Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Geometry question. Is she too big? :(

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Geometry question. Is she too big? :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-12, 07:32 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Geometry question. Is she too big? :(

I'm 5' 9" and have been comfortably riding a 54cm Neuvation FC100 Frame, which is even on the small side for me.


I just bought a 55cm BMC Race Machine 2011 - couldn't pass on the deal given the bad time to be on the market for a new bike.
She's beautiful. But she's huge. Just came in the mail yesterday.
The standover height is very tall, the top tube rubs against me. Meanwhile, the reach is shorter than on my other bike with the 1 cm shorter stem.

I have not yet had a chance to ride the new bike. But this is bothering me and I wanted your opinion.

Thanks.
FasterNearGirls is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 07:33 AM
  #2  
Galveston County Texas
 
10 Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,222

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,245 Times in 623 Posts
Pics would help much.
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"

10 Wheels is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 07:38 AM
  #3  
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
ColinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903

Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
the BMC 55cm has the geometry typical of a cannondale or specialized 56cm.

that said, 56cm eTT doesn't sound unworkable for 5'9". you just explained that the reach is shorter than your other bike, so it sounds like you can put a longer stem on the BMC and have the same reach.

so the problem seems to be standover. elaborate on that. are you grazing the TT, or is it fully against your crotch, supporting some weight?
ColinL is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 07:43 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ColinL
the BMC 55cm has the geometry typical of a cannondale or specialized 56cm.

that said, 56cm eTT doesn't sound unworkable for 5'9". you just explained that the reach is shorter than your other bike, so it sounds like you can put a longer stem on the BMC and have the same reach.

so the problem seems to be standover. elaborate on that. are you grazing the TT, or is it fully against your crotch, supporting some weight?
The TT is grazing my crotch, no weight being supported.
So that's really what I was looking to discuss - assuming I can get comfortable reach wise and etc, this tall frame will not matter much? What are the downside? Maybe the fact that my seat post / saddle height will be low relatively to the frame, and that I can't get in a very aggressive position?

Unfortunately can't take pics until next week. Going away with the Neuvation after work, for the weekend.

Thanks.
FasterNearGirls is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 07:49 AM
  #5  
Cat Enthusiast
 
ddeadserious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 2,227

Bikes: All City Nature Boy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
People seem to base a lot of fit off of standover height/clearance, but top tube length is significantly more important. If the top tube and the reach are proper for you, you're should be good to go(assuming you don't have the slam the seat to have a good pedal stroke).
ddeadserious is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 07:53 AM
  #6  
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
ColinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903

Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
grazing the TT is no big deal at all. I have a flat TT as well-- not sloping-- and am on the biggest frame I can fit. (could ride 58cm, have 61cm.) I don't clear the TT by much, probably 10-15 mm.

you might not look 'pro' with a low amount of seatpost showing, but if you get the saddle height correct, and the bar reach and height correct, of course you can ride that bike.
ColinL is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 08:14 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you very much for the insight. This makes me feel better. Can't wait to ride!
I'll ride some, and eventually get a pro fit and their opinion on the frame size for me before I make my final decision, i.e. whether to keep her.
FasterNearGirls is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 09:43 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
I'm 5'9" with a 34" bike inseam and ride a 55 BMC SLR01. Stem is 110mm and tops of the bars are 10cm below the top of the saddle. Needed a -17 degree stem to get there. Never consciously checked the stand over height but I guess it's OK. If you can get the right relative positions between the cranks, saddle, and bars, there's not reason not to ride it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Williams saddle and tape.jpg (98.0 KB, 68 views)
Looigi is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 09:54 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Looigi
I'm 5'9" with a 34" bike inseam and ride a 55 BMC SLR01. Stem is 110mm and tops of the bars are 10cm below the top of the saddle. Needed a -17 degree stem to get there. Never consciously checked the stand over height but I guess it's OK. If you can get the right relative positions between the cranks, saddle, and bars, there's not reason not to ride it.
Nice bike!
Great news then. Thank you. I like the 110mm -17 degree stem idea. I might be OK after all.
Not sure what my bike inseam is, possibly a little shorter than yours, but we've gone over how that will not matter.

Thanks again.
FasterNearGirls is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 10:01 AM
  #10  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,179 Times in 1,469 Posts
I looked at the geometry of that bike because a friend is looking at one. In a 55, the seta tube is 57 to top of seatpost. With the sloping and diminishing diameter, that's close a regular 57. The top tube is 56. Both of those are large for someone who's 5'9". If that reach seems short, what is the stem length.

Regardless of what others say, that seems it may be too big. Either psot some pictures ot have someone knowledgable take a look at you on it. Do you know a LBS that might give you objective advice?

I'm 6'0" exactly and that would fit me perfectly
StanSeven is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 10:05 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
I looked at the geometry of that bike because a friend is looking at one. In a 55, the seta tube is 57 to top of seatpost. With the sloping and diminishing diameter, that's close a regular 57. The top tube is 56. Both of those are large for someone who's 5'9". If that reach seems short, what is the stem length.

Regardless of what others say, that seems it may be too big. Either psot some pictures ot have someone knowledgable take a look at you on it. Do you know a LBS that might give you objective advice?

I'm 6'0" exactly and that would fit me perfectly
Wanna buy it in case it doesn't work out for me??

Stem is only a 90mm. Definitely will need to change.
I plan on doing both: pasting pics and going to an LBS.
I have 60 day money back guarantee too, so I should be OK. I want it to work though.
FasterNearGirls is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 10:36 AM
  #12  
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
ColinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903

Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
I looked at the geometry of that bike because a friend is looking at one. In a 55, the seta tube is 57 to top of seatpost. With the sloping and diminishing diameter, that's close a regular 57. The top tube is 56. Both of those are large for someone who's 5'9". If that reach seems short, what is the stem length.

Regardless of what others say, that seems it may be too big. Either psot some pictures ot have someone knowledgable take a look at you on it. Do you know a LBS that might give you objective advice?

I'm 6'0" exactly and that would fit me perfectly
It entirely depends on his arm and torso length, since we've already established that he can stand over the bike, if only just.

I'm also 6'0" exactly and I have broad shoulders and long arms, resulting in a 78.5" boxing reach. Most people have a boxing reach within 1-2" of their height. If I setup the OP's bike to match the bar position of mine, it would require a 140mm 6deg stem and no spacer.

But this thread isn't about me, and I agree that we need pics of him on the bike. Actually both bikes would be really helpful to understand his impressions of the Neuvation being too small and the BMC too large.
ColinL is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 10:48 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,570
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 679 Times in 430 Posts
I cannot say conclusively without seeing you on the bike, but if the BMC feels to you like it is too big, then it is probably too big.

A 55 BMC is essentially one size up from your 54 Neuvation (53 BMC would be closer to your Neuvation.)
topflightpro is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 10:51 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
St_Pete_Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So... in looking at the thread title, I had had these really good answers to give you:
  • if you love her, she is not too big...
  • much more comfortable...
  • maybe encourage her to ride more...

Then I actually read the post...
St_Pete_Speed is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 10:57 AM
  #15  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by FasterNearGirls
The TT is grazing my crotch, no weight being supported.
So that's really what I was looking to discuss - assuming I can get comfortable reach wise and etc, this tall frame will not matter much? What are the downside? Maybe the fact that my seat post / saddle height will be low relatively to the frame, and that I can't get in a very aggressive position?

Unfortunately can't take pics until next week. Going away with the Neuvation after work, for the weekend.

Thanks.
What Colin said. Downside? You will be more comfortable because your bars won't be so low. Don't sweat it. Bet you end up liking it more than your smaller bike with shorter head tube with more standover. If you want it more slammed you can get there with a -17 deg stem.
Enjoy it.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 12:06 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Hi, BMC rider here for a few years. Sincerely??? probably the bike is too big, those frames run big and if you look at the geometry sizing the effective top tube in that BMC bike is 56 cm. Probably 1 to 2 cms longer than the old bike. The top tube in the old frame is 54.5, the geometry of the new bike has an almost horizontal top tube. 1.5 centimeters of difference, not much but could be bothersome at some point.

Personally I never look at the stand over for some obvious reasons, the BB height and the top tube height change from manufacturer to manufacturer so one guy can put the top tube as high or low as they want, add to that the different BB height then you can't compare the bikes at all. An example is just look at the specialized bikes with those massive front tubes... frames like 54 in size that look like a 60 with a stand over so high that you can pedal right seated in the top tube, just insane IMO.

The only 2 things you have to compare are the top tube effective length and the reach. And now if you are talking in high end bikes like the bmc stand over just dont work because those bikes have the top tube lower than normal... since you got a large frame than your old Neuvation obviously the top tube stand over will be higher.

The 53 BMC is the equivalent to the 54 Neuvation.. even the top tube in 53 is still 5 mm longer than the Neuvation. With Ridley damocles you should have gone all the way to a small size to get close to the size you are looking for. Always effective top tube and reach to compare. The stand over doesnt work unless the bikes have exactly the same geometry and that is not going to happen.

Hope this helps you.
ultraman6970 is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 12:22 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Windham, ME
Posts: 177

Bikes: BMC SL02

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
I looked at the geometry of that bike because a friend is looking at one. In a 55, the seta tube is 57 to top of seatpost. With the sloping and diminishing diameter, that's close a regular 57. The top tube is 56. Both of those are large for someone who's 5'9". If that reach seems short, what is the stem length.

Regardless of what others say, that seems it may be too big. Either psot some pictures ot have someone knowledgable take a look at you on it. Do you know a LBS that might give you objective advice?

I'm 6'0" exactly and that would fit me perfectly
I'm 6'1 and ride a 60cm bmc
KoNP is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 01:42 PM
  #18  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,179 Times in 1,469 Posts
Originally Posted by KoNP
I'm 6'1 and ride a 60cm bmc
I see from your post you have an SL02 which is a lot different than the RM01 the OP got. Yours in a 60 has a 55.5 seat post. The same in a RM01 is a 62, although the tt is more straight which means the seat tube is longer!

Last edited by StanSeven; 05-25-12 at 01:48 PM.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 02:22 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the posts. Both the inspiring and wishful thinking ones, as well as the straight up negative ones.

That's how I feel about the new bike right now. Lot of mixed feelings regarding the fit given it's such a large frame for my size. For example, the seat post is slammed, all the way down to that red stripe.

I believe I will have fun "test riding" it for a little while but then will need to return to Competitive Cyclist. The sales person ensured me that the return process would be smooth. I hope so. He actually told me I could test ride it for 60 days and send it back no questions asked, just pay shipping.
I'll return it in a week. I need a new bike.

Thank you.
FasterNearGirls is offline  
Old 05-25-12, 02:57 PM
  #20  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,179 Times in 1,469 Posts
Originally Posted by FasterNearGirls
Thanks for the posts. Both the inspiring and wishful thinking ones, as well as the straight up negative ones.
That's the 41, regardless of the subject.

Good luck. CC does have an excellent return policy and very knowledgable personnel. I'm sure you will end up with something that makes you very happy.

Or if you're like me, for a while until something better and newer comes along.
StanSeven is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deacon mark
Road Cycling
5
03-17-17 04:43 AM
fronesis
Fitting Your Bike
7
06-22-14 09:48 PM
Inertianinja
Road Cycling
9
05-02-11 08:52 PM
Maro
Road Cycling
15
04-01-11 07:17 PM
Rice923
Road Cycling
52
12-11-09 04:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.