![]() |
Originally Posted by patentcad
(Post 12961528)
you seem to know something about bicycle crap.
This whole notion that if you would only adjust your FD properly you'd have no problem - that is the problem. Gear that requires constant adjustment tends ultimately be Utter Fail. So it goes. |
Originally Posted by jrennie
(Post 12958827)
As someone mentioned above there are two versions of the sram red fd. One has the Ti cage(matte gray) and the other is a tuned force/rival fd with a steel cage and Ti hardware. This came with my group and I have zero issues with the shifting.
|
Originally Posted by patentcad
(Post 12961552)
Of course your stance on Sram gear does call this assumption into question.
This whole notion that if you would only adjust your FD properly you'd have no problem - that is the problem. Gear that requires constant adjustment tends ultimately be Utter Fail. So it goes. |
Originally Posted by SlowOlympian
(Post 12961546)
I agree with this, ive noticed that as my cables have stretched, especially in a lower gear on my cassette, itll take longer to shift to my largest front chainring, sometimes ridiculously so, than on the smaller cogs on my cassette. or maybe ive just convinced myself of that. GL and hope its not the equipment!
|
Originally Posted by patentcad
(Post 12961528)
I think you're an incredibly arrogant idiot, but I give you a pass because you seem to know something about bicycle crap.
I shouldn't push your buttons....but it does add to your post count, and apparently that's important to you. :) |
Originally Posted by BicycleMcRider
(Post 12961182)
Bored and cant let this go. A material's stiffness is rated by it's Young's Modulus; higher = stiffer.
Esteel: ~200 Gpa. Etitanium alloys: ~115 Gpa. That being said, a part's stiffness depends on more than just the material it's made out of. And what the hell is 'ductile strength'? Are you talking about yield strength, because that has nothing to do with stiffness. This I can get behind. Carbon is not ductile. It does not bend. Overload it and it simply breaks. There is no bending, buckling, or stretching. Metals vary in density. Density is weight per unit of material. Steel weighs 7.8 grams from cubic centimeter, titanium 4.5 grams/cm3, and aluminum 2.75grams/cm3. Carbon fibre is 1.45g/cm3. It's primarily the reason why many longer distance riders prefer steel frames over other materials. |
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
(Post 12961125)
Indeed. I keep going back to a conversation I had with a Garmin pro when it came out....great story about why we were calling. His brother told me he was dating another racer's sister, and I had thought that sister was a married woman.....so being a concerned brother he called his bro under the guise of asking how he liked 7900.
Roughly "So Rob says he saw you guys were riding the new DA at Missouri. What did you think?" "The old stuff was so much better. This stuff sucks." Fast forward and I find myself fixing that exact rig and thinking to myself, "this stuff sucks". |
Late to the game but I dropped my Red FD for a Force model and have had zero problems since.
|
Originally Posted by roadwarrior
(Post 12961688)
Fourty seven thousand posts and I'm the one that's arrogant?
|
Originally Posted by roadwarrior
(Post 12961690)
Metals are comparatively ductile. Ductile means bending, buckling and stretching before breaking. Generally speaking, of the common bicycle frame building materials steel is the most ductile, titanium less ductile, followed by aluminum.
Carbon is not ductile. It does not bend. Overload it and it simply breaks. There is no bending, buckling, or stretching. Riding your bike, you sure as hell aren't plastically deforming it (if you are, you're doing bicycling wrong). You are however, elastically deforming it. This is where the modulus of elasticity comes in, as I mentioned originally. Under normal use, you're only on the material's elastic curve; ductility is irrelevant - until you crash or something. Carbon fiber's yield stress is also its ultimate tensile stress (UTS), hence why instead of going plastic, it just snaps. Ductility has basically nothing to do with how stiff your bike frame feels. How a frame actually feels while riding has a TON of important variables (elastic modulus, damping coefficients, etc), so generalizations dont carry a lot of weight, but I promise you ductility is about as important as colour when it comes to riding 'feel'.
Originally Posted by roadwarrior
(Post 12961690)
.
Metals vary in density. Density is weight per unit of material. Steel weighs 7.8 grams from cubic centimeter, titanium 4.5 grams/cm3, and aluminum 2.75grams/cm3. Carbon fibre is 1.45g/cm3. |
Originally Posted by BicycleMcRider
(Post 12966393)
Uh, sort of. Ductility is the ability of a material to deform plastically prior to ultimate failure (just a note: buckling is a completely different failure mode). Ductile deformation means plastic, non-recoverable deformation; it's what happens when you've exceeded the material's yield strength.
Riding your bike, you sure as hell aren't plastically deforming it (if you are, you're doing bicycling wrong). You are however, elastically deforming it. This is where the modulus of elasticity comes in, as I mentioned originally. Under normal use, you're only on the material's elastic curve; ductility is irrelevant - until you crash or something. Carbon fiber's yield stress is also its ultimate tensile stress (UTS), hence why instead of going plastic, it just snaps. Ductility has basically nothing to do with how stiff your bike frame feels. How a frame actually feels while riding has a TON of important variables (elastic modulus, damping coefficients, etc), so generalizations dont carry a lot of weight, but I promise you ductility is about as important as colour when it comes to riding 'feel'. Density is the MASS per unit volume of a material. A gram is a measurement of mass, not weight. |
FWIW - modern stainless steel cables don't stretch. The housings seat into the ferrules, compress, and/or wear in. That effectively changes the length of the housing - leaving the cable slack.
When installing, mount cable to anchor bolt and then pull on the cable under the down tube....HARD. then undo the anchor take the slack out and re-attach. For the poster talking about slowed reactions on one end of the cassette vs the other: 1. Worn out chain - chain flexes more and consequently doesn't move as quickly as newer, more laterally stiff chain. 2. Cable friction. If using Gore cables the housings are lined with teflon and WILL wear out and start to gum up the works. This WILL cause the issue. If you have Gore cables...take them off and burn them or else Unicorns will lose their wings. 3. Cable friction x2. Check for gummed up junctions or tight turns with the housing. The cable guide under the BB shell or internal routings (like the crappy Cervelo ones). Hard internal turns can cause the housing to wear out causing higher friction under higher tension as the housing compresses more. 4. Gummed up derail. Clean it. 5. Cassette...remove and clean. Make sure the spacers needed are in place (including the small one in back for a Shimano 10 on a 8/9/10 freehub driver) and the lockring is torqued down to the right spec. Simply tightening the lockring has helped this exact problem more than once. If this doesn't work try a different cassette if you have one laying around to see if the problem sticks around. 6. last result - shifters are shot. |
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
(Post 12966962)
FWIW - modern stainless steel cables don't stretch. The housings seat into the ferrules, compress, and/or wear in. That effectively changes the length of the housing - leaving the cable slack.
When installing, mount cable to anchor bolt and then pull on the cable under the down tube....HARD. then undo the anchor take the slack out and re-attach. For the poster talking about slowed reactions on one end of the cassette vs the other: 1. Worn out chain - chain flexes more and consequently doesn't move as quickly as newer, more laterally stiff chain. 2. Cable friction. If using Gore cables the housings are lined with teflon and WILL wear out and start to gum up the works. This WILL cause the issue. If you have Gore cables...take them off and burn them or else Unicorns will lose their wings. 3. Cable friction x2. Check for gummed up junctions or tight turns with the housing. The cable guide under the BB shell or internal routings (like the crappy Cervelo ones). Hard internal turns can cause the housing to wear out causing higher friction under higher tension as the housing compresses more. 4. Gummed up derail. Clean it. 5. Cassette...remove and clean. Make sure the spacers needed are in place (including the small one in back for a Shimano 10 on a 8/9/10 freehub driver) and the lockring is torqued down to the right spec. Simply tightening the lockring has helped this exact problem more than once. If this doesn't work try a different cassette if you have one laying around to see if the problem sticks around. 6. last result - shifters are shot. |
Pros have been using the Force steel cage (they call it the 'Pro' version) with the standard Red derailleur. Basically swap the titanium one for a steel cage.
I don't have any issues with mine. I hear if you call SRAM and complain about it, they will send you a steel cage. Anybody verify this? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:43 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.