Road 12 sp
#27
I've used vintage 2x5, 3x7, 2x9 shimano, 2x10 shimano,2x10 campy, 2x11 campy, 1x14 rohloff, all at length. Personally my favourite is the 11sp. I do appreciate that extra gear. We are like motors in that we all have our own optimum rpm, and much like a car, we work better when in our optimum gear. Now for some of us, 2x5 is all you're going to need.
But you can't then generalise and catagorically state that it's all anyone could ever need. More gears are not necessarily a bad thing or simply a gimmick to make you buy more schwag (they could start making 2x5 groupsets for weight weenies and still sell it!).
Just like more gears are more efficient for a car, they are for us too. Or at least, they can be.
FWIW I ride 11sp but the single speed I have gets the most use
But you can't then generalise and catagorically state that it's all anyone could ever need. More gears are not necessarily a bad thing or simply a gimmick to make you buy more schwag (they could start making 2x5 groupsets for weight weenies and still sell it!).
Just like more gears are more efficient for a car, they are for us too. Or at least, they can be.
FWIW I ride 11sp but the single speed I have gets the most use
#28
Obviously it is required to have as many useable and desireable gears as possible, Braden, but that doesn't mean I would like to have a car with 37 gears, does it?
More isn't always better because it overcomplicates and is more likely prone to al kinds of mechanical problems.
So ... that said ... there must be some kind of equilibrium ... some amount of gears that is enough to need and use and not too much to be unnecessarily complicated.
Personally ... I believe that 8 was enough ... 9 was just great and 10 is fantastic with small jumps between gears.
Would I go for 11? Not if it's heavier or more expensive ... because I don't see any use for that extra gear.
More isn't always better because it overcomplicates and is more likely prone to al kinds of mechanical problems.
So ... that said ... there must be some kind of equilibrium ... some amount of gears that is enough to need and use and not too much to be unnecessarily complicated.
Personally ... I believe that 8 was enough ... 9 was just great and 10 is fantastic with small jumps between gears.
Would I go for 11? Not if it's heavier or more expensive ... because I don't see any use for that extra gear.
#32
pan y agua

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,810
Likes: 1,232
From: Jacksonville
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Now, many automatics have gone to 8 speeds, for the purpose of increasing fuel mileage.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#34
Faster than yesterday
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 1
From: Evanston, IL
#37
I have noted in all threads in which I mock Di2 that I do not race. If it only has redeeming qualities in a racing environment, all mention of this ridiculous experiment in cycling should be confined to the 33. This is the 41, where we just ride bikes.
I don't need to ride it to know how it works. If you think riding it will make me go out and take a 401k loan to purchase it, you are sorely mistaken.
I don't need to ride it to know how it works. If you think riding it will make me go out and take a 401k loan to purchase it, you are sorely mistaken.
#38
One of the guys I ride with regularly has D2I. It seems to work well. I wouldn't get it because it's expensive and heavy but if it was expensive and significantly lighter than cables I'd consider it.
I dont' think the KCNC system uses 135mm axles but I don't know that for sure. The big advantage of 135 is less wheel dish, but taking that and then using the extra 5mm for cogs and keeping the same dish would negate that advantage. And would prevent its been retrofitted to existing bikes, seriously limiting its market.
Tiso shows a prototype electronic 12sp:
https://www.bikerumor.com/2011/09/29/...sette-pulleys/
Some of the current Tiso stuff looks pretty: https://www.tisobike.com/
I dont' think the KCNC system uses 135mm axles but I don't know that for sure. The big advantage of 135 is less wheel dish, but taking that and then using the extra 5mm for cogs and keeping the same dish would negate that advantage. And would prevent its been retrofitted to existing bikes, seriously limiting its market.
Tiso shows a prototype electronic 12sp:
https://www.bikerumor.com/2011/09/29/...sette-pulleys/
Some of the current Tiso stuff looks pretty: https://www.tisobike.com/
#39
One of the guys I ride with regularly has D2I. It seems to work well. I wouldn't get it because it's expensive and heavy but if it was expensive and significantly lighter than cables I'd consider it.
I dont' think the KCNC system uses 135mm axles but I don't know that for sure. The big advantage of 135 is less wheel dish, but taking that and then using the extra 5mm for cogs and keeping the same dish would negate that advantage. And would prevent its been retrofitted to existing bikes, seriously limiting its market.
Tiso shows a prototype electronic 12sp:
https://www.bikerumor.com/2011/09/29/...sette-pulleys/
Some of the current Tiso stuff looks pretty: https://www.tisobike.com/
I dont' think the KCNC system uses 135mm axles but I don't know that for sure. The big advantage of 135 is less wheel dish, but taking that and then using the extra 5mm for cogs and keeping the same dish would negate that advantage. And would prevent its been retrofitted to existing bikes, seriously limiting its market.
Tiso shows a prototype electronic 12sp:
https://www.bikerumor.com/2011/09/29/...sette-pulleys/
Some of the current Tiso stuff looks pretty: https://www.tisobike.com/
#40
Yeah, racers never just ride. They just race around everywhere.
If Di2 isn't for you, then so be it. Why you would mock something that isn't for you, something you have never even tried, well I don't get that.
Such is the mystery that is the 41.
If Di2 isn't for you, then so be it. Why you would mock something that isn't for you, something you have never even tried, well I don't get that.
Such is the mystery that is the 41.
#41
I dont' think the KCNC system uses 135mm axles but I don't know that for sure. The big advantage of 135 is less wheel dish, but taking that and then using the extra 5mm for cogs and keeping the same dish would negate that advantage. And would prevent its been retrofitted to existing bikes, seriously limiting its market.
Tiso shows a prototype electronic 12sp:
https://www.bikerumor.com/2011/09/29/...sette-pulleys/
Some of the current Tiso stuff looks pretty: https://www.tisobike.com/
Tiso shows a prototype electronic 12sp:
https://www.bikerumor.com/2011/09/29/...sette-pulleys/
Some of the current Tiso stuff looks pretty: https://www.tisobike.com/
the TISO stuff looks trick, a lot will depend on the chain... but without going to a wider rear, fitting it all on the current freehub meaning way tighter spacing, of course.
This might all be nicely achieveable in a shop, but take it out on the road, on a 100 miles wet ride and things will change.
ever notice how quickly shifting gets more notchy and less positive as the chain gets dirty, dry or mucked from the lube picking up moisture and getting caked up?
Right now the one thing I notice about 10 spd is that caking on the chain, or dried crud, really degrades shifting quite a bit - hence my move to WD cleaning every other ride (when dry) and no 'lube' - I use WD for shortterm lubing with less chance of the chain getting caked with crud. Right now I give the chain a quick blast of WD almost every ride, quick solid wipe and everything runs great, every ride.
With the precision spacing needed for 12 spd on a 130, I would expect shifting to degrade even faster and be more evident.
Then there's the question of materials engineering and the inevitable cost of the materials and precision manufacturing, and then cog/chain longevity. Prolly less of a concern for the 'pro' scene and the small element who find a $250 to $500 cassette and a $200 chain, reasonable.
THen when you do that to the rear, the crankset/chainrings will certainly have to be re-engineered... $1K+ for a basic double ???
Would the market be big enough?
certainly would produce some trickle-down
IMO 135 offers a broad move to the entire marketplace. More space, less problems in giveing a broad range of 'Ace-Ultegra-105' type gruppos, and another reason for all of us to drop more dosh on a new frame, and of course the new wheelset and then all the goodies to make it a garagedoor photo-op.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hobkirk
Bicycle Mechanics
10
06-18-11 12:49 PM







