Power Explanation
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Power Explanation
Hello all,
I would like to get an explanation on power mainly 700 watt of power. I am looking at purchasing a Tacx Blue Matic trainer and the specs say it has 700 watt of maximum resistance. I don't understand power and I don't have a power meter so I don't know what power output I can deliver. Is the max 700 watt easily attainable? Do I go for another trainer? Will I out grow, out power this one in the future?
https://www.tacx.com/en/products/trainers/blue-matic
Thanks for the input
I would like to get an explanation on power mainly 700 watt of power. I am looking at purchasing a Tacx Blue Matic trainer and the specs say it has 700 watt of maximum resistance. I don't understand power and I don't have a power meter so I don't know what power output I can deliver. Is the max 700 watt easily attainable? Do I go for another trainer? Will I out grow, out power this one in the future?
https://www.tacx.com/en/products/trainers/blue-matic
Thanks for the input
#2
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 289
From: Vancouver, BC
Hello all,
I would like to get an explanation on power mainly 700 watt of power. I am looking at purchasing a Tacx Blue Matic trainer and the specs say it has 700 watt of maximum resistance. I don't understand power and I don't have a power meter so I don't know what power output I can deliver. Is the max 700 watt easily attainable? Do I go for another trainer? Will I out grow, out power this one in the future?
https://www.tacx.com/en/products/trainers/blue-matic
Thanks for the input
I would like to get an explanation on power mainly 700 watt of power. I am looking at purchasing a Tacx Blue Matic trainer and the specs say it has 700 watt of maximum resistance. I don't understand power and I don't have a power meter so I don't know what power output I can deliver. Is the max 700 watt easily attainable? Do I go for another trainer? Will I out grow, out power this one in the future?
https://www.tacx.com/en/products/trainers/blue-matic
Thanks for the input
Personally, I prefer a fluid trainer like the KK to a magnetic one.
#3
Reasonably Slow...
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 628
Likes: 1
From: Middle of Oklahoma
You can probably achieve 700 Watts without too much trouble, but you probably can't sustain it for more than a minute.
Take from that what you will. If you are using it for base training or long intervals you should be fine. If you are doing short intervals, might exceed 700.
Take from that what you will. If you are using it for base training or long intervals you should be fine. If you are doing short intervals, might exceed 700.
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Greg, the only I am looking at Tacx is due to their videos, where they tell you what resistance to set the trainer at. Is there a big feel difference between mag and fluid in comparison to price? I know there are tons of people on here recommending the KK road machine.
Laser, this will be my first off-season of training so I am clueless as to what I will be doing. Looking for videos as well. Have seen tons recommend sufferfest and cyclocore
Laser, this will be my first off-season of training so I am clueless as to what I will be doing. Looking for videos as well. Have seen tons recommend sufferfest and cyclocore
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 13
From: Haunchyville
The big difference in feel between fluid and mag is that fluid trainers have progressive resistance, meaning the faster you go the harder it gets, like on the road. With most mag trainers the only way to increase is with a dial control. I say most because Cyclops has a mag model that has a progressive resistance device built in, but I have never tried it.
As indicated above, if you are just spinning the mag models are ok and economical. But for intervals a fluid model is best, and the KK is the only one with a completely sealed resistance unit.
As indicated above, if you are just spinning the mag models are ok and economical. But for intervals a fluid model is best, and the KK is the only one with a completely sealed resistance unit.
#7
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 289
From: Vancouver, BC
Greg, the only I am looking at Tacx is due to their videos, where they tell you what resistance to set the trainer at. Is there a big feel difference between mag and fluid in comparison to price? I know there are tons of people on here recommending the KK road machine.
Laser, this will be my first off-season of training so I am clueless as to what I will be doing. Looking for videos as well. Have seen tons recommend sufferfest and cyclocore
Laser, this will be my first off-season of training so I am clueless as to what I will be doing. Looking for videos as well. Have seen tons recommend sufferfest and cyclocore
#8
Making a kilometer blurry
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 26,170
Likes: 93
From: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
I agree that you'll be able to do intervals longer than 1' on a 700W trainer. Note that it's not really a matter of the resistance of the unit, but more a traction limit for the interface with the tire. I tried an 800W 1' interval on a trainer, and it just kept slipping
Best video for the trainer: Breaking Bad. I'm getting close to the end of season two...
All of the mag trainers I'm familiar with are progressive resistance. The difference between magnetic resistance and fluid resistance is that mag is linearly progressive, like tires and bearings. Fluid is progressive like, well fluid (air, water, oil) and progresses quadratically. So, on a mag trainer, twice as much speed requires twice as much power. On a fluid trainer, or on the road, twice as much speed requires eight times as much power.
So, one big advantage to a fluid trainer is that it feels a lot more like the road with respect to minor unintentional accelerations, and you also get more normal gearing behavior vs. effort. Many of them also handle their heat better since the fluid is in contact with more of the resistance unit's body, for better conduction to the fins. Lastly, the fluids used do not change viscosity under normal operating temps (even when it's hot enough to sizzle a drop of sweat).
Best video for the trainer: Breaking Bad. I'm getting close to the end of season two...
The big difference in feel between fluid and mag is that fluid trainers have progressive resistance, meaning the faster you go the harder it gets, like on the road. With most mag trainers the only way to increase is with a dial control. I say most because Cyclops has a mag model that has a progressive resistance device built in, but I have never tried it.
So, one big advantage to a fluid trainer is that it feels a lot more like the road with respect to minor unintentional accelerations, and you also get more normal gearing behavior vs. effort. Many of them also handle their heat better since the fluid is in contact with more of the resistance unit's body, for better conduction to the fins. Lastly, the fluids used do not change viscosity under normal operating temps (even when it's hot enough to sizzle a drop of sweat).
#9
There are lots of videos you can use with a fluid trainer as well. Sufferfest videos combined with trainerroad.com make a decent combination that many seem to like. I just listen to music, but check out trainerroad. With a KK and a Garmin cadence/speed sensor you can get a reasonably accurate virtual power meter to guide your workouts.
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
From: Quebec, Canada
Bikes: Argon18 Gallium 2016, Trek Emonda SL6 Pro 2018, Salsa Beargrease
Good choice. I'm using the KK's R&R and it's great. Considering you'll end up with the same resistance unit, you'll be ok. It's really hard to spin at a good cadence that 50-12 on it for more than a minute.
#15
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Thanks, all the reviews were positive so...My concerns is putting a carbon bike on a trainer, I guess we will see what happens. Anybody else use TrainerRoad? of Sufferfest?
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
From: Quebec, Canada
Bikes: Argon18 Gallium 2016, Trek Emonda SL6 Pro 2018, Salsa Beargrease
. I had the same concern about the frame on a trainer, that was one of the reason I chose a R&R instead of a road machine.
#18
I tryed the spinnervals DVD they gave me with the trainer. It's a good training, but it's not entertaining or fun at all. My next step is to try a sufferfest
. I had the same concern about the frame on a trainer, that was one of the reason I chose a R&R instead of a road machine.
. I had the same concern about the frame on a trainer, that was one of the reason I chose a R&R instead of a road machine.Thanks.
#19
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 13
From: Haunchyville
I don't know how valid it is, but the thought is that since the bike can move around it isn't subject to as much stress and/or flexing as a regular trainer that holds the rear ridged.
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
From: Quebec, Canada
Bikes: Argon18 Gallium 2016, Trek Emonda SL6 Pro 2018, Salsa Beargrease
Well It's how I thought it. As I can stand on the bike and move it left and right, I get some of that force goes into motion and removes stress from the bike. I don't have any "official" info about this. Seams logic to me.
#21
Making a kilometer blurry
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 26,170
Likes: 93
From: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
On an R&R, when you are in the saddle, it's possible for you to lean over. Now you have sideloads going into your saddle that you will never see on the road as the R&R fights to keep you upright. Since it allows the swing, you can get much further off center on an R&R than a Road Machine.
Of course, that doesn't mean anything bad will happen. I haven't heard of anyone damaging a frame in a trainer, ever. This is not a significant problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pakossa
General Cycling Discussion
0
11-10-12 08:04 PM
dnuzzomueller
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
38
02-27-12 05:11 AM





