Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Wireless computer or Wired???

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Wireless computer or Wired???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-12 | 12:09 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Wireless computer or Wired???

Hi, Whats your thoughts on Wired bike computers vs Wireless.

Do they both work relatively the same? Is one better than the other? And does the wire on the wired computer get in the way or looks messy?

Thanks all
TripleAce is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 12:43 AM
  #2  
rekmeyata's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,953
Likes: 387
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

There's pros and cons to both, it just depends on what you want. A Wireless job looks nicer when it's on the bike due to no wire going from the computer to the sender, but they cost more to get the same features found in a wired computer. Wireless computers use batteries in the computer and sender, the bat in the wireless computer will last at least 5 years same with wired, the wireless sender about 6 months. The wireless is a bit heavier due to the bulky sending unit. Typically a wireless computer will last about 4 years though none of mine ever made it past 3 years. Overall I believe wired computers are better in terms of features, reliability, and cost.

Brand wise Cateye and Sigma are my favorites, currently I use Sigma's, I think they offer more features for the money, plus I think their the nicest looking of all the computers on the market.
rekmeyata is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 01:13 AM
  #3  
Fox Farm's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 63
From: Prague, Czech Republic

Bikes: Time ADH01, Merlin Extra Light, Orbea Orca, Ritchey Outback,Tomac Revolver Mountain Bike, Cannondale Crit 3.0 now used for time trials.

When I use to have an Avocet 45 wired, I would compare it to the wireless Polar which I would also mount on the bike at the same time. The wired responded to speed changes and showed them to you instantly where as the wireless had a short delay. I now use a Cateye double wireless on one bike and a Ciclo wired on the other. Both have cadence and the wireless is muss less messy with out all of the wires and double senders. My one dislike of Cateye units are the very narrow digits.
Fox Farm is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 01:22 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 1
From: Incheon, South Korea

Bikes: Nothing amazing... cheap old 21 speed mtb

I use a basic wired cateye. Totally reliable and the single wire going to the front wheel can ride down the brake cable. Its lasted six years so far and never missed a beat. If you want cadence etc wireless may offer a neater solution, but IMHO its just more complicated for no real reason going wireless.

Last edited by krobinson103; 05-18-12 at 05:45 AM.
krobinson103 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 04:49 AM
  #5  
K&K_Dad's Avatar
Schleckaholic
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 1
From: Carteret Co., NC, USA

Bikes: '08 Trek 1.2, Schwinn Avenue Hybrid, '11 GT Sport

The biggest thing in my book is that when, (it's only a matter of time), you mess up the wire in a wired system your screwed. I have nothing against them and I loved mine. Worked flawlessly for years but because the wires somehow frayed or split made mine a paperweight.
If all you want to know is how far you went and how long and how fast then all you need is a basic wired, or a watch. if you want all that other stuff cadence, elevation, blah blah blah. go wireless.
K&K_Dad is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 05:16 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 429
Likes: 22
I have had trouble with interference from bike lights disrupting the signal of wireless computers. Doesn't happen with my Garmin though which uses a digital protocol that is less susceptible. Just something to bear in mind.
bobones is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 05:20 AM
  #7  
IthaDan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 14
From: Ithaca, NY

Bikes: Click on the #YOLO

I also like how a wired computer just starts up when you start moving, but you have to wake up a wireless or else it'll just stay blank, and not register anything until you do.
IthaDan is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 06:21 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 236

Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo

cateye wireless never an issue and when done with a wheel rollout it is deadly accurate.
deacon mark is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 07:46 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ

Bikes: Cervelo RS

Originally Posted by IthaDan
I also like how a wired computer just starts up when you start moving, but you have to wake up a wireless or else it'll just stay blank, and not register anything until you do.
When I had a Cateye Strada wireless, you didn't have to do anything to get it started unless the bike had been sitting for a long time (like 2 weeks) and it went to sleep. Otherwise just get on the bike and go. I use a Garmin Edge 200 now, which requires a few button pushes (power on, select ride mode, press start) but is a much cleaner installation with nothing on the wheel or fork.
kh6idf is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 08:11 AM
  #10  
Keep on climbing
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 2
From: Marlborough, Massachusetts

Bikes: 2004 Calfee Tetra Pro

Originally Posted by IthaDan
I also like how a wired computer just starts up when you start moving, but you have to wake up a wireless or else it'll just stay blank, and not register anything until you do.
I have a wireless computer on my bike. Whenever I start a ride (i.e., mile 0) I reset the various ride counters (i.e., time ridden, distance ridden, etc), so that "wakes it up" anyway. If I am just resuming from a mid-ride stop (i.e., traffic light, lunch, etc) though, I don't have to touch it.
KevinF is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 09:07 AM
  #11  
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 23,208
Likes: 10,653
From: Seattle, WA
I bought a wireless CatEye Strada Cadence, what a waste of money. Even if it wasn't crap (it just stopped working one day - I replaced the batteries and it just shows 0 mph no matter how fast I'm going) I wouldn't have a use for it now that I've got a Garmin.

GPS bike computers can be profoundly useful and nice-to-have. If you're the type of person who might want one down the line, consider putting the money you might have spent on a wireless cyclocomputer right into a GPS.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 09:27 AM
  #12  
K&K_Dad's Avatar
Schleckaholic
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 1
From: Carteret Co., NC, USA

Bikes: '08 Trek 1.2, Schwinn Avenue Hybrid, '11 GT Sport

Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
I bought a wireless CatEye Strada Cadence, what a waste of money. Even if it wasn't crap (it just stopped working one day - I replaced the batteries and it just shows 0 mph no matter how fast I'm going) I wouldn't have a use for it now that I've got a Garmin.

GPS bike computers can be profoundly useful and nice-to-have. If you're the type of person who might want one down the line, consider putting the money you might have spent on a wireless cyclocomputer right into a GPS.
what is it about the Strada Cadence that causes so many problems. Even after Cateye sent me new parts I refused to put it on my bike because I knew down the road I'd just have the same problem everyone else did.

I agree.. if you think you're gonna stick with cycling and really really want a computer just do yourself a favor and get something nicer from the get go.
K&K_Dad is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 09:36 AM
  #13  
John_V's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 122
From: Tampa, Florida

Bikes: 2017 Colnago C-RS, 2012 Colnago Ace, 2010 Giant Cypress hybrid

I prefer wired, but I have a Cateye Double Wireless on my road bike because the black wire from the chain stay to the handlebar on a white bike just looks weird. The computers on the other bikes are Sigmas.
__________________
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily

2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
John_V is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 10:00 AM
  #14  
Canadian eh?
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 114
From: Toronto

Bikes: 2025 Giant Revolt Advanced Pro 0

I use the Bontrager Node 1.1 system. It's a great system, big screen...but for Trek Madone riders, the best part is the sensors built right into the frame mount. Makes for a very clean setup.
WorldIRC is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 01:47 PM
  #15  
rekmeyata's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,953
Likes: 387
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

One poster mentioned that the wire on a wired job can be broken, that's true, you can break one...but it's also a rare event, my last wired computer lasted 18 years before the wire got loose...18 to 20 years vs 3 to 4 years for wireless...hmmm, I can't figure out which is more reliable and cost effective, maybe someone can figure that out for me.
rekmeyata is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 01:58 PM
  #16  
RT's Avatar
RT
The Weird Beard
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,554
Likes: 3
From: COS
I have a wired Sigma that has been great for 8+ years.
RT is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 02:03 PM
  #17  
Carbon Unit's Avatar
Live to ride ride to live
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,896
Likes: 1
From: Austin, Texas

Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro

I have a Garmin which is wireless. It works perfectly and have never had an issue with it. I am using cadence and heart rate on it so they require two batteries and the head unit is rechargeable.
Carbon Unit is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 02:13 PM
  #18  
eja_ bottecchia's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,799
Likes: 491
My Gramin Edge500 works great. It is a bit pricey, but I can use it on three of my bikes and still get a grand total of miles for all three bikes.

Wired computers are OK, but I kept ruining the wires.
eja_ bottecchia is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 07:40 PM
  #19  
GlennR's Avatar
On Your Left
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,373
Likes: 2,438
From: Long Island, New York, USA

Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303

Originally Posted by WorldIRC
I use the Bontrager Node 1.1 system. It's a great system, big screen...but for Trek Madone riders, the best part is the sensors built right into the frame mount. Makes for a very clean setup.
Just got a Node 1.1 and love the clean and easy install.
GlennR is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 09:03 PM
  #20  
Nachoman's Avatar
well hello there
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 15,487
Likes: 388
From: Point Loma, CA

Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)

Originally Posted by rekmeyata
A Wireless job looks nicer when it's on the bike due to no wire going from the computer to the sender,

It takes some patience to make a wired computer look good.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
img2189cj9.jpg (59.1 KB, 15 views)
__________________
.
.

Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Nachoman is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 09:09 PM
  #21  
10 Wheels's Avatar
Galveston County Texas
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 33,335
Likes: 1,285
From: In The Wind

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Originally Posted by rekmeyata
One poster mentioned that the wire on a wired job can be broken, that's true, you can break one...but it's also a rare event, my last wired computer lasted 18 years before the wire got loose...18 to 20 years vs 3 to 4 years for wireless...hmmm, I can't figure out which is more reliable and cost effective, maybe someone can figure that out for me.
I use these, free shipping.
https://www.dealextreme.com/p/sunding...edometer-24075
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"

10 Wheels is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 09:27 PM
  #22  
snowman40's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA

Bikes: Fuji

I've used Schwinn (Target) wired and Topeak wired and they were ok. The Schwinn ones didn't have features I needed (heart rate, I would get tunnel vision up some hills and decided to upgrade to something with heart rate) and the Topeak failed horribly. My wireless ones are both Sigma and I love them. I get interference from lights in the winter, so I just use strava for then when commuting. I got the Sigmas from moderbike.com and REI.
snowman40 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 11:32 PM
  #23  
pgjackson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Don't know why anyone would still use a wired computer. That's like having a cord on your house phone. Get with the times and just buy a wireless system.
pgjackson is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 11:46 PM
  #24  
FPSDavid's Avatar
1337
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, CA

Bikes: CAAD10

Originally Posted by K&K_Dad
The biggest thing in my book is that when, (it's only a matter of time), you mess up the wire in a wired system your screwed. I have nothing against them and I loved mine. Worked flawlessly for years but because the wires somehow frayed or split made mine a paperweight.
If all you want to know is how far you went and how long and how fast then all you need is a basic wired, or a watch. if you want all that other stuff cadence, elevation, blah blah blah. go wireless.
Yeah, my wired cateye cadence is now a clock.
FPSDavid is offline  
Reply
Old 05-18-12 | 11:47 PM
  #25  
Peiper1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada

Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 5.2

Originally Posted by WorldIRC
I use the Bontrager Node 1.1 system. It's a great system, big screen...but for Trek Madone riders, the best part is the sensors built right into the frame mount. Makes for a very clean setup.
Second that for the Node, I have the Node 2 on my Madone. Seeing as you are a fellow Torontonian which model Madone do you have?
Peiper1 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.