Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

shimano 105 or ultegra?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

shimano 105 or ultegra?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-12, 10:19 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
shimano 105 or ultegra?

I am going to surprise my son with a bike next weekend. I have a new s-works sl2 frame and fork that I am going to build up. Is it worth going to ultegra or should I save a little money and put on the new 105? I beleive the difference in price would be around $400.
sdlesko is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 10:20 AM
  #2  
Galveston County Texas
 
10 Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,322

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Liked 1,273 Times in 644 Posts
105 is good.
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"

10 Wheels is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 10:29 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,843
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
105 is good. Even the new 4600 Tiagra is excellent since it is really the old 105 5600 from what I can tell.
fstshrk is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 10:38 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,946

Bikes: Pedal Force RS2, Canyon, Basso, Tommaso, Rock Racing, Schwinn, SWOBO, Trek

Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ultegra is better Lighter, more refined.
ThinLine is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 10:53 AM
  #5  
OMC
 
revchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960

Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race

Liked 116 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by fstshrk
105 is good. Even the new 4600 Tiagra is excellent since it is really the old 105 5600 from what I can tell.
I switched from a DA 7800 RD to a Tiagra 4600 RD to get the extended range of cogs, and I'm pleasantly surprised at how well it works. Then again, my nine speed Tiagra always worked well too. If you live where it's hilly, I'd go with Tiagra 4600....though I understand the current 105 will also handle 30t cogs.
__________________
Regards,
Chuck

Demain, on roule!
revchuck is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 11:23 AM
  #6  
Middle-Aged Member
 
MikeyBoyAz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,276

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito CV 2014, TREK HIFI 2011, Argon18 E-116 2013

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am upgrading right now (should be here Tuesday) from 105 (5700) to Ultegra (6750) I test rode a bike at my LBS to see if I could tell the difference and I MUST say... it is significant! the 105 shifts nice, but the Ultegra shifts Very nice and smooth(er). Is he worth a smooth shifting group or just a good shifting group?
MikeyBoyAz is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 12:00 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,181

Bikes: 2017 Specilized Roubaix, 2012 Scott CR1 Team, Felt Z85

Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by revchuck
though I understand the current 105 will also handle 30t cogs.
I have a 5700 long RD with the 12-30 Tiagra and it works excellent. Some of the new Scotts and Felts are sold that way
Mike F is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 01:08 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
todayilearned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is it his first Road Bike?

105 is fine.
todayilearned is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 01:18 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,843
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by MikeyBoyAz
I am upgrading right now (should be here Tuesday) from 105 (5700) to Ultegra (6750) I test rode a bike at my LBS to see if I could tell the difference and I MUST say... it is significant! the 105 shifts nice, but the Ultegra shifts Very nice and smooth(er). Is he worth a smooth shifting group or just a good shifting group?
That all depends on how well the bike was set up when assembled. There is a huge impact on shift quality and the tuning of the shifting. I spent 4 hrs last night tuning my bike and even with the 4600 brifters, the shift quality is great.
fstshrk is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 10:14 PM
  #10  
I'm a roadrunner baby
 
dinobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: central valley, california
Posts: 69

Bikes: I HAVE 13 BIKES and two of them are cool

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
shimano's website says:
RD-5700-A does 30T
RD-5700 only 28T
dinobyte is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 09:42 AM
  #11  
Still spinnin'.....
 
Stealthammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Whitestown, IN
Posts: 1,208

Bikes: Fisher Opie freeride/urban assault MTB, Redline Monocog 29er MTB, Serrota T-Max Commuter, Klein Rascal SS, Salsa Campion Road bike, Pake Rum Runner FG/SS Road bike, Cannondale Synapse Road bike, Santana Arriva Road Tandem, and others....

Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I run 105 on all of my road bikes now except for the chains and cassettes which I used Ultegra for, but I rode mostly DA and a bit of Ultegra/600 for most of the past 25+ years because I got excellent pricing. For my money, the DA and Ultegra groups have a slightly lower weight and shift slightly more smoothly, but I would bet that a new Tiagra group shifts as well or better than a 10-15 year old Ultegra group did. Go with what you want to spend, but my guess is that performance wise,the difference will barely be noticable.
Stealthammer is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 09:50 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,950

Bikes: Yes

Liked 4,262 Times in 1,572 Posts
Originally Posted by MikeyBoyAz
I am upgrading right now (should be here Tuesday) from 105 (5700) to Ultegra (6750) I test rode a bike at my LBS to see if I could tell the difference and I MUST say... it is significant! the 105 shifts nice, but the Ultegra shifts Very nice and smooth(er). Is he worth a smooth shifting group or just a good shifting group?
This really surprises me. I've got 5600 on one bike and 6600 on two others. IME, the one that I've tuned up most recently is the one that shifts best. They're all great.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 09:52 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I rode Sora components for a year and a half. I switched to my bike now which is ultegra and 105 mix and the biggest upgrade was the shifters. Thumb shifting sucks. If the ultegra cost significantly more, I'd just stick with 105. I'm sure he'll get a new bike later down the line anyways if he gets really really into it.
NaOH is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 10:00 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd go with 105.Is it the 5700,although the Ultegra crank looks better if you can just get that.The other components - not really
brundle_fly is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 10:01 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
tagaproject6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550

Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)

Liked 278 Times in 146 Posts
105 is excellent. Save your $400.
tagaproject6 is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 10:18 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
IthaDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 4,852

Bikes: Click on the #YOLO

Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
I'm in the opposite camp, buy the 'best' components you can afford, they'll never be cheaper than they are OEM and they transfer right over to new frames and bikes.
IthaDan is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 10:29 AM
  #17  
The Recycled Cycler
 
markwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,399

Bikes: Real Steel. Really. Ti is cool, too !

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't know what the price difference is the shop is quoting you. If less than $200 difference I'd go Ultegra. If more than that I'd lean towards 105. Personally, I prefer Ultegra. I notice big differences. But I also have migrated to SRAM Rival which I find much more to my liking that even DA. I like the functionality better, and I get more reliable shifting. Plus I can run a 32 cassette on rear and I can't do that with Shimano 105 or Ultegra.
markwebb is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 10:39 AM
  #18  
Port
 
Rocket-Sauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,820

Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro

Liked 2,168 Times in 1,191 Posts
105 is good enough for Astana to race this year's Paris-Roubaix (Corima is their official wheel sponsor so they put decals over 105).

It is good enough for your son.

Seriously, 105 is very, VERY, good stuff.
Rocket-Sauce is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 12:22 PM
  #19  
Middle-Aged Member
 
MikeyBoyAz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,276

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito CV 2014, TREK HIFI 2011, Argon18 E-116 2013

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fstshrk
That all depends on how well the bike was set up when assembled. There is a huge impact on shift quality and the tuning of the shifting. I spent 4 hrs last night tuning my bike and even with the 4600 brifters, the shift quality is great.
I properly adjusted my bike's derailleurs.

Originally Posted by Andy_K
This really surprises me. I've got 5600 on one bike and 6600 on two others. IME, the one that I've tuned up most recently is the one that shifts best. They're all great.
I don't mean the shifting is 'Better' which is pretty much unmeasurable... I mean the indexed clicks are softer (less harsh) and require a shorter throw and less force is required to move the rd to larger cogs on the cassette.

both bikes have properly adjusted derailleurs and relatively fresh cables and housing... no binds in the housing... both are external cable on the down tube etc...
MikeyBoyAz is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 12:54 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Southern California
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sdlesko
I am going to surprise my son with a bike next weekend. I have a new s-works sl2 frame and fork that I am going to build up. Is it worth going to ultegra or should I save a little money and put on the new 105? I beleive the difference in price would be around $400.
It depends on where you get the parts, of course, but, at low-cost online retailers like Nashbar, the difference in price should only come up to about $200 .. 250, mostly due to the shifters and the crank. You can get Ultegra FD/RD/cassette/brakes instead of 105 for $70 extra.

Going the other way, if you were willing to spend $400 on top of the 105 group, if I'm not mistaken, if you find some extra money in your budget and make that $700, you may be able to go electric:

Ultegra Di2 shifters: $350 (vs 105 shifters: $260)
Ultegra Di2 RD: $267 (vs 105 RD: $60)
Ultegra Di2 FD: $242 (vs 105 FD: $36)
Ultegra Di2 battery: $76
Ultegra brakes: $125 (vs 105 brakes: $100)
Ultegra 10-speed cassette: $69 (vs 105 cassette: $53)
Wires & mounts: call it $100

Since you're starting with a $3000 frame, going with Di2 would have been a no-brainer for me, but it's your decision.

Last edited by eugenek; 04-09-12 at 01:16 PM.
eugenek is offline  
Old 04-09-12, 01:07 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,950

Bikes: Yes

Liked 4,262 Times in 1,572 Posts
Originally Posted by MikeyBoyAz
I don't mean the shifting is 'Better' which is pretty much unmeasurable... I mean the indexed clicks are softer (less harsh) and require a shorter throw and less force is required to move the rd to larger cogs on the cassette.
I definitely know what you're talking about. I felt that way going from 4500 Tiagra to 6600 Ultegra. I just don't notice it between 5600 105 and 6600 Ultegra. Perhaps they increased the gap between them in the new generation, or maybe I'm just not attuned enough to pick up on what you are experiencing (a distinct possibility).
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 10-15-12, 02:39 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
TXRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThinLine
Ultegra is better Lighter, more refined.
Ok I will give you that, but does that really make it better? As a Noob myself a more "refined" explanation of what make it better would greatly be appreciated.
TXRR is offline  
Old 10-15-12, 02:48 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
abstractform20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
105 is very good, ultegra is nicer.

do what you will.
abstractform20 is offline  
Old 10-15-12, 03:25 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
IthaDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 4,852

Bikes: Click on the #YOLO

Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by TXRR
Ok I will give you that, but does that really make it better? As a Noob myself a more "refined" explanation of what make it better would greatly be appreciated.
Nice bump.

Define "better"- is it performance per dollar? Performance outright? That's a very personal question with a very personal answer. Hell, some guy wrote an entire book on that topic.

The biggest differences between groups, other than materials- titanuim hardware an/or carbon cages/blades/plates/levers- especially once you get up to the top end are manufacturing tolerances, surface finishes and pivots. The differences are subtle, but make a lot of difference in not only the weight, but the "feel" of a component group.
__________________

Shimano : Click :: Campy : Snap :: SRAM : Bang
IthaDan is offline  
Old 10-15-12, 03:41 PM
  #25  
OM boy
 
cyclezen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Goleta CA
Posts: 4,550

Bikes: a bunch

Liked 771 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by sdlesko
I am going to surprise my son with a bike next weekend. I have a new s-works sl2 frame and fork that I am going to build up. Is it worth going to ultegra or should I save a little money and put on the new 105? I beleive the difference in price would be around $400.
you didn;t mention which wheels you were gonna put on the bike...
without making any prejudgement on whether your son can tell the diff between 105 and Ultegra - he would certainly be able to tell the diff. between lower end and better wheels/tubes/tires.
If I had to ride Mavic Ksyrium equipes (or similar) with Ultegra STI - I would run, not walk, to swap out to 105 STI and a set of HED Ardennes...
cyclezen is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.