Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Zipp/SRAM warranty failed me? Or am I expecting too much?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Zipp/SRAM warranty failed me? Or am I expecting too much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-13, 09:50 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
garysol1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Traverse City Michigan
Posts: 10,244
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 11 Posts
I have dealt with SRAM and Zipp specifically on warranty and service issues for both myself and for customers and both have never been anything but excellent and very profesional in implementing warranty claims. I have to believe that there is mor to this story for Zipp to be denying this claim.
__________________
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
garysol1 is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 10:00 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
abstractform20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,884
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by teamtrinity
My personal feeling as a consumer is that a company should stand behind their product. Cervelo warrantied a cracked P2 frame for me through a different retailer than who I bought from without even proof of purchase. Look did the same. Profile Designs did the same. Reynolds offered to do the same but ultimately my wheels did not require a warranty. Their focus was customer service and they believed in their product. It seems Zipp's focus is bottom line money and/or they don't have the same confidence in their product.
while i believe that the customer should resources due to a breach of contract between manufacturer and dealer, you seem to break a lot of things.

-bike frame
-pedals
-i assume aero bars from PD
-wheels

what is the name of the bike shop? its quite odd that you refuse to disclose it.
abstractform20 is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 10:02 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times in 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Stickyrunner01
Keep in mind, from my experience... the MOMENT they sold you the bars (that were not a closeout model) at lower than MAP or any price agreed upon by the dealer and vendor, the LBS's "Authorized Retailer" status is suspended. Therefore any product sold at lower than dealer agreed upon pricing does not offer a warranty.
Again, there may be more to the story, but the consumer can't be expected to keep track of the contracts between manufacturers and retailers. And MAPs are legal, but setting actual floors on pricing is illegal in the US as far as I remember.
rebel1916 is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 10:38 PM
  #54  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 2,218 Times in 1,490 Posts
Originally Posted by rebel1916
Again, there may be more to the story, but the consumer can't be expected to keep track of the contracts between manufacturers and retailers. And MAPs are legal, but setting actual floors on pricing is illegal in the US as far as I remember.
Come on. That price is too good to be true. Just google and see how much discount you find on Zipp products. Anybody that knows anything about the industry sees a red flag with that large a discount. It's like buying a $20 Rolex watch from a street vendor. It doesn't take a lot of sense to know there's no contract between the vendor and the company.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 10:43 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by garysol1
I have dealt with SRAM and Zipp specifically on warranty and service issues for both myself and for customers and both have never been anything but excellent and very profesional in implementing warranty claims. I have to believe that there is mor to this story for Zipp to be denying this claim.
If there's more to the story, I'm not aware of it. In my email, I did ask for clarification/more detail of denial of warranty.
teamtrinity is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 10:53 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by abstractform20
while i believe that the customer should resources due to a breach of contract between manufacturer and dealer, you seem to break a lot of things.

-bike frame
-pedals
-i assume aero bars from PD
-wheels

what is the name of the bike shop? its quite odd that you refuse to disclose it.
Cervelo P2 frame cracked after having a transition rack collapse at a race. Cervelo determined that while they could issue a crash replacement since this happened in a race, instead they decided that the frame should not have cracked that easily and just warrantied the frame. Went through different retailer than where it was bought, and Cervelo never asked for any proof of purchase. They simply stated they the frame shouldn't have cracked under such little blunt force trauma and they would replace it regardless of any else. Look 595 integrated E-Post was a very very very tight fit into the frame. Look decided to just warranty the post and sent me a new E-Post. Again, they did not care where it was bought or any proof of purchase. Profile Designs was a Aero Drink bottle. I ran it through the dish washer and afterwords, the spongy top shrank and splashed water too easily. Profile Designs just warrantied the entire Aero Drink instead of just the top. Reynolds...didn't use their warranty...but they when I asked if I could use a second hand MV32UL for cyclocross, they emphatically stated I could and that they would even warranty the second hand wheels if they fail on me due to manufacturing issues. As for why not disclose the site? I'm trying to get this straightened out...and until I do, I would rather not disclose who at Zipp I'm speaking with, the local bike shop that attempted to process the warranty, or the shop it was purchased at. To do you all a service, after this comes to a conclusion, I'll update this thread.
teamtrinity is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 10:57 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
Come on. That price is too good to be true. Just google and see how much discount you find on Zipp products. Anybody that knows anything about the industry sees a red flag with that large a discount. It's like buying a $20 Rolex watch from a street vendor. It doesn't take a lot of sense to know there's no contract between the vendor and the company.
The analogy isn't entirely accurate. It's more like buying a Rolex at steep discount not from a street vendor but from the fancy authorized Rolex dealer. Plus...the other bike companies customer services that I have dealt with never raise a red flag for final selling price because they never asked for proof of purchase. The other companies I mentioned just stood behind the quality of their product. They didn't care where I got it or how much I got it for. They just felt their product should work as advertised...or it should be warrantied.
teamtrinity is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 11:03 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by garysol1
I have dealt with SRAM and Zipp specifically on warranty and service issues for both myself and for customers and both have never been anything but excellent and very profesional in implementing warranty claims. I have to believe that there is mor to this story for Zipp to be denying this claim.
My friend did a warranty with SRAM his experience was WAY different than mine. SRAM did not ask for proof of purchase, and did not care who the original retailer was. They just sent him new SRAM Red shifters in 3 business days. And that's been my experience with Look, Cervelo, and Profile Designs (and sorta with Reynolds). Zipp is the first company in the bike industry I've dealt with that seems to actually want a proof of purchase, might care about where it was bought, and might care about how much you bought it for.
teamtrinity is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 11:05 PM
  #59  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 2,218 Times in 1,490 Posts
I understand what you're saying. But the price is just too good. It may be something like Zipp knew the only way it was that cheap was gray market - the bars maybe were rejects from the overseas manufacturer, or something like that.

But good luck with your claim. The good news is you are only out $100 instead of $300. Ad like you said, you have other bars and keep riding.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 11:08 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by teamtrinity
My friend did a warranty with SRAM his experience was WAY different than mine. SRAM did not ask for proof of purchase, and did not care who the original retailer was. They just sent him new SRAM Red shifters in 3 business days. And that's been my experience with Look, Cervelo, and Profile Designs (and sorta with Reynolds). Zipp is the first company in the bike industry I've dealt with that seems to actually want a proof of purchase, might care about where it was bought, and might care about how much you bought it for.
They appear to have good reason for being more rigorous in their warranty claims as there are counterfit or knockoff products being sold with their name on it.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 11:08 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
I understand what you're saying. But the price is just too good. It may be something like Zipp knew the only way it was that cheap was gray market - the bars maybe were rejects from the overseas manufacturer, or something like that.

But good luck with your claim. The good news is you are only out $100 instead of $300. Ad like you said, you have other bars and keep riding.
true, at least i'm only out $100. and yeah...i'm basically expecting zipp to tell me to go eff myself. lol but at this point, i'm just curious to see how this goes down. i'm just shocked that zipp does things so different than the other companies iv'e dealt with. live and learn!
teamtrinity is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 11:22 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
They appear to have good reason for being more rigorous in their warranty claims as there are counterfit or knockoff products being sold with their name on it.
That makes sense. But I'd guess there are a bunch of fake Look frames, Cervelo frames, and Reynolds wheels available in China as well. Found Look 695 and Reynolds RZR and Cervelo S5 on alibaba.com.
teamtrinity is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 11:30 PM
  #63  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by rebel1916
I understand you are in the biz, but, man, if someone buys from an authorized retailer, no matter what price they pay, the manufacturer needs to make that right and than hash it out with their (apparently shady) authorized retailer. The consumer can't be expected to bear the brunt of that. Again, it was bought from an authorized retailer. That really oughta trump all.
I am a consumer as well and I would be pissed if I were in the OP's position. I am just spiltballing as to what may be going on.

Let's look at it another way.

A consumer purchases a grey market item from an authorized dealer and that product fails resulting in a lawsuit. Who is on the hook for that?

As soon as a product falls outside of normal production/distribution channels all bets are off. Why? Because the brand has certain QC checks in place to ensure the quality of their goods and to protect the end user. Who knows where grey market goods come from. They could be stolen, made illegally by a third shift at the factory, they could be QC failures or straight up counterfeit. Why would a brand want to take a HUGE risk and claim ANY responsibility for that product?

If it is in fact a grey market or counterfeit good then the OP should be talking to the LBS and getting a refund from them not from Zipp who may or may not have had anything to do with the product in the first place.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 11:32 PM
  #64  
SuperGimp
 
TrojanHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Whittier, CA
Posts: 13,346

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 147 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 47 Posts
Originally Posted by teamtrinity
Cervelo P2 frame cracked after having a transition rack collapse at a race. Cervelo determined that while they could issue a crash replacement since this happened in a race, instead they decided that the frame should not have cracked that easily and just warrantied the frame. Went through different retailer than where it was bought, and Cervelo never asked for any proof of purchase. They simply stated they the frame shouldn't have cracked under such little blunt force trauma and they would replace it regardless of any else. Look 595 integrated E-Post was a very very very tight fit into the frame. Look decided to just warranty the post and sent me a new E-Post. Again, they did not care where it was bought or any proof of purchase. Profile Designs was a Aero Drink bottle. I ran it through the dish washer and afterwords, the spongy top shrank and splashed water too easily. Profile Designs just warrantied the entire Aero Drink instead of just the top. Reynolds...didn't use their warranty...but they when I asked if I could use a second hand MV32UL for cyclocross, they emphatically stated I could and that they would even warranty the second hand wheels if they fail on me due to manufacturing issues. As for why not disclose the site? I'm trying to get this straightened out...and until I do, I would rather not disclose who at Zipp I'm speaking with, the local bike shop that attempted to process the warranty, or the shop it was purchased at. To do you all a service, after this comes to a conclusion, I'll update this thread.
I don't think I've ever had as many warranty issues in my life as you had in one post.

(clap clap)
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 11:48 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by teamtrinity
That makes sense. But I'd guess there are a bunch of fake Look frames, Cervelo frames, and Reynolds wheels available in China as well. Found Look 695 and Reynolds RZR and Cervelo S5 on alibaba.com.
Yes, and I'm pretty sure that Look, Cervelo and Reynolds aren't warranting those products either.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 12:07 AM
  #66  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 159

Bikes: 11 BMC SLR01 / 09 Madone 4.5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I can't believe how much flack this guy is getting on here. I can find GP 4000 tires for $75 all day online, more in bike shops, yet can get them on sale from Ribble for $35 dollars. I would expect the exact same warranty on them regardless of the price paid. I am a little surprised how we are demonizing the consumer and not the manufacturer / dealer here. I don't care if you bought them for $5, if Zipp inspected them and they passed as legit Zipp manufactured product purchased from a Zipp dealer, you should get a replacement set no questions, no hand wringing. Hope it works out for you soon
TDRILL is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 12:48 AM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
The consumer is screwed. The dealer is in the wrong. Zipp is just trying to keep their marketing channels clean; they evidently have a lot of trouble with counterfeit and gray market parts. Sucks for the consumer. Sucks for Zipp. The dealer is the one who should pay for this mistake. Likely, had you gone through the bike shop you bought from in the first place, if they were dealing with gray market parts (at that price, it's likely), they would have just replaced the part no questions asked and without getting the manufacturer involved. The lesson here is to always deal with product defect issues through the shop you bought from, if at all possible.

FYI: Ribble and PBK deal in gray market parts; how do you think they come up with those prices? Caveat emptor whenever you are dealing with 1) the internet, and 2) a deal that seems too good to be true. Expect problems if you are trying to do things normally done through normal channels. People these days are way too trusting about doing business over the internet. If you are getting stuff at half price, expect problems with manufacturer warranties because what you bought was likely obtained outside normal distribution channels.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 12:56 AM
  #68  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by TDRILL
I can't believe how much flack this guy is getting on here. I can find GP 4000 tires for $75 all day online, more in bike shops, yet can get them on sale from Ribble for $35 dollars. I would expect the exact same warranty on them regardless of the price paid. I am a little surprised how we are demonizing the consumer and not the manufacturer / dealer here. I don't care if you bought them for $5, if Zipp inspected them and they passed as legit Zipp manufactured product purchased from a Zipp dealer, you should get a replacement set no questions, no hand wringing. Hope it works out for you soon
Go ahead and try to get a warranty from Continental on those tires without going through Ribble.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 02:31 AM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
I <3 Robots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,657

Bikes: Cervelo S2, Workswell 062, Banshee Spitfire

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Far as I know Campag USA will not warranty gray market parts either.
I <3 Robots is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 02:55 AM
  #70  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
^^^ No they will not. Company policy worldwide.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 05:20 AM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664

Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by teamtrinity
From a customer perspective, there's no clause or stipulation in the warranty that says the warranty is only valid if the item purchased at or above a certain price. And what's a consumer to do? If a consumer is price shopping, is it expected that the consumer check with the manufacturer whether or not it will be covered under warranty even though it is being purchased through their dealer network?
If it is too good to be true, it probably is.
roadwarrior is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 05:25 AM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664

Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
I am a consumer as well and I would be pissed if I were in the OP's position. I am just spiltballing as to what may be going on.

Let's look at it another way.

A consumer purchases a grey market item from an authorized dealer and that product fails resulting in a lawsuit. Who is on the hook for that?

As soon as a product falls outside of normal production/distribution channels all bets are off. Why? Because the brand has certain QC checks in place to ensure the quality of their goods and to protect the end user. Who knows where grey market goods come from. They could be stolen, made illegally by a third shift at the factory, they could be QC failures or straight up counterfeit. Why would a brand want to take a HUGE risk and claim ANY responsibility for that product?

If it is in fact a grey market or counterfeit good then the OP should be talking to the LBS and getting a refund from them not from Zipp who may or may not have had anything to do with the product in the first place.
Exactly.
roadwarrior is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 05:29 AM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664

Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Go ahead and try to get a warranty from Continental on those tires without going through Ribble.
And this is what cracks me up all the time out here when you read these stories on product failures...that the consumer goes directly to the manufacturer and leaves out the third party vendor. I suspect that most of the time they know better, in that they know to save money they circumvented the system and are hoping they can get free replacements because someone is not paying attention. I live about a good nine iron from the Zipp factory and know people there. They are paying attention.

Go back to the shop where you bought the bars. Case closed.

If it is too good to be true, it is...
roadwarrior is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 05:30 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664

Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
The consumer is screwed. The dealer is in the wrong. Zipp is just trying to keep their marketing channels clean; they evidently have a lot of trouble with counterfeit and gray market parts. Sucks for the consumer. Sucks for Zipp. The dealer is the one who should pay for this mistake. Likely, had you gone through the bike shop you bought from in the first place, if they were dealing with gray market parts (at that price, it's likely), they would have just replaced the part no questions asked and without getting the manufacturer involved. The lesson here is to always deal with product defect issues through the shop you bought from, if at all possible.

FYI: Ribble and PBK deal in gray market parts; how do you think they come up with those prices? Caveat emptor whenever you are dealing with 1) the internet, and 2) a deal that seems too good to be true. Expect problems if you are trying to do things normally done through normal channels. People these days are way too trusting about doing business over the internet. If you are getting stuff at half price, expect problems with manufacturer warranties because what you bought was likely obtained outside normal distribution channels.
Yep. Well said.
roadwarrior is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 07:51 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by TDRILL
I don't care if you bought them for $5, if Zipp inspected them and they passed as legit Zipp manufactured product purchased from a Zipp dealer, you should get a replacement set no questions, no hand wringing.
"Zipp manufactured," doesn't necessarily mean "Zipp QC passed," if it's gray market.
WhyFi is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.