Data usage by popular cycling apps
#26
Senior Member


Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 15,249
Likes: 1,759
From: Far beyond the pale horizon.
#28
Making a kilometer blurry
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 26,170
Likes: 93
From: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
Are you suggesting that it uses network location for elevation?
#29
hmm..
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: RVA
Depends. For Garmins, it's pure GPS. For my phone, it projects a GPS position onto a height map. My Lat/Long position is pure GPS. Elevation makes a call based on the expected accuracy of the device.
Are you suggesting that it uses network location for elevation?
Are you suggesting that it uses network location for elevation?
#30
Making a kilometer blurry
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 26,170
Likes: 93
From: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
It would be nice, but inexpensive GPS receivers have low altitude accuracy, so they'll probably continue to divide that functionality between GPS devices and smart phones.
#31
GPS altitude is notoriously imprecise, even with good units. On a ride through the city when the chip knows where you are to within 10 feet in lat/lon terms, it can be 150 feet off for altitude. That's why Garmins - including the fancy but not brand spanking new anymore Edge 800 - will recalibrate themselves based on USGS DEM (?) at the beginning of the ride.
I don't know of any phones with altimeters in them, though, so it's probably a moot point.
I don't know of any phones with altimeters in them, though, so it's probably a moot point.
#32
Making a kilometer blurry
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 26,170
Likes: 93
From: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
GPS altitude is notoriously imprecise, even with good units. On a ride through the city when the chip knows where you are to within 10 feet in lat/lon terms, it can be 150 feet off for altitude. That's why Garmins - including the fancy but not brand spanking new anymore Edge 800 - will recalibrate themselves based on USGS DEM (?) at the beginning of the ride.
I don't know of any phones with altimeters in them, though, so it's probably a moot point.
I don't know of any phones with altimeters in them, though, so it's probably a moot point.
#34
wr, that's an awful lot of data for something so small. Are you uploading over mobile net? My OTG Droid Eris uses noting but WiFi to upload with Strava and had no mobile network to use, yet it records rides as accurately as on my regular phone.
#35
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
GPS altitude is notoriously imprecise, even with good units. On a ride through the city when the chip knows where you are to within 10 feet in lat/lon terms, it can be 150 feet off for altitude. That's why Garmins - including the fancy but not brand spanking new anymore Edge 800 - will recalibrate themselves based on USGS DEM (?) at the beginning of the ride.
I don't know of any phones with altimeters in them, though, so it's probably a moot point.
I don't know of any phones with altimeters in them, though, so it's probably a moot point.
There are rumors that the Wahoo RFLKT second generation will include an Ant+ relay plus a barometric altimeter. That would help improve altitude for smartphones.
#36
Making a kilometer blurry
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 26,170
Likes: 93
From: Austin (near TX)
Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection
There's no reason not to use wifi, I just don't care mobile vs. wifi ($30/month phone plan with unlimited text, unlimited data). There will be no difference in fidelity between wifi and mobile. The app did update once during the week, and that should be considered as part of the data budget. I think the longest I've gone w/out an update is two weeks (in the last year).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PastorJim
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
3
05-27-19 12:14 AM
MikeOK
General Cycling Discussion
4
07-12-17 11:45 PM





