Socks?
#1
Thread Starter
LBKA (formerly punkncat)

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 1,016
From: Jawja
Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0
Socks?
Do you feel like having "cycling specific" socks makes a real difference?
A friend keeps telling me that I should buy some "cycling" socks. He is the same guy that turned me on to clipless and that sure was a hit. I just have a hard time justifying how a pair of socks could make any appreciable difference over the cotton ones I am currently wearing....I mean, in essence I will get two socks for the price of one, it doesn't matter WHAT I put on my left foot...but anyway, cycling socks worth it?
What do they do better?
A friend keeps telling me that I should buy some "cycling" socks. He is the same guy that turned me on to clipless and that sure was a hit. I just have a hard time justifying how a pair of socks could make any appreciable difference over the cotton ones I am currently wearing....I mean, in essence I will get two socks for the price of one, it doesn't matter WHAT I put on my left foot...but anyway, cycling socks worth it?
What do they do better?
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach


#8
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL
Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo
Any moisture-wicking sock should be fine. NO COTTON! I use the Target brand performance sock. Works fine. Under Armor makes some good ones. Just don't wear moisture wicking socks with regular shoes. MAN, they will make your feet stink.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Bikes: 2010 FUJI SL-1 Comp
Hmmm... Haven ridden over 1500 miles in the last 6 months wearing nothing but my Hanes 100% cotton Target specials - I'm now seeing people yell "NO COTTON" and looking down and wondering if my feat are due to fall off any minute now.
Please, do not say NO without saying WHY.
Please, do not say NO without saying WHY.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach
Hmmm... Haven ridden over 1500 miles in the last 6 months wearing nothing but my Hanes 100% cotton Target specials - I'm now seeing people yell "NO COTTON" and looking down and wondering if my feat are due to fall off any minute now.
Please, do not say NO without saying WHY.
Please, do not say NO without saying WHY.
#12
Hmmm... Haven ridden over 1500 miles in the last 6 months wearing nothing but my Hanes 100% cotton Target specials - I'm now seeing people yell "NO COTTON" and looking down and wondering if my feat are due to fall off any minute now.
Please, do not say NO without saying WHY.
Please, do not say NO without saying WHY.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Bikes: 2010 FUJI SL-1 Comp
They actually make you sweat? That's just silly. I rode 85 miles yesterday and my socks were no more damp than my jersey and shorts.
Got caught out in a rainstorm a few weeks ago and it took my shoes 3 days to dry out. Yet you propose it would be better if my socks wicked the moisture out where? I think I'll take my wet socks off so today so that I can put some dry shoes on tomorrow.
I'm skeptical of this whole moisture wicking phenom in clothes lately. Sure, it keeps you dry, fine. But the whole purpose of sweat in the first place is for the cooling affect of evaporation. If the moisture is just wicked away before it evaporates, you don't get the cooling affect. Seems to me that the body would just keep producing even more sweat to try to cool down.
Got caught out in a rainstorm a few weeks ago and it took my shoes 3 days to dry out. Yet you propose it would be better if my socks wicked the moisture out where? I think I'll take my wet socks off so today so that I can put some dry shoes on tomorrow.
I'm skeptical of this whole moisture wicking phenom in clothes lately. Sure, it keeps you dry, fine. But the whole purpose of sweat in the first place is for the cooling affect of evaporation. If the moisture is just wicked away before it evaporates, you don't get the cooling affect. Seems to me that the body would just keep producing even more sweat to try to cool down.
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach
They actually make you sweat? That's just silly. I rode 85 miles yesterday and my socks were no more damp than my jersey and shorts.
Got caught out in a rainstorm a few weeks ago and it took my shoes 3 days to dry out. Yet you propose it would be better if my socks wicked the moisture out where? I think I'll take my wet socks off so today so that I can put some dry shoes on tomorrow.
I'm skeptical of this whole moisture wicking phenom in clothes lately. Sure, it keeps you dry, fine. But the whole purpose of sweat in the first place is for the cooling affect of evaporation. If the moisture is just wicked away before it evaporates, you don't get the cooling affect. Seems to me that the body would just keep producing even more sweat to try to cool down.
Got caught out in a rainstorm a few weeks ago and it took my shoes 3 days to dry out. Yet you propose it would be better if my socks wicked the moisture out where? I think I'll take my wet socks off so today so that I can put some dry shoes on tomorrow.
I'm skeptical of this whole moisture wicking phenom in clothes lately. Sure, it keeps you dry, fine. But the whole purpose of sweat in the first place is for the cooling affect of evaporation. If the moisture is just wicked away before it evaporates, you don't get the cooling affect. Seems to me that the body would just keep producing even more sweat to try to cool down.
PS. I don't ride in the rain.....and wicking clothes weren't made for that.
#15
I like to use socks made for cycling and also some that are made for hiking.
I do not like having my toes squished together and the DeFeet socks (my first pair of cycling socks) were just as roomy in the toe as my favorite lightweight Smartwool PhD hiking socks. So I use the wool in the winter and the others in the summer.
Sometimes I also use my Injini toe socks but I find that, although they are great for hiking, they tend to develop uncomfortable wrinkles after about 25 miles. So I don't use them any more.
I don't like cotton socks since my feet sweat a lot and the cotton just holds on to the sweat and then I get blisters from the soggy socks rubbing on my feet.
I do not like having my toes squished together and the DeFeet socks (my first pair of cycling socks) were just as roomy in the toe as my favorite lightweight Smartwool PhD hiking socks. So I use the wool in the winter and the others in the summer.
Sometimes I also use my Injini toe socks but I find that, although they are great for hiking, they tend to develop uncomfortable wrinkles after about 25 miles. So I don't use them any more.
I don't like cotton socks since my feet sweat a lot and the cotton just holds on to the sweat and then I get blisters from the soggy socks rubbing on my feet.
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Bikes: 2010 FUJI SL-1 Comp
I think perhaps I just don't have very sweaty feet. And I think this whole cycling sock thing might boil down to "your mileage may vary". I do have several pair of UA socks, and to be honest I just don't find them that comfortable to wear. I've worn them when cycling occasionally and I just never really noticed any difference from my regular cotton socks.
Now, I do own several pair of the UA boot socks and I can tell you those make a world of a difference - because of the way the compression is built in, I can wear a heavy set of boots for 12 hours in the snow and not have cold sore feet.
Now, I do own several pair of the UA boot socks and I can tell you those make a world of a difference - because of the way the compression is built in, I can wear a heavy set of boots for 12 hours in the snow and not have cold sore feet.
#19
I'm skeptical of this whole moisture wicking phenom in clothes lately. Sure, it keeps you dry, fine. But the whole purpose of sweat in the first place is for the cooling affect of evaporation. If the moisture is just wicked away before it evaporates, you don't get the cooling affect. Seems to me that the body would just keep producing even more sweat to try to cool down.
This may not be as effective when it comes to socks encased in not-very-breatheable shoes however... Different people may have different experiences with socks. While I don't hate cotton socks, wool or wicking tech fabric socks feel more comfortable to me. YMMV
#21
I got 99 problems....
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 3
From: Does anyone know where the love of God goes, when the waves turn the minutes to hours?
I use regular Dri-Fit whatever socks for shorter rides, but when it's hot, or I have a long ride, I go with my thin PI socks.
They simply keep my feet cooler. If I had never used the PI socks, I probably would think that the Dri-Fits were fine because the difference is not earth shattering, but once you have used both of them, there is no question the PI's keep your feet noticeably cooler.
They simply keep my feet cooler. If I had never used the PI socks, I probably would think that the Dri-Fits were fine because the difference is not earth shattering, but once you have used both of them, there is no question the PI's keep your feet noticeably cooler.
#22
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix 2.0. 2006 Iron Horse Azure Expert
#24
Also, you shouldn't drink gasoline because it's toxic and will kill you. 
These are good socks, and while they're meant for the bike, I use them hiking, too. They're tough, thin, wick like nobody's business, and they go on sale now and then.

These are good socks, and while they're meant for the bike, I use them hiking, too. They're tough, thin, wick like nobody's business, and they go on sale now and then.
#25
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
They actually make you sweat? That's just silly. I rode 85 miles yesterday and my socks were no more damp than my jersey and shorts.
Got caught out in a rainstorm a few weeks ago and it took my shoes 3 days to dry out. Yet you propose it would be better if my socks wicked the moisture out where? I think I'll take my wet socks off so today so that I can put some dry shoes on tomorrow.
I'm skeptical of this whole moisture wicking phenom in clothes lately. Sure, it keeps you dry, fine. But the whole purpose of sweat in the first place is for the cooling affect of evaporation. If the moisture is just wicked away before it evaporates, you don't get the cooling affect. Seems to me that the body would just keep producing even more sweat to try to cool down.
Got caught out in a rainstorm a few weeks ago and it took my shoes 3 days to dry out. Yet you propose it would be better if my socks wicked the moisture out where? I think I'll take my wet socks off so today so that I can put some dry shoes on tomorrow.
I'm skeptical of this whole moisture wicking phenom in clothes lately. Sure, it keeps you dry, fine. But the whole purpose of sweat in the first place is for the cooling affect of evaporation. If the moisture is just wicked away before it evaporates, you don't get the cooling affect. Seems to me that the body would just keep producing even more sweat to try to cool down.





