Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Cog ratios

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Cog ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-11 | 10:09 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Cog ratios

I'm upgrading rims but want to keep the original set. I want to add a new cassette to the new rims. I have SRAM Rival compact. What advantages do the following choices give me on a new SRAM Red cassette?
The 11/23 includes: 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,21,23
The 11/26 includes: 11,12,13,14,15,17,19,21,23,26
The 11/28 includes: 11,12,13,14,15,17,19,22,25,28

Most of my rides are hilly with a few triathlons
j mazz is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-11 | 10:46 PM
  #2  
ericm979's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,169
Likes: 1
From: Santa Cruz Mountains
The ones with lower gears give you lower gearing. If you need lower gearing you might want one of them.

Describing your rides as "hilly" is useless. Some people consider a freeway overpass a serious climb, others think that anything less than 1500' elevation gain is a roller. Even if your hilly is the same as everyone else's hilly, there's big differences in fitness and in riding style.

Use your current cassette as a comparison. If you have been wishing for a lower gear, get a cassette with a lower gear. If you never use your largest cog, get a cassette that doesn't go that low.
ericm979 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-12-11 | 01:36 AM
  #3  
flatlander_48's Avatar
Cathedral City, CA
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 2
From: Cathedral City, CA

Bikes: 2016 RITCHEY BreakAway (full Chorus 11), 2005 Ritchey BreakAway (full Chorus 11, STOLEN), 2001 Gary Fisher Tassajara mountain bike (sold), 2004 Giant TRC 2 road bike (sold)

Without checking, I thought the SRAM 11-28 had a different 9th cog. I thought is was 24, making a 4 tooth jump. They also go out to 32 with a 12-32. I think the last jump there is 24 to 32. Anyway, check their website. I believe the 32 is available only in Force and Rival grade.
flatlander_48 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-12-11 | 02:51 AM
  #4  
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 326
From: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Originally Posted by j mazz
I'm upgrading rims but want to keep the original set. I want to add a new cassette to the new rims. I have SRAM Rival compact. What advantages do the following choices give me on a new SRAM Red cassette?
IMHO they all suck because they have at least one and maybe two tiny little cogs you can't make good use of (professionals used to ride a 52x13 big gear) and no 18 cog which feels real good on the big ring and except with the 11-23 you don't even get a 16 cog which is rather nice down-hill/sprinting cog on the big ring or gear for a little head wind or incline on a 39 ring.

As a fit not fat rider I never needed anything bigger than 34x23 to get over anything in the Rocky Mountains (including the Mike Horgan Memorial Hill Climb Magnolia Road route, although I did puke on that one) which is the same as 39x26. I also never wanted anything bigger than a 50x13.

With 10 cogs I'll do 12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23 (I don't need the 12, but it gives me more top end on my small ring) or 13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23-26 (The 26 is only nice with my fat belly on climbs at 6%+, but it gives a better chain line on the 18/19/21 cogs which I spend most of my time on with flatter terrain).

The 11/23 includes: 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19,21,23
The 11/26 includes: 11,12,13,14,15,17,19,21,23,26
The 11/28 includes: 11,12,13,14,15,17,19,22,25,28
This all depends on what rings you're running, aerodynamics (aerobars vs road drops make a big difference), your mean maximal power output for various durations, how heavy you are, how steep and long your hills are, what your preferred cadence range is, what happens in terms of fatigue when you need to pedal faster or slower, etc.

All of that is personal and makes the question something you need to answer for yourself.

You should know where you bounce between cogs where neither is right and you'd like one in the middle, where you need a lower gear to make it up something without unacceptable fatigue, where you'd like a smaller gear, etc.

For instance I noted that although happy to pedal down to 80 RPM I could ride threshold intervals on back to back days if I kept pedaling over 90 RPM but not at lower speeds and I'm happier doing sustained and repeated efforts at that power level on the low side of 100 RPM. Small cogs running 17-18-19 make that possible with less frenzied shifting. _Training and Racing with a Power Meter_ has an anecdote about a racer who got dropped anytime he spent more than five minutes a power he could otherwise maintain for an hour but cadence under 70. Bigger cogs fixed his problem.

The best answer may also involve learning to spin faster and smaller gears.

Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 12-12-11 at 02:54 AM.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Reply
Old 12-12-11 | 08:14 AM
  #5  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,812
Likes: 1,233
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Play around with this: https://www.gear-calculator.com/#

Gives you a nice graphic showing how the range, spacing and cross overs compare with the different cassettes.

There's also Sheldon's calculator: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/

But I like the first link better because of the graphic display.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply
Old 12-12-11 | 08:40 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,585
Likes: 6,538
From: TN
Ericm979 pretty much covered it. Don't over think this. If you need easier gears to go up hills, get a cassette with a larger cog than what you have now. If you are fine with what you have, get the same again. BTW, if most of your build is Rival, you probably will not notice any "improvement" with a Red cassette. Only lighter in the wallet.
shelbyfv is offline  
Reply
Old 12-12-11 | 08:56 AM
  #7  
Homebrew01's Avatar
Super Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,980
Likes: 1,156
From: Ffld Cnty Connecticut

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

I agree with Drew that many people (not all) would be better off with a 12 instead of 11, and add an extra cog in the middle where it will get used more frequently.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-12-11 | 09:07 AM
  #8  
sherpakid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: Scott Addict R1 and Walter Croll Mtn.

This is a pretty nice spreadsheet that you can use to enter two setups to compare some ratios. It obviously won't tell you how fit you are to turn the gears, but it gives a nice overview of cog to cog percentage jumps and speed based on gear and rpm. Just have to edit it with your inner/outer ring sizes (in red), edit the cog teeth column, and then edit the rpm to see how fast you'd be going. It assumes a 700c road tire.
10sp_cassette_jump_chart.xls.zip
sherpakid is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-11 | 08:45 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Thanks - great education!

i think i'll stay with the 11 - 26 as i like the 23 for the majority of the climb and fall back on the 26 to get me to the top. The 28 sounds nice but maybe too slow, i'll have to tough it out.

Hilly to me is 7 - 9% grades on average, i checked the signs for the trucks this morning.

RED will save me some weight so it seems smart for the extra $$
j mazz is offline  
Reply
Old 12-19-11 | 12:13 PM
  #10  
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 326
From: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Originally Posted by j mazz
Thanks - great education!

i think i'll stay with the 11 - 26 as i like the 23 for the majority of the climb and fall back on the 26 to get me to the top. The 28 sounds nice but maybe too slow, i'll have to tough it out.

Hilly to me is 7 - 9% grades on average, i checked the signs for the trucks this morning.

RED will save me some weight so it seems smart for the extra $$
An 11-25 OG-1090 "Red" cassette weighs 161g with lock ring (weight weenies didn't have a measured weight for an 11-26). The lowest of the 3 shopping results returned by a Google search was $163.

An 11-26 OG-1070 cassette weighs 231g with lock ring. The best of five Google results was $51.

Assuming you weigh 140 pounds (like a 5'10" climber should) and are riding a 6.870 kg bike within striking distance of the UCI minimum the Red cassette will make you a full 0.099% faster up the steepest hills. The results will be proportionally less with a heavier rider and bike.

If you are currently competitive as a climber and plan on racing off the front to an up-hill mountain finish that will give you 3.6 seconds an hour on the chasing peleton and the extra $100+ is well spent every few years.

If you'd just like a shiny bauble (I admit to having carbon fiber cranks, carbon fiber and titanium in my derailleurs, a titanium seat post, etc. They make nice guy jewelry which costs far less than something pretty with an engine. I also get the least expensive Campagnolo cassettes that still come with nickel chrome finish so I don't feel bad dropping them in the trash can) that's fine too but be honest about it.

Otherwise it's not so smart.

Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 12-26-11 at 01:11 PM.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Reply
Old 12-19-11 | 12:28 PM
  #11  
Homebrew01's Avatar
Super Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,980
Likes: 1,156
From: Ffld Cnty Connecticut

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Drew, Drew, Drew ...... there you go again. Spouting facts & common sense in an attempt to trick people into saving money.
As Homer Simpson said, you can use facts to prove just about anything !!
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-19-11 | 01:42 PM
  #12  
banerjek's Avatar
Portland Fred
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 54

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Originally Posted by j mazz
i think i'll stay with the 11 - 26 as i like the 23 for the majority of the climb and fall back on the 26 to get me to the top. The 28 sounds nice but maybe too slow, i'll have to tough it out.
Lower gears are not slower unless you're spun out (in which case you should just upshift). The fastest gear will be the best gear. Toughing it out normally works fine if you have several thousand feet of climbing. But if you're one of those types who wants to climb 15K feet or more in one day, you can burn up your spinning muscles and will be in for a lot of hurt. 7-9% isn't that bad, but it's worse than it sounds if you're out all day.

The 11-26 will combine nicely with the compact. 11-28 is actually the same as the 11-26 except at the bottom of the range, so it's also a good option. I don't think 11-23 is a good idea with a compact for the simple reason that there are not enough overlapping gear ratios between the rings.
banerjek is offline  
Reply
Old 12-19-11 | 02:04 PM
  #13  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,115
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Just throwing it out there, but Ultegra offers a 12-25, which is my favorite all-around cassette. If 25 is a low enough low gear for you, it's a good bet.

12/25 Tooth (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25)

Those one-cog gaps in the middle are just heaven for cruising around.
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 12-19-11 | 06:16 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: New England

Bikes: 2010 Jamis Xenith Comp

i'd go 11-26, especially with a compact crank. i've been using shimano 11-25 cassettes but it's basically the same. 50x11 is a bigger gear than 53x12 and will almost always give you enough top-end speed, and 34x25 or 26 should be enough to get you up just about any hill. i've used both of those extreme gears in multiple rides and races but almost never felt like i needed a wider range (with the exception of a certain stage race over the summer when i used an 11-28 and still barely made it up the hill).
climber7 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-19-11 | 08:58 PM
  #15  
banerjek's Avatar
Portland Fred
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 54

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Since this won't be your first cassette, what do you have now?

The best thing to do is get whatever you don't have now. If you have a tight cassette, get a wide one and vice versa. If you have an all-rounder, go for something wide. The difference between Rival and Red is not nearly as significant as being able to choose the right cassette for the ride.
banerjek is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WNCGoater
Bicycle Mechanics
22
08-26-17 01:49 PM
bobbyl1966
General Cycling Discussion
25
07-08-15 11:30 PM
louye2
Bicycle Mechanics
9
10-02-14 09:36 PM
rpenmanparker
Road Cycling
80
05-21-14 05:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.