case).
The OP asked which derailleur he could use, not which chain length. What you're missing is that if you go too far beyond the chain wrap capacity of a derailleur, it will be impossible for a chain to be the correct length. It will either be too long for the small/small combo, or too short for the large/large combo.
#11
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,250
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1415 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times
in
341 Posts
^ But why would anyone care onther than to determine whether the derailleur they're planning on using has enough chain wrap capacity to work with their intneded gears, or vice versa? In which case, you'd want to look at the manufacturer's chain wrap specs.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#12
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,252
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 951 Post(s)
Liked 1,119 Times
in
647 Posts
To be completely honest, I wasn't aware of and had never used the manufacturer's capacity specification. I've always used that formula and hand-measurement of how much chain I can pull with the derailleur in question. This method has not failed me yet, and is no less accurate than your method.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#13
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,392
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 286 Times
in
157 Posts
I'm not so sure about that. I once had a rear derailleur with a max chain wrap of 27 and a 50/34 crank with an 11-28 cassette (do the math). I accidentally cross shifted once and pulled the rear derailleur apart. It was a good excuse to upgrade to 10 speed, though.
They do have a little wiggle room in their numbers, but go too far outside that (you can now get an 11-34 cassette to go with your 52/34 double if you wanted) and you will be sorry.
And a more accurate formula would be (A+C) - (B+D) = chain wrap.
They do have a little wiggle room in their numbers, but go too far outside that (you can now get an 11-34 cassette to go with your 52/34 double if you wanted) and you will be sorry.
And a more accurate formula would be (A+C) - (B+D) = chain wrap.
This is correct, see: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_ca-g.html#capacity
#14
.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 3,981
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Comp, Soma ES
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would think it's more an adjustment issue than anything. Check out the park tools site under the maintenance section and see how to adjust your front derailleur. I am currently running a 28/38/48, 12/27 on one of my bikes with a 9 speed Ultegra short cage rear derailleur and it works great. 48 isn't a 52 so that could be the biggest issue with the chain wrap as others are saying above.
__________________
Demented internet tail wagging imbicile.
Demented internet tail wagging imbicile.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
volosong
Bicycle Mechanics
7
09-06-11 07:47 PM