Power Meter
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Power Meter
Anyone with experience using iBike Newton cycling power meter? Good/bad? is it worth it. It's the cheapest out there but not sure.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't have experience with that one, but I do have a Quarq on my sram red bike, and I'm getting a Stages for my Di2 bike. Can't beat the Stages for light weight, ease of installation and service, and most of all PRICE!!! It's half as much as a quarq.
#3
John Wayne Toilet Paper
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Roanoke
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: BH carbon, Ritchey steel, Kona aluminum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It is not a power meter. A power meter measures force and speed and therefore has a direct power measurement. The iBike measures wind, gradient, speed, heartrate, etc and extrapolates power based on certain assumptions. Basically it measures almost everything except power and then makes an educated guess at the actual power.
If you want to have power data for training purposes, it's not the right tool. If you want to have approximate power to tell your friends about, it is probably fine.
If you want to have power data for training purposes, it's not the right tool. If you want to have approximate power to tell your friends about, it is probably fine.
Last edited by nhluhr; 04-23-14 at 10:26 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Damn, stages for $699 for my 105, that's cheaper than I expected. Though I'm not training for anything. Wonder why some use those bulking SRM when the stages is so small!
#5
Beer >> Sanity
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#6
John Wayne Toilet Paper
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Roanoke
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: BH carbon, Ritchey steel, Kona aluminum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the Stages power meter only measures left leg directly and then doubles the reading to provide total power. This is either "accurate enough" or deficient depending on how you look at it. I'm not saying the SRM is worth it, but it measures both legs and is a full crank.
If you want both-leg full-crank measurement, the Quarq is an extremely competitive option, but of course it's not available in Shimano.
If you want both-leg full-crank measurement, the Quarq is an extremely competitive option, but of course it's not available in Shimano.
#7
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
Posts: 4,813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
SRM's actually measure power, where as stages just measure your left leg power and multiply by 2. Also reliability. My srm was only a bit more for the stages, and it was basically brand new..
#8
Beer >> Sanity
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The only time the left leg only would be an issue is if you wanted to compare numbers from a Stages to something else and in a rider with a leg imbalance. If comparing to ones own data over time this shouldn't matter much. Injuries would skew data too but aside from that your Stages power number should be a fairly consistent measure and something you can use to train. It just might not mean as much to someone with a different PM. If one could borrow the Garmin Vecto for a couple rides it would be an interesting comparison point as you could ride with both PMs and compare.
#10
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
Posts: 4,813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
powertap > stages.
yeah stages isn't terrible, but why waste that much money on something that only does half the job?
yeah stages isn't terrible, but why waste that much money on something that only does half the job?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Apparently the Stages PM is good enough for pro team SKY this year.
Stages, Wahoo sponsor Team Sky, CycleOps sponsors Trek Pro team, and Team Lampre on ROTOR Power, Movistar on Power2Max | DC Rainmaker
Stages, Wahoo sponsor Team Sky, CycleOps sponsors Trek Pro team, and Team Lampre on ROTOR Power, Movistar on Power2Max | DC Rainmaker
#12
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
Posts: 4,813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
you give someone money they will ride what every you want. They are also riding pinerellos which are typically heavier and less aerodynamic than other possible bike sponsors.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MABRA cat3
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
power2max is a great option for crank-based power meters and it can be pretty affordable. it compensates for temperature drift, options for some cranks with removable spiders, and does L-R balance as well. I'd probably get that over the quarq since it doesn't account for temperature drift and is substantially more expensive.
I don't like the left-balance-doubling Stages, but it is a nice affordable option that doesn't add a lot of weight. no carbon crank options, unless you're willing to mix alloy and carbon for your crank arms.
I don't like the left-balance-doubling Stages, but it is a nice affordable option that doesn't add a lot of weight. no carbon crank options, unless you're willing to mix alloy and carbon for your crank arms.
#14
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
I'd go with Powertap or Power2Max. Easily.
#15
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,273
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
With the price of Powertaps and Stages, the case for Ibike gets slimmer and slimmer.
Now using an Ibike with a strain gauge based power meter gives you a virtual wind tunnel which could be cool.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#16
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,845
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 924 Times
in
610 Posts
It is not a power meter. A power meter measures force and speed and therefore has a direct power measurement. The iBike measures wind, gradient, speed, heartrate, etc and extrapolates power based on certain assumptions. Basically it measures almost everything except power and then makes an educated guess at the actual power.
If you want to have power data for training purposes, it's not the right tool. If you want to have approximate power to tell your friends about, it is probably fine.
If you want to have power data for training purposes, it's not the right tool. If you want to have approximate power to tell your friends about, it is probably fine.
If I had an IBike, I would always be wondering how accurate it really is.
I bought a used wired PowerTap wheel for $250 instead.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#17
Beer >> Sanity
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#20
John Wayne Toilet Paper
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Roanoke
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: BH carbon, Ritchey steel, Kona aluminum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ibike website
Aerodynamic and Frictional Drag Coefficients
As part of initial setup the user enters total bike/rider weight, tire size and road surface, rider height, and ride position. From these inputs the rider’s CdA (coefficient of drag), and bike Crr (coefficient of rolling resistance) are determined.
As part of initial setup the user enters total bike/rider weight, tire size and road surface, rider height, and ride position. From these inputs the rider’s CdA (coefficient of drag), and bike Crr (coefficient of rolling resistance) are determined.
#21
SuperGimp
It doesn't matter which one you're using, as long as it's repeatable it's perfectly suitable for your purposes, unless you need the highest possible power number to brag about or you want to obsess about leg imbalance.
One thing I dislike about SRM is that you have to send the meter in if you change chainrings. And price, good lord.
One thing I dislike about PowerTap is that you can only use the one wheel. once you start getting multiple wheels you're in a situation where you may as well shell out for a crank based power meter.
Of course, with crank based power meters, now you're limiting yourself to one bike unless you REALLY want to spend some money.
Power2Max seems to be the best over all cost/value solution in today's market with stages & powertap making a similar strong case.
It's not cheap, no matter what you choose, that's for sure. it IS cheaper than it was even 2 years ago though.
One thing I dislike about SRM is that you have to send the meter in if you change chainrings. And price, good lord.
One thing I dislike about PowerTap is that you can only use the one wheel. once you start getting multiple wheels you're in a situation where you may as well shell out for a crank based power meter.
Of course, with crank based power meters, now you're limiting yourself to one bike unless you REALLY want to spend some money.
Power2Max seems to be the best over all cost/value solution in today's market with stages & powertap making a similar strong case.
It's not cheap, no matter what you choose, that's for sure. it IS cheaper than it was even 2 years ago though.
#22
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 900 Post(s)
Liked 1,122 Times
in
482 Posts
I don't have any experience with the Newton but I've examined the output of the previous 3 generations of iBike against PTs and SRMs. Every time iBike has released a new version they claim 1) that it is as good as an SRM or a PT, and 2) that it is an improvement over the previous release.
I've also spent some time examining the Stages compared to various other power meters. Like all power meters, it has good points and not-so-good points. Its data quality is not equivalent to a PT or SRM but it's not bad. I wouldn't use it for QA analyses, or for drag estimation, or for sprint training, but not many people do those kinds of things. Sky probably won't be looking at QA analysis or sprint training, and they can afford to send their riders to the wind tunnel for drag estimation.
I've also spent some time examining the Stages compared to various other power meters. Like all power meters, it has good points and not-so-good points. Its data quality is not equivalent to a PT or SRM but it's not bad. I wouldn't use it for QA analyses, or for drag estimation, or for sprint training, but not many people do those kinds of things. Sky probably won't be looking at QA analysis or sprint training, and they can afford to send their riders to the wind tunnel for drag estimation.
Last edited by RChung; 04-23-14 at 03:44 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 2,844
Bikes: '13 Spech Roubaix SL4 Expert
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'll just say this quick thingy. Without a power meter you are not a real cyclist. And I don't mean Stages, Pioneer, whatever... I mean SRM, Quarq and maybeeeee... power tap. In that order specifically. Good luck!
__________________
Cat 6 going on PRO....
Cat 6 going on PRO....
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for your input but I was not looking to be a "real cyclist" just a cyclist with a power meter
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a sram force crank and I was told that stages don't work on carbon cranks