My new signature...
#51
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,057
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JBBOOKS
53 - First off, you are a dork .
#52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,057
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
Denying that there are tangible benefits for the vast majority of cyclists riding long distances is just plain wrong.
You keep saying that a "good saddle" negates the need for cycling shorts yet you never reveal the name of that magical saddle. Why not?
You keep saying that a "good saddle" negates the need for cycling shorts yet you never reveal the name of that magical saddle. Why not?
Carbon Fiber frames have tangible benefits......but you don't "need" a carbon fiber frame to ride as long as you are happy with what you have.....whether it is steel, aluminum, etc.
Specialized Body geometry saddle (older version)..tilted slight down.
Last edited by 53-11 alltheway; 01-02-05 at 11:24 AM.
#53
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,057
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by soda
Bottom line is do what you want but if your goals are to ride with a group and have some training buddies, don't expect to hook up with them spontaneously on the road if you're wearing gym shorts. But that doesn't seem to be a goal of yours like you said so keep doing what you're doing. It's working.
No doubt, everyone judges you by the clothes you wear and the car you drive (or the shorts you wear and how nice your bike is)......but damn this is exercise.
Biking is just exercise.....
#54
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,057
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
Oh, and BTW, there's no so such thing as a "grouppo". If it's Italian and you're pretentious it's a "gruppo", otherwise it's just a component group.
#55
demon speeder
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 449
Bikes: commuter: Kona Fire Mountain Road: Mongoose Pro Bosberg
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If it's snobbery that allows me to ride with a group of guys that I can trust to know how to safely ride in a group and also get a good workout then I'm a snob. I'll admit to that statement. I'm a snob by your definition. I like to ride with people that know what they're doing but I also like to ride with people that are just starting so we can teach them the rules for safe group rides. And frankly, yes you are judged by what you wear and ride because it's a sign that you know what you're doing. The more experienced you are, the more you can appreciate quality and how it can effect your ride and as much as you seem to not be able to admit to it, cycling shorts have a tremendous impact on the quality of the ride. You're right in that they're not necessary but they do improve the quality of the ride. I commuted in gym shorts for years and finally decided to try cycling shorts. When I first used them I didn't know what the big deal was but one day I forgot my cycling shorts and had to use my gym shorts again. Even within those short 6 miles, I could tell a big difference in comfort. The rest of us can't seem to convince you of that so let's agree to disagree.
Let me finish by reinforcing my comment about riding with newbies: I encourage newbies to join our group and enjoy road cycling safely. And riding safely isn't restricted to the road. It also applies to the health of the rider and I can't allow a newbie to start riding and already be behind the 8 ball by not wearing cycling shorts. I want them to come back but if they're sore from the first ride, do you think they're going to be up for the next ride? I would even venture to say that it's your idea that cycling shorts aren't necessary that is keeping newbies from enjoying the ride. They're not used to sitting the boys on a saddle for 2-3 hours and their thighs are not used to the constant road vibration and if anything can minimize or eliminate those discomforts they'll be more likely to come back and become a strong rider and friend. I want more people to ride with not less. It's kinda boring being out there alone. There is nobody to challenge me or help push me up that hill or to even vent about the hard day at work. So as you can see it's more than just excersise.
cycling shorts = newbie comfort = ride with me again = stronger rider/good friend = better workout for both of us
gym shorts = newbie DIScomfort = "what the heck are they doing to me" = "screw them" = I ride alone = poorer workout
And as much as you may think that I think you're a dork; I don't. I actually think you would be great fun on a ride as long as I don't have to see your gym shorts flopping in the wind giving me a peak at your tighty whities. If you could promise me that isn't a possiblity, then I'm game.
Let me finish by reinforcing my comment about riding with newbies: I encourage newbies to join our group and enjoy road cycling safely. And riding safely isn't restricted to the road. It also applies to the health of the rider and I can't allow a newbie to start riding and already be behind the 8 ball by not wearing cycling shorts. I want them to come back but if they're sore from the first ride, do you think they're going to be up for the next ride? I would even venture to say that it's your idea that cycling shorts aren't necessary that is keeping newbies from enjoying the ride. They're not used to sitting the boys on a saddle for 2-3 hours and their thighs are not used to the constant road vibration and if anything can minimize or eliminate those discomforts they'll be more likely to come back and become a strong rider and friend. I want more people to ride with not less. It's kinda boring being out there alone. There is nobody to challenge me or help push me up that hill or to even vent about the hard day at work. So as you can see it's more than just excersise.
cycling shorts = newbie comfort = ride with me again = stronger rider/good friend = better workout for both of us
gym shorts = newbie DIScomfort = "what the heck are they doing to me" = "screw them" = I ride alone = poorer workout
And as much as you may think that I think you're a dork; I don't. I actually think you would be great fun on a ride as long as I don't have to see your gym shorts flopping in the wind giving me a peak at your tighty whities. If you could promise me that isn't a possiblity, then I'm game.
Last edited by soda; 01-02-05 at 12:17 PM.
#56
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,057
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by soda
If it's snobbery that allows me to ride with a group of guys that I can trust to know how to safely ride in a group and also get a good workout then I'm a snob. I'll admit to that statement. I'm a snob by your definition. I like to ride with people that know what they're doing but I also like to ride with people that are just starting so we can teach them the rules for safe group rides. And frankly, yes you are judged by what you wear and ride because it's a sign that you know what you're doing. The more experienced you are, the more you can appreciate quality and how it can effect your ride and as much as you seem to not be able to admit to it, cycling shorts have a tremendous impact on the quality of the ride. You're right in that they're not necessary but they do improve the quality of the ride. I commuted in gym shorts for years and finally decided to try cycling shorts. When I first used them I didn't know what the big deal was but one day I forgot my cycling shorts and had to use my gym shorts again. Even within those short 6 miles, I could tell a big difference in comfort. The rest of us can't seem to convince you of that so let's agree to disagree.
Let me finish by reinforcing my comment about riding with newbies: I encourage newbies to join our group and enjoy road cycling safely. And riding safely isn't restricted to the road. It also applies to the health of the rider and I can't allow a newbie to start riding and already be behind the 8 ball by not wearing cycling shorts. I want them to come back but if they're sore from the first ride, do you think they're going to be up for the next ride? I would even venture to say that it's your idea that cycling shorts aren't necessary that is keeping newbies from enjoying the ride. They're not used to sitting the boys on a saddle for 2-3 hours and their thighs are not used to the constant road vibration and if anything can minimize or eliminate those discomforts they'll be more likely to come back and become a strong rider and friend. I want more people to ride with not less. It's kinda boring being out there alone. There is nobody to challenge me or help push me up that hill or to even vent about the hard day at work. So as you can see it's more than just excersise.
cycling shorts = newbie comfort = ride with me again = stronger rider/good friend = better workout for both of us
gym shorts = newbie DIScomfort = "what the heck are they doing to me" = "screw them" = I ride alone = poorer workout
And as much as you may think that I think you're a dork; I don't. I actually think you would be great fun on a ride as long as I don't have to see your gym shorts flopping in the wind giving me a peak at your tighty whities. If you could promise me that isn't a possiblity, then I'm game.
Let me finish by reinforcing my comment about riding with newbies: I encourage newbies to join our group and enjoy road cycling safely. And riding safely isn't restricted to the road. It also applies to the health of the rider and I can't allow a newbie to start riding and already be behind the 8 ball by not wearing cycling shorts. I want them to come back but if they're sore from the first ride, do you think they're going to be up for the next ride? I would even venture to say that it's your idea that cycling shorts aren't necessary that is keeping newbies from enjoying the ride. They're not used to sitting the boys on a saddle for 2-3 hours and their thighs are not used to the constant road vibration and if anything can minimize or eliminate those discomforts they'll be more likely to come back and become a strong rider and friend. I want more people to ride with not less. It's kinda boring being out there alone. There is nobody to challenge me or help push me up that hill or to even vent about the hard day at work. So as you can see it's more than just excersise.
cycling shorts = newbie comfort = ride with me again = stronger rider/good friend = better workout for both of us
gym shorts = newbie DIScomfort = "what the heck are they doing to me" = "screw them" = I ride alone = poorer workout
And as much as you may think that I think you're a dork; I don't. I actually think you would be great fun on a ride as long as I don't have to see your gym shorts flopping in the wind giving me a peak at your tighty whities. If you could promise me that isn't a possiblity, then I'm game.
I resist the shorts for one very good reason. I don't want to get "addicted" to them. I get along perfectly fine without them.....but if I ever wear them one day and I get hooked by the way they hold my muscles (and all the other reasons people state) its going to add the "hassle" factor into my riding. I don't want them to take away from the spontaneous nature of my cycling.
#57
Former Hoarder
Originally Posted by 53-11 alltheway
I resist the shorts for one very good reason. I don't want to get "addicted" to them. I get along perfectly fine without them.....but if I ever wear them one day and I get hooked by the way they hold my muscles (and all the other reasons people state) its going to add the "hassle" factor into my riding. I don't want them to take away from the spontaneous nature of my cycling.
55/Rad
#58
1.9lb/in
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Susquehanna shoreline
Posts: 1,360
Bikes: LeMond, CAAD9/1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 55/Rad
You stated you average almost 250 miles per week. To maintain that level, you must have to wake up every day knowing if you are going out or not.
Keeping the cables adjusted, chain lubed, wheels trued, etc. would be a much more significant factor than keeping a clean pair of cycling shorts at-the-ready.
#60
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155
Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Necessary? No. But you ride enough to merit buying bike shorts. You say it is a hassle to put on bike shorts but it is not much more difficult than putting on other shorts. You have to wear something, why not shorts that don't flap in the wind, add padding and won't get caught on your saddle when you mount/dismount? If you are uncomfortable in lycra shorts for any reason, don't bother. They might hold some parts of you closer to the body so you don't need to ride on sloping saddle, maybe not. I don't need bike shorts, sometime use the padded underwear. Maybe to be welcome on group rides you need them. If you ride well the group will accept you after they get over your fashion faux pas.
#61
Lets Ride
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Biking Country, USA
Posts: 1,102
Bikes: Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
53-11, try the damn shorts. You know you are in denial because you can't even come up with good reasons not to wear them. If you get addicted then so be it. When you were a child someone fed you real food. You liked it now you eat it all the time. (I may be assuming too much Ha Ha HA). It will just make a better rider out of you. I'm sure there is room for improvement. Actually I have never riden with a cyclist that was wearing gym shorts that was worth a **** anyway.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 53-11 alltheway
.....and you said I'm in the 10th grade. How immature are you to resort to name calling? I'm above that.
#63
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155
Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by JBBOOKS
It's not a name, it's a word that means an annoyingly stupid or foolish person.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,698
Bikes: 2006 custom Walt Works roadie, 2003 Fuji Finest (road), 2002 Giant Iguana (mtb), 1986 BMW K75 (motor)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
this thread = sofa king we todd ed
#65
Former Hoarder
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by 53-11 alltheway
Never said there weren't tangible benefits......just not neccessary.
Originally Posted by 53-11 alltheway
Specialized Body geometry saddle (older version)..tilted slight down.