Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

54 or 56

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-12 | 07:32 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
dropped at birth
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 114
Likes: 12
From: western Pa

Bikes: a few

54 or 56

I am 5' 9 1/2" inches tall, 32 inseam. Been looking at road bikes, size calculators say 55cm frame. I have tested some Cannondales at the LBS, 56 seemed decent, but the 54 did too.

I am real tempted by a used Allez Comp, but it's a 56. It's not nearby, so test rides are out. Some here say smaller is better, others the reverse. Would being slightly too big be a mistake?

Need some opinions before pulling the trigger.
type36 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 07:35 PM
  #2  
killerRabbit's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
My first bike was a 56. If I knew what I know now, I'd have gotten a 54. Take from that what you will.

I'm your same height but .5" longer inseam.
killerRabbit is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 07:37 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 1,108
From: Tallahassee, FL
Depends on the geometry as well. I'm 5'8" and find some 54s on the small side for me.
jon c. is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 07:45 PM
  #4  
Chickenstrip's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
If you are that close in size then either should work for you. A Slightly shorter stem or slightly longer stem, a few adjustments, and you're there. A 52 or 58 may be stretching it, but 2cm in either direction can be made up for.
Chickenstrip is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 07:48 PM
  #5  
Chickenstrip's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Btw, it's easier to make a small bike bigger than to make a big bike smaller.
Chickenstrip is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 07:49 PM
  #6  
Maximus
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
54.
Gluteus is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 08:09 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA

Bikes: '09 Fuji Team Pro

Originally Posted by Chickenstrip
Btw, it's easier to make a small bike bigger than to make a big bike smaller.
+1 go for the 54.
neneboricua is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 08:20 PM
  #8  
echotraveler's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Gluteus
54.
+1
echotraveler is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 08:39 PM
  #9  
bianchi10's Avatar
King Hoternot
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,255
Likes: 0
From: Oregon City, OR

Bikes: 2015 Cannondale Evo Hi mod

I am your exact height and inseem. I ride a cannondale supersix 54
bianchi10 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 08:45 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
I'm also supposed to be at 55cm, 5 10 and 33" seam. I have a 54 and a 56 Allez. The 54 gets you lower with its shorter top tube. I've a 100mm stem on one, and a 90mm on the bigger bike. So it depends what/how you get the bike to fit you. Between the two, I concur with everyone on the 54cm.
das Ben Gator is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 08:47 PM
  #11  
Canadian eh?
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 114
From: Toronto

Bikes: 2025 Giant Revolt Advanced Pro 0

Originally Posted by jon c.
Depends on the geometry as well. I'm 5'8" and find some 54s on the small side for me.
And I'm 5'8, very comfortable on my 54 Trek...but yes, geometry matters!
WorldIRC is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 09:02 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1

Bikes: Colnago C59 Italia Di2

Look at the different manufacturers carefully, some state a 56 has a 56 top tube (specialized) others state a 56 means it has a 56 seat tube (colnago for example) so a 56 might have a 56 top tube or a 58 top tube, it just depends.

specialised and cannondale both state top tube length so are roughly comparable.

That said I would guess at a 54 spesh fitting you quite well
lazerzxr is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 09:38 PM
  #13  
Dunbar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 2
From: SoCal

Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2

I'm 5'9" with a 32" cycling inseam (30" pant inseam) and ride a 54 with a 550mm top tube. I could probably fit a 56 if I was willing to run a 70-80mm stem. The 54 will definitely allow more saddle-to-bar drop if that matters.
Dunbar is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 11:18 PM
  #14  
frpax's Avatar
Steel is real, baby!
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 8
From: Boise, ID

Bikes: 1984 Pinarello, 1986 Bianchi Portofino, 1988 Bianchi Trofeo, 1989 Specialized Allez, 1989 Specialized Hard Rock, 2001 Litespeed Tuscany

54
frpax is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 11:19 PM
  #15  
YOJiMBO20's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA

Bikes: 2010 Litespeed Icon, 1987 Nishiki Olympic 12

Originally Posted by killerRabbit
My first bike was a 56. If I knew what I know now, I'd have gotten a 54. Take from that what you will.

I'm your same height but .5" longer inseam.
I'm the opposite. Roughly same height. My first bike was a 54, but I also have a 55 and just bought a 56 that I'm building up.

You've got to determine if you're more leg or torso to really figure it out, I think.
YOJiMBO20 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 11:20 PM
  #16  
Nagrom_'s Avatar
Fixie Infamous
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,480
Likes: 28
Don't guess.

https://www.competitivecyclist.com/za...LCULATOR_INTRO
__________________
Originally Posted by seau grateau
No offense but you're an idiot.
PedalRoom
Nagrom_ is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-12 | 11:45 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1

Bikes: Colnago C59 Italia Di2

Originally Posted by Nagrom_
fify
lazerzxr is offline  
Reply
Old 10-26-12 | 12:03 AM
  #18  
Nagrom_'s Avatar
Fixie Infamous
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,480
Likes: 28
Originally Posted by lazerzxr
fify
rather oxymoronic.
__________________
Originally Posted by seau grateau
No offense but you're an idiot.
PedalRoom
Nagrom_ is offline  
Reply
Old 10-26-12 | 03:44 AM
  #19  
Thread Starter
dropped at birth
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 114
Likes: 12
From: western Pa

Bikes: a few

Let me just add to my OP- due to neck injuries, I will likely need to run a fairly tall bar stem if I want to ride a roadie at all. Would this impact sizing?
type36 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-26-12 | 08:00 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 577
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

Originally Posted by type36
Let me just add to my OP- due to neck injuries, I will likely need to run a fairly tall bar stem if I want to ride a roadie at all. Would this impact sizing?
That depends on how sensitive you are to a dorky-looking high rise stem angle. Nearly every brand now sells a model with a 2cm taller head tube that will raise the bars and reduce the need for a steeply angled stem. Don't buy a short head tube racing model if you need the bars set high.

A steeply angled stem will also be significantly shorter in it's horizontal length, that the advertised "length". If you select the larger size to get even more head tube length, then stick with a sloping TT, or you'll run out of standover clearance.

A 54cm Synapse would be a good choice. The 165mm head tube would allow you to get a very small saddle to bar drop of only around 3cm, with a common 84 (-6) degree stem and about 2cm of spacer.

It would help if you posted and actual saddle height, but it should be in the 71-73cm range, with the inseam you've posted.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 10-26-12 | 10:25 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA

Bikes: '09 Fuji Team Pro

If you have neck issues and may need the bars higher, get a size 54 bike, but in a relaxed geometry frame. The Allez you mentioned in the OP is a race frame meant to be ridden aggressively.

Originally Posted by DaveSSS
A 54cm Synapse would be a good choice. The 165mm head tube would allow you to get a very small saddle to bar drop of only around 3cm, with a common 84 (-6) degree stem and about 2cm of spacer.
I agree with Dave. A 54 Synapse has more relaxed geometry but is still closer to the correct size for you. If your flexibility increases over time, you can always make the Synapse a little more aggressive while still remaining comfortable to you. If you went with an Allez, you could make it slightly more relaxed but you'd be fighting the frames' purpose at that point.
neneboricua is offline  
Reply
Old 10-26-12 | 10:31 AM
  #22  
Nagrom_'s Avatar
Fixie Infamous
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,480
Likes: 28
Look at Specialized Secteurs.

Much more relaxed geometry, same price point.
__________________
Originally Posted by seau grateau
No offense but you're an idiot.
PedalRoom
Nagrom_ is offline  
Reply
Old 10-26-12 | 10:33 AM
  #23  
echotraveler's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
I agree dont buy a racing bike. Race bikes can be setup like comfort bikes... They are still TOO stiff for back injured riders, and could be even be too much for most riders.
echotraveler is offline  
Reply
Old 10-26-12 | 03:57 PM
  #24  
Dunbar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 2
From: SoCal

Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2

Originally Posted by type36
Let me just add to my OP- due to neck injuries, I will likely need to run a fairly tall bar stem if I want to ride a roadie at all. Would this impact sizing?
For someone with neck issues I'm guessing you want the seat to be level or slightly lower than the bars. If that's the case I'd consider getting a 56cm frame in relaxed geometry and run a shorter 70-80mm stem. The will get you a fairly tall ~190mm head tube and won't force you to run a dorky high rise stem to get the bar position you're seeking. This assumes 32" is your cycling inseam and not your pant inseam.

Last edited by Dunbar; 10-26-12 at 04:02 PM.
Dunbar is offline  
Reply
Old 10-26-12 | 06:12 PM
  #25  
Thread Starter
dropped at birth
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 114
Likes: 12
From: western Pa

Bikes: a few

Originally Posted by Dunbar
For someone with neck issues I'm guessing you want the seat to be level or slightly lower than the bars. If that's the case I'd consider getting a 56cm frame in relaxed geometry and run a shorter 70-80mm stem. The will get you a fairly tall ~190mm head tube and won't force you to run a dorky high rise stem to get the bar position you're seeking. This assumes 32" is your cycling inseam and not your pant inseam.
This is absolutely correct. On my hybrid, I had to get a higher stem which puts seat and bars at about the same height. This was not done on a whim, but rather a pro fit to help with comfort. I am hopeful that a similar setup on a road bike will help me ease into being more at home on the drops. I have tested a couple of Synapses, but the stock (lower) bar height makes it tough for me to determine if it's the way to go.

32 is pants inseam, please educate me on the difference to cycling inseam.

BTW, the Allez sold, so it probably was for the best.
type36 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.