Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Which chain ring for climbing?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Which chain ring for climbing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-12 | 09:33 PM
  #1  
s4one's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Which chain ring for climbing?

I'd like to give q rings or osymmetrics a try, purely to help increase climbing. I don't care much for power gains for flat, main focus is climbing. I don't have knee pain or other issues so the new rings is only to promote better spinning up mtns.

Should I first use just the q ring inner 39t to see if there are any improvements?

For those who ride/rode both q rings and osymm which rings provide the best benefits for climbing?

Thanks
s4one is offline  
Reply
Old 11-25-12 | 10:55 PM
  #2  
bon_gabs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: IE,CA
all my bikes,Im using q-rings,the 52-36 combo is great for both climbs and flats..rember the 52=54 peak then 36=38 peak..
bon_gabs is offline  
Reply
Old 11-25-12 | 11:34 PM
  #3  
s4one's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Thanks for the reply!
s4one is offline  
Reply
Old 11-26-12 | 07:21 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 10
From: Cobourg Ontario Canada

Bikes: ParleeZ5/Parlee Chebacco/Trek Farley/Cannondale Slice/Burley Tandem

I have Q-rings in 53-39, I really can't tell a difference.
youcoming is offline  
Reply
Old 11-26-12 | 08:36 AM
  #5  
VA_Esquire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
34/50 with a 12-23 cassette. Fun stuff.
VA_Esquire is offline  
Reply
Old 11-26-12 | 08:36 PM
  #6  
s4one's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
I am interested in trying out a 39t inner q ring to help with climbing, would you guys not recommend this and why?
s4one is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-12 | 06:47 AM
  #7  
pdedes's Avatar
ka maté ka maté ka ora
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 4
From: wessex

Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra

You'll have to pony up and test for yourself.
pdedes is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-12 | 09:13 AM
  #8  
s4one's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
yea.. gotta pay to play?
s4one is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-12 | 11:17 PM
  #9  
khill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
I made the switch to Qrings and am happy I did...It did however, take a TON of time and trial and error before I figured them out for me..Early this year, I started with one on my TT bike and kinda liked it (seemed easier) so I got a set for my road bike and uhhh, didn't like them. Worked with them for a month trying to figure them out..Yes, I tried them in all sorts of positions and yes I do have a PM to look at data..

I did notice when they were on my road bike, that I liked the inner ring and when in my inner ring, it felt very normal and my climbing "seemed" better. I still went back and forth with the reg ring on my TT bike, but still liked the inner ring on my road bike. It wasn't until I started up with a new coach at the end of this racing year (middle-Sept) that while doing a set that included a higher cadence, I by chance found something that clicked. I was doing a interval set in a head-wind and had to drop to my inner ring while maintaining a high RPM...with the small Qring my sustainability was much better. So much better that on my next weeks sets, I put the outer ring on and with the higher cadence, it too worked great. Same thing with my TT bike...

For me, I found I have to be above 93-94RPM for them to start "working" and the sweet spot is 95-102RPM. When I tried them all early in the year, it was at a much lower RPM and I struggled to finish sets similar to what I'm doing now. I've been racing 3 years and within the last 2 months of going back to them, it has allowed me to get to my best ever power numbers (1min-60min) So...I like them and they are working great for me, just took a while to figure them out.

Ken
khill is offline  
Reply
Old 11-27-12 | 11:53 PM
  #10  
s4one's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
awesome, thanks for your story. I will try to hunt down a inner 39t to put on my crankset. I hope using a q ring on the inner and a normal SRAM outter wont affect shifting too much.
s4one is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pippin65
Fifty Plus (50+)
31
10-27-19 04:48 PM
LouB
Classic & Vintage
41
11-16-16 12:26 PM
Jibin
General Cycling Discussion
16
09-19-16 09:20 AM
HungFarLo
Classic & Vintage
15
08-22-13 10:45 PM
trek330
Bicycle Mechanics
4
02-13-12 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.