2003 Lemond Zurich
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
2003 Lemond Zurich
I found a brand new 2003 Zurich frame at a LBS. It's all 853 tubing with a Lemond carbon fiber fork. They are asking $500 for it including an Aheadset headset. Is that a good deal? I'm thinking of replacing my rusty Casati Columbus SL with this frame and will transfer my 1993 Campy Chorus 8sp ergo group to it. Does anyone see a problem with tht setup?
On a side note. I've been shopping around for a frame for a while and it seems like you can't find a reasonably priced decent steel frame anywhere. I know there are smaller companies like Waterford and Independent Fabricators but their frames cost too much. It would be nice if one of the larger companies like Bianchi, Giant,Trek would put out a nice, solid, steel frame. It seems only Lemond is putting out a couple of frames like this. It's quite annoying. Steel is still a great material for frames. The majority of riders from cat 4 to cat 1 would be better off training harder then shedding a few ounces by spending heaps of cash on a new high tech carbon/ti/alu frame. When I was racing back in the early 90's I remember a guy that was consistantly in the top 5 finishers of every race he was in. He was riding a Miyata triple butted frame. The thing was a tank and probably weighed as much too. Also, I had a buddy who raced a Bianchi SLX frame back then and he was a monster in the hills. These bike companies seem to be catering to the ignorant masses who think getting the lightest bike is all that matters. It sucks. Stupid masses.
On a side note. I've been shopping around for a frame for a while and it seems like you can't find a reasonably priced decent steel frame anywhere. I know there are smaller companies like Waterford and Independent Fabricators but their frames cost too much. It would be nice if one of the larger companies like Bianchi, Giant,Trek would put out a nice, solid, steel frame. It seems only Lemond is putting out a couple of frames like this. It's quite annoying. Steel is still a great material for frames. The majority of riders from cat 4 to cat 1 would be better off training harder then shedding a few ounces by spending heaps of cash on a new high tech carbon/ti/alu frame. When I was racing back in the early 90's I remember a guy that was consistantly in the top 5 finishers of every race he was in. He was riding a Miyata triple butted frame. The thing was a tank and probably weighed as much too. Also, I had a buddy who raced a Bianchi SLX frame back then and he was a monster in the hills. These bike companies seem to be catering to the ignorant masses who think getting the lightest bike is all that matters. It sucks. Stupid masses.
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Bobdohm31
Steel is still a great material for frames. The majority of riders from cat 4 to cat 1 would be better off training harder then shedding a few ounces by spending heaps of cash on a new high tech carbon/ti/alu frame. When I was racing back in the early 90's I remember a guy that was consistantly in the top 5 finishers of every race he was in. He was riding a Miyata triple butted frame. The thing was a tank and probably weighed as much too. Also, I had a buddy who raced a Bianchi SLX frame back then and he was a monster in the hills. These bike companies seem to be catering to the ignorant masses who think getting the lightest bike is all that matters. It sucks. Stupid masses.
Last edited by 53-11 alltheway; 12-08-04 at 08:52 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Considering it is brand new with a carbon fork...I don't think it is a bad deal.
You could probably do better, but I don't think you would be getting ripped off for paying that much.
At one time I was thinking of getting a Raleigh Professional frame/carbon fork. It was Columbus Zona steel......GVH used to sell them for $350. In all honestly I would rather have a lemond Frame with the 853.
You could probably do better, but I don't think you would be getting ripped off for paying that much.
At one time I was thinking of getting a Raleigh Professional frame/carbon fork. It was Columbus Zona steel......GVH used to sell them for $350. In all honestly I would rather have a lemond Frame with the 853.
#5
I have a 2003 Zurich built up DA components. If I was forced to choose which one of my 5 bikes to keep, I'd really be torn between the Zurich and my Merlin. (Well, not that torn, but I do like the Zurich very much.)
$500 might be a little high for a 2 year old frame/fork/headset combination. I bought a new '99 Lemond Malliot Jaune new in 2001 for $400, and it has a better fork than the Zurich.
Assuming it's the right size for you, I'd offer them $400 and see if they take it. If they won't budge, see if they'll throw in something you need.
I not familiar with your components, so I won't speculate if there are any issues with them. The seat tube does not have a braze-on for the front derailleur, though.
$500 might be a little high for a 2 year old frame/fork/headset combination. I bought a new '99 Lemond Malliot Jaune new in 2001 for $400, and it has a better fork than the Zurich.
Assuming it's the right size for you, I'd offer them $400 and see if they take it. If they won't budge, see if they'll throw in something you need.
I not familiar with your components, so I won't speculate if there are any issues with them. The seat tube does not have a braze-on for the front derailleur, though.
#6
Aluminium Crusader :-)

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,050
Likes: 11
From: Melbourne, Australia
Sounds like a reasonable price to me, especially compared to Aussie prices, but just be aware that they are not exactly feather weight: the 57cm Zurich I nearly bought was 3.9lbs. The top tubes are slightly longer than most manufacturers, but I think it depends on the size -- the larger the frame, the smaller the relative length of the top tube.
The head-tubes are also slightly on the short size, with the one I looked at being 153mm -- this could cause spacing issues if you wanna have the bars up high
The head-tubes are also slightly on the short size, with the one I looked at being 153mm -- this could cause spacing issues if you wanna have the bars up high
Last edited by 531Aussie; 12-09-04 at 07:31 AM.
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Thanks for the feedback. I guess I'll go with offering 400 or make them throw in a front der. clamp.
53-11Alltheway,
Glad you enjoyed my post. I really meant what I said. Also,what's "Top Gun School of Cycling "?
53-11Alltheway,
Glad you enjoyed my post. I really meant what I said. Also,what's "Top Gun School of Cycling "?
#8
Former Hoarder

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 9
From: Portland & Yachats, OR
Bikes: Steve Rex, Seven Axiom, Felt Z1, Dave Moulton Fuso
Originally Posted by Bobdohm31
These bike companies seem to be catering to the ignorant masses who think getting the lightest bike is all that matters. It sucks. Stupid masses.
Good thing it's your mind.
55/Rad
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
55/Rad,
That's an annoying and extreme interpretation of my post. Also, I didn't say you couldn't care at all about the weight of your gear I said "getting the lightest bike is all that matters". Meaning, it seems that the most important attribute to the general public is light weight. Hence, it seems most larger companies are catering to the general public by producing the lightest possible bikes. I'm assuming that's why there seems to be less steel out there.
So if you had said in your post, "So in your mind, if all I cared about was the weight of my gear, then I'm ignorant." I would have agreed that you're ignorant.
Does that clear things up?
That's an annoying and extreme interpretation of my post. Also, I didn't say you couldn't care at all about the weight of your gear I said "getting the lightest bike is all that matters". Meaning, it seems that the most important attribute to the general public is light weight. Hence, it seems most larger companies are catering to the general public by producing the lightest possible bikes. I'm assuming that's why there seems to be less steel out there.
So if you had said in your post, "So in your mind, if all I cared about was the weight of my gear, then I'm ignorant." I would have agreed that you're ignorant.
Does that clear things up?
#10
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Las Cruces, NM
Bikes: Lemond Zurich, Thompson Elite Seatpost, Fizik Airone Saddle, Speedplay X-2 pedals, 3T Less Stem
I have a 2003 Lemond as you can see (with a bit of carbon added). Carbon for alloy as my thought is why have steel and then every part that you touch is alloy - oh well! Anyway I think the price is pretty good as you won't find many 2003 Zurich frames, especially in the right size, hanging in bike shops. Also the Fork for the 2003 Malliot Jaune and Zurich are both 110 GSM carbon. Good Luck
__________________
LeMond Zurich(2003), Winwood Carbon Post, Fizik Arione Saddle, Speed Play X-2 pedals, 3T More Carbon Bar & Giant Carbon Stem, FSA Super Light 53/39 Crank Set.
LeMond Zurich(2003), Winwood Carbon Post, Fizik Arione Saddle, Speed Play X-2 pedals, 3T More Carbon Bar & Giant Carbon Stem, FSA Super Light 53/39 Crank Set.
#11
Former Hoarder

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 9
From: Portland & Yachats, OR
Bikes: Steve Rex, Seven Axiom, Felt Z1, Dave Moulton Fuso
Originally Posted by Bobdohm31
55/Rad,
That's an annoying and extreme interpretation of my post. Also, I didn't say you couldn't care at all about the weight of your gear I said "getting the lightest bike is all that matters". Meaning, it seems that the most important attribute to the general public is light weight. Hence, it seems most larger companies are catering to the general public by producing the lightest possible bikes. I'm assuming that's why there seems to be less steel out there.
So if you had said in your post, "So in your mind, if all I cared about was the weight of my gear, then I'm ignorant." I would have agreed that you're ignorant.
Does that clear things up?
That's an annoying and extreme interpretation of my post. Also, I didn't say you couldn't care at all about the weight of your gear I said "getting the lightest bike is all that matters". Meaning, it seems that the most important attribute to the general public is light weight. Hence, it seems most larger companies are catering to the general public by producing the lightest possible bikes. I'm assuming that's why there seems to be less steel out there.
So if you had said in your post, "So in your mind, if all I cared about was the weight of my gear, then I'm ignorant." I would have agreed that you're ignorant.
Does that clear things up?
If you give, then so shall you receive. Peace.
55/Rad
Last edited by 55/Rad; 12-09-04 at 08:14 PM.
#12
OTB is imminent

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Campbell,CA
Bikes: '06 Trek 5.2, '06 Lemond Poprad, '06 Bianchi San Jose
I have a 2003 Zurich as well but I added alot of carbon. That is a decent price and I don't think you will find too many of them laying around. The bike is outstanding.
#14
Hamburger Pimp
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Hell of the North
Bikes: BMC SLT O1 Team Full Record, Kuips SuperNova Ultegra & DuraAce, Rocky Mountain Team Scandium full XTR w sids & dope parts, Guerciotti Khaybar Full Record.
I have a 2001 Zurich, all steel. Very hopped up with great parts. I don't think I can find any flaws in it (Frame or parts). If it has a flaw, it's that it is too good for a rider of my skill.
#15
deathstar activist
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Bikes: Soulcraft Royale, Santa Cruz Blur, Trek Singletrack, Fuji Shangri-la
I have a Soulcraft Royale and love it... incredible ride quality. If you have the money go for it. However, for my next bike (my first crosser) I'm planning on getting a Surley. Good steel at reasonable prices.








