Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

advice needed.. 11-28 to 12-30 cassette

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

advice needed.. 11-28 to 12-30 cassette

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-12, 04:37 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I switch from a 12-27 to 12-30 cassette for the Everest Challenge stage race. The extra gear helps quite a bit when your legs are tired and you are faced with steep ramps at the end of 15,000' of climbing. I could do any one or two of the biggest climbs with a 12-27 but doing 29,035 feet in two days is tougher.

Also, the 12-30 cassette's last three cogs are 24,27,30. The 12-28's last two are 24,28. There's a big step from the 24t to the 28t cog. When you're doing a lot of big climbs it is important to have the right gear. Climbing at too low an rpm will tire your legs out more quickly.

There's no drawback to bringing the 12-30. You don't have to use the low gears if you don't need them.
ericm979 is offline  
Old 07-30-12, 04:45 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
volosong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 2,809

Bikes: n + 1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 15 Posts
I went from 28 to 30 and will never go back, (unless I'm doing a TT). We only have a couple of HC climbs around here, but plenty of 1 and 2 climbs, (did an HC this last Saturday - GMR/GRR to Mt. Baldy Village). Being on the bigger size, (6'3", 195 lbs.), and getting on in years, (61 next month), I need all the help I can get, short of a petroleum fueled motor. After I switched, I definitly felt the difference with those two teeth. It's not much use on grades less than 7-8%, but I'm not afraid of 15% grades anymore, (well, that is if they are less than a quarter mile or so). It ultimately depends on if you have the discretionary income. If not, you can probably get by with 28. If so, 30 will help you on those lengthy +10% grades.
volosong is offline  
Old 07-30-12, 04:48 PM
  #28  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
30T no question...Or HTFU and use a 23.
znomit is offline  
Old 07-30-12, 05:18 PM
  #29  
2 Fat 2 Furious
 
contango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: England
Posts: 3,996

Bikes: 2009 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Disc, 2009 Specialized Tricross Sport RIP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by RobertMillar84
Ok.. so there seems to be an intriguing split in opinion.. so, bearing in mind I will be cycling over 2 possibly 3 cols a day for over a week, who thinks going from a 28T to a 30T is a complete waste of time and who thinks the marginal gain would help?
I'd reckon it will help, you're talking about dropping your gearing by about 6-7%.

If I were riding the Alps I'd be looking for ways to reduce my gearing any which way I could. I've made it up 20-25% grades in my 30/32 granny combo but even then it was hard work. Don't know what you'll face in the Alps, but even if it's not as steep as the hills I've done I'll bet they are incomparably longer.
__________________
"For a list of ways technology has failed to improve quality of life, press three"
contango is offline  
Old 07-30-12, 08:03 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Dee Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 52

Bikes: Bertha

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BykOfALesserGod
Trek specs 12-30 Tiagra cassettes on one of their 105 bikes, the 2.3, so if they could make it work then so could you and your wrench.

https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes...d_1_series/2_3
Yup-I have a 2011 Trek with 105 (50/34 and 11-28) and just made this exact same change from a 105, 11-28 to Tiagra 12-30. No adjustments needed. Smooth transition and well worth the effort to make the swap. I noticed a measurable difference on the low end.
Dee Tee is offline  
Old 07-31-12, 12:28 AM
  #31  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Originally Posted by BykOfALesserGod
Trek specs 12-30 Tiagra cassettes on one of their 105 bikes, the 2.3, so if they could make it work then so could you and your wrench.

https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes...d_1_series/2_3
5700-A rear derailleur is new and officially supports 30T, older stuff is 28 max.

https://techdocs.shimano.com/media/te...9830746860.pdf
vs
https://techdocs.shimano.com/media/te...9830702204.PDF
znomit is offline  
Old 09-08-12, 11:35 AM
  #32  
Cyclist
 
storckm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by RobertMillar84
Intrigued as to why you say I might not be able to use small-small combinations though?
If your derailleur doesn't have a long enough cage, it will fold up all the way with the smallest cogs. Not a big deal in practice, at least in my experience.
storckm is offline  
Old 09-08-12, 12:36 PM
  #33  
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
ColinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903

Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by storckm
If your derailleur doesn't have a long enough cage, it will fold up all the way with the smallest cogs. Not a big deal in practice, at least in my experience.
There's two ways to do it... make sure your chain is long enough for big-big and then you will lose at least one gear*, small-small, or you can size the chain smaller and give up big-big... BUT if you shift into big-big by mistake you can tear the derailleur off the hangar and then you've got a bit of a problem.

It's a bad idea to exceed the derailleur's chain wrap capacity. *In reality you often lose two or more gears in your small chainring and that really sucks.
ColinL is offline  
Old 09-16-12, 06:33 AM
  #34  
Cyclist
 
storckm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by ColinL
In reality you often lose two or more gears in your small chainring and that really sucks.
That really depends on how you use your smallest chainring. I seldom use it, and only when I need a really low gear: I doubt I've ever used the small cog with anything other than the largest three cogs. I got the idea that mountain biking might involve more use of the small chainring with smaller cogs, but haven't ever seriously mountain biked.
storckm is offline  
Old 09-16-12, 03:16 PM
  #35  
Early riser
 
davida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I run 12-30, compact cranks with standard 6700 Ultegra RD and a slightly longer chain and it still shifts perfectly well. The mechs will say it doesn't work based on tech data, but when you actually do it, it works fine. Great for going up steep hills, or going up lots of hills with a higher cadence. A bit of a jump between the low gears is the only disadvantage. I slightly miss the 11 cog, but only for a few seconds a ride, whereas I use the 30 cog for an hour on a long hilly ride.
davida is offline  
Old 09-16-12, 03:50 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by davida
I run 12-30, compact cranks with standard 6700 Ultegra RD and a slightly longer chain and it still shifts perfectly well. The mechs will say it doesn't work based on tech data, but when you actually do it, it works fine. Great for going up steep hills, or going up lots of hills with a higher cadence. A bit of a jump between the low gears is the only disadvantage. I slightly miss the 11 cog, but only for a few seconds a ride, whereas I use the 30 cog for an hour on a long hilly ride.
+1. I have done this as well.
fstshrk is offline  
Old 09-16-12, 04:22 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
I did switch from 11-28 to 11-30, technically exceeding the specs of the RD but it works without issue. The one caveat is that I have a lower end Shimano road derailleur which oddly allows more range than the more expensive ones.

I could be off-base, but it seems to me that provided you can actually shift ok to the big cog, the worst case is you lose the big-big cross-chain gearing.
wphamilton is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
biketampa
General Cycling Discussion
50
11-10-18 05:49 PM
kcblair
Classic & Vintage
16
08-10-17 04:00 PM
ls0725
Bicycle Mechanics
14
08-16-14 09:24 AM
david58
Bicycle Mechanics
10
01-10-12 06:57 PM
mguitard
Bicycle Mechanics
3
03-15-11 11:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.