![]() |
Power Explanation
Hello all,
I would like to get an explanation on power mainly 700 watt of power. I am looking at purchasing a Tacx Blue Matic trainer and the specs say it has 700 watt of maximum resistance. I don't understand power and I don't have a power meter so I don't know what power output I can deliver. Is the max 700 watt easily attainable? Do I go for another trainer? Will I out grow, out power this one in the future? http://www.tacx.com/en/products/trainers/blue-matic Thanks for the input |
Originally Posted by Nassa
(Post 14868509)
Hello all,
I would like to get an explanation on power mainly 700 watt of power. I am looking at purchasing a Tacx Blue Matic trainer and the specs say it has 700 watt of maximum resistance. I don't understand power and I don't have a power meter so I don't know what power output I can deliver. Is the max 700 watt easily attainable? Do I go for another trainer? Will I out grow, out power this one in the future? http://www.tacx.com/en/products/trainers/blue-matic Thanks for the input Personally, I prefer a fluid trainer like the KK to a magnetic one. |
You can probably achieve 700 Watts without too much trouble, but you probably can't sustain it for more than a minute.
Take from that what you will. If you are using it for base training or long intervals you should be fine. If you are doing short intervals, might exceed 700. |
Greg, the only I am looking at Tacx is due to their videos, where they tell you what resistance to set the trainer at. Is there a big feel difference between mag and fluid in comparison to price? I know there are tons of people on here recommending the KK road machine.
Laser, this will be my first off-season of training so I am clueless as to what I will be doing. Looking for videos as well. Have seen tons recommend sufferfest and cyclocore |
The big difference in feel between fluid and mag is that fluid trainers have progressive resistance, meaning the faster you go the harder it gets, like on the road. With most mag trainers the only way to increase is with a dial control. I say most because Cyclops has a mag model that has a progressive resistance device built in, but I have never tried it.
As indicated above, if you are just spinning the mag models are ok and economical. But for intervals a fluid model is best, and the KK is the only one with a completely sealed resistance unit. |
Don't forget the dial on your bike needs to be set to 400W.
|
Originally Posted by Nassa
(Post 14868578)
Greg, the only I am looking at Tacx is due to their videos, where they tell you what resistance to set the trainer at. Is there a big feel difference between mag and fluid in comparison to price? I know there are tons of people on here recommending the KK road machine.
Laser, this will be my first off-season of training so I am clueless as to what I will be doing. Looking for videos as well. Have seen tons recommend sufferfest and cyclocore |
I agree that you'll be able to do intervals longer than 1' on a 700W trainer. Note that it's not really a matter of the resistance of the unit, but more a traction limit for the interface with the tire. I tried an 800W 1' interval on a trainer, and it just kept slipping
Best video for the trainer: Breaking Bad. I'm getting close to the end of season two...
Originally Posted by canam73
(Post 14868641)
The big difference in feel between fluid and mag is that fluid trainers have progressive resistance, meaning the faster you go the harder it gets, like on the road. With most mag trainers the only way to increase is with a dial control. I say most because Cyclops has a mag model that has a progressive resistance device built in, but I have never tried it.
So, one big advantage to a fluid trainer is that it feels a lot more like the road with respect to minor unintentional accelerations, and you also get more normal gearing behavior vs. effort. Many of them also handle their heat better since the fluid is in contact with more of the resistance unit's body, for better conduction to the fins. Lastly, the fluids used do not change viscosity under normal operating temps (even when it's hot enough to sizzle a drop of sweat). |
Originally Posted by gregf83
(Post 14868665)
There are lots of videos you can use with a fluid trainer as well. Sufferfest videos combined with trainerroad.com make a decent combination that many seem to like. I just listen to music, but check out trainerroad. With a KK and a Garmin cadence/speed sensor you can get a reasonably accurate virtual power meter to guide your workouts.
|
Ended up ordering a KK road machine.
|
KK??? what brand is that?
what about noise??? |
Kurt Kinetic. They aren't silent, but mine doesn't seem much different from the cycle ops fluid I used to use.
|
Cool thanks!
|
Good choice. I'm using the KK's R&R and it's great. Considering you'll end up with the same resistance unit, you'll be ok. It's really hard to spin at a good cadence that 50-12 on it for more than a minute.
|
Originally Posted by generalkdi
(Post 14889915)
Good choice. I'm using the KK's R&R and it's great. Considering you'll end up with the same resistance unit, you'll be ok. It's really hard to spin at a good cadence that 50-12 on it for more than a minute.
|
I use my carbon bikes on the trainer all the time, and Sufferfest = good.
|
Originally Posted by Nassa
(Post 14890497)
Thanks, all the reviews were positive so...My concerns is putting a carbon bike on a trainer, I guess we will see what happens. Anybody else use TrainerRoad? of Sufferfest?
|
Originally Posted by generalkdi
(Post 14890629)
I tryed the spinnervals DVD they gave me with the trainer. It's a good training, but it's not entertaining or fun at all. My next step is to try a sufferfest :D. I had the same concern about the frame on a trainer, that was one of the reason I chose a R&R instead of a road machine.
Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Campag4life
(Post 14891598)
Can you explain why the R&R is more forgiving to a carbon bike than a road machine?
Thanks. |
Well It's how I thought it. As I can stand on the bike and move it left and right, I get some of that force goes into motion and removes stress from the bike. I don't have any "official" info about this. Seams logic to me.
|
Originally Posted by generalkdi
(Post 14892710)
Well It's how I thought it. As I can stand on the bike and move it left and right, I get some of that force goes into motion and removes stress from the bike. I don't have any "official" info about this. Seams logic to me.
On an R&R, when you are in the saddle, it's possible for you to lean over. Now you have sideloads going into your saddle that you will never see on the road as the R&R fights to keep you upright. Since it allows the swing, you can get much further off center on an R&R than a Road Machine. Of course, that doesn't mean anything bad will happen. I haven't heard of anyone damaging a frame in a trainer, ever. This is not a significant problem. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.